cover slide - austin & stanovich · cover slide (intro by tim palmer ... berklee college of...

20
1 URMIA Conference 2012: “Providence 2012-Guiding you Across the Ocean of Risk” 1. Cover Slide (Intro by Tim Palmer) Good Morning and welcome to “Ahoy Matey-Take the Tiller and Maintain Due Course through Exposure Identification”. I am Tim Palmer . . . . . . . Let me introduce you to the presenters for this session. Edward Frackiewicz: Ed Frackiewicz is the Leader of the Boston Consortium Risk Management Advisory Group providing integrated Risk Management services to Brandeis University, Bentley College, Berklee College of Music, Bryant University, Emerson College, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, LaSelle College, Salve Regina University, Wellesley College, Wheaton College and Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Prior to joining the Consortium team, Ed was the Director, Risk Management for Allmerica Financial Corporation and the Del Monte Foods Company. In both roles, he was the primary individual responsible for corporate risk management awareness and the execution of financial treatments designed to protect company assets. In addition, he had global accountabilities for the strategy and selection of property & casualty insurance programs, security and safety service providers and corporate fleet vehicle management. Ed was a leading member of the risk management team with the Liberty Mutual Insurance Group. During his twenty- year career at Liberty, he held numerous positions including claims adjuster, training supervisor, Manager of Consumer Affairs & Corporate Insurance and Director of Risk Financing. Ed is a graduate of Wake Forest University with a BS in Business and has earned his ARM designation. He currently serves the role as an independent Director and President Emeritus of the New England Educators Insurance Association Board (NEEIA) and a member of their Risk Management and Strategic Planning Committees. He has presented at programs hosted by URMIA, RIMS, the Society of Consumer Affairs in Business (SOCAP), Insurance Consumer Affairs Exchange (ICAE), International Quality & Productivity Center (IQPC) and the Alliance of American Insurers (AAI). He also served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Triple S Insurance Agency, Inc. and on a National Food Processors Association (NFPA) Insurance Task Force. William Austin: Bill Austin is a principal of Austin & Stanovich Risk Managers LLC, a national risk management consulting firm, with offices in MA and RI. He specializes in all aspects of risk management. His higher education practice includes many well-known colleges and universities located through the Northeast US such as Boston College, Bryant University, Johnson & Wales University, Marist College, Providence College, Rhode Island School of Design, Trinity College. He is a resource to University of Rhode Island, Rhode Island College and Community College of Rhode Island. His consulting practice includes organizations from Fortune 100 companies to large regional corporations to governmental entities. He also has an active litigation support practice that includes experience as an expert witness in both disclosed and non-disclosed engagements. Some of his expert witness engagements have included higher education risk and insurance issues. His risk and insurance career began in 1977 and evolved to include successful employments in underwriting with Wausau Insurance Companies, national brokerage with Rollins Hudig Hall now Aon, independent consulting with Albert Risk and 7+ years as a VP/Corporate Risk manager for FleetBoston a Fortune 100 corporation, 7th largest US bank with operations in 21 countries and more than 50,000 employees. He co-founded Austin & Stanovich Risk Managers with Craig Stanovich in 2002 as an independent risk management and insurance consulting firm. Bill is a regulator contributor to International Risk Management Institute. He is a graduate of University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire with a BBA in marketing with an emphasis in finance and has a CRIS designation from IRMI. Bill is a frequent speaker on risk management and insurance topics. In the past year he was a panelist for a NYC RIMS panel discussion on RMS risk modeling; a panelist at Fordham Law School in NYC on “Human Rights – Emerging Risks for Corporate Counsel and discussed operational risk issues for non-profits for the RI CPA Society. Ed and Bill have known each other for 10 years as both are active in the Greater Boston Risk Management Community for 10 years. They told me it is a pleasure to present this session together today.

Upload: vuonghanh

Post on 10-Jun-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

UR

MIA

Co

nfe

ren

ce 2

01

2:

“P

rovid

en

ce

20

12

-Gu

idin

g y

ou

Ac

ross

the O

ce

an

of R

isk”

1. C

ove

r Slid

e (In

tro b

y T

im P

alm

er)

Good M

orn

ing a

nd w

elc

om

e to

“Aho

y M

ate

y-T

ake th

e T

iller a

nd M

ain

tain

Due C

ours

e th

rough E

xposure

Ide

ntific

atio

n”. I

am

Tim

Palm

er . . . . . . . L

et m

e in

troduce

yo

u to

the p

resente

rs fo

r this

sessio

n.

Ed

wa

rd F

rackie

wic

z:

Ed

Fra

ckie

wic

z is

the

Le

ad

er o

f the

Bo

sto

n C

on

so

rtium

Ris

k M

an

ag

em

en

t Advis

ory

Gro

up

pro

vid

ing

inte

gra

ted

Ris

k

Ma

na

gem

en

t se

rvic

es

to

Bra

nde

is

Un

ive

rsity

, B

en

tley

Colle

ge

, B

erk

lee

C

olle

ge

o

f M

usic

, B

rya

nt

Un

ive

rsity

, E

me

rso

n C

olle

ge

, Fra

nklin

W. O

lin C

olle

ge o

f Eng

ine

erin

g, L

aS

elle

Co

llege

, Salv

e R

egin

a U

niv

ers

ity, W

elle

sle

y

Colle

ge

, Whea

ton

Colle

ge a

nd

Worc

este

r Poly

tech

nic

Institu

te.

Prio

r to jo

inin

g th

e C

onso

rtium

team

, Ed

wa

s th

e D

irecto

r, Ris

k M

an

ag

em

en

t for A

llme

rica

Fin

an

cia

l Co

rpo

ratio

n a

nd

the

D

el

Mon

te

Foo

ds

Co

mp

an

y.

