crim 2010 bar examinations

7
2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS CRIMINAL LAW 19 September 2010 2 P.M. – 5 P.M. PART I I An agonizing and protracted trial having come to a close, the judge found A guilty beyond reasonable doubt of homicide and imposed on him a straight penalty of SIX (6) YEARS and ONE (1) DAY of p rision mayor. The public prosecutor objected to the sentence on the ground that the proper penalty should have been TWELVE (12) YEARS and ONE (1) DAY of reclusion temporal. The defense counsel chimed in, contending that application of the Indeterminate Sentence Law should lead to the imposition of a straight penalty of SIX (6) MONTHS and ONE (1) DAY of prision correccional only. Who of the three is on the right track? Explain. (3%) (Public prosecutor. Penalty imposed by law for homicide is reclusion temporal, not prision mayor. And wrong application of ISL by defense counsel) II A. What is the crime of qu alified bribery? (2%) (See Art. 211-A of the RPC as amended by R.A. 7659) B. May a judge be charged and prosecuted for such felony? How about a public prosecutor? A police officer? Explain. (5%) (Yes, if the judge asks or demands the gift or present, and the public prosecutor as well, if he refrains to prosecute the offender or he asks or demands such gift or present under Art. 211-A of the RPC) III May a public officer charged un der Section 3(b) of Republic Act No. 3019 [“directly or indirectly requesting or receiving any gift, present, share, percentage or benefit, for himself or for any other person, in connection with any contract or transaction between the government and any other party, wherein the public officer in his official capacity has to intervene under the law”] also be simultaneously or successively charged with direct bribery under Article 210 of the Revised Penal Code? Explain. (4%) (Yes, he can be charged under the special law (R.A. 3019) and also under the penal code (Art. 210), see Merencillo vs. People G.R. Nos. 142369-70) IV Because of the barbarity and hideousness of the acts committed by the suspects/respondents in cutting off their victims’ appendages, stuffing their torsos, legs,

Upload: anonymous-tyegt2rjju

Post on 08-Apr-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

8/7/2019 Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/crim-2010-bar-examinations 1/7

2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS 

CRIMINAL LAW 

19 September 2010 2 P.M. – 5 P.M.

PART I

I

An agonizing and protracted trial having come to a close, the judge found A guiltybeyond reasonable doubt of homicide and imposed on him a straight penalty of SIX (6)

YEARS and ONE (1) DAY of prision mayor. The public prosecutor objected to the

sentence on the ground that the proper penalty should have been TWELVE (12) YEARSand ONE (1) DAY of reclusion temporal. The defense counsel chimed in, contending that

application of the Indeterminate Sentence Law should lead to the imposition of a straight

penalty of SIX (6) MONTHS and ONE (1) DAY of prision correccional only. Who of thethree is on the right track? Explain. (3%) (Public prosecutor. Penalty imposed by law for 

homicide is reclusion temporal, not prision mayor. And wrong application of ISL bydefense counsel)

II

A. What is the crime of qualified bribery? (2%) (See Art. 211-A of the RPC as amended 

by R.A. 7659)

B. May a judge be charged and prosecuted for such felony? How about a public

prosecutor? A police officer? Explain. (5%) (Yes, if the judge asks or demands the gift or present, and the public prosecutor as well, if he refrains to prosecute the offender or he

asks or demands such gift or present under Art. 211-A of the RPC)

III

May a public officer charged under Section 3(b) of Republic Act No. 3019 [“directly or 

indirectly requesting or receiving any gift, present, share, percentage or benefit, for himself or for any other person, in connection with any contract or transaction between

the government and any other party, wherein the public officer in his official capacity has

to intervene under the law”] also be simultaneously or successively charged with direct

bribery under Article 210 of the Revised Penal Code? Explain. (4%) (Yes, he can becharged under the special law (R.A. 3019) and also under the penal code (Art. 210), seeMerencillo vs. People G.R. Nos. 142369-70)

IV

Because of the barbarity and hideousness of the acts committed by thesuspects/respondents in cutting off their victims’ appendages, stuffing their torsos, legs,

Page 2: Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

8/7/2019 Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/crim-2010-bar-examinations 2/7

body parts into oil drums and bullet-riddled vehicles and later on burying these oil drums,

vehicles with the use of backhoes and other earth-moving machinery, the Commission on

Human Rights (CHR) investigating team recommended to the panel of public prosecutorsthat all respondents be charged with violation of the “Heinous Crimes Law.” The

prosecution panel agreed with the CHR. As the Chief Prosecutor tasked with approving

the filing of the Information, how will you pass upon the recommendation? Explain. (5%)(Chief Prosecutor should disapprove the filing of information as violation of the Heinous

Crimes Law is broad and general, and covers not only murder but treason, qualified piracy, qualified bribery, parricide, kidnapping, etc.)

