cpted crime and design.pdf

Upload: oanama232

Post on 04-Jun-2018

259 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    1/99

    A Quick

    Review ofCPTED

    Strategies(Crime Prevention

    ThroughEnvironmental

    Design)

    By: Russell James, J.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor,College of Human Sciences, Texas Tech University

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    2/99

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    3/99

    Surveillance(Will I be seen?)

    Research

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    4/99

    burglarizedhouses had

    less visualaccess toimmediately

    neighboringhouses thandid non-

    burglarizedhouses

    Brown, B. (University of Utah), Altman, B. (University of Utah). 1983. Territoriality, defensible space andresidential burglary: an environmental analysis,Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(3), 203-20.

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    5/99

    Convenience stores

    experienced mean

    annual robbery ratereductions after

    installation of CCTV

    systems (-23%);

    installation of video

    cameras with monitors(-54%)

    C. Casteel (UCLA) & C. Peek-Asa (UCLA). 2000. Effectiveness of crime prevention through

    environmental design (CPTED) in reducing robberies. American Journal of PreventativeMedicine, 18, 99-115, p. 110

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    6/99

    Office beveragesavailable withpayment on an

    honor system.Picture abovepaymentinstructionsrotated weekly.

    Payments werehigher when

    picture of eyeswas posted.

    M. Bateson, D. Nettle & G. Roberts (2006). Cuesof being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters 2, 412414.

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    7/99

    A B

    Two groups with two computer backgrounds. Eachperson receives $10. Computer question: Do you want toshare any of it with another (anonymous) participant?

    K. J. Haley (UCLA), D.M.T. Fessler (UCLA). 2005. Nobodys watching? Subtle cues affect generosityin an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245256

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    8/99

    Sharing

    55%

    NotSharing

    45%

    Normal

    Screen

    Sharing88%

    Not

    Sharing

    12%

    Eyes Screen

    K. J. Haley (UCLA), D.M.T. Fessler (UCLA). 2005. Nobodys watching? Subtle cues affect generosityin an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245256

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    9/99

    Access(Can I get in and out)?

    Research

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    10/99

    Burglarized houses had fewerfences and locked gates

    surrounding the yard than didnon-burglarized houses.

    Brown, B., Altman, B. (1983). Territoriality,

    defensible space and residential burglary:an environmental analysis, Journal ofEnvironmental Psychology, 3(3), 203-20.

    b dd h l k f

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    11/99

    Preventing access by adding chain link fencingand lighting to lower levels of this parkinggarage led to 50% drop in reported crime.

    Tseng, C.-H. (Ohio State U.), Duane, J. (Ohio State U.), &Hadipriono, F. (Ohio State U.). 2004. Performance of

    Campus Parking Garages in Preventing Crime.Journal ofPerformance of Constructed Facilities, 18(1), 21-28.

    h

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    12/99

    Territoriality

    (Does anyone carewhat happens

    here?)

    Research

    b l i d h h d f b li

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    13/99

    burglarized houses had fewer symbolicbarriers characteristic of primaryterritories (i.e., fewer markers depictingthe identity of the territory owners)

    Brown, B. (University of Utah), Altman, B. (University of Utah). 1983. Territoriality, defensible space andresidential burglary: an environmental analysis,Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(3), 203-20.

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    14/99

    In a study of 400 convenience store robberies, onesignificant difference between robbed and non-robbed stores was distance from nearest graffiti

    S. A. Hendricks, D. P. Landsittel, H. E. Amandus, J. Malcan, & J. Bell. (1999) A matched case-control study of convenience store robbery risk factors.Journal of Occupational andEnvironmental Medicine, 41 11 , 995-1004

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    15/99

    Surveillance(Will I be seen?)

    Access(Can I get in and out)?

    Territoriality(Does anyone care what happens here?)

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    16/99Will I be seen?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    17/99Surveillance: FAIL

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    18/99Can I get in and out?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    19/99Access: FAIL

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    20/99Does anyone care what happens here?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    21/99Territoriality: FAIL

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    22/99

    Does anyone care what happens here?

    Territoriality: FAIL

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    23/99

    Can I get in and out?

    Access: FAIL

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    24/99Does anyone care what happens here?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    25/99

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    26/99Access: Can I get in and out? Territoriality impacts Access

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    27/99

    If no one cares what happens here, is itless risky to try opening the door with

    a crowbar or bolt cutter?

    Territoriality impacts Access

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    28/99

    ACCESS: Does t e ence ma e it ar er to

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    29/99

    ACCESS: Does t e ence ma e it ar er toget in and out?

