country portugal profile -...
TRANSCRIPT
COUNTRYPROFILE PORTUGAL
1
WORLD COMPETITIVENESSRANKING 2019
All data are available from theWorld Competitiveness Online.
Visit our eShop
Statistical tables
Factor I: Economic Performance
2
1
BASIC FACTS
Capital
Land area (square km '000) 922018
Exchange Rate (per $) 0.8472018
Population - market size (millions) 10.262018
38
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (US$ billions) 237.92018
43
GDP (PPP) per capita (US$) 32,0772018
36
Real GDP growth (%) 2.12018
45
Consumer price inflation (%) 1.172018
12
Unemployment rate (%) 7.002018
46
Labor force (millions) 5.232018
37
Current account balance (% of GDP) -0.612018
37
Direct investment stocks inward ($bn) 143.62017
37
Direct investment flows inward (% of GDP) 2.042018
34
PEER GROUPS RANKINGSEUROPE - MIDDLE EAST - AFRICA (40 countries) POPULATIONS < 20 MILLION (34 countries)
COMPETITIVENESS TRENDS - OVERALL
PORTUGALOVERALL PERFORMANCE (63 countries) Rank
Lisbon
CHALLENGES IN 2019Keep the structural reduction of public deficit to achieve a
permanent surplus and reduce public debt.
Porto Business School, University of Porto, Porto
COMPETITIVENESS LANDSCAPE
3639 39
33
39
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
55
26
34
48
30
53 51
40
1926
41 4347
54
31
4134 32
2128
Dom
estic
Eco
nom
y
Inte
rnat
iona
l Tra
de
Inte
rnat
iona
l Inv
estm
ent
Empl
oym
ent
Pric
es
Publ
ic F
inan
ce
Tax
Pol
icy
Inst
itutio
nal F
ram
ewor
k
Busi
ness
Leg
isla
tion
Soci
etal
Fra
mew
ork
Prod
uctiv
ity &
Effi
cien
cy
Labo
r M
arke
t
Fina
nce
Man
agem
ent
Prac
tices
Att
itude
s an
d V
alue
s
Basi
c In
fras
truc
ture
Tec
hnol
ogic
al In
fras
truc
ture
Scie
ntifi
c In
fras
truc
ture
Hea
lth a
nd E
nvir
onm
ent
Educ
atio
n
Economic Performance Government Efficiency Business Efficiency Infrastructure
23 26 26 21 26
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
23 23 2421
23
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
• Keep the structural reduction of public deficit to achieve a permanent surplus and reduce public debt.
• Guarantee a stable yet more significant economic growth in a context of international economic constraints.
• Reinforce a national strategy for digital transformation that becomes a cross-sectorial innovation and entrepreneurship reference to the overall Portuguese economy.
• Agreement of major political parties on an education policy emphasising STEM; developing well-educated, responsible citizens able to embrace continuous emerging new technologies.
• Reduce bureaucracy and improve efficiency of judicial system.
Provided by:Porto Business School, University of Porto, Porto
3
2
IMPROVEMENTSWCY 2018
WCY 2019 DECLINES
WCY 2018
2.1.02 Government budget surplus/deficit (%) -2.96 -0.45 1.2.02 Current account balance 0.54
2.5.02 Homicide 1.0 0.6 2.3.08 Exchange rate stability 0.025
1.4.08 Long-term unemployment 5.10 3.60 1.1.18 Gross fixed capital formation - real growth 9.00
1.5.01 Consumer price inflation 1.56 1.17 2.4.14 Start-up days 5.0
1.4.07 Unemployment rate 8.90 7.00 2.3.13 Bribery and corruption 5.00
1.2.12 Exports of commercial services ($bn) 29.15 34.14 2.4.10 Competition legislation 5.84
1.4.09 Youth unemployment 23.90 20.30 1.1.14 Real GDP growth 2.7
4.3.18 Number of patents in force 26.4 30.3 1.1.15 Real GDP growth per capita 2.89
1.2.25 Tourism receipts 6.84 7.81 2.4.11 Parallel economy 6.20
4.4.18 Renewable energies (%) 22.6 25.4 2.1.10 Tax evasion 5.10
2.4.07 Government subsidies 0.45 0.40 3.3.10 Stock market capitalization (%) 32.69
1.2.08 Exports of goods ($bn) 62.21 68.45 3.4.04 Credibility of managers 6.00
4.3.05 Business expenditure on R&D (%) 0.61 0.67 3.5.06 Digital transformation in companies 6.36
1.2.13 Exports of commercial services (%) 14.21 15.57 4.5.01 Total public expenditure on education 6.0
1.1.20 GDP per capita 21,159 23,176 2.2.12 Real personal taxes 3.31
COMPETITIVENESS EVOLUTION & ATTRACTIVENESS INDICATORS
PORTUGALCOMPETITIVENESS EVOLUTION
-0.61
3.78
4.53
2.1
2.33
5.03
4.17
5.0
The criteria below highlight the 15 biggest Improvements and the 15 biggest Declines in the overall performance of the economy. They are
determined by the largest percentage changes in the value of each criterion from one yearbook to the next.
