creating the 1st eu-wide guarantee of origin for green ... · wp2: definition of ... tÜv sÜd is...

Project supported by the FCH JU

CertifHyCreating the 1st EU-wide Guarantee of Origin forGreen Hydrogen

Webinar12th June

09:30 – 11:30Wouter Vanhoudt (CertifHy Project Leader/

Director Europe Hinicio)

www.certifhy.eu #CertifHy

Agenda

Introduction to GO schemes

CertifHy Phase 1:• Definition of Green hydrogen • GO scheme

Business Models for Green H2 GO’s

CertifHy Phase 2

Appendix: Analysis of pathways leading to Green H2 production

2

Guarantee of Origin (GO) scheme for Electricity has allowed Electricity Suppliers to sell renewable electricity (RE) contracts to households and provide evidence of RE consumption to their customers.

3

In Flanders, consumers can checkvia the regulator their electricityconsumption to be renewable (asthe electricity supplier cancelledGOs):http://www.vreg.be/nl/controleren-hoe-groen-uw-stroom-groencheck

IDENTITY PRESERVEDSustainable palm oil from a single identifiable certified source is kept separately from ordinary palm oil throughout supply chain.

Dif

fere

nt s

chem

es e

xist

for

su

stai

nabl

epa

lm o

il

4

SEGREGATEDSustainable palm oil from different certified sources is kept separate from ordinary palm oil throughout supply chain

Dif

fere

nt s

chem

es e

xist

for

su

stai

nabl

epa

lm o

il

5

MASS BALANCESustainable palm oil from certified sources is mixed with ordinary palm oil throughout supply chain.

Source:http://www.rspo.org/

Dif

fere

nt s

chem

es e

xist

for

su

stai

nabl

epa

lm o

il

6

GREEN PALM / BOOK & CLAIMThe chain is not monitored for the presence of sustainable palm oil.Retailers can buy a GreenPalm certificate from certified grower

Source:http://www.rspo.org/

Dif

fere

nt s

chem

es e

xist

for

su

stai

nabl

epa

lm o

il

7

A book and claim system has been chosen for sustainable palm oil to avoid duplication of an expensive supply chain

Source:http://greenpalm.org 8

Agenda


CertifHy Phase 1:• Definition of green hydrogen • GO scheme


CertifHy Phase 2

Appendix: Analysis of pathways leading to green H2 production

9

Phase 2Phase 1

Define a widely acceptabledefinition of green hydrogen

CertifHy aims to develop the 1st European-wide Green and Low Carbon hydrogen GO scheme

Determine how to designand implement a robust EUwide GO scheme

2

Set-up a hydrogen GO Stakeholder platform

2014 2016 2017 2018/9 2020s..

Finalise the scheme designensuring it can be the main routeto guarantee the origin of green &low carbon hydrogen across EUMember States

Run a pilot scheme to test the proposed design

1

2

3

Identify actions which need to beundertaken after the completionof the study to achieve an EUwide deployment of the scheme

4

1

Phase 3

Prepare EU wide deployment:Implement key elements

Ø Competent authorityØ Issuing BodyØ Registry operatorØ Accreditation body

10

Finalise Regulation, Codes and Standards:

ØCEN StandardØ EU and national regulation Ø CertifHy scheme docs

1

2

Affiliated partners:

WP7:ProjectManagementandAdministrationProjectleader:Hinicio

WP1:Genericmarketoutlook forgreen

hydrogenProjectleader:Hinicio

WP6:StakeholderEngagement&CommunicationProjectleader:Hinicio

WP2:Definitionof“GreenHydrogen”Project leader:TÜVSÜD

WP3:ReviewofexistingplatformsforGOProject leader:ECN

WP4:Definitionofanewframeworkof

guaranteesoforiginfor"green"hydrogen

Project leader:TÜVSÜD

WP5:RoadmapfortheimplementationofanEU-

wideGOschemeforgreenhydrogenProject leader:ECN

The current definition of Green and Low Carbon Hydrogen and GO scheme has been the result of a 2 year consensus building processfrom 2014 to 2016

RationaleofgreenH2

Lessonslearntfromotherinitiatives

Commondefinitionwithallstakeholders

Robust+Transparentsystem

Buy– inEnabling implementation

11

Consortium

Affiliated Partners

6/13/18

12

Over those two years: a step-by-step consensus building approach was followed with many models developed along the way

Example of intermediary approaches:• GHG emissions to be allocated to RE part • GHG emissions to allocated to both RE and

non-RE part • Green H2 to have zero GHG emissions • See D2.4 on http://www.certifhy.eu in

