counter forensics multimedia investigations darren chaker

Upload: counterforensics

Post on 07-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    1/62

    Multimedia Forensics is notComputer Forensics

    Rainer Bohme, Felix Freiling, Thomas Gloe, Matthias Kirchner

    Technische Universitat Dresden Universitat Mannheim

    International Workshop on Computational Forensics 2009 (IWCF09)

    The Hague 2009/8/14

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    2/62

    Outline

    1 Multimedia forensics and computer forensics

    2Multimedia forensics is not computer forensics

    3 Counter-forensics

    4 And how does this all relate to practice?

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 2 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    3/62

    Multimedia forensicsA science to assess the authenticity of digital media objects

    manipulation detection and source device identification based on

    artifacts of processing operations

    resampling copy & paste inconsistent lightning double compression

    characteristics of the source devicee. g. digital camera

    scene

    lens

    filter R

    G

    G

    B

    sensorcolor

    interpolation

    postprocessing

    digital imagelens

    distortionCFA layout

    hot pixels,sensor noise

    interpolationscheme

    quantizationtable

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 3 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    4/62

    Multimedia forensics: Examples

    digital camera identification

    based on sensor noise

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 4 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    5/62

    Multimedia forensics: Examples

    digital camera identificationbased on sensor noise

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 4 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    6/62

    Multimedia forensics: Examples

    digital camera identificationbased on sensor noise

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 4 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    7/62

    Multimedia forensics: Examples

    digital camera identificationbased on sensor noise

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 4 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    8/62

    Multimedia forensics: Examples

    digital camera identificationbased on sensor noise

    copy & paste detection

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 4 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    9/62

    Multimedia forensics: Examples

    digital camera identificationbased on sensor noise

    copy & paste detection

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 4 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    10/62

    By the way,what is computer forensics?

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    11/62

    Computer forensics

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 6 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    12/62

    Computer forensics

    01

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 6 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    13/62

    Computer forensics

    11

    52 51 51 51 49

    49 40 36 34 33

    55 48 40 33 23

    62 58 45 33 22

    66 62 53 34 22

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensicsslide 6 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    14/62

    Computer forensics

    10

    52 51 51 51 49

    49 40 36 34 33

    55 48 40 33 23

    62 58 45 33 22

    66 62 53 34 22

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensicsslide 6 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    15/62

    Outline

    1 Multimedia forensics and computer forensics

    2 Multimedia forensics is not computer forensics

    3 Counter-forensics

    4 And how does this all relate to practice?

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensicsslide 7 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    16/62

    Digital forensics: proposed ontology

    forensics

    digital forensics

    computerforensics

    multimediaforensics

    analog forensics

    digital evidence physical evidence

    0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 00 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 00 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 00 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 01 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 00 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 11 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 8 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    17/62

    Digital forensics: proposed ontology

    forensics

    digital forensics

    computerforensics

    multimediaforensics

    analog forensics

    digital evidence physical evidence

    1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 11 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 00 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 10 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 11 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 00 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1

    finite sequence of discrete andperfectly observable symbols

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 8 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    18/62

    The following slides

    intentionally draw a veryblack-and-white

    picture

    WARNING!

    ing slides

    draw a veryd-white

    ure

    ING!

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    19/62

    Computer forensics = Multimedia forensics

    computer forensics multimedia forensicsphysical evidence

    WWW

    10111 0 0 1

    digital evidence

    physical evidence

    10111 0 0 1

    digital evidence

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 10 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    20/62

    Computer forensics = Multimedia forensics

    computer forensics multimedia forensicsphysical evidence

    WWW

    WWW

    10111 0 0 1

    digital evidence

    physical evidence

    10111 0 0 1

    digital evidence

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 10 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    21/62

    Computer forensics = Multimedia forensics

    computer forensics multimedia forensicsphysical evidence

    WWW

    WWW

    10111 0 0 1

    digital evidence

    physical evidence

    10111 0 0 1

    digital evidence

    digital evidence is not linkedto the outside world

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 10 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    22/62