In

bo

th

role

s,

he

w

as

the

p

rima

ry

indiv

idu

al

resp

on

sib

le

for

co

rpo

rate

ris

k

man

agem

en

t aw

are

ne

ss a

nd

the

execu

tion

of fin

ancia

l trea

tme

nts

de

sig

ne

d to

pro

tect c

om

pan

y a

sse

ts. In

ad

ditio

n,

he

ha

d g

lob

al a

ccou

nta

bilitie

s fo

r the

stra

teg

y a

nd

se

lectio

n o

f pro

pe

rty &

ca

su

alty

insu

ran

ce

pro

gra

ms, s

ecu

rity a

nd

sa

fety

se

rvic

e p

rovid

ers

an

d c

orp

ora

te fle

et v

eh

icle

man

agem

en

t. E

d w

as a

lea

din

g m

em

be

r of th

e ris

k m

ana

gem

en

t team

with

the L

ibe

rty M

utu

al In

su

rance

Gro

up

. Du

ring

his

twe

nty

-ye

ar

ca

ree

r a

t L

ibe

rty,

he

h

eld

n

um

ero

us p

ositio

ns in

clu

din

g cla

ims a

dju

ste

r, tra

inin

g su

pe

rvis

or,

Ma

na

ge

r of

Co

nsum

er A

ffairs

& C

orp

ora

te In

su

ran

ce

an

d D

irecto

r of R

isk F

ina

ncin

g.

Ed

is

a g

rad

ua

te o

f Wake

F

ore

st

Univ

ers

ity w

ith a

B

S in

B

usin

ess a

nd h

as ea

rne

d his

A

RM

desig

na

tion

. H

e

cu

rren

tly se

rve

s th

e ro

le a

s an

in

de

pen

den

t D

irecto

r a

nd P

resid

en

t E

me

ritus of

the

N

ew

E

ng

lan

d E

du

ca

tors

In

su

ran

ce

Asso

cia

tion

Boa

rd (N

EE

IA) a

nd

a m

em

be

r of th

eir R

isk M

ana

gem

en

t an

d S

trate

gic

Pla

nn

ing

Com

mitte

es.

He

has p

resen

ted

at p

rog

ram

s h

oste

d b

y U

RM

IA, R

IMS

, the

So

cie

ty o

f Con

sum

er A

ffairs

in B

usin

ess (S

OC

AP

), In

su

ran

ce

Con

sum

er A

ffairs

Exch

an

ge

(ICA

E), In

tern

atio

na

l Qua

lity &

Pro

du

ctiv

ity C

en

ter (IQ

PC

) an

d th

e A

llian

ce

of

Am

eric

an

Insu

rers

(AA

I). He

als

o s

erv

ed

as a

mem

be

r of th

e B

oa

rd o

f Dire

cto

rs o

f the

Trip

le S

Insu

ran

ce

Ag

en

cy,

Inc. a

nd

on

a N

atio

nal F

oo

d P

roce

sso

rs A

sso

cia

tion

(NF

PA

) Insu

ran

ce

Task F

orc

e.

Willia

m A

ustin

: B

ill Au

stin

is a

prin

cip

al o

f Austin

& S

tan

ovic

h R

isk M

an

age

rs L

LC

, a n

atio

na

l risk m

an

agem

en

t co

nsultin

g firm

, with

o

ffice

s in

MA

and

RI. H

e s

pe

cia

lize

s in

all a

sp

ects

of ris

k m

an

ag

em

en

t. His

hig

he

r edu

ca

tion

pra

ctic

e in

clu

des

man

y w

ell-k

no

wn

co

lleges a

nd

un

ive

rsitie

s lo

ca

ted

th

roug

h th

e N

orth

ea

st

US

su

ch

as B

osto

n C

olle

ge

, B

rya

nt

Univ

ers

ity, J

oh

nson

& W

ale

s U

niv

ers

ity, M

aris

t Colle

ge

, Pro

vid

en

ce

Co

lleg

e, R

hod

e Is

lan

d S

ch

ool o

f De

sig

n, T

rinity

C

olle

ge

. He

is a

reso

urc

e to

Un

ive

rsity

of R

ho

de

Isla

nd

, Rho

de

Isla

nd

Colle

ge

an

d C

om

mu

nity

Colle

ge

of R

hod

e

Isla

nd

. His

con

sultin

g p

ractic

e in

clu

des o

rgan

iza

tion

s fro

m F

ortu

ne

10

0 c

om

pa

nie

s to

larg

e re

gio

na

l co

rpo

ratio

ns to

g

ove

rnm

en

tal

en

tities.

H

e als

o h

as an

activ

e litig

atio

n sup

po

rt p

ractic

e th

at

inclu

de

s e

xp

erie

nce

as a

n e

xp

ert

witn

ess in

bo

th d

isclo

se

d a

nd

no

n-d

isclo

se

d e

ng

age

me

nts

. Som

e o

f his

expe

rt witn

ess e

ng

agem

en

ts h

ave

inclu

ded

hig

he

r ed

uca

tion

risk a

nd

insu

rance

issu

es.

His

risk a

nd

insu

ran

ce

care

er b

ega

n in

19

77

an

d e

vo

lve

d to

inclu

de

su

cce

ssfu

l em

plo

ym

en

ts in

und

erw

riting

with

W

ausa

u In

su

ran

ce

Com

pa

nie

s, n

atio

nal b

roke

rag

e w

ith R

ollin

s H

ud

ig H

all n

ow

Ao

n, in

dep

end

en

t consu

lting

with

A

lbe

rt Ris

k a

nd

7+

ye

ars

as a

VP

/Co

rpo

rate

Ris

k m

an

age

r for F

lee

tBo

sto

n a

Fo

rtune

100

co

rpo

ratio

n, 7

th la

rge

st

US

ba

nk w

ith o

pe

ratio

ns in

21 c

ou

ntrie

s a

nd m

ore

tha

n 5

0,0

00

em

plo

ye

es. H

e c

o-fo

un

de

d A

ustin

& S

tan

ovic

h R

isk

Ma

na

ge

rs w

ith C

raig

Sta

no

vic

h in

20

02

as a

n in

de

pe

nd

en

t risk m

an

agem

en

t an

d in

su

rance

co

nsu

lting

firm. B

ill is a

re

gu

lato

r co

ntrib

uto

r to In

tern

atio

na

l Ris

k M

an

agem

en

t Institu

te. H

e is

a g

rad

ua

te o

f Univ

ers

ity o

f Wis

con

sin

-Ea

u

Cla

ire w

ith a

BB

A in

ma

rke

ting

with

an

em

pha

sis

in fin

an

ce

and

ha

s a

CR

IS d

esig

na

tion

from

IRM

I. B

ill is a

freq

uen

t sp

eake

r on

risk m

an

agem

en

t an

d in

su

rance

topic

s. In

the

pa

st y

ea

r he

wa

s a

pa

nelis

t for a

NY

C

RIM

S p

an

el d

iscu

ssio

n o

n R

MS

risk m

ode

ling

; a p

an

elis

t at F

ord

ham

La

w S

ch

ool in

NY

C o

n “H

um

an

Rig

hts

Em

erg

ing

Ris

ks fo

r Co

rpora

te C

oun

sel a

nd

dis

cu

sse

d o

pe

ratio

na

l risk is

su

es fo

r non

-pro

fits fo

r the

RI C

PA

So

cie

ty.

