council evidence, rezoning - manukau and highbrook

BEFORE THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL

IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991

and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010

AND

IN THE MATTER of TOPIC 081f Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas)

AND

IN THE MATTER of the submissions and further submissions set out in the Parties and Issues Report

JOINT EVIDENCE REPORT ON SUBMISSIONS

BY ANNA JENNINGS, ROGER ECCLES AND DAVID WONG

SOUTH – HIGHBROOK AND MANUKAU CENTRAL CITY BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY

26 JANUARY 2016

1

GLOSSARY OF TERMS Abbreviation Business Park BP City Centre CC Countryside Living CL Future Urban FU General Business GB Heavy Industry HI Height Sensitive Areas HSA Historic Character HC Large Lot LL Light Industry LI Local Centre LC Metropolitan Centre MC Mixed Housing Suburban MHS Mixed Housing Urban MHU Mixed Rural MR Mixed Use MU National Grid Corridor NGC Neighbourhood Centre NC Outstanding Natural Feature ONF Outstanding Natural Landscape ONL Pre-1944 Building Demolition Control Pre-1944 BDC Public Open Space POS Rapid and/or frequent service network RFN Rural and Coastal Settlement RCS Rural Coastal RC Rural Conservation RCon Rural Production RP Rural Urban Boundary RUB Significant Ecological Areas SEA Single House SH Special Purpose SP Strategic Transport Corridor STC Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings

THAB

Town Centre TC Volcanic Viewshafts VV

2

1. SUMMARY

1.1 The purpose of this Joint Evidence Report (Report) is to consider submissions and

further submissions to the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) Topic 081

Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas) (Topic 081). This Report considers

submissions and further submissions that were received by Auckland Council (the Council) in relation to zoning of Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and

Industry.

1.2 This evidence covers the geographical areas of Highbrook, Manukau and Puhunui.

These areas have similar zoning themes due to the large portion of land zoned Heavy

Industry and Light Industry. Highbrook is bounded by the East Tamaki River and

Manukau and Puhunui by the Manukau Harbour.

1.3 A total of 142 submission points have been received by the Council in relation to the

PAUP zoning within Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry. The

area has been divided into the following 2 sub areas:

• S3 area – Botany, East Tamaki, Highbrook (25 submission points)

• S10 area – Manukau City Centre, Rata Vine, Great South Road, Browns Road

(117 submission points)

1.4 The Report states whether or not we support the submissions, in full or in part, and

identifies what amendments, if any, should be made to address matters raised in

submissions.

1.5 In response to these submission points which either seek to amend or retain zoning,

an assessment was made against the relevant PAUP objectives and policies of the

relevant zone/s, the Regional Policy Statement (RPS), and local and regional context

to determine whether the requests are supported or rejected. As a result of the

assessment, our position is broadly as follows:

Where:

(a) Submissions seek retention of the zone and where this is the most

appropriate way to achieve the objectives and policies of the PAUP zone(s)

and gives effect to the RPS, retention is supported.

(b) Submissions seek to rezone sites to a higher or lower residential zone,

consideration has been given to the PAUP objectives and policies of the

3

notified and sought zone(s), the RPS and local context. We support changes

to zoning where the zoning complements the local context, and/or is the most

appropriate way to achieve the objectives and policies of the zone, and/or

gives effect to the RPS.

(c) Submissions seek to make changes to business zoned land, the requests are

assessed against the relevant zone objectives and policies, the RPS, the

context of the site and its surroundings and the potential economic growth and

viability of the area. We support changes to zoning where the zoning

complements the local context, and/or is the most appropriate way to achieve

the objectives and policies of the zone, and/or gives effect to the RPS.

(d) Submissions seek to rezone sites from Light Industry or Large Lot zone as a

consequence of the Council’s position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui.

1.6 As a result of the rezoning analysis undertaken, we propose a number of zoning

changes. Where we have not supported changes proposed in submissions we have

outlined reasons to justify our positions.

1.7 Attachment B to this Report sets out the analysis and planners' position with regard to

the themes raised in submissions requesting relief in relation to the zoning of

Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry. Attachment C contains

the analysis and the planners' proposed position against each submission point and

proposed changes to the zoning maps. Attachment D addresses area wide

submissions, on which we have relied in proposing a number of in scope area-wide or

street-wide changes to the notified zones.

1.8 Attachment E contains two maps for each of the geographic submission area units

within Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry: the PAUP zones

as notified but with properties identified that are subject to submissions; and the zoning

changes now proposed by the Council, with in-scope and out of scope changes

identified. Proposed changes that are within scope are shown as black outline, while

those that are out of scope are shown as blue outline. The out of scope changes

proposed are set out in Attachment F, together with the reasons for them.

4

PART A: OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND

2. INTRODUCTION

2.1 The purpose of this Report is to consider submissions and further submissions that

were received by the Council in relation to zoning of Highbrook and Manukau Central

City Business and Industry (as shown in Figure 1). These areas have been grouped

together as they are predominately zoned for business or industry and have similar

zoning themes. The evidence of Mr Marc Dendale for Auckland Council Topic 081

Geographic rezoning includes a full description of the areas covered in this Report.

Figure 1: Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry

5

2.2 Highbrook is one of the largest industrial areas in Auckland and is located in the

Howick Local Board Area. It is bounded by Ti Rakau Drive, Ti Iriangi Drive and

intersected by Harris Road, Highbrook Drive and Springs Road. The area is relatively

flat and juts out into the Tamaki Estuary which provides a coastal edge. It has good

transport connections for trucks and goods to State Highway 1 – heading north and

south. Connector bus routes run along Cryers Road and Highbrook Drive.

2.3 The centre of the area is zoned HI, surrounded by a sleeve of LI. The type of business

activity vary across the area from office/business park, warehousing, distribution to

heavy industry. Several large industrial companies have headquarters within

Highbrook.

2.4 Along the edges of the area fronting Ti Rakau Drive and Te Irirangi Drive the type of

use changes to larger scale retail and commercial including large format DIY

companies. Closer to Botany Town Centre, the zoning changes from industrial to

residential with THAB, MHS and MHU along Te Irirangi Drive and MU adjacent to the

Centre. Manukau City is the main commercial centre for southern Auckland. It is zoned

MC and serviced by two major transport routes, State Highway 1 and State Highway

20 and has a rail connection to the Auckland CBD. West and North of the Centre is a

significant area of GB zoning and to the South West Wiri provides a large are of

industrial zoned land. There are also residential areas around Rata Vine Drive, Trevor

Hoskins and Inverell Avenues to the South East of the Centre.

2.5 The Puhinui area comprises about 1,100 hectares and is located adjacent to the

South-Western Motorway to the east, and in close proximity to Auckland International

Airport to the west. It is largely zoned RP in the PAUP, and lies outside the RUB as

notified. The area includes the Manukau Memorial Gardens (Cemetery), Colin Dale

Park and Puhinui Reserve. The Council has undertaken structuring planning for the

Puhinui area, which has informed its position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui, and

to provide additional land for future urban development.