“publications-and-deliverables” for a full report

13

The definition of green and Low Carbon hydrogen was one of themain outcomes of the program

Renewable energy Non renewable energy

Low

-car

bon CertifHy

Green H2Bio

Hydro/Wind/Solar**

CertifHyLow Carbon H2NuclearelectricityFossilwithCCS/CCU

Not

Low

-car

bon

Carbon intensity* limit that will evolve over time* Greenhouse gas emissions (CO2 equ.) per unit of hydrogen over whole generation pathway up to marketable product

** Zero carbon intensity since electricity from these sources is considered to have zero carbon intensity by convention

201X202X202X

Feedstock

GHG

Renewable hydrogen will be as green as the energy input into the production device

Hydrogen production

Electricity input10 GJ

Biomass input20 GJ

14

Total energy input : 30 GJ

Renewable*:20GJNon-renewable:

7GJ

Renewable*:3GJ

Renewable:23GJ

Non-renewable:7GJ 23%

77%

RenewableH2

77%

Non-renewableH2

23%

*ViaGOordirectfeedstock

Hydrogen GOs and the associated GHG emissions cover the whole generation pathway up to marketable product

15

Productiondevice

Transport

Storage

CertifHyscope

OutofscopeH2product:

≥99.9%&≥30bar

Outofscope

Dispensing

With the low carbon benchmark set at an ambitious level, yet allowing for bio-based sources to be eligible

16

Eligiblepathways

The definition of green and Low Carbon hydrogen was widely endorsed by stakeholders

17

The current definition of Green and Low-Carbon Hydrogen has been the result of a 2 year consensus building process;

Outcome of 1st consultation: “No GOs should be allowed for

biomass co-fired coal power plants”

Was adapted to hydrogen into:

“Overall emissions of a hydrogen production device issuing GO’s should not exceed benchmark”

90%

10 %

10 %

18

Getting consensus on a GO Scheme was the second major outcome (1/2)

19

Getting consensus on a GO Scheme was the second major outcome (2/2)

20

Agenda




CertifHy Phase 2


21

A GO scheme allows access to green hydrogen for users that are not in the vicinity of green hydrogen sources & optimises the economics and

environmental footprint of a green H2 supply chain

22

1

2

2

n H2source BenchmarkRenewableandlow carbon

Participating toCertifHy scheme

CertifHyGreenH2

NoGOScheme:Dedicated SupplyChain CertifHyGOScheme:CaseHRS operatorensures green hydrogenbeingconsumedbyFCEV

H2 source

H2

H2

H2

H2

1

2 H2

H2

H2H2

H2H2

H2

2

H2 source

Residual mix

H2

GO

Mar

ket

As with RE GO’s, H2 GOs will create new business models for Green Hydrogen for H2 suppliers, HRS operators, Fleet Operators & OEMs

23

GO

Mar

ket

H2 supplier GO account

HRS operator GO account

H2H2

H2H2

Fleet operator GO account

H2

Vehicle OEM GO account

H2

H2H2

HRS operator GO account

On-siteproduction

1

2

3

4

2’H2

H2

H2

H2

H2

H2

H2

Agenda




CertifHy Phase 2:• Current status• Achievements• Next steps

Appendix: Analysis of pathways leading to green H2 production 24

Phase 2Phase 1

Define a widely acceptabledefinition of green hydrogen

CertifHy aims to develop the 1st European-wide Green and Low Carbon hydrogen GO scheme

Determine how to designand implement a robust EUwide GO scheme

2

Set-up a hydrogen GO Stakeholder platform

2014 2016 2017 2018/9 2020s..

Finalise the scheme designensuring it can be the main routeto guarantee the origin of green &low carbon hydrogen across EUMember States

Run a pilot scheme to test the proposed design

1

2

3

Identify actions which need to beundertaken after the completionof the study to achieve an EUwide deployment of the scheme

4

1

Phase 3

Prepare EU wide deployment:Implement key elements

Ø Competent authorityØ Issuing BodyØ Registry operatorØ Accreditation body

25

Finalise Regulation, Codes and Standards:

ØCEN StandardØ EU and national regulation Ø CertifHy scheme docs

1

2

Affiliated partners:

Who are we? The CertifHy project team

26

Independent strategy consulting firm specialized in sustainable energy and transport with a European competence centre on hydrogen and fuel cells.

The Energy research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN) is a leading independent European institute for applied energy technology development, energy research, and policy advice.