Ed

a

nd B

ill h

ave

kn

ow

n e

ach

o

the

r fo

r 1

0 ye

ars

a

s b

oth

a

re a

ctiv

e in

th

e G

rea

ter

Bo

sto

n R

isk M

an

agem

en

t C

om

mu

nity

for 1

0 y

ea

rs. T

he

y to

ld m

e it is

a p

lea

sure

to p

rese

nt th

is s

essio

n to

ge

the

r toda

y.

2 2

. Ou

r Ex

pe

cta

tion

s S

lide

Ed

Fra

ckie

wic

z a

nd

I are

ve

ry h

ap

py to

se

e a

ll of y

ou a

t our s

essio

n.

Ou

r go

al to

da

y is

sim

ple

: Thro

ug

h a

n e

xch

an

ge

of id

ea

s w

e h

op

e a

ll of u

s w

ill beco

me

mo

re e

ffectiv

e ris

k

ma

nag

ers

thro

ug

h e

nh

an

ced

aw

are

ne

ss to

the im

po

rtan

ce o

f exp

os

ure

iden

tificatio

n.

I rem

em

ber th

e re

cru

iting

bro

ch

ure

used

by W

ausa

u In

sura

nce

Co

mp

an

ies in

197

7, w

hen

I go

t out o

f co

lleg

e.

It sa

id s

om

eth

ing

like

FIR

E, E

XP

LO

SIO

N, L

OS

S o

f LIF

E, D

ISA

ST

ER

-how

ca

n a

ca

ree

r in in

sura

nce

be b

orin

g

wh

en

yo

u w

ork

with

these

typ

es o

f eve

nts

. All e

xp

osu

res to

loss b

ut s

imp

ly w

ord

s, n

ot d

ime

nsio

na

l in a

ny w

ay

for o

ne

that w

ould

ultim

ate

ly b

eco

me

a F

ortu

ne

10

0 ris

k m

anag

er.

Yo

u c

an

no

t ma

nag

e o

r un

ders

tan

d o

r treat w

ha

t yo

u d

o n

ot k

no

w!!! Y

ou

nee

d to

ma

nag

e a

360

de

gre

e

of e

xp

os

ure

-cau

se

/effe

ct a

nd

effe

ct o

n a

giv

en

ass

et (b

uild

ing

, data

, hu

ma

n c

ap

ital) a

nd

wh

at th

es

e

sam

e a

ss

ets

ca

n d

o to

cre

ate

exp

os

ure

to o

the

r ass

ets

(neig

hb

orin

g b

uild

ing

, theft o

f data

, inju

ry to

h

um

an

ca

pita

l an

d in

jury

to o

ther p

eo

ple

an

d o

rgan

izatio

ns). E

xp

osu

re re

vie

w is

3 d

ime

nsio

na

l-it is

no

t that w

hic

h m

ay b

e o

bvio

us

. T

he P

ow

erP

oin

t that y

ou

ma

y h

ave

do

wn

load

ed

from

UR

MIA

is a

wo

rkin

g d

raft w

e c

reate

d a

t the b

eg

innin

g o

f th

e s

um

me

r. We d

ecid

ed

this

se

ssio

n m

ay a

llow

gre

at id

ea

s, s

torie

s a

nd s

o o

n fro

m th

is g

rou

p.

Th

e o

ne

used

for to

da

y is

our fin

al d

raft. W

e h

ope

to e

licit id

ea

s fro

m th

e g

roup

toda

y th

at w

e c

an u

se to

u

pd

ate

this

final d

raft in

to a

final v

ers

ion

that in

clu

de

s a

ll poin

ts fro

m th

is s

essio

n. In

oth

er w

ord

s th

is w

ill be

kin

d o

f a liv

ing

docu

men

t to ta

ke

our id

ea

s a

nd

poin

ts a

nd

brin

g in

the c

om

me

nts

from

those o

f yo

u th

at d

ecid

e

to s

hare

thoug

hts

, idea

s a

nd

sto

ries w

ith u

s. S

ucce

ss s

torie

s a

nd fa

ilure

sto

ries. W

e le

arn

from

he

arin

g fro

m

one a

no

ther w

hat w

ork

s a

nd

wh

at d

oe

s n

ot.

Ed

is s

erv

ing

as s

crib

e to

da

y. H

e lo

st th

e c

oin

toss a

s to

wh

o w

ould

sp

ea

k a

nd

wh

o w

ou

ld b

e s

crib

e. T

hen

ag

ain

ma

yb

e h

e w

on! H

e lik

e m

e w

as a

lso

a ris

k m

anag

er a

nd

has d

eve

lope

d a

risk m

anag

em

ent to

ol s

et th

at

inclu

de

s id

eas o

n e

xp

osu

re id

en

tificatio

n.

We w

ill take

idea

s fro

m th

is s

essio

n a

nd

upd

ate

the P

ow

erP

oin

t as b

est w

e c

an a

nd

have

it co

nve

rted to

PD

F.

It will lik

ely

be p

oste

d b

y U

RM

IA a

nd

will b

e a

t my w

ebsite

Octo

ber 1

5, 2

01

2 w

ww

.austin

sta

no

vic

h.c

om

. Ed

will

yo

u b

e p

ostin

g it to

Th

e B

osto

n C

onsortiu

m w

ebsite

as w

ell?