2.6 The structure planning work has confirmed that parts of the Puhinui area can be

urbanised, subject to robust and more restrictive planning provisions to recognise and

protect significant archaeological, cultural heritage, and environmental values and to

respond to development constraints associated with the operation of Auckland

International Airport and the capacity of the transport network.

2.7 Precinct provisions will apply to the live zones, which address when and how

development can occur.

6

2.8 Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry area contains seven

precincts as follows:

(a) Waiouru

(b) East Tamaki

(c) Wiri 1

(d) Wiri 2

(e) Wiri 3

(f) Manukau

(g) Puhunui

2.9 We note that submission points on the precinct provisions are addressed in the

separate precinct Evidence Reports prepared by Michelle Perwick, Jeremy Wyatt,

Anna Jennings, Vrinda Moghe and Sukhdeep Singh.

2.10 This Report has been prepared Anna Jennings, Roger Eccles and David Wong. The

qualifications and experience of the Report writers are attached in Attachment A.

2.11 This Report states whether or not we support the submissions, in full or in part, and

identifies what amendments, if any, should be made to address matters raised in

submissions.

Analysis of Submissions by Planners

2.12 Submission points on sub area unit S3 (Highbrook) were addressed by Anna Jennings.

2.13 Submission points on sub area unit S10 (Manukau and Puhunui) were addressed by

Roger Eccles and David Wong.

3. CODE OF CONDUCT

3.1 We confirm that we have read the Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses contained in

the Environment Court Practice Note 2014 and that we agree to comply with it. We

confirm that we have considered all the material facts that we are aware of that might

alter or detract from the opinions that we express, and that this Report is within our

area of expertise, except where we state that we are relying on the evidence of another

person.

7

4. SCOPE

4.1 We are providing planning evidence in relation to Highbrook and Manukau Central City

Business and Industry rezoning submissions.

4.2 In preparing this Report we have relied on the Auckland-wide evidence of John Duguid

for Topic 080 Rezoning and Precincts (General) (Topic 080) and Topic 081, which

sets out the statutory framework, methodology, principles, and section 32 evaluations,

used to guide the development and application of zones and precincts.

4.3 In preparing this Report we have also relied on the statement of evidence of Marc

Dendale for Topic 081f Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas) - South, which

sets out a sub-regional overview of the South area including an area description of the

area, overview of key infrastructure and transformation projects, and a summary of the

precincts and rezoning outcomes in the South area.

4.4 The following expert statements of evidence have been relied on in preparing our

Report:

(a) Alastair Cribbens, Steve Wrenn and Liam Winter, Public Transport (Auckland

Transport);

(b) Mark Bourne, Water Infrastructure Planning (Watercare Services Ltd);

(c) Anthony Reidy, Zoning of Roads;

(d) David Mead, Flooding and Natural Hazards ;

(e) Deborah Rowe, Historic Heritage and the Pre-1944 Overlay ;

(f) Lisa Mein, Historic Character; and

(g) Peter Reaburn, Volcanic Viewshafts and Height Sensitive Areas.

5. STATUTORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK

5.1 The statutory framework is detailed in Section 5 of the evidence of Mr Duguid, dated 3

December 2015, and has not been repeated here.

5.2 Paragraph 5.12 of Mr Duguid's zoning evidence identifies the provisions of the New

Zealand Coastal Policy Statement of particular relevance to zoning, while paragraphs

5.13 to 5.21 address the provisions of the Auckland Plan. Section 6 then discusses

the key sections of the RPS, as amended by the Council's current position, which need

8

to be considered and given effect to through the application of zones (and precincts).

Again, we do not repeat Mr Duguid's evidence here. However, of particular relevance

to the planners' proposed positions relating to Highbrook and Manukau Central City

Business and Industry are the following RPS provisions discussed at paragraph 6.2 of

Mr Duguid's evidence (with specific paragraph references in brackets):

(a) B2.1 Providing for growth in a quality compact urban form – Objectives 1 and 3

and Policy 2 (paragraph 6.2(a)).

(b) B2.2 A Quality Built Environment – Objective 1B (paragraph 6.2(b)).

(c) B2.3 Development Capacity and Supply of land for urban development –

Objective 2 (paragraph 6.2(c)).

(d) B3.1 Commercial and Industrial Growth – Objective 1 (paragraph 6.2(g)).

(e) B.3.2 Significant infrastructure – Objectives 5 and 6 (paragraph 6.2(h)).

(f) B3.3 Transport – Objective 2 (paragraph 6.2(i)).

(g) B4.1 Historic heritage – Objective 1 (paragraph 6.2(j)).

(h) B4.2 Special (Historic) character – Objectives 1, 3 and 4 (paragraph 6.2(k)).

(i) B4.3.1 Natural character – Objective 1 (paragraph 6.2(l)).

(j) B4.3.2 Landscape and Natural Features – Objective 7 (paragraph 6.2(m)).

(k) B6.7 Natural hazards – Objective 1 (paragraph 6.2(s)).

(l) B7.1 Subdivision, use and development in the coastal environment – Objective

5 and Policy 2A (paragraph 6.2(t)).

6. INTERIM GUIDANCE FROM THE PANEL

6.1 We have read the Panel’s Interim Guidance and in particular those relating to:

(a) Chapter G: General Provisions, dated 9 March 2015;

(b) Best practice approaches to re-zoning and precincts, dated 31 July 2015;

(c) Air Quality, dated 25 September 2015; and

(d) Chapter G General Provisions, dated 9 October 2015.

9

(e) Chapter G: Regional and District Rules, dated 9 October 2015.

6.2 The Panel’s Interim Guidance on best practice approaches to re-zoning and precincts

sets out best practice approaches to changing zoning and precincts and Air Quality. I

support the Panel’s guidance.

7. APPROACH TO ZONING WITHIN THE PAUP

7.1 As noted above, the Council’s zoning principles are set out in Mr Duguid’s evidence

about zoning for Topics 80 and 81 dated 3 December 2015. The Council’s approach

to zoning is also detailed in Mr Duguid’s evidence in paragraphs 5.3-5.11. We have

read and agree with this evidence.

Section 32 and 32AA

7.2 Section 32AA of the RMA requires a further evaluation for any changes that are

proposed to the notified zones since the original Auckland Unitary Plan Evaluation

Report (the Evaluation Report) was completed under section 32. All of the

amendments to the notified PAUP zonings proposed in our evidence have been

assessed in accordance with section 32AA. Although not explicitly stated, the options

that we have considered in our assessment include the notified zoning, the amended

zoning as sought by submitters, and the zone we have proposed in each case. The

outcome of our section 32AA analysis is reflected in the reasons stated in (as relevant)

Attachments B, C and F.

7.3 The zoning issues to which this Report relates are not specifically discussed in the

Evaluation Report, however they reflect any recent decisions of the Environment Court,

if relevant, and have been the subject of a section 32 process.

Auckland Transport / Watercare / Stormwater Unit input

7.4 Watercare Services Limited (WSL), Auckland Transport (AT), and the Council's

Stormwater Unit (SWU) have provided technical input on rezoning. There was also

consultation on HC and Pre-1944 BDC matters and VVs / HSAs as required.