LBST is an expert consultancy for sustainable energy and mobility founded with a European competence centre on hydrogen and fuel cells with one of the longest track-records.

TÜV SÜD is one of the world’s leading technical service providers of testing, inspection, certification and training solutions with the strategic business segments INDUSTRY, MOBILITY and CERTIFICATION.

Grexel is the leading European energy certification service provider

Project leader

CertifHy phase 2

CertifHy phase 1 & 2

Platform operationPlatform creation

Platform operational

Plat

form

Steering Group

WG 1: GO Scheme and procedures

WG 2: GO issuing (Producers)

WG 3: GO commercialisation

and use (Users)

Preliminary scheme definition- incl. interaction with standards and regulation

Pilot specification

Milestone

Stakeholder group

WP1: The creation and operation of a stakeholders platform

Updating of GO scheme

Plan for EU rollout

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

WP3: Pilot scheme development, operation and feedback

Pilot preparation- Scheme procedures- ICT system- Production site audits- Monitoring plan

Preliminary GO scheme defined

Pilot operation - Registry operation- GO issuing and use - Pilot monitoring and stakeholder feedback- Cost analysis and business model

Pilot online

WG 4: Regulatory framework

WP2: Preliminary scheme finalization & Specification of pilot

GO scheme finalizedEU roll out plan adopted

Pilot scheme tested

WP4: Final GO scheme design & EU-wide implementation plan

27

Current status

WP1 & WP2 are finalized, WP3 is progressing well, with Pilot in final stage of preparation

CertifHy2 is developing all the core elements of a hydrogen GO scheme to test through pilot implementation

REGISTRY SYSTEM

ISSUING CRITERIA

SCHEME DESIGN & PROCEDURES

GO issuing

GO transfer

GO cancellation

GO expiry

Ac. holder registration

Prod. dev. registration

Merged functionsinthepilot

Accreditation of certification

body

Registration of issuing body

100 t/y - 50%GO volumeTotal - Market av.

3

29

4 pilot producers with different production pathways will lead to the issuance of GOs made available to the market

TBD

TBDGO volume

Total - Market av.

SMR with CCU - Port Jérôme (France)1

12 t/y - 0% GO volumeTotal - Market av.

Electrolyser + Wind – Halle (Belgium)2

Up to 38 t/y - 10%GO volumeTotal- Market av.

Electrolyser + grid - Falkenhagen (Germany)4

Chlor Alkali - Botlek (Netherlands)

The CertifHy scheme is developed collaboratively with key stakeholders across the value chain

30



+ 25 new members in 2018 withincreasing international interest (US, AU)


WG 3: GO commercialisation and use

(Users)

1st design of CertifHy GO scheme is endorsed by WG1

31

3 meetings (WG1)

Questions still being addressed

Content1) Introduction2) Core principles

2.1 Uniqueness2.2 Transparency2.3 Immutability2.4 Ownership of CertifHy GOs2.5 Operational reliability

3) CertifHy Goals & Mission4) Scope and Normative references

4.1 Geographical scope4.2 Technologies 4.3 Applications

5) Definitions6) Roles & responsibilities7) GO Labels and content

7.1 GO Labels7.2 GO Content7.3 Cancellation statement

8) ProceduresAnnexes

Next steps

- GO lifetime- GO content

Updating the GO scheme based upon the results of the pilot (WP4)

A selection of procedures necessary for the pilot are currently being drafted

32

2 meetings (WG1)1 meeting planned (WG2) 1 meeting to be set up (WG3)

Questions to be addressed

Content

Next steps

None

Getting feedback from WGs for finalising the procedures

Illustrative example of CertifHy proceduresP0.1 | Registration of Account Holder

33

P0.1 | Registration of Account Holder

Call to amend/correct inputs

Account Holder registeredin the Registry

Applicant submits request for Account Holder registration to

Issuing Body

Forms:§ Registration form (online)

Entry of Account Holder in the Registry

Account Holder dismissedto register

Issuing Body decision?

Rework Clearance

Dismissal

Note:§ Must/shall/nice-to-have

criteria?

Applicant submits signed Standard terms of service to Issuing Body

Forms:§ Standard terms of service

Notes:§ Must be a legal entity§ Several accounts per legal entity possible§ “know your customer”!