    Computer forensics = Multimedia forensics

    computer forensics multimedia forensicsphysical evidence

    WWW

    WWW

    10111 0 0 1

    digital evidence

    physical evidence

    10111 0 0 1

    digital evidence

    digital evidence is not linkedto the outside world

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 10 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    23/62

    Computer forensics = Multimedia forensics

    computer forensics multimedia forensicsphysical evidence

    WWW

    WWW

    10111 0 0 1

    digital evidence

    physical evidence

    10111 0 0 1

    digital evidence

    digital evidence is not linkedto the outside world

    digital evidence is linkedto the outside world

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 10 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    24/62

    Computer forensics: A closer look

    digital

    data

    processing

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 11 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    25/62

    Computer forensics: A closer look

    digital

    data

    processingsuspicious

    traces?

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 11 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    26/62

    Computer forensics: A closer look

    reality

    digital

    data

    processingsuspicious

    traces?

    digital evidence is stored in the

    finite automaton each computer

    represents

    number of states in a closed

    system is finite

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 11 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    27/62

    Computer forensics: A closer look

    reality

    digital

    data

    processingsuspicious

    traces?

    digital evidence is stored in the

    finite automaton each computer

    represents

    number of states in a closed

    system is finite

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 11 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    28/62

    Computer forensics: A closer look

    reality

    digital

    data

    processingsuspicious

    traces?

    digital evidence is stored in the

    finite automaton each computer

    represents

    number of states in a closed

    system is finite

    non-negligible chance that a

    computer is left in a state which

    perfectly erases all traces

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 11 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    29/62

    Multimedia forensics: A closer look

    digital media

    object

    processing

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 12 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    30/62

    Multimedia forensics: A closer look

    digital media

    object

    processingoriginal?

    source

    (device) ?

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 12 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    31/62

    Multimedia forensics: A closer look

    digital media

    object

    processing

    sensor

    original?

    source

    (device) ?

    sensors capture parts of the reality and

    transform them into digital representations

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 12 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    32/62

    Multimedia forensics: A closer look

    digital media

    object

    processing

    sensor

    original?

    source

    (device) ?

    sensors capture parts of the reality and

    transform them into digital representations

    reality is incognizable: ultimate knowledge

    whether a piece of digital media reflectsreality or not cannot exist

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 12 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    33/62

    Multimedia forensics: A closer look

    digital media

    object

    processing

    sensor

    original?

    source

    (device) ?

    sensors capture parts of the reality and

    transform them into digital representations

    reality is incognizable: ultimate knowledge

    whether a piece of digital media reflectsreality or not cannot exist

    multimedia forensics = empirical science

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 12 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    34/62

    Sensors: A source of uncertainty

    projection of reality to discrete symbols means a dimensionality reduction

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 13 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    35/62

    Sensors: A source of uncertainty

    projection of reality to discrete symbols means a dimensionality reduction multimedia forensics has to cope with an additional source of uncertainty

    degrees of freedom

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 13 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    36/62

    Sensors: A source of uncertainty

    projection of reality to discrete symbols means a dimensionality reduction multimedia forensics has to cope with an additional source of uncertainty

    what kind of common

    post-processing is

    legitimate / tolerable?

    ?

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 13 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    37/62

    Models: Yet another dimensionality reduction

    models make projection of reality todiscrete symbols tractable with formal

    methods

    typical models in multimedia forensics:

    sensor noise follows a Gaussian distribution connected regions of identical pixel values are

    unlikely to occur in original images

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 14 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    38/62

    Models: Yet another dimensionality reduction

    models make projection of reality todiscrete symbols tractable with formal

    methods

    typical models in multimedia forensics:

    sensor noise follows a Gaussian distribution connected regions of identical pixel values are

    unlikely to occur in original images

    p

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 14 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    39/62

    Models: Yet another dimensionality reduction

    models make projection of reality todiscrete symbols tractable with formal

    methods

    typical models in multimedia forensics:

    sensor noise follows a Gaussian distribution connected regions of identical pixel values are

    unlikely to occur in original images

    p

    projection to a1-dimensionalvariable

    models of reality function as yet another dimensionality reduction

    quality of forensic methods depends on the quality of the employed model!