WCY 2019
2.76
KEY ATTRACTIVENESS INDICATORS
From a list of 15 indicators, respondents of the Executive Opinion Survey were asked to select 5 that they perceived as the key
attractiveness factors of their economy. The chart shows the percentage of responses per indicator from the highest number of responses
to the lowest.
0.046
4.37
6.5
26.87
4.94
5.25
2.8%4.2%5.6%6.9%9.7%11.1%18.1%20.8%37.5%38.9%43.1%54.2%68.1%76.4%77.8%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Effective legal environmentCompetency of government
Strong R&D cultureCompetitive tax regime
Quality of corporate governanceAccess to financing
Effective labor relationsDynamism of the economy
High educational levelBusiness-friendly environmentPolicy stability & predictability
Open and positive attitudesReliable infrastructureCost competitiveness
Skilled workforce
4
WORLD COMPETITIVENESSDIGITAL RANKING 2018
All data are available from theWorld Competitiveness Online.
Visit our eShop
2019 release: 24th September
5
Alpha AlphaLabelBeta BetaLabel Gamma GammaLabel1 2 2 2 2 2 24 4 4 2 2
6.5 4 4 2 28.5 4 4 2 2
10.5 4 4 2 2
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
30 29 31 33 32
31 29 31 31 27
33 30 35 37 36
30 31 31 35 32
OVERALL
Future readiness
PEER GROUPS RANKINGS
EUROPE - MIDDLE EAST - AFRICA (40 countries) POPULATIONS < 20 MILLION (34 countries)
COMPETITIVENESS & DIGITAL RANKINGS
Technology
DIGITAL TRENDS - OVERALL
PORTUGAL
OVERALL PERFORMANCE (63 countries)
OVERALL & FACTORS - 5 years
Knowledge
30 29 31 33 32
43 36 39 3933
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Digital
Competitiveness
20 1921 22 21
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
19 1920
2120
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
27 23 27 34
36 19 45 3932
32 35 27 30
Knowledge Talent Training & education Scientific concentration
Technology Regulatory framework Capital Technological framework
Future readiness Adaptive attitudes Business agility IT integration
The direction of the triangle indicates the performance change from the last year: improved or stabledeclined
Overall Factors Sub-Factors
N.B. This graph provides only a comparison of the country’s performance in the two rankings.
6
u Overall top strengths
w Overall top weaknesses
Subfactors 2014 2015 2016 2017 201834 29 31 30 23
21 20 21 18 27
37 37 35 36 34
Talent Rank Rank Rank
Educational assessment PISA - Math 27 w 48 28 International experience 38 13 26 Foreign highly-skilled personnel 21 38 16 Management of cities 21 u 11 31u Digital/Technological skills 11 15 28 Net flow of international students 30 37 46
Subfactors 2014 2015 2016 2017 201822 20 20 19 19
47 44 50 50 45
38 40 38 43 39
Regulatory framework Rank Rank Rank
Starting a business 26 30 u 6 Enforcing contracts 18 29 w 56u Immigration laws 7 41 w 48 Development and app. of technology 24 45 u 12 Scientific research legislation 29 41 33 Intellectual property rights 26 46 w 55
Subfactors 2014 2015 2016 2017 201830 33 31 34 35
30 25 27 40 27
29 30 32 32 30
Adaptive attitudes Rank Rank Rank
E-Participation 40 37 33 Internet retailing 33 13 24 Tablet possession 33 30 36 Smartphone possession 40 w 48 28 Attitudes toward globalization 21 31
Training & education Scientific concentration
Talent
IT integration
Business agility IT integration
Scientific concentration
Capital Technological framework
FACTORS BREAKDOWN - STRENGHTS AND WEAKNESSES
PORTUGAL
FUTURE READINESS
TECHNOLOGY
Technological framework
Opportunities and threats E-GovernmentInnovative firms Public-private partnerships
IT & media stock market capitalization Communications technology
Regulatory framework
Capital
KNOWLEDGE
Agility of companies Cyber securityUse of big data and analytics Sofware piracyKnowledge transfer
Adaptive attitudes
Business agility
Venture capital Internet bandwidth speedInvestment in Telecommunications High-tech exports (%)
Funding for technological development Mobile Broadband subscribersBanking and financial services Wireless broadbandInvestment risk Internet users
Training & education
Employee training Total expenditure on R&D (%)Total public expenditure on education Total R&D personnel per capitaHigher education achievement Female researchersPupil-teacher ratio (tertiary education) R&D productivity by publicationGraduates in Sciences Scientific and technical employmentWomen with degrees High-tech patent grants
7
WORLD TALENTRANKING 2018
All data are available from theWorld Competitiveness Online.