Case studies using the pilot plants on the application of CertifHy criteria were performed

34

Individual meetings with pilot producer (4)2 meetings (WG2)1 meeting planned (WG2)

Questions being addressed

Content

Next steps

1) Consideration of CCU2) CO2 emissions allocation in

Chlor-Alkali process+ others

Ø WG2 meeting to address outstanding questions

Ø TÜV to finalise audit report to allow GO issuing

4 case studies for different production pathways with:

1) A brief description of the pilot plant

2) The expected GO issuing and use during the pilot

3) A production process diagram, including production device boundary

4) Detailed application of the CertifHy criteria (i) on past production and (ii) on production batch (calculation of the H2 product footprint and quantity of Green/ Low Carbon H2 produced)

All 4 pilot plant audits have been undertakenAudits

Colruyt Group – Electrolysis (Alkaline + PEM)

35

Key characteristics

• H2 production capacity: 8,1 kg/h• PEM (2,7 kg/h) + Alkaline (5,4 kg/h)

• Storage• 85 kg

• Fuel Cell: 120 kW

Production process description

36

Key parameters

• 400 bar 75 forklifts / heavy duty• 900 bar min 5 passenger cars

• Purity min 99,998 %

Production process diagram

37

Distributioncabinet

ALKelektrolysis5.4kg/u

PEMelektrolysis2.7kg/u

Compressor12.7kg/u

Compressor25.4kg/u

Storage A420bar

Storage B420bar

Outdoordispenser

Publicservicestation

Indoordispenser1

Backup storage200bar

Backup

Distributioncabinet

Compressor1Compressor2

ALKElektrolysis

PEMElektrolysis

Outdoordisp.

BackupStorageA

StorageB

H2

H2

H2

O2

Indoordispenser2

?

?

?

Expected GO issuing and use during pilot (6 Months)

38

Expected hydrogen production volume

Max 190 kg/d

Green Hydrogen GOs

Up to 190 kg/d

Low Carbon Hydrogen GOs

Up to 0 kg

Share available for GO market

0 %


0 %

Criteria to be checked for issuing CertifHy GOs(1) on past production and (2) on production batch

39

Timet2t2 – 12mths

H2Production

12months*

t1

ProductionBatch

Non-renewableshare

Renewableshare

CertifHyLowCarbonH2 GOs

CertifHyGreenH2GOs

(1)Averagecarbonfootprintsincet2-12monthsofNon-CertifHyH2mustnotexceed91gCO2/MJH2

PastProduction

H2withGreenGO

H2withLCGO

GreyH2

<91gCO2/MJH2 ?

(2)AveragecarbonfootprintofH2coveredbyaCertifHyGOmustnotexceed36.4gCO2/MJH2

<36.4gCO2/MJH2 ?

<36.4gCO2/MJH2 ?

* Or since joining the scheme if more recent than 12 months

Renewable share of hydrogen = Share of renewable energy in the energy input into the production device

Hydrogen production

Electricity input10 GJ

Biomass input20 GJ

40

Total energy input : 30 GJ

Renewable*:20GJNon-renewable:

7GJ

Renewable*:3GJ

Renewable:23GJ

Non-renewable:7GJ 23%

77%

RenewableH2

77%

Non-renewableH2

23%

*ViaGOordirectfeedstock6/13/18

Definition of the production device -H2 from water electrolysis with purification and compression

41

WaterElectrolysis

& Compression (for storage)

Water

Hydrogen

O2

Grid Electricity

Product system

H2O

+ H

2

Wind/PV Electr.The “product system” (ISO 14044) includes all the steps needed for generating hydrogen with a purity of at least 99.9% and a pressure of at least 30 barg (CertifHy criteria).

Calculation of H2 product carbon footprint –(1) Non certified H2 produced in the preceding 12 months

42

Grid elec. consumed (MWh)

Grid. elec. emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)

1 tCO2eq/tH2= 8.33 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV

El. GOs purchased*(MWh)

El. GO emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)

Measured Constant factor

Process specific factor

Calculation output

Calculation output for criteria application

In accounting


H2 emissions (tCO2eq)

Certified H2 produced (t)

Non-certified H2 footprint tCO2eq/tH2)

Source of calculation input data

Emissions of cert. product (tCO2eq)

H2 produced(t)

Max footprint of non-certified product:10.9 tCO2eq/tH2= 91 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV

In preceding 12 months:

* for greening grid electricity

Zero if GOs are acquired for all grid electricity

consumed

Note: Grid electricity is consumed when electrolyser consumption exceeds Wind/PV generation

Calculation of H2 product carbon footprint –(2) H2 batch foot print

43







Calculation output


In accounting



H2 batch footprint tCO2eq/tH2)


H2 produced(t)