7.5 In particular, WSL has provided input on the known transmission capacity constraints

and planned investment of infrastructure in respect of their network. This information

was provided on the basis of WSL’s understanding of capacity as at November 2015.

7.6 AT has provided input on planned infrastructure investment in line with the new public

transport network to be implemented from 2016, as well as more specific comments on

10

particular areas where other transport investment is planned. These infrastructure

factors have informed Council’s consideration on appropriate zonings in Highbrook and

Manukau Central City Business and Industry area, with the view to reach alignment

between land-use and infrastructure provision.

7.7 SWU has also provided relevant input where there are flooding constraints on

properties. For instance, as noted in Attachment D to David Mead's evidence of Topic

080 on flooding and natural hazards, in some cases SWU has assessed a particular

site as being "in an area where flood plain hazards are considered to be inaccurate

and/or not significant". That advice, alongside the other factors / principles also listed

in Mr Mead’s Attachment D, has influenced our assessment of the appropriate zoning

of properties affected by a flood plain.

PART B: OVERVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS

8. SUBMISSION THEMES

8.1 A total of 140 submission points have been received by the Council in relation to the

PAUP zoning within Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry. The

area has been divided into the following 2 sub areas:

• S3 area – Botany, East Tamaki, Highbrook (25 submission points)

• S10 area – Manukau City Centre, Rata Vine, Great South Road, Browns Roa

and Puhunui (117 submission points)

8.2 Of the 140 submission points received, the following themes have been identified

across the Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry. Within these

themes submissions seek to retain or rezone, details of which are set out in the

analysis in Attachment B:

• Any residential properties subject to a key overlay – 31 submission points.

• THAB isolated or new areas – 16 submission points

• Spot zoning – 15 submission points.

• Heavy Industry Zone (HIZ) and Light Industry Zone (LIZ) – 12 submission

points

• Rural Urban Boundary (RUB) and rezoning – 10 submission points.

11

• Centres/Terrace Housing Apartment Buildings (THAB)/Mixed Use

Expansion/Contraction – 8 submission points.

• Combined rezoning and precinct submission – 6 submission points.

• Special Purpose – 5 submission points

• Mixed Housing Urban/Mixed Housing Suburban/Single House

Expansion/Contraction – 4 submission points.

• Business to other business zone (excludes mixed use and centres zones) – 3

submission points.

• Centres Hierarchy – 3 submission points.

• Residential to other use – 1 submission points.

• Public open space – 1 submission point.

8.3 The Auckland Council submission (no. 5716-2986) seeks to rezone 1 property within

S10 to correct a mapping error.

8.4 Full analysis of the changes requested by these submission points is included in

Attachment C to this Report. Maps showing proposed zoning changes are included in

Attachment E.

PART C: ANALYSIS

9. ANALYSIS OF SUBMISSIONS

Attachment B

9.1 Attachment B contains an analysis and planners' position with regard to the themes

raised in submissions requesting relief in relation to the zoning of Highbrook and

Manukau Central City Business and Industry.

9.2 In undertaking this analysis we have had regard to the expert statements of evidence

listed at paragraph 4.4 above.

Attachment C

9.3 Attachment C contains an analysis and position on individual submission points. On

occasion, we have proposed the application of a new zone which differs from both the

12

notified zone and the zone proposed by a submitter, and which is not within the scope

of the submission. In those circumstances, we have recorded in the "reasons" column

in Attachment C that the proposed rezoning is regarded as 'out of scope' (in which

case further detail is provided in Attachment F and out of scope changes have been

identified on zoning maps in Attachment E)

Relevant Overlays, Precincts and Constraints.

9.4 The table in Attachment C has 16 columns for each submission point. The purpose of

each column is generally self-explanatory. However we wish to explain briefly the

content in the column entitled “Relevant Overlays, Precincts and Constraints” (the constraints column), and clarify the relationship between the content of the

constraints column and the “Reasons” column:

(a) Properties are often subject to a number of overlays and constraints.

(b) As the word “relevant” in the heading of the constraints column suggests, we

have not always listed all overlays / constraints in the constraints

column. Instead, we have only listed those constraints that we consider may

have an impact on the zoning of the relevant property.

(c) Consistent with (b) above, the use of “N/A” in the constraints column does not

necessarily mean that there are no overlays or constraints affecting a

property. In some instances we have reached the view that any overlays or

constraints are not directly relevant to the determination of the appropriate

zoning and have used the abbreviation “N/A” in those circumstances.

(d) Moving to the “Reasons” column, it should be noted that we do not

necessarily discuss every one of the constraints listed in the constraints

column. Rather, we have generally focused our discussion on the key or

principal constraint(s) relevant to determining the appropriate zoning for a

given property.

Attachment D

9.5 Attachment D addresses area wide submissions, on which we have relied in

proposing a number of in scope area-wide or street-wide changes to the notified

zones.

13

Attachment E

9.6 Attachment E contains two maps for the Highbrook and Manukau Central City

Business and Industry area:

(a) The PAUP zones as notified, but with properties identified that are subject to

submissions; and

(b) The zoning changes proposed by the Council, with both “in scope” and “out of

scope” changes identified. Proposed changes that are in scope are shown as

black outline, while those that are out of scope are shown in blue outline.

9.7 Having regard to the requirements of sections 32 and 32AA of the RMA and the other

statutory criteria of the RMA outlined in the evidence of Mr Duguid and the matters

raised by submitters, we consider that the proposed zoning changes are appropriate

because:

(a) The proposed amendments to the zones meet, and are the most appropriate

way to achieve, the relevant PAUP objectives and policies of the Residential

and Business zones.

(b) The proposed amendments give effect to the RPS provisions of the PAUP.

(c) The proposed amendments which are outside the scope of submissions are a

holistic and comprehensive approach, which enables Council to give effect to

the RPS, achieve the zone objectives and policies and which is in accordance

with best planning practice.

(d) The proposed zoning of land is aligned with the provision of infrastructure; in

particular transport, wastewater, water and stormwater management and

planned investment of these infrastructure networks for the growth potential of

Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry area.

(e) The proposed zoning of land takes into consideration the Council’s approach

in determining the most appropriate zone, where the area/site is subject to the

pre-1944 and historic (special) character and SEA overlays.

(f) The Council’s position is to partially shift the RUB at Puhunui. Structure Plan

work has been undertaken. Light Industry and Large Lot zoning of the area is

considered most appropriate to achieve the objectives of these zones and

gives effect to the RPS.

14

10. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF SUBMISSIONS

10.1 As outlined in Mr Duguid’s evidence, a number of amendments are proposed which

are outside the scope of the submissions in order to give effect to the proposed PAUP

RPS and to achieve the objectives (and policies) of the zones as proposed to be

amended in the Council’s closing statements to the Panel on Topics 051-054

(Business) and Topics 059, 060, 062, and 063 (Residential). The out of scope changes

proposed are set out in Attachment F, together with the reasons for them.

10.2 Out of scope changes proposed by the Council are, as noted, shown as blue outline on

the zoning changes proposed by the Council map for each sub area in Attachment E.

10.3 Additionally, we have proposed a number of amendments to zoning(s) to correct minor

technical errors. There are no particular submissions to which these amendments

respond, and therefore they are technically also out of scope.