Do

wn

load

it/sh

are

it as y

ou d

ee

m a

pp

rop

riate

. If y

ou ra

ther h

ave

it em

aile

d to

yo

u w

hen

read

y s

imp

ly le

ave

yo

ur e

ma

il add

ress w

ith u

s o

n th

is s

ign-u

p s

heet

and

we

will e

ma

il it to y

ou

wh

en

it is re

ad

y fo

r rele

ase

. Ple

ase

prin

t yo

ur e

ma

il add

ress c

learly

for u

s to

read.

3. S

lide: T

he R

isk

Man

ag

em

en

t Pro

ce

ss

Is

a te

mp

late

app

roa

ch

rea

lly u

se

d?

Is it u

sefu

l? Y

es to

bo

th q

uestio

ns. If y

ou

r initia

l rea

ctio

n is

no

the

n y

ou

ma

y n

eed

to re

-thin

k y

ou

r pra

ctic

e o

f risk m

an

agem

ent. T

he

ste

ps a

re s

imp

le. T

he

ste

ps

ke

ep

us o

n p

oin

t as to

exp

osu

re id

en

tificatio

n firs

t an

d tre

atm

en

t op

tion

s s

eco

nd.

1

. Id

en

tify a

nd

an

aly

ze

ex

po

su

re to

loss.

2.

Eva

lua

te fe

asib

le a

ltern

ativ

e ris

k m

ana

ge

men

t tech

niq

ue

s to

ha

nd

le lo

ss e

xp

osu

res.

3.

Se

lect th

e m

ost a

pp

rop

riate

/effic

ien

t risk m

an

age

me

nt te

chn

iqu

es to

han

dle

loss e

xp

osu

res.

4.

Imp

lem

en

t the c

ho

se

n te

ch

niq

ue

s.

5.

Mo

nito

ring

the

resu

lts, re

vis

e a

s re

qu

ired

and

sta

rt ove

r ag

ain

with

ex

po

su

re id

en

tificatio

n.

What is

inte

restin

g th

ese

5 s

tep

s a

re u

se

d in

ma

ny ty

pe

s o

f risk m

an

age

me

nt p

roce

sse

s. I h

ave

se

en

sim

ilar s

tep

s fo

r e-d

ata

risk m

an

agem

en

t and

in IS

O 9

00

1 d

ocum

en

ts th

at d

iscuss ris

k m

an

agem

ent

as a

dis

cip

line

an

d a

ma

na

gem

ent p

ractic

e.

3 4

. Ins

ert F

lee

t Bu

sin

es

s P

lan

ne

xt S

lide

an

d d

isc

uss

WK

A R

isk

Ma

nag

em

en

t Slid

e

I imp

lem

en

ted

a b

usin

ess p

lan

ap

pro

ach

to ris

k m

ana

ge

men

t that w

as in

itially

a o

ne y

ear p

lan

an

d

the

n a

s th

e o

rga

niz

atio

n b

ecam

e m

ore

com

ple

x I e

xp

an

de

d it u

ltima

tely

to 3

ye

ars

as s

om

e o

f ou

r in

itiativ

es c

ou

ld o

r wo

uld

take

mu

ch

lon

ge

r tha

n 1

2 o

r eve

n 2

4 m

on

ths to

de

sig

n a

nd

imp

lem

en

t. It le

d o

ff with

Exp

osu

re ID

-the

n R

isk C

on

trol-th

en

Ris

k F

ina

ncin

g a

nd th

en

Adm

in E

fficie

ncie

s-s

elf is

sue

of in

su

ran

ce

ce

rts-tra

ditio

na

l insu

ran

ce

as w

ell a

s c

aptiv

e.

Pla

n th

e w

ork

-Wo

rk th

e P

lan

E

d a

nd

I firmly

be

lieve

the

2 m

ost im

po

rtan

t ste

ps in

the

Ris

k M

ana

ge

men

t pro

ce

ss a

re th

e firs

t and

las

t-eve

ryth

ing

be

gin

s

with

e

xp

osu

re

ide

ntific

atio

n

and

sta

rts

ove

r a

ga

in

with

e

xp

osu

re

ide

ntific

atio

n. O

rga

niz

atio

ns e

vo

lve

as w

ill exp

osu

re to

loss-in

su

rab

le o

r no

t-1st p

arty

or 3

rd pa

rty.

A ris

k m

an

ag

em

en

t pro

gra

m th

at d

oes

no

t evo

lve

co

nsis

ten

t with

ex

po

su

res

to lo

ss

is lik

ely

a

n in

effe

ctiv

e ris

k m

an

ag

em

en

t p

rog

ram

fo

r th

e o

rgan

iza

tion

. T

ec

hn

iqu

es

lik

e In

su

ran

ce

pu

rch

as

e o

r imp

lem

en

tatio

n o

f a c

ap

tive

ins

ure

r are

no

t risk m

an

ag

em

en

t pro

gra

ms

. Ea

ch

m

ay b

e c

ritica

l co

mp

on

en

t of th

e o

ve

rall ris

k m

an

ag

em

en

t pro

gra

m b

ut a

re n

ot s

ub

stitu

tes

for

the

risk

ma

nag

em

en

t pro

gra

m in

tota

l. 5

. Wh

at D

o W

e m

ea

n b

y E

xp

osu

re

Exp

osu

res to

loss-in

sura

ble

or n

ot-c

ontin

ue

to e

vo

lve

and

ou

r skill s

et m

ust e

vo

lve

as w

ell in

ord

er to

se

rve

our

org

aniz

atio

ns a

s e

ffectiv

e ris

k m

anag

ers

. E

xp

osu

re d

efin

ed

from

IRM

I: “Th

e s

tate

of b

ein

g s

ub

ject to

loss b

eca

use

of s

om

e h

aza

rd o

r co

ntin

ge

ncy”.

6. W

hat d

o w

e m

ea

n “

Ris

k” a

nd

“L

os

s”

Ho

w to

defin

e “ris

k”: IR

MI: a

term

of m

any m

eanin

gs. T

wo

of th

e p

rincip

al m

ean

ing

s a

re 1

. Un

certa

inty

and

2.