Max footprint of H2 batch:4.37 tCO2eq/tH2= 36.4 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV

Between t1 and t2:


Zero if GOs are acquired for all grid electricity

consumed

Note: Grid electricity is consumed when electrolyser consumption exceeds Wind/PV generation

Calculation of the share of the batch that is of renewable origin

44

Total electricity consumed (MWh)

Renew. elec. GOs purchased (MWh)

H2 batch renew. share (%)

Between t1 and t2:

Wind/PV elec. consumed (MWh)



Calculation output


In accounting


Uniper WindGas Falkenhagen – Electrolysis

45

Key characteristics

Electrolysis• H2 production capacity 32 kgH2/h

360 m³H2/h2 MWel

Methanation• H2 utilisation 19 kgH2/h

210 m³H2/h• CO2 (biogenic) utilisation 104 kgCO2/h

52,5 m³CO2/h• SNG1 production capacity 41 kgSNG/h

57 m³SNG/hSource:Googlemaps 1 SNG=SyntheticNaturalGas

Production process diagram

46

Key parameters

Electrolysis• Product H2 pressure 10 bar

• Product H2 purity 5.0• Feed in either into gas grid

(certified as biogas) or in future into methanation plant

• Prequalified for secondary control reserve

Methanation• Catalytic methanation

• Product SNG1 purity G260

6Electrolysiscontainer2MWel,

max.360Nm³/h

Methanation210Nm³/hH2 à57Nm³/hSNG1

Measuringandcontrol systemSNG1 (methane)

Measuringandcontrol system

Hydrogen

CompressorHydrogenand/orSNG(methane)

CO2 Source(biogenicorigin) O

NTR

ASgaspipeline

Electricitygridincl.windfarmconnection(PowerGOs)

Unitprocess1 Unitprocess2

1 SNG=SyntheticNaturalGas

10bar(g) 55bar(g)

WindGas Falkenhagen

47

Expected GO issuing and use during pilot (6 Months)

48

Expected hydrogen production volume

Up to 38 tH2/a (max. 456 kgH2/d)1

Green Hydrogen GOs

Up to 38 t

Low Carbon Hydrogen GOs

0 t


Up to 10 %


na

1 Inaddition upto192tH2/a(directfeedin/nomethanation)

Compression

Definition of the production device -H2 from water electrolysis with purification and compression

49

H2 generation

&purification

Water

Hydrogen

O2

Electricity

Electricity

Unit process 1

Product system

LowP H2-1

Unit process 2

H2O

+ H

2

SNG

Low

PH

2-2

SNG

Note: At a any given moment in time, LowP H2 generated will be either ALL directly compressed for injection as pure hydrogen, or ALL converted to SNG.

The “product system” (ISO 14044) includes all the steps needed for generating hydrogen with a purity of at least 99.9% and a pressure of at least 30 barg(CertifHy criteria).

Calculation of H2 product carbon footprint –(1) Non certified H2 produced in the preceding 12 months

50




LowP H2 emissions (tCO2eq)




LowP H2 footprint(tCO2eq/tH2)


Grid elec. emis. factor (tCO2eq/MWh)

El. GOs purchased(MWh)



Unit process 1

Unit process 2

Compression emissions (tCO2eq)





H2 produced(t)


In preceding 12 months:

LowP H2 produced(t)

LowP H2 fed to compressor (t)

LowP H2-1 emissions (tCO2eq)


Zero if GOs are acquired for all grid electricity consumed



Calculation output


In accounting


Calculation of H2 product carbon footprint –(2) H2 batch foot print

51




LowP H2–1 emissions (tCO2eq)









Unit process 1

Unit process 2




H2 produced(t)





Calculation output


In accounting



Between t1 and t2:

Calculation of the share of the batch that is of renewable origin

52

Electricity consumed (MWh)

Renew. elec. GOs purchased (MWh)*

Unit process 1 Unit process 2


Between t1 and t2:



Calculation output


In accounting


Wind elec. directly consumed (MWh)





Calculation of H2 product carbon footprint –(1) Non certified H2 produced in 12 months - Example

53




LowP H2 emissions (tCO2eq)




LowP H2 footprint(tCO2eq/tH2)






Unit process 1

Unit process 2






H2 produced(t)


LowP H2 produced(t)

LowP H2 fed to compressor (t)

LowP H2-1 emissions (tCO2eq)





Calculation output


In accounting


Production time frame: Jul 2015 – Jun 2016

6184

6184

100

100

225

2250

0

0

6184

00

225

0

0

100

0

0

00

Calculation of H2 product carbon footprint –(2) H2 batch foot print - Example

54




LowP H2–1 emissions (tCO2eq)