11. CONCLUSIONS

11.1 We have considered the submissions received on the zoning of Highbrook and

Manukau Central City Business and Industry area and we consider that the zoning

changes proposed by the Council, as set out in the maps included within Attachment E, most appropriately meet the statutory framework for zoning set out in the statement

of evidence of John Duguid about zoning for Topics 080 and 081, and the purpose of

the Act.

Anna Jennings, Roger Eccles and David Wong

26 January 2016

15

ATTACHMENT A: CVs of Report Writers

Career Summary – David Wong

Career Period Role Organisation

2010 to present Principal Planner Auckland Council

2000 to 2010 Senior Planner Auckland Council

1991 to 2000 Planner Manukau City Council

Qualifications

Bachelor of Planning, University of Auckland, 1992.

Bachelor of Arts, University of Auckland, 1989.

Affiliations

Full member of the New Zealand Planning Institute.

Career Summary

I have over twenty years’ experience working in the former Manukau City Council, the former

Auckland City Council, and Auckland Council on designations, plan changes, and spatial

plans. For the last two years I have been Lead Planner for the Otara-Papatoetoe Area Plan,

and contributed to the development of the rural urban boundary at Puhinui in the PAUP.

Roger Eccles

Career Summary

Duration Organisation Role November 2010 -

Auckland Council

Planner, Planning South

March 2008 – October 2010

North Shore City Council

Planner

Jan 2006 – Nov 2007

Transport, Auckland City Council

Policy Planner

16

Qualifications

Bachelor of Planning, University of Auckland, 1991

Bachelor of Arts, University of Auckland

ANNA JENNINGS

EDUCATION AND AFFLIATIONS

Member of the New Zealand Planning Institute Full Membership of NZPI granted in February 2011

Master of Planning (Honours), University of Auckland July 2004 – July 2005

Bachelor of Planning (Honours, Senior Scholar), University of Auckland July 1999 – July 2003

EMPLOYMENT HISTORY

Principal Planner, Planning South, Auckland Council Auckland, April 2013 to present

Regional Stormwater Policy Advisor, Melbourne Water Melbourne, Australia September 2011 to December 2012

Planning Consultant, Hill Young Cooper Auckland, New Zealand, March 2010 to May 2011

Major Projects Officer/Technical Specialist, Environment Agency London, United Kingdom June 2006 to July 2009

Planning Consultant, Meridian Planning Consultants Ltd Auckland, December 2004 to December 2005

Policy Advisor, Ministry for the Environment Wellington, February 2004 to July 2004

17

AFFLIATIONS AND CONFERENCES

Stormwater Industry Association 2012 Victoria Excellence Awards Merit award for ‘Excellence in Research, innovation, policy and education’

Healthy Cities Conference – Geelong, June 2012 Presentation titled ‘Improving Liveability through the Implementation of WSUD’

Stormwater Conference 2012 – Melbourne, October 2012 Presentation and paper titled ‘Building capacity with regional and rural councils – Water

Sensitive Urban Design and Integrated Water Management’

18

ATTACHMENT B: ANALYSIS OF SUBMISSIONS BY THEME

S3 HIGHBROOK, EAST TAMAKI, BOTANY

THEME OVERVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS PLANNER’S POSITION Centres/Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings/Mixed Use Expansion/Contraction

• Two submissions seek to rezone an area from THAB to MU (on Ti Rakau Drive).

• One submission seeks to retain the MU zone on Ti Rakau and Te Irirangi Drive.

• One submission seeks to rezone all properties with access from Bishop Lenihan Place from LI to MU.

• Position: Submissions seeking to rezone an area of THAB on Ti Rakau Drive to MU are not supported. The site is already partly occupied by residential units, the site is on a RFN and close to Botany MC. Immediately to the east of the sites is an area of THAB. Retention of the THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: Support the retention of MU zone for land directly adjacent to Botany Centre. Retention of the MU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone. This is already an established area of MU and retaining the zone gives effect to the RPS. These sites are adjacent to and compliment the Botany MC and on Ti Rakau Drive, an RFN that will be served in the future by a rapid busway being delivered by AMETI. Retention of the MU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS

• Position: Do not support change of zone from LI to MU. The most appropriate zone is LI. Te Irirangi Drive in this location creates a buffer between the developing residential areas to the east (Flat Bush) and industrial land to the west. The current use on the site which includes live work units is protected by existing use rights. Residential activities in this location have the potential to create reverse sensitivity issues. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Business to other Business zone (excludes Mixed Use and Centres zones)

• Four submissions relate to rezoning properties adjacent to Te Irirangi Drive from LI to GB.

• Position: Do not support submission points requesting a zone change from LI to GB. Maintaining the site as LI zone reduces the potential of creating reverse sensitivity on adjacent industrial sites and Te Irirangi Drive provides separation to the residential areas to the east. Any new areas of GB are subject to a number of criteria, set out in Policy 7 and 8 of B3.1 of the RPS, which includes distributional effects on centres, transport, effects on quality compact urban form, and industrial land. These sites do not meet the criteria. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Combined rezoning and new precinct request

• Four submissions relate to rezoning sites from LIto MU in line with a new precinct request, East Tamaki.

• Position: Do not support change of zone from LI to MU. The most appropriate zone is LI. Te Irirangi Drive in this location creates a buffer between the developing residential areas to the east (Flat Bush) and industrial land to the west. The current use on the site which includes live work units is protected by existing use rights. Residential activities in this location have the potential to create reverse sensitivity issues. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. The new precinct request for East Tamaki is not supported; refer to evidence of Michelle Perwick for Auckland Council.

Heavy Industry Zone (HIZ) and Light Industry Zone (LIZ)

• Nine submissions seek to retain the HI or LI zone as notified in the PAUP.

• One submission seeks to rezone 90 Cryers Road from

• Position: All submissions to retain the HI zoning as notified are supported. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. Highbrook is one of the largest areas of industrial zoned land in Auckland and it is important to retain current zoning that allows for continued use of the land for these activities.

19

THEME OVERVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS PLANNER’S POSITION HI to LI. • Position: Do not support change of zone from HI to LI. Refer to evidence of Mr Roger Eccles

for Auckland Council Topic 051-054. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes place in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and South Auckland in particular. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the HI zone and give effect to the RPS.

Special purpose • One submission seeks to rezone 28 and 32 Bishop Dunn Place to Special Purpose – Places of Worship.

• Position: Do not support change from LI to SP - Places of Worship. Council's position on the SP - Places of Worship zone is to remove it from the PAUP. Refer to evidence of Trevor Mackie Topic 055. No change is recommended and the notified zone of LI should be retained. Existing use rights will allow the activities on site to continue. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS

S10 MANUKAU AND PUHUNUI

THEME OVERVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS PLANNER’S POSITION Mixed Housing Urban/Mixed Housing Suburban/Single House Expansion/Contraction

• Three submission points to retain MHS zoning.

• One area-wide submission for SH zoning in areas subject to potential reserve sensitivity constraints related to HI zoning.