A s

ubje

ct o

f insura

nce (e

.g., a

hou

se) (s

om

etim

es a

lso

refe

rred to

as a

n e

xp

osu

re u

nit o

r unit o

f exp

osu

re)

Ris

k d

efin

ed

? IR

MI: S

om

etim

es th

e p

roba

bility

of a

n e

ve

nt. L

et’s

just s

ay th

e p

ossib

ility o

f loss. L

et’s

not

pre

tend

to b

e a

n a

ctu

ary

. It ca

n e

ither h

ap

pe

n o

r it ca

nn

ot h

ap

pe

n. It is

or it is

not. M

ust lo

ok a

t eac

h s

ing

le

exp

os

ure

a

s to

th

e p

oss

ibility

o

f a

n e

ve

nt.

A

SS

UM

E s

om

eth

ing

c

an

o

r c

an

no

t h

ap

pen

a

fter

yo

u

inq

uire

. DO

NO

T S

IMP

LY

AS

SU

ME

IT C

AN

NO

T H

AP

PE

N H

ER

E.

“lo

ss

”: IR

MI: th

e b

asis

of a

cla

im fo

r dam

ag

es u

nd

er th

e te

rms o

f a (in

sura

nce

) polic

y.

Be

tter: re

du

ctio

n in

the v

alu

e o

f an a

sset d

ue to

pe

ril or d

am

ag

es fo

r neg

lige

nt u

se o

f the a

sset.

We

ha

ve

5 s

en

ses

: Sig

ht, S

peec

h, S

me

ll, So

un

d a

nd

Tas

te. L

et’s

co

ns

ide

r ou

r 5 s

en

se

s a

s a

m

ea

ns to

ide

ntify

ex

po

su

re.

7. K

ey P

oin

ts o

f Ris

k M

an

ag

em

en

t

8. S

lide: C

ras

h-B

oo

m-B

an

g

Did

yo

u h

ea

r so

und

s o

r exp

osu

res?

What a

re s

om

e e

xp

osu

res th

at c

om

e to

min

d?

Airp

lan

e c

rash

(dam

age

to b

uild

ing, d

ea

th o

f pa

ssen

ge

rs), (in

terru

ptio

n o

f freig

ht tra

nsit)

Scre

am

s-a

ssa

ult-m

uggin

g (la

ck o

f safe

ty)

Gu

n s

ho

ts (la

ck o

f safe

ty, d

am

age

to b

uild

ings, ro

bbe

ry o

f mon

ey/s

ecu

rities)

4 A

mbu

lan

ce

-on

ca

mp

us o

r off (in

jurie

s o

n c

am

pu

s-in

jurie

s c

au

se

d b

y d

rive

r of c

olle

ge

am

bu

lan

ce

) T

raffic

co

nge

stio

n (p

rob

lem

or s

om

e e

ve

nt o

n c

am

pu

s)

Do

g g

row

ling (la

ck o

f safe

ty a

nd

bre

ach

of c

om

mo

n la

w)

Fire

Ala

rm (d

an

ge

r on

ca

mpu

s, d

an

ge

r from

ne

ar c

am

pu

s, fa

ulty

ala

rm, d

am

age

to b

uild

ing, in

jury

to

pe

rso

n p

ullin

g a

larm

) N

ot a

ll exp

osu

res a

re o

bvio

us.

WK

A

pro

pe

rty

un

de

rwrite

r e

ure

ka

: P

rope

rty

we

se

e

the

a

sse

t a

nd

ca

n

vis

ua

lize

th

e

exp

osu

re.

Ca

su

alty

ma

y n

ot b

e o

bvio

us. M

an

in w

ind

ow

sittin

g a

t de

sk m

ay c

rea

te m

ore

exp

osu

re to

loss th

an

the

bu

ildin

g h

e w

ork

s in

. 9

-10

-11. W

ha

t do

yo

u s

ee

?

12

. Ex

po

su

re Id

en

tifica

tion

Usin

g 5

Se

ns

es

PL

US

1

Sile

nce

do

es n

ot m

ean a

ll is a

t pe

ace

What e

xp

osu

re d

id y

ou s

ee

an

d h

ea

r?