    SURVEILLANCE: Does t e ence ma e it ess

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    30/99

    SURVEILLANCE: Does t e ence ma e it esslikely I will be seen when attempting to break in

    through a back door?

    Survei ance + Access + Territoria ity may impact

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    31/99

    Survei ance + Access + Territoria ity may impacteach other.

    Does anyone care what happens here?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    32/99

    Does anyone care what happens here?

    T e ence says May e

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    33/99

    T e ence says May e .Everything else says No

    Does anyone care what happens here?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    34/99

    Does anyone care what happens here?

    TERRITORIALITY:

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    35/99

    TERRITORIALITY:High level maintenance. Defined borders.

    Short decorative fencing can enhance

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    36/99

    Short decorative fencing can enhanceterritoriality inside the fence withoutdisconnecting from the surroundingneighborhood

    Short decorative fencing can enhance

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    37/99

    Short decorative fencing can enhanceterritoriality inside the fence withoutdisconnecting from the surroundingneighborhood

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    38/99

    Short fencing,even if solid,

    creates nosurveillanceproblems.

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    39/99

    As fences get higher, the access barrierincreases, but the risk of visually disconnecting

    from the neighborhood also grows

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    40/99

    Does anyone carewhat happens hereINSIDE the fence?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    41/99

    Does anyone carewhat happens hereOUTSIDE the fence?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    42/99

    High fences maydiminish territorialityoutside the fence

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    43/99

    High solid fences

    Indicates lack of

    territoriality

    outside of walls Reduces natural

    surveillance

    Can anyone see whathappens outside the fence?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    44/99

    High solid fences

    Indicates lack of

    territoriality

    outside of walls Reduces natural

    surveillance

    Does anyone care whathappens outside the fence?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    45/99

    High solid fences

    Indicates lack of

    territoriality

    outside of walls Reduces natural

    surveillance

    High solid fences maycreate spaces with littlesurveillance or territoriality

    Some high fences

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    46/99

    Some high fencescontrol access, butfail the S.A.T. by

    (1) Blockingsurveillance

    (2) Sending a clear

    message thatthe area isdangerous,crime isaccepted, andno one careswhat happens

    outside the wall

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    47/99

    Making the chain link fence opaque blockssurveillance and permits graffiti showing a lack

    of external territoriality.

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    48/99

    With proper designand maintenance,

    high fences canlimit access without

    damagingsurveillance or

    territoriality

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    49/99

    A high fence blocking access without

    damaging surveillance or territoriality Spikes can add a visceral

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    50/99

    Spikes can add a visceralelement of accessreduction that is still

    decorative and residential

    Of course, you

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    51/99

    Of course, youcan go too farwith anything!

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    52/99

    Window bars limit access, but may also send anegative territoriality message about

    neighborhood safety.

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    53/99

    Glass block can createsecurity similar to windowbars but without the sti ma

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    54/99

    Most burglaryentries do notoccur through

    the front door,often becauseof natural

    surveillance.

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    55/99

    Open accessto side or

    rear entrypoints wherethere is no

    naturalsurveillancemake formore

    attractiveburglaryentrances.

    Access barriers toid

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    56/99

    side or rear entrancecan reduce the risk

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    57/99

    A very short barrier may provide

    insufficient access control

    As barriers rise access

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    58/99

    As barriers rise, access

    is reduced

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    59/99

    Tall opaque barrierslimit access, but mayalso eliminate natural

    surveillance The line of sight for entry points is critical.

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    60/99

    The line of sight for entry points is critical.

    Am I visible to outsiders here?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    61/99

    Am I visible to outsiders here?

    Am I visible to outsiders here?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    62/99

    Am I visible to outsiders here?

    Am I visible to outsiders here?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    63/99

    s b e to outs de s e e?

    Am I visible to outsiders here?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    64/99