Unit process 1

Unit process 2




H2 produced(t)





Calculation output


In accounting



Between Jul 2015 and Jul 2016:

6184

6184

225

2250

0

0

6184

0

225

0

0100

0

0

Calculation of the share of the batch that is of renewable origin –Example

55

Unit process 1 Unit process 2



Calculation output


In accounting


Between Jul 2015 and Jul 2016:









6184

0

225

0

6184

225

100%

The ICT registry system is operational and we are in the process of creating accounts for the pilot plants and users

56

3 demonstrations of the tool (WG2 -1 & WG3 - 2)Further demonstrations possible

Key issues

Content

Next steps

Identifying a diversity of pilot users

Start issuing and trading GOs.

Register at the following address:https://grexel.kayako.com/Knowledgebase/Article/View/26/9/how-to-open-a-certifhy-account-in-cmogrexel

CertifHy is following up on key EU regulatory evolutions to identify barriers, issues and opportunities

57

3 meetings (WG4)Questions which are being raised wrt RED II

Next stepsØ Continue monitoring RED II

evolutionsØ Examine links between

CertifHy GO and other GO schemes

Ø Review other upcoming legislation (Gas Directive, State Aid, Implementing Act…)

1) Definition of green hydrogen not mentioned in RED II;2) The purpose of GOs - in RED II, it is limited to proving or showing a final customer that a given share or quantity of energy is produced from renewable energy;3) CertifHy scope of applications is larger than RED II, more applications & includes low carbon hydrogen4) MS could implement non-unified GO rules as provisions for GOs are not explicit and/or mandatory;5) Biofuels, biomass fuels and bioliquids must use a mass balance approach. This raises issues of compatibility with CertifHy’s book-and-claim approach for bio-based hydrogen for transport;6) Possibly no GOs issued to RES-E producers receiving financial support (e.g. FIT/FIP)7) Conditions for counting electricity from the grid as fully renewable (implementing act to be adopted by December 2021).

The standardisation framework will be developped to support the CertifHy hydrogen GO scheme

58

2 WG1 meetings1 meeting with CEN TC6 WG2

Questions to be addressed

Content

Next steps

Ø WG1 to suggest what should be in the standard and what shouldn’t.

Ø Recommendations to CEN for the standard.

1) Existing standardization efforts• The main standardization efforts relevant to CertifHy is

the work undertaken by CEN-CENELEC TC6 “Hydrogen in Energy Systems” WG2 on Guarantees of origin.

• The Commission is finalizing a standardization request (mandate) which is expected to cover GOs.

2) Ensuring coherence between the CertifHy scheme and standardization efforts

• It was agreed that CertifHy should be the source of the needed content for a standard

NoteThe CertifHy project position is that the definition of green hydrogen should not be included in the standard, and that there should not be a harmonized standard.

GO framework for electricity today

59

GO for H2 (under development)

60

We are focusing on addressing 2 key issues in the short term

61

Key issues Next steps

1) Going to be discussed as part of WG2 on 15/05

2) Will be reviewed by consortium as needed

3) Expected GO issuing by

1) Addressing the identified questions to allow TÜV SÜD to issue an audit report on the basis of which GOs can be issues

2) Identify GO users to purchase and trade GOs

1) Define key potential targets

2) Continue communication efforts

Platform operationPlatform creation

Platform operational

Plat

form

Steering Group



WG 3: GO commercialisation

and use (Users)

Preliminary scheme definition- incl. interaction with standards and regulation

Pilot specification

Milestone

Stakeholder group

WP1: The creation and operation of a stakeholders platform

Updating of GO scheme

Plan for EU rollout

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

WP3: Pilot scheme development, operation and feedback

Pilot preparation- Scheme procedures- ICT system- Production site audits- Monitoring plan

Preliminary GO scheme defined

Pilot operation - Registry operation- GO issuing and use - Pilot monitoring and stakeholder feedback- Cost analysis and business model

Pilot online


WP2: Preliminary scheme finalization & Specification of pilot

GO scheme finalizedEU roll out plan adopted

Pilot scheme tested

WP4: Final GO scheme design & EU-wide implementation plan

62

Current status

Where we stand/current status

Phase 2

Next steps beyond CertifHy phase 2 (1/2)

2017 2018/9 2020s..