• Position: Support three submission-points seeking retention of MHS zoning. These properties are a significant distance from the RFN and are not close to the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. This area is mainly of suburban dwellings. The MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: Support one submission point for retention of SH zoning where practicable to limit reverse sensitivity constraints and loss of amenity in relation to HI zoning. The SH zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

Centres/Terrace Housing Apartment Buildings (THAB)/Mixed Use Expansion/Contraction

• Six submission points seek to retain the zoning. Two relate to a NC at Burnside Road, three relate to retention of the MC zoning for Manukau and one relates to the MU zoning at 736 Great South Rd.

• One submission point seeks to rezone 286 Puhunui Rd from NC to LI.

• Position: All six submission points that seek retention of the NC, MC or MU zoning are supported. Three relate to the MC zoning for Manukau, the zoning of which is in line with the centres hierarchy strategy in the RPS. Retention of the relevant NC, MC or MU zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the relevant zone and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: Change of zone from NC to LI at 286 Puhunui Rd is not supported. The site is a suitable location for a NC. There is a range of local retail businesses at the location. There is also residential development in the area. Retention of the NC zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone, recognise local context and gives effect to the RPS.

Any residential properties subject to a key overlay – including flooding

• 31 submission points seek rezoning of properties from SH, and MHS to MHU or THAB. Two of these submission points seek rezoning from MHS to MHU and THAB in the area immediately south of South-Western Motorway and between Druces Road and

• Position: Support rezoning of 22 Pantera Way from a SH to MHS zone as managing the flooding risk on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone.

• Position: Do not support 28 requests for rezoning from SH or MHS to MHS, MHU or THAB. The submission points may be declined on the basis of flooding constraints, reverse sensitivity

20

THEME OVERVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS PLANNER’S POSITION Great South Road

constraints related to the High Aircraft Noise Areas (HANA) or HI air quality. Rezonings in relation to reverse sensitivity constraints were opposed this include HANA and air quality. The proposed rezoning in Brown Street, Manurewa was opposed because of reverse sensitivity constraints. Also considered was the distance to TC or THAB zoning and the distance to the RFN. Retention of the SH or MHS zonings is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: Two submission points seeking to rezone an area from SH and MHS to MH, MHU and THAB are supported in part. This includes provision of MHU in Great South Road, Manukau and THAB in Barrowcliffe Place, Manukau. Some parts of this area are subject to flood constraints or are remote from the Manukau Metropolitan Centre or from the RFN. Some sites are proposed to be rezoned where managing flood risks does not require maintaining the SH zone. The mix of residential zonings provided is considered the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zones and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB isolated or new areas

• 16 submission points seek to rezone properties from SH or MHS to THAB.

• Position: 12 submission points were partially supported for rezoning from MHS to MHU. The area is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent to the RFN .THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC zone. Rezoning to MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: Four submission points seeking to rezone from MHS to THAB were not supported because of the distance from MC, TC and MU zonings and the RFN. Retention of the MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Spot zoning

• 15 submission points seek to rezone from SH,MHS or LI to MHU,THAB and LI

• Position: One submission-point supported in part. Submitter requested LI to GB, however, it is considered that MU zoning better reflects the existing use of the site and potential for redevelopment next to the AUT campus. The MU zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: One submission-point supported at 3 Great South Rd to rezone from MHS to MHU. The site is in close proximity to the RFN and rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: 13 submission-points were not supported as they create a spot zone and were remote from a TC, MC or THAB zoning or the RFN. A spot zone in these locations will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. Retention of the current SH or MHS zonings is considered the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

21

THEME OVERVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS PLANNER’S POSITION Public Open Space • One submission point seeks to provide for parking at

boat jetties. • Position: Most ramps and jetties are in POS zones that allow for car parking areas or

reserve area that provided for supporting activities. Retention of the POS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Business to other Business Zone (excludes mixed use and centres zones)

• Two submission points seek rezoning of properties at 2 Ryan Place from LI to GB and 277 Browns Road, Manurewa from GB to LC.

• One submission to retain GB zoning at 652 Great South Rd.

• Position: The two rezoning submission points are not supported. At 2 Ryan Place, retention of the LI zone is supported. The RPS seeks the retention of LI zoning where practicable. Rezoning at 277 Browns Rd is not supported. The GB to LC was not supported The GB zoning is close to the Wiri HI zoning. To locate a LC zone would provide a zoning that would be problematic in managing reverse sensitivity effects.

• Position: Support the retention of the GB zoning at 652 Great South Road as the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the GPS.

Centres Hierarchy

• Two submission points seek to rezone the Manukau MC to a ‘Super’ MC and surrounding GB and LI to MU.

• One submission seeks to rezone an area of GB adjacent to Manukau MC to MC zone.

• One submission points seeks to retain the NC zone at 4 Noel Burnside Road in Wiri.

• Position: Do not support two submissions seeking expanding MC zoning of the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. The submissions seek to create a Manukau Metropolitan "Super' Centre zone. Retention of the MC zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the centres hierarchy strategy in the RPS.

• Position: Do not support submission rezoning from GB to MC. The property falls within High

Aircraft Noise Area (HANA) overlay areas and is adjacent HI zoned area. Retention of the GB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: Support retention of current NC zone. Retention of the NC zone is the most

appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone. This NC zoning at Noel Burnside Road, Wiri can has a role and function for the surrounding Papatoetoe residential area and gives effect to the centres strategy/hierarchy of the RPS.

Combined rezoning and precinct submissions

• Two submission points seek to rezone land surrounding the Manukau MC from GB to MC or MU.

• One submission seeks to rezone 10 Pacific Events Centre Drive and 834 Great South Road from MU to LI.

• Two submissions seek to retain the MC zoning for Manukau and one submission seeks to retain the GB zoning for 55 Lambie Drive.

• Position: Do not support two submission-points to rezone GB zones to MU and /or MC. These properties within the HANA, as such there are reverse sensitivity constraints. Retention of the GB and MU zones is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS including the centres strategy/hierarchy.

• Position: Do not support rezoning from MU to possible alternative business zone. The site is in close proximity to a MU zone, Manukau MC and the RTN. While there is no direct equivalent of Business 5 in the PAUP; the MU zone is the closest. The Auckland Council District Plan (Manukau Section) Business 5 zone is a mixed used zone for industry, offices and a limited range of retailing activity. Retention of the MU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position Support the current MC zoning of the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. Retention of the current MC zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the MC zone objectives and gives effect to the centres strategy /hierarchy of the RPS.

• Position: Support retention of GB zoning at 55 Lambie Drive. GB zoning in response to HANA aircraft noise controls. Retention of the GB zone is the most appropriate way to

22

THEME OVERVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS PLANNER’S POSITION achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Residential to other use • One submission point seeks to rezone land in the Puhunui Road and Cavendish Drive area and the Burrell Avenue area from SH to LI.

• Position: Rezoning from SH to LI is not supported. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone, recognise local context and gives effect to the RPS.

Special Purpose

• One submission points seek to retain Special Purpose – Major Recreation Facility zoning for 770R Great South Road, Manukau

• Two submission points seek to rezone land on Marble Place, Manurewa from MHS to SP.