Visit our eShop
2019 release: 19th November
8
Alpha AlphaLabel Beta BetaLabel Gamma GammaLabel1 2 2 2 2 2 24 4 4 2 2
Value
6.0 % 13u 29.3 % 3 13.70 ratio 25 9.85 ratio 10 5.03 Survey [0..10] 24w 5.16 Survey [0..10] 48u 48.91 % 5 7.08 Survey [0..10] 22
Value
65.30 index 19 6.58 Survey [0..10] 33 5.86 Survey [0..10] 33 5.14 Survey [0..10] 29 8.25 Survey [0..10] 21 6.07 Survey [0..10] 21w 19,069 US$ 35w 156,994 US$ 33 18.02 % 30 8.23 Survey [0..10] 16
Value
0.79 % 31u 6.54 Survey [0..10] 8 6.70 Survey [0..10] 25w 5.12 Survey [0..10] 38 5.64 Survey [0..10] 31 7.07 Survey [0..10] 13 6.43 Survey [0..10] 14 7.45 Survey [0..10] 14u 7.55 Survey [0..10] 8u 8.52 Survey [0..10] 5w 1.63 number 37 496 Average 22
Investment & Development 2018 Rank
Health infrastructure meets the needs of society
2018 Rank
Total public expenditure on education Percentage of GDP
ApprenticeshipsEmployee training is a high priority in companies
Readiness 2018 Rank
Educational assessment - PISA PISA survey of 15-year olds
Appeal
Personal security and private property rights are adequately protected
Management education meets the needs of the business community
Language skills are meeting the needs of enterprises
Student mobility inbound Foreign tertiary-level students per 1000 inhabitants
Educational system The educational system meets the needs of a competitive economy
Science in schools is sufficiently emphasized
University education meets the needs of a competitive economy
are readily available
International experience of senior managers is generally significant
Competent senior managers are readily available
PORTUGAL
Remuneration in services professions Gross annual income including supplements such as bonuses, US$
Remuneration of management Total base salary plus bonuses and long-term incentives, US$
Effective personal income tax rate Percentage of an income equal to GDP per capita
Brain drain (well-educated and skilled people) does not hinder competitiveness in your economy
Quality of life is high
Foreign highly-skilled personnel are attracted to your country's business environment
Attracting and retaining talents is a priority in companies
Worker motivation in companies is high
Index of a basket of goods & services in the main city, including housing (New York City = 100)
Government expenditure on education per studentPercentage of GDP per capita (secondary education)
Pupil-teacher ratio (primary education) Ratio of students to teaching staff
Pupil-teacher ratio (secondary education) Ratio of students to teaching staff
are sufficiently implemented
Female labor force Percentage of total labor force
Labor force growth Percentage change
Skilled labor is readily available
Finance skills
Cost-of-living index
IMD World Talent Ranking 2018
OVERALL PERFORMANCE (63 countries)
26
22
25 24
17
6 68 7 7
41
37
40
36
29
46
3331 31
22
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Overall
Investment &Development
Appeal
Readiness
7
2917
22
Investment & Development
Appeal
Readiness
The direction of the triangle indicates the performance change from the last year: improved or stabledeclined
IMD
, IMD
INTE
RNAT
ION
AL R
EAL
WOR
LD. R
EAL
LEAR
NIN
G, IM
D B
USI
NES
S SC
HOO
L an
d IM
D W
ORLD
COM
PETI
TIVE
NES
S YE
ARB
OOK
are
trade
mar
ks o
f IM
D –
Inte
rnat
iona
l Ins
titut
e fo
r Man
agem
ent D
evel
opm
ent.
©IM
D 2
017
IMD SwitzerlandChemin de Bellerive 23 P.O. Box 915CH-1001 Lausanne SwitzerlandCentral tel: +41 21 618 01 11
IMD SingaporeIMD SE Asia Pte. LtdSouth Beach Tower38 Beach Road #17-11Singapore 189767Central tel: +65 6715 9988
Connect with us
Developing leaders Transforming organizations Impacting your future
IMD is ranked in open programs worldwide – 7 years in a row.Financial Times 2012 – 2018
Talk with us+41 21 618 07 00 [email protected]