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 14 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    40/62

    Models: Yet another dimensionality reduction

    models make projection of reality todiscrete symbols tractable with formal

    methods

    typical models in multimedia forensics:

    sensor noise follows a Gaussian distribution connected regions of identical pixel values are

    unlikely to occur in original images

    p

    projection to a1-dimensionalvariable

    models of reality function as yet another dimensionality reduction

    quality of forensic methods depends on the quality of the employed model!

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 14 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    41/62

    Outline

    1 Multimedia forensics and computer forensics

    2 Multimedia forensics is not computer forensics

    3 Counter-forensics

    4 And how does this all relate to practice?

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 15 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    42/62

    Digital forensics: proposed ontology

    forensics

    digital forensics

    computerforensics multimediaforensics

    analog forensics

    digital evidence physical evidence

    0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 01 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 00 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 10 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 11 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 01 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 11 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 00 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 01 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1

    forgeability

    counter-forensics

    b=

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 16 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    43/62

    Digital forensics: proposed ontology

    forensics

    digital forensics

    computerforensics multimediaforensics

    analog forensics

    digital evidence physical evidence

    0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 01 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 10 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 00 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 01 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 01 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 10 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0

    forgeability

    counter-forensics

    b=

    physical evidence cannot be wrong,

    it cannot perjure itself,

    it cannot be wholly absent

    Kirk (1953)

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 16 of 24

    C f i C f i

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    44/62

    Counter-forensics: Computer forensics

    leavetraces

    valid state invalid state

    C f i C f i

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    45/62

    Counter-forensics: Computer forensics

    leavetraces

    eliminatetraces

    valid state invalid state valid state

    C t f i C t f i

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    46/62

    Counter-forensics: Computer forensics

    leavetraces

    eliminatetraces

    valid state invalid state valid state

    valid states are perfectly known

    or can be recorded before

    C t f i C t f i

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    47/62

    Counter-forensics: Computer forensics

    leavetraces

    eliminatetraces

    preemptivelyavoid traces

    valid state invalid state valid state

    valid states are perfectly known

    or can be recorded before

    C t f i C t f i

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    48/62

    Counter-forensics: Computer forensics

    leavetraces

    eliminatetraces

    preemptivelyavoid traces

    valid state invalid state valid state

    valid states are perfectly known

    or can be recorded before

    virtualization in a larger system

    Counter forensics: Multimedia forensics

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    49/62

    Counter-forensics: Multimedia forensics

    leavetraces

    eliminatetraces

    preemptivelyavoid traces

    valid state invalid state valid state

    valid states are perfectly known

    or can be recorded before

    virtualization in a larger system

    invalidity depends on

    the model of reality

    Counter forensics: Multimedia forensics

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    50/62

    Counter-forensics: Multimedia forensics

    leavetraces

    eliminatetraces

    preemptivelyavoid traces

    valid state invalid state valid state

    valid states are not perfectly known

    or can be recorded before

    and cannot be recorded before

    virtualization in a larger system is not possible

    invalidity depends on

    the model of reality

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 18 of 24

    Digital forensics: proposed ontology

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    51/62

    Digital forensics: proposed ontology

    forensics

    digital forensics

    computer

    forensicsmultimedia

    forensics

    analog forensics

    0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 11 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 00 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 10 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 11 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 10 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 01 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

    forgeability

    counter-forensics

    b=

    perfect crime

    possiblecompete for

    the best model

    perfect crime

    impossible

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 19 of 24

    Outline

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    52/62

    Outline

    1 Multimedia forensics and computer forensics

    2 Multimedia forensics is not computer forensics

    3 Counter-forensics

    4 And how does this all relate to practice?

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 20 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    53/62

