craig n. eatough, kent hatfield, steven eatough combustion resources, inc. provo, utah 30 th oil...

20
Craig N. Eatough, Kent Hatfield, Steven Eatough Combustion Resources, Inc. Provo, Utah 30 th Oil Shale Symposium Colorado School of Mines, Golden CO 18-22 October, 2010 Clean, Shale Oil Surface (C-SOS) Process Process Pilot Plant Pilot Plant

Upload: lesley-collins

Post on 25-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Craig N. Eatough, Kent Hatfield, Steven Eatough

Combustion Resources, Inc.

Provo, Utah

30th Oil Shale Symposium

Colorado School of Mines, Golden CO

18-22 October, 2010

Clean, Shale Oil Surface (C-SOS) Process Process

Pilot PlantPilot Plant

Motor fuels can be made from oil shale

with

Minimal release of CO2 to the atmosphere

when using the C-SOS process

Minimal water use in processing

Hydrogen for energy and upgrading

Combustion Resources, Inc. facilities in Provo, Utah,

USA

• Demonstrate kiln operation with oil shale

• Demonstrate recovery section

• Perform parametric study for optimization

• Recover shale oil fractions for upgrading testing

• Obtain operational data for scale-up and to refine economic analysis

• Demonstrate process in long-term run

• Perform initial check-out tests

• Complete parametric test plan– Shale feed rate

– Kiln temperature

– Kiln speed

– Particle size

– Sweep gas rate

• Analyze oil fractions for upgrading

• Run plant for extended period

• 150 tons from White River mine stockpile near Bonanza, UT• Acquired through BLM and OSEC• Obtained, crushed to -3/8” and shipped by Sage Geotech

Parameter Value Units

Carbon 19.45 wt %

Hydrogen 2.08 wt %

Nitrogen 0.49 wt %

Oxygen 15.4 wt %

Sulfur 0.13 wt %

Moisture 0.65 wt %

Heating Value 2831 Btu/lb

Oil (Fisher Assay) 29 Gal/ton

Oil Density 0.9 g/cc

White River Mine Test Shale Analysis

Oil Shale Particle Size Distribution

Particle Size Variation

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

0246810

Particle Size (mm)

% W

eig

ht

.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Effect of Set Point on Gravel Exit Temp (5 tpd)

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

500 550 600 650 700 750 800

Control Set Point © (near outside tube)

Gra

vel E

xit Tem

p (C

) .

• Performed 3 check-out tests (3 tpd)

• Variation in kiln set point temperature

• Collected full system operational data using Opto 22 control system

• Collected different oil fractions

• Collected and analyzed spent shale

Collected oil from different column fractions plus product gas

Particle Size Distributions

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

0246810

Particle size (mm)

Wei

ght

% . Gravel

Spent Shale 1

Spent Shale 2

Shale

Approximate Yield (by TGA on spent shale)

0.60

0.65

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

650 700 750 800 850

Kiln Set Point (C)

Ap

pro

xim

ate

Yie

ld

.

• Ultimate Goal: convert oil fractions to motor-ready fuels

• Hydrotreating testing to be performed by independent lab

• Collected fractions treated separately

• Trial catalysts being selected

• Current discussions with 2 catalyst suppliers

• C-SOS pilot-scale facility is complete

• Pilot-scale check-out tests are underway with very early, preliminary data

• Parametric testing is planned

• Upgrading testing will follow

• Results to aid in scale-up and refining economic analysis

AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments

Co-authors K. Hatfield, S. EatoughCo-authors K. Hatfield, S. Eatough

U.S. Department of Energy/SBIR GrantU.S. Department of Energy/SBIR Grant• (Chandra M. Nautiyal – Project Officer)(Chandra M. Nautiyal – Project Officer)

30th Oil Shale Symposium30th Oil Shale SymposiumColorado School of Mines, Golden COColorado School of Mines, Golden CO

18-22 October 201018-22 October 2010