• Two submission points seek to rezone land on Lambie Drive and Druces Road, Manurewa from MHS and LI to POS/SP.

• Position: Support retention of SP-Major Recreation Facility zone for Pacific Events Cultural Centre. This is the appropriate zoning for the Pacific Events Cultural Centre. Retention of the SP - Major Recreation Facility zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: Do not support rezoning of land on Marble Place from MHS to SP. The land is in private ownership and no agreement with the owner has been reached. Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: Do not support rezoning of land on Lambie Drive and Druces Road from MHS to LI and POS/SP. There is no land owner agreement for the change. Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.


• Three submission points seeks to rezone properties from LI to HI including on the boundary of the Wiri Oil Terminal boundary and at 195 Browns Road.

• Four submission points seek to rezone properties from HI to LI at 100 Plunket Avenue, 8 Diversey Lane and around Kerrs Road.

• Five submission points to seek to retain HI or LI zoning.

• Position: Two submission points seeking to rezone from LI to HI zones were supported. This related to the area immediately south of the Wiri Oil Terminal and west of Roscommon Road Wiri. This large area of land was formal zoned Quarry Zone under the Auckland Council District Plan (Manukau Section). The former Quarry zone operated under similar controls as HI zoning and as a consequence it is less likely that reverse sensitivity issues will arise. This provides an opportunity to extend the existing HI zoning with the former quarry area. Rezoning to HI is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the HI zone and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the Council's Topic 051-054 evidence.). Part of this area is the site of the Wiri Prison and the Youth Justice facility.

• Position: Do not support rezoning from LI to HI at 195 Browns Road. Proposed HI zone directly opposite Browns Road MHS. The LI provides a higher threshold for air quality measures and better protects the amenity of residential areas. Retention of the LI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: Four submission points seeking to rezone from LI to HI were not supported. Rezoning to LI would result in the loss of scarce heavy industrial land. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area. Importantly, retaining the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives effect to the RPS. This include Plunket Avenue HI zoning with provides for larger HI zoned block and a better protection against possible reverse sensitivity effects that could arise. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the

23

THEME OVERVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS PLANNER’S POSITION objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the Topic 051-054 evidence.)

• Position: Support 5 submission points for the retention of LI and HI zones. RPS addresses need to retain HI zoning within Auckland where possible. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area.

Rural Urban Boundary (RUB) and rezoning

• Four submissions seek to rezone the block of land bounded by State Highway 20 to the east, State Highway 20B/Puhinui Road to the north, Prices Road to the west, and Puhinui Stream to the south from Rural Production to General Business zone. The Southern Gateway Consortium constituting a number of individual companies are the majority owners of this block of land.

• Two submissions seek to rezone 286 Portage Road, Mangere from Rural Production to Mixed Housing Suburban zone.

• Two submissions seek to rezone Puhinui Peninsula from Rural Production to Future Urban zone.

• One submission seeks to provide residential and business growth in Drury, Alfriston, Karaka, Flat Bush and Puhinui. Reject development in Paerata.

• One submission seeks to retain the Rural Production zone in the Puhinui area on land either side of Puhinui Road, east of the South-western Motorway and east of the airport.

• Position: The request to rezone this block of land (i.e. the Southern Gateway Consortium’s land) from RP to GB is not supported as it will not give effect to B3.1 of the RPS. The Council has undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Council’s position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. LI zoning of this land is consistent with the Council’s position to rezone all the land South of Waokauri Creek (including the consortium’s land) to LI, and is compatible with the LI and HI zoning respectively of the nearby Noel Burnside/Diversity Lane area, and Mclaughlins Road. Rezoning of LI is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the LI zone and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: Do not support the rezoning of 286 Portage Road, Mangere from RP to MHS. The land is outside the RUB and is subject to the ONF overlay for Crater Hill, and has significant cultural heritage and landscape value to Mana Whenua. Retention of the RP zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the RP zone and gives effect to the RPS, including B8.2 by maintaining the site’s capability, flexibility and accessibility for primary production.

• Position: Do not support the rezoning of Puhinui Peninsula from RP to FU zone. The Council has undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Council’s position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. Rezoning the land from RP to LI and LL, subject to precinct provisions to manage the effects of future development on the cultural landscape values of Puhinui, and to ensure that staged development of the land is co-ordinated with the provision of infrastructure; is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the two zones and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: The request to provide residential and business growth is supported in the Puhinui Peninsula. The Council has undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Council’s position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. Rezoning the land from RP to LI and LL zoning (to provide for future business and residential development and growth) is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the two zones and gives effect to the RPS.

• Position: Do not support the retention of the Rural Production zone. The Council has undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Council’s position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. Rural zoning is not appropriate within the RUB. Rezoning the land to LI and LL, subject to precinct provisions to manage the effects of future development on the cultural landscape values of Puhinui, and to ensure that staged development of the land is co-ordinated with the provision of infrastructure; is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the LI and LL zones and gives effect to the RPS.

24

ATTACHMENT C: Zoning Analysis and Position for each Submission Point

Planner's Position

SUBSUBMITTER

NAME TOPIC

SUB AREA UNIT SUMMARY

PROPERTIES SUBJECT TO SUBMISSION SUBMISSION THEME LOCALITY PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED ZONE

RELEVANT OVERLAYS,

PRECINCTS AND CONSTRAINTS

PLANNER'S PROPOSED POSITION REASONS

PROPOSED ZONE

CHANGEGIS MAP CHANGE CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENT

5716-2986

Auckland Council (Attn: Stephen Town)

Highbrook and Manukau City Central Business

S10 Rezone 22 Pantera Way, Manukau Central (LOT 2 DP 206110) from Single House to Mixed Housing Suburban. Refer to submission, Volume 4, page 14/35 and Attachment 712, Volume 20.

22 Pantera Way, Manukau Central

Any residential properties subject to a key overlay

Manukau SH MHS Flooding Constraints

SUPPORT IN FULL; CHANGE OF ZONE

Support rezoning from a SH to MHS zone. Managing the flooding risk on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS Yes No

839-5039 Housing New Zealand Corporation

Highbrook and Manukau City Central

S10 Rezone 226, PUHINUI ROAD, Papatoetoe from Single House to Mixed Housing Urban.

226, PUHINUI ROAD, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe SH MHU High Aircraft Noise Area/flooding

DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. This property is within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA) and as such there are reverse sensitivity constraints. The SH zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 8, ATKINSON AVENUE, Papatoetoe from Single House to Mixed Housing Suburban.

8, ATKINSON AVENUE, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe SH MHS High Aircraft Noise Area/Flooding/Sensitive Area Restriction


Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. This property is within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA). The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the SH zone.The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 2, ISLAY PLACE, Wiri from Single House to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

2, ISLAY PLACE, Manukau


Manukau SH THAB Flooding Constraints


Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The SH site and nearby properties are affected by flooding constraints. The site is also remote from Manukau Metropolitian Centre and a significant distance from the RFN. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 148, PUHINUI ROAD, Papatoetoe from Single House to Mixed Housing Urban.