V

Arlene is engaged in the buy and sell of used garments, more popularly known as “ukay-ukay.” Among the items found by the police in a raid of her store in Baguio City were

brand-new Louie Feraud blazers. Arlene was charged with “fencing.” Will the charge

prosper? Why or why not? (5%) (No, unless she knew that the blazers were derived from

the proceeds of the crime of robbery or theft, see definition of fencing under P.D. 1612)

VI

There being probable cause to believe that certain deposits and investments in a bank are

related to an unlawful activity of smuggling by Alessandro as defined under Republic Act(RA) No. 9160, as amended (Anti-Money Laundering Act) an application for an order to

inquiry into his deposit was filed with the Regional Trial Court. After hearing the

application, the court granted the application and issued a freeze order. Pass upon the

correctness of the court’s order. Explain. (3%) (The RTC’s order is invalid. Under R.A.

9160 as amended by R.A. 9194, it is the CA that has jurisdiction to determine probable

case and to issue the freeze order, upon application, ex parte, by the AMLC)

VII

A widower of ten years, septuagenarian Canuto felt that he had license to engage invoyeurism. If not peeping into his neighbors’ rooms through his powerful single-cylinder 

telescope, he would trail young, shapely damsels along the hallways of shopping malls.

While going up the escalator, he stayed a step behind a mini-skirted one, and in a momentof excitement, put his hand on her left hip and massaged it. The damsel screamed and

hollered for help. Canuto was apprehended and brought up on inquest. What charge/s, if 

any, may he be held responsible for? Explain. (5%) (R.A. 9995 or the Anti-Photo and 

Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 is not applicable here. He may only be charged of unjust vexation under Art. 287 of the RPC)

VIII

A asked financial support from her showbiz friend B who accommodated her by issuing

in her favor a postdated check in the sum of P90,000.00. Both of them knew that thecheck would not be honored because B’s account had just been closed. The two then

Page 3: Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

8/7/2019 Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/crim-2010-bar-examinations 3/7

approached trader C whom they asked to change the check with cash, even agreeing that

the exchange be discounted at P85,000.00 with the assurance that the check shall be

funded upon maturity. Upon C’s presentment of the check for payment on due date, itwas dishonored because the account had already been closed. What action/s may C

commence against A and B to hold them to account for the loss of her P85,000.00?

Explain. (5%)

IX

Proserfina, an assistant public high school principal, acted to facilitate the release of 

salary differentials and election duty per diem of classroom teachers with the agreement

that they would reimburse her for her expenses. Did Proserfina commit a crime? Explain.

(5%) (No. To be liable under R.A. 3019, she should have intervened in her official 

capacity, see Jaravata vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. L-56170)

X

A, B and C are members of SFC Fraternity. While eating in a seaside restaurant, they

were attacked by X, Y and Z, members of a rival fraternity. A rumble ensued in whichthe abovenamed members of the two fraternities assaulted each other in a confused and

tumultuous manner resulting in the death of A. As it cannot be ascertained who actually

killed A, the members of the two fraternities who took part in the rumble were chargedfor death caused in a tumultuous affray. Will the charge prosper? Explain. (4%) (Yes,

under Art. 251 of the RPC, the criminal liability extends to those who have used violenceupon the person of the deceased though it cannot be determined who inflicted the serious

physical injuries on him)

XI

Angelina maintains a website where visitors can give their comments on the posted

pictures of the goods she sells in her exclusive boutique. Bettina posted a comment that

the red Birkin bag shown in Angelina’s website is fake and that Angelina is known to sellcounterfeit items.