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    65/99

    Consider thesight-lines inthis aerial shotof a new group

    of duplexes Front

    E t /

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    66/99

    RearEntrance /Windows

    Entrance /Windows

    SideWindows

    What are thesight lines forthe potentialentry points in

    this unit?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    67/99

    10residenceshave sight

    lines tothe rear

    entry

    What are thesight lines forthe potentialentry points in

    this unit?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    68/99

    16residenceshave sightlines to thefront entry

    What are thesight lines forthe potentialentry points in

    this unit?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    69/99

    11residenceshave sight

    lines toside

    window

    What are thesight lines forthe potentialentry points in

    this unit? Rear Entrance /

    WindowsSide Entrance/

    Windows

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    70/99

    FrontEntrance /Windows

    What are thesight lines forthe potentialentry points in

    this unit?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    71/99

    2residenceshave sight

    lines torear

    entrance

    What are thesight lines forthe potentialentry points in

    this unit?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    72/99

    0residenceshave sight

    lines toside

    window

    What are thesight lines forthe potentialentry points in

    this unit?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    73/99

    Zone outsideresidence

    where sight

    lines arecovered by

    wooded areawith link to

    walking trail

    What are thesight lines forthe potentialentry points in

    this unit?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    74/99

    Which residencehas better SAT

    scores? What natural surveillance issue best

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    75/99

    predicted convenience store robberies?

    C. Casteel (UCLA) & C. Peek-Asa (UCLA). 2000. Effectiveness of crime prevention through environmentaldesign (CPTED) in reducing robberies. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 18, 99-115, p. 110

    C. Casteel (UCLA) & C. Peek-Asa (UCLA). 2000. Effectiveness of crime prevention through environmentaldesign (CPTED) in reducing robberies. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 18, 99-115, p. 110

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    76/99

    Visibility from outside the store to inside

    the store was the most important sight line C. Casteel (UCLA) & C. Peek-Asa (UCLA). 2000. Effectiveness of crime prevention through environmentaldesign (CPTED) in reducing robberies. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 18, 99-115, p. 110

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    77/99

    Visibility from outside the store to insidethe store was a more significant predictorof convenience store robberies than thenumber of clerks or the proximity to drug

    traffic, gangs, or subsidized housing. At night, surveillance depends on lighting.

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    78/99

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    79/99

    Of course, surveillance canbe blocked by both darkness

    and solid barriers.

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    80/99

    line of site; access out

    Lighting alone may notovercome natural barriers to

    surveillance

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    81/99

    Lighting can alsobe importantduring the day,

    especially wherelines of sight arelimited

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    82/99

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    83/99

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    84/99

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    85/99

    What signals doyou get thatterritoriality

    appears weakhere?

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    86/99

    Closed stairwells have low natural surveillance

    and easy access for both entry and escape Combined with territoriality deficiencies,

    stairwells can create CPTED problem areas

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    87/99

    stairwells can create CPTED problem areas.

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    88/99

    Design solutionscan improve the

    naturalsurveillance for

    stairwells

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/31/Student_center_York_University_Goddess_of_Democracy.jpg
  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    89/99

    Open stairwellshave strong

    natural

    surveillance

    properties

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/31/Student_center_York_University_Goddess_of_Democracy.jpg
  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    90/99

    All ranges of

    naturalsurveillancelevels are

    possible forstairwells

    depending uponthe design

    solution chosen

    replacing bathroom entrance doorswith right-angle entrances permit the

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    91/99

    g g pwarning sounds of crime to travel morefreely and reduce the sense of isolation

    Sommer, R. (1983). Social design: Creating buildings with people in mind. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    92/99

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    93/99

    Cul-de-sacs make automobile

    escape more problematic as

    there is only one exit route

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    94/99

    Street closures can providesimilar access results

    Pedestrian trafficcan also be limited

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    95/99

    can also be limitedwith street closures

    High rise buildingsprovide weaker

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    96/99

    provide weakersurveillance of

    street level activitybecause ofstructural

    separation, distance

    separation, andsound separation.

    This separation alsolimits the sense ofterritoriality over

    street level

    activities

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    97/99

    Mid rise balconies create stronger surveillance and

    territoriality connecting residents with street level

    Mid-rise balconyneighborhoods

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    98/99

    neighborhoods

    create safer

    street level areaswith high levels

    of perceived

    surveillance and

    perceived

    territoriality

    Presentation by Russell James III, J.D., Ph.D.,Associate Professor, College of Human

    Sciences, Texas Tech University.

  • 8/14/2019 CPTED crime and design.pdf

    99/99

    , y

    Dr. James research has been published in a

    variety of housing and design related

    academic journals including: Environment& Behavior; Housing Policy Debate; Journal

    of Urban Planning & Development (ASCE);

    Journal of Performance of Constructed

    Facilities (ASCE); Housing, Theory, and

    Society; Housing & Society; Journal of the

    Community Development Society

    Please feel free to use any of these slides

    for any non-commercial purposes.

    All pictures used in this presentation are

    creative commons licensed, have beenpurchased with rights to allow this usage,

    are from MS PowerPoint or are the authors

    own photographs. Citations for all creative