48, PUHINUI ROAD, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe SH MHS Flooding Constraints


Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. The site and nearby properties are affected by flooding constraints. The site is also remote from Manukau Metropolitian Centre. The SH zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 2, INVERELL AVENUE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

2, INVERELL AVENUE, Wiri


Manukau MHS THAB Flooding Constraints


Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The site is also remote from Manukau Metropolitian Centre and a significant distance from the RFN. The MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No








Do not support rezoning MHS to THAB. The property is remote from Manukau Metropolitian Centre and the Great South Road Mixed Use zone. It is also a significant distance from the RFN. The MHS zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 29, INVERELL AVENUE, Wiri from Single House to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

29, INVERELL AVENUE, Wir




Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The site and nearby properties are affected by flooding constraints. The site is also remote from Manukau Metropolitian Centre. The SH zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No








Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Property is distant from Manukau Metropolitian Centre and Great South Road Mixed Use zone. It is also a significant distance from the RFN. The MHS zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 41, CLENDON AVENUE, Papatoetoe from Single House to Mixed Housing Suburban.

41, CLENDON AVENUE, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe SH MHS N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. This property is within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA). The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the SH zone. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 38,20,48,22,46,32,44,42,36,40,34,52,50, TREVOR HOSKEN DRIVE,2, DRUCES ROAD, Wiri from Single House to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

38,20,48,22,46,32,44,42,36,40,34,52,50, TREVOR HOSKEN DRIVE,2, DRUCES ROAD, Wiri




Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The site and nearby properties have flooding constraints. Property is distant from Manukau Metropolitian Centre and more than 500 metres from good RFN and the proposed Manukau public transport hub. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 11,13,1,3,5,7,9, TOURMALIN PLACE,1A,3, TREVOR HOSKEN DRIVE,24,26,12,14,22,16, DRUCES ROAD, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

11,13,1,3,5,7,9, TOURMALIN PLACE,1A,3, TREVOR HOSKEN DRIVE,24,26,12,14,22,16, DRUCES ROAD, Wiri


Manukau MHS THAB N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning friom MHS to THAB. The properties are remote from Manukau Metropolitian Centre, more than 500 metres from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 21, TREVOR HOSKEN DRIVE,10,5,7,8, ZIRCON PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

21, TREVOR HOSKEN DRIVE,10,5,7,8, ZIRCON PLACE, Wiri


Wiri MHS THAB N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning friom MHS to THAB. The properties are remote from Manukau Metropolitian Centre, more than 500 metres from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 10,8,6, GRANITE PLACE,11,1,3,5,7,9, MARBLE PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

10,8,6, GRANITE PLACE,11,1,3,5,7,9, MARBLE PLACE, Wiri


Manukau MHS THAB DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning friom MHS to THAB. The properties are remote from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre, more than 500 metres from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 54,52, INVERELL AVENUE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

54,52, INVERELL AVENUE, Wiri




Do not support rezoning friom MHS to THAB. The properties are remote from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre, more than 500 metres from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 1,9,7, ISLAY PLACE,39,45,43,41, INVERELL AVENUE, Wiri from Single House to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

1,9,7, ISLAY PLACE,39,45,43,41, INVERELL AVENUE, Wiri




Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The site and nearby properties are affected by flooding constraints. The properties are remote from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre and more 500 metres from the RFN route. The SH zone complements the suburban built character and retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 46,44,42,48, INVERELL AVENUE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

46,44,42,48, INVERELL AVENUE, Wiri



Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The properties are also remote from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre and more than 500 metres from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS zone complements the suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

Submission Point Pathway Report Analysis

HIGHBROOK AND MANUKAUAttachment 'C': Zoning Analysis and Position for each Submission PointNotes: The black text in the "summary" column of this Attachment is as notified. Occasional amendments have been made in red to take account of any re-notified SDR points and also for clarity, where necessary.

Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel Auckland Council Evidence

Planner's Position

SUBSUBMITTER

NAME TOPIC



REQUESTED ZONE

RELEVANT OVERLAYS,



PROPOSED ZONE







S10 Rezone 753,749,751,747, GREAT SOUTH ROAD,12A,12B,14,10B,10C,10A, ISLAY PLACE, Papatoetoe from Single House to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

753,749,751,747, GREAT SOUTH ROAD,12A,12B,14,10B,10C,10A, ISLAY PLACE, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe SH THAB N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The site and nearby properties are affected by flooding constraints. The properties are remote Manukau Metropolitian Centre and more 500 metres from the RFN route. The SH zone complements the suburban built character and retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 18, ILIAD PLACE,26, INVERELL AVENUE,10,4, IXIA PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

18, ILIAD PLACE,26, INVERELL AVENUE,10,4, IXIA PLACE, Wiri



Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The properties are also remote from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre and more than 500 metres from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 10,12,14, INVERELL AVENUE,5, ILIAD PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

10,12,14, INVERELL AVENUE,5, ILIAD PLACE, Wiri



Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The properties are remote from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre and a significant distance from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 10,8,12,14,16, ILIAD PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

10,8,12,14,16, ILIAD PLACE, Wiri



Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The properties are remote from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre and a significant distance from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 20 DRUCES ROAD. Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Mixed Housing Urban.

20 DRUCES ROAD Any residential properties subject to a key overlay

Manukau MHS MHU N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are remote from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre and a significant distance from the RFN. The MHS suburban zone is separated by a POS zone from a new THAB area. The MHS zone complements the suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 118 PUHINUI ROAD. Papatoetoe from Single House to Mixed Housing Urban.

18 PUHINUI ROAD Any residential properties subject to a key overlay

Papatoetoe SH MHU N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from SH toTHAB. The SH site and nearby properties are affected by flooding constraints. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 36A PLUNKET AVENUE. Puhinui-Manukau City Centre from Single House to Mixed Housing Suburban.

36A PLUNKET AVENUE


Manukau SH MHS N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects it is proposed that the area be retained as a SH zone. The site and nearby properties also are affected by flooding constraints. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

5277-243 The Urban Design Forum New Zealand (Attn: Graeme Scott)


S10 Rezone land surrounding Manukau Metropolitan Centre, as shown in the submission [refer to page 50/104] from Mixed Housing Suburban to Mixed Housing Urban and Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

Manukau Metropolitan Centre


Manukau SH/MHS MHU/THAB N/A SUPPORT IN PART; PARTIAL CHANGE

Support rezoning inpart from MHS to MHU and THAB. This includes THAB for land adjacent to Barrowcliffe Place, rezoning of 761 - 783 Great South Road to MHU and rezoning parts of Kerrs Road to MHU. Other parts of this area are subject to flood constraints or are distant from the Manukau Metropolitan Centre or from the RFN. Some sites are proposed to be zoned for higher density where managing flood risks does not require maintaining the SH zone. This mix of residential zonings is considered the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS, THAB and MHU

Yes no

1607-1 Mila Cheung Highbrook and Manukau City Central

S10 Rezone 192 Puhinui Road, Papatoetoe from Single House to Mixed House Suburban

192 Puhinui Road, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe SH MHS N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects it is proposed that the area be retained as a SH zone. The site and near properties are also affected vby flooding constraints. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

5280-225 The New Zealand Institute of Architects (Attn: Graeme Scott)


S10 Rezone land on Browns Road, Manurewa as shown in the submission [refer to page 41/104] from Single House and Light industry to Mixed Housing suburban.