Angelina wants to file a case against Bettina. She seeks your advice. What advice will

you give her? (4%) (She can file a case of libel, see definition of libel under Art. 353 of 

the RPC. Posting a comment on the internet is sufficient compliance to the publication

requirement in a libel case)

PART II

XII

A. Define Money Laundering. What are the three (3) stages in money laundering? (3%)(Definition of Money Laundering, see Sec. 4 of R.A. 9160. The stages in money

laundering are: placement, layering and integration)

Page 4: Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

8/7/2019 Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/crim-2010-bar-examinations 4/7

B. What is the doctrine of pro reo? How does it relate to Article 48 of the Revised Penal

Code? (3%) (Doctrine of Pro Reo - Whenever a penal law is to be construed and applied

and the law admits of two interpretations, that interpretation which is lenient or favorableto the offender will be adopted. This doctrine is an exception to Art. 48 of the RPC)

XIII

While his wife was on a 2-year scholarship abroad, Romeo was having an affair with his

maid Dulcinea. Realizing that the affair was going nowhere, Dulcinea told Romeo thatshe was going back to the province to marry her childhood sweetheart. Clouded by anger 

and jealousy, Romeo strangled Dulcinea to death while she was sleeping in the maid’s

quarters. The following day, Romeo was found catatonic inside the maid’s quarters. He

was brought to the National Center for Mental Health (NCMH) where he was diagnosedto be mentally unstable. Charged with murder, Romeo pleaded insanity as a defense.

A. Will Romeo’s defense prosper? Explain. (2%) (Yes, insanity as exempting 

circumstance unless he acted during a lucid interval, see Art. 12 of the RPC)

B. What is the effect of the diagnosis of the NCMH on the case? (2%) (The diagnosis willbe taken as a defense of insanity)

XIV

Paul lives with his long-time girlfriend Joan in a condominium in Makati. For more than

a year, he has been secretly saving money in an envelope under their bed to buy her anengagement ring. One day, while Joan was cleaning their room, she found the envelope,

took the money, and left Paul. As prosecutor, what crime, if any, would you charge Joan?

Explain. (3%) (Theft)

XV

Suspecting that her husband of twenty years was having an affair, Leilanie hired a privateinvestigator to spy on him. After two weeks, the private investigator showed Leilanie a

video of her husband having sexual intercourse with another woman in a room of a five-

star hotel. Based on what she saw on the video, Leilanie accused her husband of concubinage. Will the case of concubinage prosper? Explain. (3%) (No, isolated sexual 

intercourse in a hotel is not considered as cohabitation under Art. 334 of the RPC)

XVI

The president, treasurer, and secretary of ABC Corporation were charged with syndicated

estafa under the following Information:

That on or about the 1st week of January 2010 or subsequent thereto in Cebu City and

within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, conspiring and

confederating together and all of them mutually helping and aiding one another in a

Page 5: Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

8/7/2019 Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/crim-2010-bar-examinations 5/7

syndicated manner, through a corporation registered with the Securities and Exchange

Commission (SEC), with intention of carrying out the unlawful or illegal act, transaction,

enterprise or scheme, with intent to gain and by means of fraud and deceit, did then andthere wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously defraud Virna, Lana, Deborah and several

other persons by falsely or fraudulently pretending or representing in a transaction or 

series of transactions, which they made with complainants and the public in general, tothe effect that they were in a legitimate business of foreign exchange trading successively

or simultaneously operating under the name and style of ABC Corporation and DEF

Management Philippines, Incorporated, induced and succeeded in inducing complainantsand several other persons to give and deliver to said accused the amount of at least

P20,000,000.00 on the strength of said manifestations and representations, the accused

knowing fully well that the abovenamed corporations registered with the SEC are not

licensed nor authorized to engage in foreign exchange trading and that suchmanifestations and representations to transact in foreign exchange were false and

fraudulent, that these resulted to the damage and prejudice of the complainants and other 

persons, and that the defraudation pertains to funds solicited from the public in general by

such corporations/associations. Will the case for syndicated estafa prosper? Explain. (5%)

XVII

A killed his wife and buried her in their backyard. He immediately went into hiding in the

mountains. Three years later, the bones of A’s wife were discovered by X, the gardener.Since X had a standing warrant of arrest, he hid the bones in an old clay jar and kept quiet

about it. After two years, Z, the caretaker, found the bones and reported the matter to the

police. After 15 years of hiding, A left the country but returned three years later to take

care of his ailing sibling. Six years thereafter, he was charged with parricide but raisedthe defense of prescription.

A. Under the Revised Penal Code, when does the period of prescription of a crime

commence to run? (1%) (Under Art. 91 of the RPC, the period of prescription commence

to run upon discovery of the crime by the offended party, the authorities, or their agents)

B. When is it interrupted? (1%) (It is interrupted upon filing of the complaint or 

information in court)

C. Is A’s defense tenable? Explain. (3%) (No, parricide prescribes in 20 years. The filing of the complaint, 19 years after the discovery and report of the killing, against him was

still within the prescriptive period)

XVIII

On her way home, Eva Marie saw an injured chow chow puppy behind a bush. Since the

puppy did not have a collar, she brought it home so she could have it as a pet. Her son infact begged Eva Marie to keep the puppy. The following day, Eva Marie bought a collar 

for the puppy and brought it to a veterinarian for treatment.