    Computer forensics in a broader sense

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    54/62

    Computer forensics in a broader sense

    computers interact with their environment

    physical evidence

    WWW

    WWW

    10111 0 0 1

    digital evidenceWWW

    WWW

    WWW

    WWW

    WWW

    WWW

    computers can be part of a network

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 21 of 24

    Computer forensics in a broader sense

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    55/62

    Computer forensics in a broader sense

    computers interact with their environment

    physical evidence

    WWW

    WWW

    10111 0 0 1

    digital evidenceWWW

    WWW

    WWW

    WWW

    WWW

    WWW

    computers can be part of a network

    computers can be sensors itself

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 21 of 24

    Computer forensics in a broader sense

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    56/62

    Computer forensics in a broader sense

    computers interact with their environment

    physical evidence

    WWW

    WWW

    10111 0 0 1

    digital evidenceWWW

    WWW

    WWW

    WWW

    WWW

    WWW

    computers can be part of a network

    computers can be sensors itself

    computers leave physical evidence

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 21 of 24

    (Finally) A more practical view

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    57/62

    (Finally) A more practical view

    2

    2

    IWCF 09

    2A

    3

    3

    IWCF 09

    3A

    4

    4

    IWCF 09

    4A

    5

    5

    IWCF 09

    5A

    6

    6

    IWCF 09

    6A7

    7

    IWCF 09

    7A

    8

    8

    IWCF 09

    8A

    9

    9

    IWCF 09

    9A

    10

    10

    IWCF 09

    10A

    11

    11

    IWCF 09

    11A

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 22 of 24

    Concluding remarks

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    58/62

    Concluding remarks

    forensic examinations include techniques from a variety of forensic sciences

    important differences in the underlying assumptions between different methods are

    blurred by practice

    in particular: digital evidence = digital evidence (= physical evidence):

    digital evidence in computer forensics is not linked to the outside world whereas

    in multimedia forensics it is effects the reliability of forensic methods

    furture work: rigorous probabilistic modeling

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 23 of 24

    Concluding remarks

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    59/62

    Co c ud g e a s

    forensic examinations include techniques from a variety of forensic sciences

    important differences in the underlying assumptions between different methods are

    blurred by practice

    in particular: digital evidence = digital evidence (= physical evidence):

    digital evidence in computer forensics is not linked to the outside world whereas

    in multimedia forensics it is effects the reliability of forensic methods

    furture work: rigorous probabilistic modeling

    reality is ultimately incognizable, but

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 23 of 24

    Concluding remarks

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    60/62

    g

    forensic examinations include techniques from a variety of forensic sciences

    important differences in the underlying assumptions between different methods are

    blurred by practice

    in particular: digital evidence = digital evidence (= physical evidence):

    digital evidence in computer forensics is not linked to the outside world whereas

    in multimedia forensics it is effects the reliability of forensic methods

    furture work: rigorous probabilistic modeling

    reality is ultimately incognizable, but

    your comments will help to gain a more comprehensive view on it

    The Hague, 2009/8/14 Multimedia Forensics is not Computer Forensics slide 23 of 24

  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    61/62

    Thanks for your attention

    Questions?

    Rainer Bohme, Felix Freiling, Thomas Gloe, Matthias Kirchner

    Technische Universitat Dresden Universitat Mannheim

    Matthias Kirchner gratefully receives a doctorate scholarship fromDeutsche Telekom Stiftung, Bonn, Germany.

    Image sources

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/6/2019 Counter Forensics Multimedia Investigations Darren Chaker

    62/62

    Iranian missile test (4) http://www.spiegel.de

    hard drive (6) http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_hard-drive.jpg

    floppy disk (11,17) http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Desktop_icons

    core memory (11) http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KL_CoreMemory.jpg

    multimedia (12,18) http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Desktop_icons

    fingerprints (22) https://reader009.{domain}/reader009/html5/0515/5afa059577e25/5afa05b6f045e.jpg

    handcuffs (22) http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Handcuffs01_2003-06-02.jpg

    http://www.spiegel.de/http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_hard-drive.jpghttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Desktop_iconshttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KL_CoreMemory.jpghttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Desktop_iconshttp://www.lanl.gov/news/albums/chemistry/fingerprint.jpghttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Handcuffs01_2003-06-02.jpghttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Handcuffs01_2003-06-02.jpghttp://www.lanl.gov/news/albums/chemistry/fingerprint.jpghttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Desktop_iconshttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KL_CoreMemory.jpghttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Desktop_iconshttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_hard-drive.jpghttp://www.spiegel.de/