E

mp

loye

e liftin

g h

ea

vy o

bje

ct n

ot p

ayin

g a

tten

tion

to p

rop

er liftin

g m

eth

od

s

B

roke

r curb

in a

he

avy fo

ot tra

ffic a

rea

S

milin

g s

tude

nt ju

st a

cce

pte

d in

to fo

reig

n s

tud

y p

rogra

m in

Ch

ina

W

ithd

raw

n s

tud

en

t dw

ellin

g o

n b

ad

test s

co

re

W

ithd

raw

n s

tud

en

t dw

ellin

g o

n s

exu

al a

ssa

ult

P

are

nt ta

lkin

g to

atto

rne

y a

bo

ut s

exu

al a

ssau

lt of th

eir c

hild

N

ew

sp

ap

er re

po

rter g

ath

erin

g fa

cts

on

ca

mp

us s

exu

al a

ssa

ults

L

ega

l dep

artm

ent c

reatin

g a

ne

w e

ntity

to a

ct a

s s

traw

to p

urc

ha

se

pro

pe

rty n

ea

r cam

pu

s

S

tude

nt d

rive

r with

sp

ee

din

g tic

kets

ge

tting in

to c

olle

ge

va

n to

tran

spo

rt fello

w a

thle

tes

A

dju

nct in

stru

cto

r den

ied

a p

erm

ane

nt p

ositio

n

O

lde

r facu

lty m

em

be

r tha

t ha

s y

et to

rece

ive

ten

ure

B

oa

rd m

em

be

rs v

otin

g to

exp

an

d n

ew

bu

ildin

g w

hile

facin

g fin

an

cia

l ch

alle

nge

s

G

ay s

tud

en

t vid

eo

go

ing v

iral o

n Y

ou

Tube

S

tude

nt h

acke

r ob

tain

ing s

tud

en

t pe

rsona

l info

rma

tion

from

ca

mp

us c

om

pu

ters

F

acu

lty m

em

be

r en

terin

g in

to re

sea

rch g

ran

t for s

om

e ty

pe

of b

io/m

ed

de

vic

e

• B

ein

g a

risk m

anag

er is

not th

e s

am

e a

s b

ein

g ris

k a

dve

rse

. Be

ing c

onscio

us o

f exp

osu

re s

imp

ly m

ean

s

bein

g a

wa

re o

f situ

atio

ns th

at m

ay b

e a

dve

rse

to y

our in

stitu

tion a

nd

if don

e tim

ely

giv

ing

the in

stitu

tion

time

to im

ple

me

nt a

pp

rop

riate

risk m

anag

em

ent te

chn

iqu

es. W

e n

ee

d to

imp

lem

en

t techn

iqu

es c

on

sis

tent

with

the n

ee

ds o

f our in

stitu

tion b

ut c

onsis

tent w

ith o

ur o

wn

feels

of ris

k. T

hin

k in

term

s o

f risk/re

wa

rd a

nd

h

ow

to m

inim

ize

the ris

k a

nd

still re

ap th

e re

wa

rd

• T

he p

ractic

e o

f risk m

an

ag

em

ent is

both

Art a

nd S

cie

nce

. It takes o

ur 5

se

nse

s P

LU

S a

6th s

en

se o

f E

XP

OS

UR

E A

WA

RE

NE

SS

wh

ich

I thin

k is

a c

om

bin

atio

n o

f EX

PE

RIE

NC

E, C

OM

MO

N S

EN

SE

an

d

BU

SIE

NS

S S

EN

SE

to p

erfo

rm th

e a

rt aspe

ct o

f risk m

anag

em

ent. D

eve

lop

ing

a 6

th s

ense

with

in ris

k

ma

nag

em

ent is

ke

y to

first c

reatin

g a

nd

se

con

d m

ain

tain

ing

a ris

k m

anag

em

ent p

rog

ram

that is

effe

ctiv

e

for y

our in

stitu

tion a

nd

one

that s

hou

ld e

vo

lve

with

yo

ur in

stitu

tion

. So

me

wa

ys to

deve

lop a

nd

ma

inta

in

yo

ur 6

th se

nse

.

5 •

We b

elie

ve

ris

k m

anag

em

ent

is b

est

perfo

rmed

a

s a

te

am

sp

ort.

It

take

s a

villa

ge

. Y

OU

a

s ris

k

ma

nag

em

ent n

ee

d te

nta

cle

s in

to th

e o

rga

niz

atio

n. T

alk

to y

our c

olle

ag

ues a

s a

risk m

anag

er n

ot ju

st o

nce

a y

ear to

ga

ther in

sura

nce

rene

wa

l info

rmatio

n.

• W

e b

elie

ve

risk m

anag

em

ent c

ann

ot b

e e

ffectiv

ely

pra

ctic

ed a

s “s

ilo” o

r in a

“so

lo”. L

ea

rn to

iden

tify a

ny

exp

osu

re o

r risk to

yo

ur in

stitu

tion a

nd s

hare

with

those th

at m

ay b

e in

po

sitio

n to

bette

r dea

l with

it than

yo

u. J

ust b

eca

use

yo

u a

re n

ot in

IT o

r HR

doe

s n

ot m

ean

yo

u s

hou

ld a

ssu

me

those

folk

s a

re u

p to

date

w

ith e

xp

osu

res th

at m

ay c

ripple

yo

ur in

stitu

tion fin

ancia

lly o

r by re

puta

tion

. •

Th

e tra

nsitio

n fro

m o

pera

tion

al ris

k m

anag

em

ent to

ente

rpris

e ris

k m

anag

em

ent is

easy. R

isk is

Ris

k.

Th

e 8

0/2

0 A

dag

e: 8

0%

of e

xp

osu

re fa

ce

d b

y a

ny o

rga

niz

atio

n is

sa

me

or s

imila

r to th

at fa

ce

d b

y o

the

r org

aniz

atio

ns in

oth

er in

du

strie

s. T

he tru

e d

iffere

nce

in e

xp

osu

re b

y in

du

stry

ma

y b

e 2

0%

. Th

ere

is m

ore

in

co

mm

on a

s to

loss e

xp

osu

res to

all in

du

strie

s th

en

that w

hic

h is

unco

mm

on: B

uild

ing

s b

urn

, pe

op

le g

et

inju

red

beca

use

of o

pera

tions, p

eo

ple

su

e w

hen

inju

red. E

mp

loye

es s

ue w

hen

term

inate

d, e

tc.

Co

lleg

e a

nd

Un

ive

rsity

ca

mp

use

s a

re lik

e c

ities w

ith m

ore

go

ing

on a

t any o

ne

mo

me

nt th

an

stric

tly e

du

catio

n.

Ca

mp

us s

ecurity

-polic

e; re

sta

ura

nt/fo

od

pre

p a

nd

deliv

ery

, gro

un

ds m

ain

ten

ance

; hea

lth c

are

de

live

ry-o

nsite

clin

ic, h

osp

itals

, me

nta

l he

alth

co

un

selin

g e

ve

n E

MT

am

bu

lance

s; b

roa

dca

stin

g-T

V, ra

dio

, prin

t, we

b;

13. S

lide M

om

en

t of T

ruth

We a

ll talk

ab

out ris

k m

ana

ge

me

nt. In

one

se

nte

nce

to y

ou

rself o

r to a

ll of u

s

• D

escrib

e y

ou

r risk m

ana

ge

men

t pro

gra

m. (E

d w

ill act a

s o

ur s

crib

e).

• S

ingle

stre

ngth

of y

ou

r risk m

ana

ge

me

nt p

rogra

m.

• D

escrib

e h

ow

do

es y

ou

r Bo

ss d

escrib

es y

ou

r risk m

ana

ge

me

nt p

rogra

m.

• D

o y

ou

do

en

ou

gh

expo

su

re id

en

tificatio

n in

yo

ur jo

b?

Are

yo

u a

wa

ke

a

t n

igh

ts w

on

de

ring if

yo

ur

risk m

ana

ge

men

t p

rogra

m is

re

ason

ab

le fo

r yo

ur

co

llege

or u

niv

ers

ity.

• W

hat d

o y

ou k

now

abo

ut y

our b

usin

ess-th

e b

usin

ess o

f co

lleg

e a

nd u

niv

ers

ity o

pe

ratio

ns?

Wha

t are

so

me

of th

e e

xp

osu

res?

• D

escrib

e h

ow

yo

u m

ay a

pp

roa

ch

exp

osu

re id

en

tifica

tion

in y

ou

r risk m

an

age

me

nt p

rogra

m a

fter

yo

u re

turn

to h

om

e b

ase

afte

r this

co

nfe

ren

ce

. (Ed

will a

ct a

s o

ur s

crib

e).