Page 6: Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

8/7/2019 Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/crim-2010-bar-examinations 6/7

A. Did Eva Marie incur criminal liability in bringing the puppy home as a pet? Explain.

(2%) (Yes, having found a lost property and failed to deliver it to the authorities or to its

owner, she is liable for theft under Art. 308 of the RPC)

B. Did she incur civil liability? Explain. (2%) (Yes, every person criminally liable is

likewise civilly liable)

XIX

Jack and Jill have been married for seven years. One night, Jack came home drunk.

Finding no food on the table, Jack started hitting Jill only to apologize the following day.A week later, the same episode occurred – Jack came home drunk and started hitting Jill.

Fearing for her life, Jill left and stayed with her sister. To woo Jill back, Jack sent her 

floral arrangements of spotted lilies and confectioneries. Two days later, Jill returnedhome and decided to give Jack another chance. After several days, however, Jack again

came home drunk. The following day, he was found dead. Jill was charged with parricide

but raised the defense of “battered woman syndrome.”

A. Define “Battered Woman Syndrome.” (2%) (See Sec. 3 paragraph c of R.A. 9262)

B. What are the three phases of the “Battered Woman Syndrome”? (3 %) (The three

phases are: tension-building phase, acute battering incident, and tranquil and loving phase)

C. Would the defense prosper despite the absence of any of the elements for justifyingcircumstances of self-defense under the Revised Penal Code? Explain. (2%) (Yes, under 

Sec. 26 of R.A. 9262, battered woman syndrome is an absolutory defense despite absence

of any elements for justifying circumstances)

XX

Matt was found guilty of drug trafficking while his younger brother Jeff was found guiltyof possession of equipment, instrument, apparatus and other paraphernalia for dangerous

drugs under Section 12 of Republic Act No. 9165. Matt filed a petition for probation. Jeff 

appealed his conviction during the pendency of which he also filed a petition for probation. The brothers’ counsel argued that they being first time offenders, their 

petitions for probation should be granted. How would you resolve the brothers’ petitions

for probation? Explain. (3%)

XXI

Because peace negotiations on the Spratlys situation had failed, the People’s Republic of China declared war against the Philippines. Myra, a Filipina who lives with her Italian

expatriate boyfriend, discovered e-mail correspondence between him and a certain

General Tung Kat Su of China. On March 12, 2010, Myra discovered that on even dateher boyfriend had sent an e-mail to General Tung Kat Su, in which he agreed to provide

Page 7: Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

8/7/2019 Crim 2010 BAR EXAMINATIONS

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/crim-2010-bar-examinations 7/7

vital information on the military defense of the Philippines to the Chinese government in

exchange for P1 million and his safe return to Italy. Two weeks later, Myra decided to

report the matter to the proper authorities. Did Myra commit a crime? Explain. (3%)(Yes, she liable for misprison of treason for failing to report the matter as soon as

possible to the proper authorities. She will be punished as an accessory to the crime of 

treason)

XXII

Immediately after murdering Bob, Jake went to his mother to seek refuge. His mother 

told him to hide in the maid’s quarters until she finds a better place for him to hide. After 

two days, Jake transferred to his aunt’s house. A week later, Jake was apprehended by the

police. Can Jake’s mother and aunt be made criminally liable as accessories to the crimeof murder? Explain. (3 %) (The mother is exempt from criminal liability under Art. 20 of 

the RPC as a result of her relationship to her son, however the aunt is liable as accessory

under Art. 19 paragraph 3 of the RPC if the author of the crime is guilty of murder)

XXIII

Christopher, John, Richard, and Luke are fraternity brothers. To protect themselves from

rival fraternities, they all carry guns wherever they go. One night, after attending a party,

they boarded a taxicab, held the driver at gunpoint and took the latter’s earnings.

A. What crime, if any, did the four commit? Enumerate the elements of the crime. (2%)(Robbery. The elements are: 1) Unlawful taking of personal property belonging to

another; 2) with intent to gain; and 3) with violence against or intimidation of person)

B. Would your answer be the same if they killed the driver? Explain. (2%) (No, theycommitted the complex crime of r obbery with homicide because by reason of or on

occasion of robbery, the crime of homicide was committed)