63

Phase 3: Preparing EU-wide roll-out of a financially sustainable hydrogen GO scheme

Elaborate the procedures (e.g for certification bodies) being developed in the current pilot into standard contractual documents to ensure multiple certification bodies can offer their services to green hydrogen producers.

ØDevelop legal/contractual documents (e.g. standard terms of use)ØBring in line procedure with European standards under development

2

Build/expand and safely operate an ICT registry with the right level of service support to its users, tailored to the needs of green hydrogen GO users.

3

Appoint or select all of the actors for a GO scheme to become operational:ØCompetent authority;ØAccreditation body;ØCertification bodies;ØIssuing body;ØRegistry operator.

The Stakeholder Platform will act as the competent authority as long as a legal basis for hydrogen GOs is not available.

1

Phase 2

Next steps beyond CertifHy phase 2 (2/2)

2017 2018/9 2020s..

64

Phase 3: Preparing EU-wide roll-out of a financially sustainable hydrogen GO scheme

Develop the stakeholder platform so it becomes a forum for stakeholders to provide convergent input and influence on RCS (e.g. RED II recast and its implementing acts, the upcoming Gas Directive, contributing to work carried out by CEN-Cenelec/ TC6/WG2…)

5

Ensure all scheme documents and procedures are compliant with the anticipated future Regulation, Code and Standards (RCS) environment.

6

Create social awareness of the existence of the hydrogen GO platform and potentially trade green hydrogen GOs commercially launching Hydrogen GOs in the market incl.

ØInitial market identification and targeting, communications, etc., ØStart the trade of CertifHy GOs and refinement of tradeable products based on trader and

user feedback.

4

Agenda




CertifHy Phase 2


65

Application of Benchmark threshold on Past Production of the Hydrogen Plant

Timet2t2 – 12months

H2Production

12months

t1

AverageGHGintensitysincet2-12monthsofNon-CertifHyH2

mustnotexceed91gCO2/MJH2

PastProduction

H2withGreenGO

H2withLCGO

GreyH2

<91gCO2/MJH2 ?

666/13/18

At the batch level, hydrogen needs to be Low Carbon for producing CertifHy Green or Low-Carbon GOs

Timet2t2 – 12mths

H2Production

12months

t1

ProductionBatch

Non-renewableshare

Renewableshare

CertifHyLowCarbonH2 GOs

CertifHyGreenH2GOs

AverageGHGintensitysincet2-12monthsofNon-CertifHyH2

mustnotexceed91gCO2/MJH2

PastProduction

H2withGreenGO

H2withLCGO

GreyH2

<91gCO2/MJH2 ?

AverageGHGintensityofH2coveredbyaCertifHyGOmustnotexceed36.4gCO2/MJH2

<36.5gCO2/MJH2 ?

<36.5gCO2/MJH2 ?

196/13/18

Decision tree presenting the criteria for producing Low-Carbon and CertifHy Green H2

Average emissions of Non-CertifHy H2 <91gCO2 eq/MJ (benchmark)?

Batch emissions < 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ

(40% of benchm.)?

100% Non- renew. batch

X% renewable and

Production unit NOT ELIGIBLE

YesNo

YesNo

Renewable energy input into batch?

YesNo

100% Low-carbon H2

Renewable share emissions

< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

YesNo

X% Green H2

Non-renewable share emissions

< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

1-X% Low-carbon H2

YesNo

68

1-X%Grey H2

X%Grey H2

100%Grey H2

and (1-X%) non-renewable. share

6/13/18

Electrolysis with different energy mixes as energy input (1/5)

Average emissions of pastNon-CertifHy H2 <91gCO2 eq/MJ

(benchmark)?


(40% of benchm.)?

60% renewable and 40% non-renew.shares


YesNo

YesNo


No


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

No

60% Green H2


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

1-X% Low-carbon H2

YesNo

Yes

Yes

69

Electrolyser

60%

40% EU electricity mix *

* GHG content as disclosed by electricity supplier’s mix


100% Low-carbon H2

100%Grey H2

60%Grey H2

40%Grey H2

6/13/18



(benchmark)?


(40% of benchm.)?