• D

escrib

e h

ow

yo

u m

ay m

ove

from

a s

olo

and

silo

risk m

an

age

r to p

layin

g ris

k m

an

agem

en

t as a

te

am

spo

rt?

14

. Ex

po

su

re T

oo

l Bo

x S

lide

Le

t’s c

reate

an

exp

osure

too

lbo

x. (E

d a

s s

crib

e to

write

do

wn

idea

s)

WK

A/E

F id

ea

s to

be

sh

are

d a

s e

xp

osu

re id

en

tificatio

n to

ols

U

se

a b

usin

ess p

lan

ap

pro

ach

to

yo

ur a

nnu

al g

oa

ls a

nd

ob

jectiv

es m

ake

su

re th

at E

xp

osu

re

Ide

ntific

atio

n is

#1.

E

ntitie

s-S

tate

co

rpo

rate

d

ata

ba

se

. W

KA

clie

nt

(ne

w C

FO

) d

id n

ot

kn

ow

o

rga

niz

atio

n h

ad

2

ad

ditio

na

l entitie

s-fo

und

by lo

okin

g a

t fina

ncia

l rep

ort. O

the

r did

no

t kn

ow

of o

the

r entitie

s a

ctiv

e

an

d in

activ

e (ta

il exp

osu

re) b

ut fo

un

d w

he

n W

KA

revie

we

d c

orp

da

tab

ase

.

T

alk

to

in

-hou

se

e

xp

erts

w

he

n

ava

ilab

le-d

o

no

t ju

mp

to

in

sura

nce

m

echa

nis

m

sim

ply

b

y

co

nclu

din

g o

n y

ou

r ow

n w

e h

ave

an

exp

osu

re-

S

afe

ty ris

k c

om

mitte

es-c

olla

bo

rativ

e effo

rts to

kno

w w

ha

t’s g

oin

g o

n. G

et a

se

at

at th

e ta

ble

(F

lee

t Ope

ratio

na

l Assu

ran

ce

co

mm

ittee

) Le

ga

l sta

ff

6

Rea

d y

ou

r insu

ran

ce

po

licie

s (R

TP

), ob

vio

usly

to u

nd

ers

tan

d c

ove

rage

, bu

t equ

ally

impo

rtan

t to

un

de

rsta

nd

wh

at is

exclu

de

d, lim

ited

, restric

ted

an

d s

o o

n. T

he re

stric

tive

pa

rts o

f an in

su

ran

ce

po

licy p

oin

t ou

t exp

osure

s th

at m

ay 1

-ma

y h

ave

no

t be

en

ide

ntifie

d in

pa

st a

nd

2-th

at m

ay n

eed

to

be

de

alt w

ith w

he

the

r insu

rab

le o

r no

t.

W

alk

aro

und

F

ina

nce

sta

ff-ne

w in

itiativ

es

A

thle

tic-n

ew

initia

tive

s

R

ese

arc

h/g

ran

t ne

w in

itiativ

es (w

ho

will o

wn

pa

tien

ts, B

II issue

s, e

mb

ezzle

me

nt is

sue

s)

C

am

pu

s c

om

pu

ter n

etw

ork

an

d u

se

of c

lou

d (p

riva

cy, b

usin

ess c

on

tinu

ity)

S

tude

nt n

ew

sp

ape

r (libe

l-glo

ba

l issue

s if w

eb

ba

sed

and

effe

ct o

n re

pu

tatio

n)

C

ertific

ate

s o

f insu

rance

-wh

y is

yo

ur firm

be

ing a

ske

d to

pro

vid

e a

co

nfirm

atio

n o

f co

ve

rage

to

oth

er o

rga

niz

atio

n. C

ertific

ate

s o

f Insu

ran

ce

-wh

y is

the

oth

er e

ntity

pro

vid

ing a

co

py to

us?

Wha

t a

re th

ey d

oin

g fo

r yo

ur o

rga

niz

atio

n?

C

lery

R

ep

ort-(w

ha

t d

oe

s th

e in

fo m

ea

n in

te

rms of

rep

uta

tion

a

nd

p

ossib

le effe

ct

on

fu

ture

a

dm

issio

ns)

F

ire s

afe

ty re

po

rts/In

su

ran

ce

co

mp

an

y e

ngin

ee

ring

(do

yo

u g

et th

e s

am

e le

ve

l of in

form

atio

n o

n

yo

ur fo

reig

n c

am

pu

se

s)

R

em

em

be

r th

e ‘6

0’s

sa

yin

g “Q

ue

stio

n a

uth

ority

” w

he

n qu

estio

n in

su

ran

ce

ap

ps-w

ha

t d

o th

ey

me

an

? H

ow

are

qu

estio

ns a

nsw

ere

d?

Lo

ok c

lose

ly a

t Ye

s a

nd

No Q

&A

. Hosp

ital is

sue

re v

ide

o

tap

e-“a

re s

cop

e s

urg

ical p

roce

du

res ro

utin

ely

vid

eo

tape

d?

No. S

oun

ds b

ad. N

o w

e d

o n

ot. B

ut it

turn

ed o

ut th

at th

e h

osp

ital to

ok s

till pic

ture

s o

f the

pro

ced

ure

s. S

o e

xp

osu

re to

insu

rer w

as b

ette

r th

an

first th

ou

gh

t. Ove

rloo

ke

d b

y p

rior ris

k m

an

agem

ent s

taff a

s w

ell a

s c

on

su

lting firm

with

a +

20

ye

ar re

latio

nsh

ip.

Indu

stry

pe

riod

ica

ls: B

I, Ris

k a

nd

Insu

ran

ce

, RIM

S m

aga

zin

e

C

on

ce

rns o

f risk m

ana

ge

men

t pe

ers

in o

the

r ind

ustrie

s: b

an

kin

g, m

an

ufa

ctu

ring, tra

nspo

rtatio

n,

sto

rage

, etc

. The

80

/20

rule

of e

xp

osu

re.