YesNo

YesNo


No


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

No

60% Green H2


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

1-X% Low-carbon H2

YesNo

Yes

Yes

70

Electrolyser

50%

50% EU electricity mix *



100% Low-carbon H2

100%Grey H2

60%Grey H2

40%Grey H2


6/13/18

Depending on the non-renewable energy source used, a minimum amount of Renewable Energy may be needed to keep GHG intensity of non-CertifHy H2 of the plant below benchmark

Note: PV and Wind are assumed to have zero GHG intensity 71

0% 10% ... 50% 60% 70% 80%EUMix 217,1 217,1 195,4 ... 108,6 86,8 65,1 43,4Coal 423,7 423,7 381,3 ... 211,9 169,5 127,1 84,7Naturalgas 191,5 191,5 172,4 ... 95,8 76,6 57,5 38,3Nuclear 7,5 7,5 6,8 ... 3,8 3,0 2,3 1,5Specificmix 50,0 50,0 45,0 ... 25,0 20,0 15,0 10,0Red:facilityisNOTallowedtoproduceH2withaCertifHyGoO

Carbonintensity(gCO2/MJH2)of"Non-CertifHyH2"infunctionoftheelectricitymixusedWithinclusionofarenewableshareWithoutinclusionofa

renewableshare

NotElegible toproduceLowCarbonorCertifHyGreenH2

MinimumrenewablesharerequiredinNon-CertifHyH2formaintainingeligibilitytoproduceCertifHyH2

EUMix 217,1 58,1%Coal 423,7 78,5%Naturalgas 191,5 52,5%Nuclear 7,5 0,0%Specificmix 50,0 0,0%

Min.renewablesharerequired

Non-renew.originemissions(gCO2/MJH2)

Non-renew.origin

6/13/18


(benchmark)?


(40% of benchm.)?


YesNo

YesNo


No


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

No

X% Green H2


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

1-X% Low-carbon H2

YesNo

Yes

Yes

72

Electrolyser

100% French electricity mix *



100% Low-carbon H2

100%Grey H2

X%Grey H2

50%Grey H2

11%

76%

6%7%

hydraulic

nuclear

fossilfuels

otherrenewables


X% renewable and 1-X % non-renew.shares

6/13/18


(benchmark)?


(40% of benchm.)?


YesNo

YesNo


No


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

No

X% Green H2


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

70% Low-carbon H2

YesNo

Yes

Yes

73

Electrolyser

70% French electricity mix *



100% Low-carbon H2

100%Grey H2

30%Grey H2

50%Grey H2

11%

76%

6%7%

hydraulic

nuclear

fossilfuels

otherrenewables


30% Renewable Electricity from waste wood

30% renewable and 70 % non-renew.shares

6/13/18


(benchmark)?


(40% of benchm.)?


YesNo

YesNo


No


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

No

25% Green H2


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

1-X% Low-carbon H2

YesNo

Yes

Yes

74* GHG content as disclosed by electricity supplier’s mix


100% Low-carbon H2

100%Grey H2

X%Grey H2

75%Grey H2


Central Steam Methane Reforming (1/3)

CentralSMR

25% bio-methane from bio-waste

75% natural gas

6/13/18


(benchmark)?


(40% of benchm.)?


YesNo

YesNo


No


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

No

X% Green H2


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

1-X% Low-carbon H2

YesNo

Yes

Yes



100% Low-carbon H2

100%Grey H2

25%Grey H2

75%Grey H2


Central Steam Methane Reforming (2/3)

CentralSMR

25% bio-methane from corn

75% natural gas

6/13/18


(benchmark)?


(40% of benchm.)?


YesNo

YesNo


No


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

No

X% Green H2


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

1-X% Low-carbon H2

YesNo

Yes

Yes



100% Low-carbon H2

100%Grey H2

X%Grey H2

1-X%Grey H2

X% renewable and 1-X% non-renew.shares

Central Steam Methane Reforming (3/3) – with CCS

CentralSMR CCS

100% natural gas

6/13/18


(benchmark)?


(40% of benchm.)?


YesNo

YesNo


No


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

No

81% Green H2


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

1-X% Low-carbon H2

YesNo

Yes

Yes



100% Low-carbon H2

100%Grey H2

X%Grey H2

19%Grey H2


On-site SMR (1/2) with bio-gas from bio-waste and non-renewable heat

81%

On-siteSMR19%

Non-renewable heat

6/13/18


(benchmark)?


(40% of benchm.)?


YesNo

YesNo


No


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

No

81% Green H2


< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?

1-X% Low-carbon H2

YesNo

Yes

Yes



100% Low-carbon H2

100%Grey H2

80%Grey H2

20%Grey H2


On-site SMR (2/2) with bio-gas from corn and non-renewable heat

80%

On-siteSMR20%

Non-renewable heat

6/13/18

Project supported by the FCH JU

Q&A

6/13/18 79

creating the 1st eu-wide guarantee of origin for green ... · wp2: definition of ... tÜv sÜd is...

Documents