C

rea

te

yo

ur

ow

n

un

iqu

e

risk

ma

na

ge

men

t te

mp

late

-RIM

S,

UR

MIA

, U

E,

AC

OR

D

Ap

ps,

hire

so

meo

ne

to a

ssis

t yo

u. U

se it a

s y

ou

wa

lk th

e c

am

pu

s, re

vie

w y

ou

r we

bsite

, take

it to m

eetin

gs,

dis

cuss is

sue

s a

t regio

na

l UE

, UR

MIA

mee

tings a

nd

so o

n.

L

oo

kin

g fo

r an

d u

nd

ers

tan

din

g e

xp

osu

re to

loss is

no

t the s

am

e a

s b

ein

g ris

k a

dve

rse.

Be

ing

co

gn

itive

of e

xp

osu

re to

loss in

su

rab

le o

r not a

llow

s y

ou

to e

va

luate

on

a ris

k/re

wa

rd b

asis

W

ha

t are

up

an

d c

om

ing

ca

mp

us e

xp

os

ure

s.

What c

an

we

as ris

k m

ana

ge

rs d

o to

lea

rn a

bo

ut th

ese

exp

osu

res, m

ake

su

re tre

atm

en

t is b

ein

g

co

nsid

ere

d w

he

the

r insu

rab

le o

r no?

Are

yo

u c

om

forta

ble

tha

t yo

u u

nd

ers

tan

d th

ese

exp

osu

res

L

oss o

f pe

rson

al in

form

atio

n-h

ard

co

py a

nd

e-fo

rmat

C

am

pu

s v

iole

nce

C

lou

d s

tora

ge

and

loss o

f da

ta a

nd

effe

ct o

n re

se

arc

h

S

tude

nts

ab

roa

d a

nd fo

reig

n h

ou

sin

g

S

tude

nts

and

facu

lty a

bro

ad

-Kid

nap

S

tude

nts

and

facu

lty a

bro

ad

-eva

c fro

m h

ot s

po

ts

A

ge

dis

crim

ina

tion

-em

plo

ye

es-fa

cu

lty a

nd o

the

rs

F

ailu

re to

info

rm s

tud

en

ts o

f poo

r job

pro

spe

cts

for c

erta

in m

ajo

rs

R

ese

arc

h a

nd

or g

ran

t activ

ities c

on

du

cte

d b

y fa

cu

lty-is

the

sch

oo

l vic

ario

usly

liab

le fo

r the

actio

ns

of th

e fa

cu

lty fo

r the

se

en

de

avo

rs

“Ahoy Matey-Take the Tiller and

Maintain Due Course through

Exposure Identification”

Edward Frackiewicz, ARM

Director Risk Management

The Boston Consortium for Higher Education, Olin College

[email protected]

William K. Austin, CRIS

Principal and Consultant

Austin & Stanovich Risk Managers LLC

[email protected]

October 3, 2012

G u i d i n g Yo u Ac r o s s t h e O c e a n o f R i s k URMIA 2012 • Providence

Our Expectations • Become better risk managers through exposure ID skills.

You cannot manage what you do not know!!!

• Class participation-Share stories-when things work and as

well as when things do not work.

• Discussion of risk management topics more important

than colorful PowerPoint Presentation.

• Updated PowerPoint: Add ideas from today!

URMIA?

www.austinstanovich.com by 10/15/12

Boston Consortium?

• .

G u i d i n g Yo u Ac r o s s t h e O c e a n o f R i s k URMIA 2012 • Providence

1. Review and analyze Exposure to loss.

2. Evaluate alternative risk management

techniques.

3. Select the most appropriate/efficient

techniques

4. Implement the chosen techniques.

5. Monitoring the results, revise as required

and start over again with exposure

identification.

The Risk Management Process

G u i d i n g Yo u Ac r o s s t h e O c e a n o f R i s k URMIA 2012 • Providence

Risk Management Process as a Daily Activity

G u i d i n g Yo u Ac r o s s t h e O c e a n o f R i s k URMIA 2012 • Providence

So many definitions-so little time

Exposure defined from IRMI:

“The state of being subject to loss because of

some hazard or contingency”.

What Do We Mean by “Exposure”?

G u i d i n g Yo u Ac r o s s t h e O c e a n o f R i s k URMIA 2012 • Providence

“Risk” from IRMI: “A term of many meanings.

Two of the principal meanings are 1. Uncertainty

and 2. a subject of insurance (e.g. building)

sometimes also referred to as an exposure unit or

unit of exposure.”

“Loss” from IRMI: “the basis of a claim for

damages under the terms of a (insurance) policy.”

Other Definitions/Ideas from the Group

What do we mean by “Risk” and “Loss”

G u i d i n g Yo u Ac r o s s t h e O c e a n o f R i s k URMIA 2012 • Providence

The process starts with exposure identification and comes back

to exposure identification.

Continually check to determine what is new to organization-

growth, new endeavors, new trends in litigation, etc.

Risk management is a team sport: It takes more than a risk

manager to manage risk.

To manage risk one must first manage activities.

What do you do to manage risk through Exposure ID?

Key Points: Risk Management Process

G u i d i n g Yo u Ac r o s s t h e O c e a n o f R i s k URMIA 2012 • Providence

Crash-Boom-Bang

Exposure Identification and the 5 Senses

G u i d i n g Yo u Ac r o s s t h e O c e a n o f R i s k URMIA 2012 • Providence

G u i d i n g Yo u Ac r o s s t h e O c e a n o f R i s k URMIA 2012 • Providence

G u i d i n g Yo u Ac r o s s t h e O c e a n o f R i s k URMIA 2012 • Providence

G u i d i n g Yo u Ac r o s s t h e O c e a n o f R i s k URMIA 2012 • Providence

Silence

Exposure Identification: 5 Senses PLUS 1

G u i d i n g Yo u Ac r o s s t h e O c e a n o f R i s k URMIA 2012 • Providence

• In one sentence describe your risk

management program.

• What is a key strength of your program

• In one sentence how would your Boss

describe your risk management program.

• How do you rate your OVERALL risk

management program?

Moment of Truth

G u i d i n g Yo u Ac r o s s t h e O c e a n o f R i s k URMIA 2012 • Providence

Exposure Tool Box

Entities-for whom do you manage risk

Create networks

Join other’s monthly meeting

Certificates of Insurance

Walking Around

Insurance Applications

Create an exposure survey

External: Peer group, other industries (80/20 Rule)