Browns Road, Manurewa


Wiri SH/LI MHS N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from SH and LI to MHS. The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects it is proposed that the area be retained as a SH zone. The SH and LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH and LI zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone land surrounding Manukau Metropolitan Centre, as shown in the submission [refer to page 50/104] from Mixed Housing Suburban to Mixed Housing Urban and Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.



Manukau MHS THAB N/A SUPPORT IN PART; PARTIAL CHANGE

Support rezoning inpart from MHS to MHU and THAB. This includes THAB for land adjacent to Barrowcliffe Place, rezoning of 761 - 783 Great South Road to MHU and rezoning parts of Kerrs Road to MHU. Other parts of this area are subject to flood constraints or are distant from the Manukau Metropolitan Centre or from the RFN. Some sites are proposed to be zoned for higher density where managing flood risks does not require maintaining the SH zone. This mix of residential zonings is considered the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS, THAB and MHU

Yes No



S10 Rezone land on Browns Road, Manurewa as shown in the submission [refer to page 41/104] from Single House and Light industry to Mixed Housing suburban.

Browns Road, Manurewa


Wiri SH/LI MHS N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from SH and LI to MHS. The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects it is proposed that the area be retained as a SH zone. The SH and LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH and LI zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone land on Puhinui Road and Plunket Avenue, Manukau as shown in the submission [refer to page 50/104] from Single House to Mixed Housing Suburban.

Puhinui Road and Plunket Avenue, Manukau




No change No No



S10 Rezone land on Puhinui Road and Plunket Avenue, Manukau as shown in the submission [refer to page 50/104] from Single House to Mixed Housing Suburban.

Puhinui Road and Plunket Avenue, Manukau




No change No No

2575-67 AMP Capital Property Portfolio Limited et al (Attn: David Haines)


S3 Retain the Mixed Use zone on Ti Rakau Drive and Te Irirangi Drive.

451, 490, 475, 500 Ti Rakau Drive and 550 Te Irirangi Drive and 5 Te Koha Road, East Tamaki


Botany MU MU N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support retention of MU zone on Ti Rakau and Te Irirangi Drive. Retention of the MU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone. This is already an established area of mixed use and retaining the zone gives effect to the RPS. These sites are adjacent to and compliment the Botany MC and on Ti Rakau Drive, an RFN that will be served in the future by a rapid busway being delivered by AMETI. The MU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MU zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

5294-349 Auckland InterNotioNol Airport Limited


S10 Rezone land in the Puhinui Road and Cavendish Drive area, Manukau, and the Burrell Avenue area, Papatoetoe, shown on the plan attached to the submission as Map 4 from 'Single House' to 'Light Industrial'. Refer to details in submission at page 166/218.

Puhinui Road and Cavendish Drive area, Manukau,

Residential to other use Manukau SH LI N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from SH to LI zone. This part of Puhinui Road is residential in Nature and this stretch of Puhinui Road remains an important part of residential Papatoetoe. This is the same for the Burrell Avenue area. The SH zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

Planner's Position

SUBSUBMITTER

NAME TOPIC



REQUESTED ZONE

RELEVANT OVERLAYS,



PROPOSED ZONE





1386-1 Body Corporate 211277 (Attn: Neil E Black)


S3 Rezone 302 Te Irirangi Drive, Flatbush from Light Industrial to Mixed Use.

302 Te Irirangi Drive, Flatbush


East Tamaki LI MU N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change of zone from LI to MU. The most appropriate zone is LI. Te Irirangi Drive in this location creates a buffer between the developing residential areas to the east (Flat Bush) and industrial land to the west. The current use on the site which includes live work units is protected by existing use rights. Residential activities in this location have the potential to create reverse sensitivity issues. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to acheive the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

1425-1 Body Corporate 344027 (Attn: Te Irirangi Lofts)


S3 Reject light industrial Zoning for Unit 13, 15 Bishop Lenihan Place, Botany South, Manukau. Zoning should allow mixed use.

Unit 13, 15 Bishop Lenihan Place, Botany South



Do not support change of zone from LI to MU. The most appropropriate zone is LI. Te Irirangi Drive in this location creates a buffer between the developing residential areas to the east (Flat Bush) and industrial land to the west. The current use on the site which includes live work units is protected by existing use rights. Residential activities in this location have the potential to create reverse sensitivity issues. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to acheive the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

2405-2 Broadway Property Group (Attn: Daniel L Shaw)


S3 Rezone 308 Te Irirangi Drive, Flat Bush from Light Industry to Mixed Use.

308 Te Irirangi Drive, Flat Bush



Do not support change of zone from LI to MU. The most appropropriate zone is LI. Te Irirangi Drive in this location creates a buffer between the developing residential areas to the east (Flat Bush) and industrial land to the west. The current use on the site which includes live work units is protected by existing use rights. Residential activities in this location have the potential to create reverse sensitivity issues. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to acheive the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

6096-75 Bunnings Limited (Attn: Bronwyn Carruthers)


S3 Retain the Light Industry Zoning at 320 Ti Rakau Drive, Botany.

320 Ti Rakau Drive, Botany.


East Tamaki LI LI Sensitive Area Restrictions, Sites and places of value to Mana Whenua

SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support the retention of LI. The site is adjacent to the industrial area of East Tamaki and on a main arterial road. It is established as a Bunnings Warehouse which the Council proposes to be permitted within the zone. Refer to evidence of Jeremy Wyatt for Auckland Council, Topics 051-054. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives and policies of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

1398-1 Colin Koh Highbrook and Manukau City Central Business

S3 Rezone 15 Bishop Lenihan Place, East Tamaki from Light Industrial to Mixed Use.

15 Bishop Lenihan Place, East Tamaki



Do not support change of zone from LI to MU. The most appropriate zone is LI. Te Irirangi Drive in this location creates a buffer between the developing residential areas to the east (Flat Bush) and industrial land to the west. The current use on the site which includes live work units is protected by existing use rights. Residential activities in this location have the potential to create reverse sensitivity issues. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

3091-1 Firmount Trust (Attn: Philip Ainsworth)


S3 Rezone 79 Ormiston Road, East Tamaki from Light Industry to General Business zone.

79 Ormiston Road, East Tamaki


East Tamaki LI GB N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

The submitter is requesting GB and cites the presence of large format DIY retail stores which are not possible in LI zone. The Council proposes that trade suppliers such as Bunnings and Mitre 10 are permitted in the LI zone. Refer to evidence of Jeremy Wyatt for Auckland Council, Topics 051-054. Maintaining the site as LI zone reduces the potential of creating reverse sensitivity on adjacent industrial sites and Te Irirangi Drive provides separation to the residential areas to the east. Any new areas of GB are subject to a number of criteria, set out in Policy 7 and 8 of B3.1 of the RPS, which includes distributional effects on centres, transport, effects on quality compact urban form, and industrial land. The site does not meet the criteria. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

3091-2 Firmount Trust (Attn: Philip Ainsworth)


S3 Rezone the western part of the property at 79 Ormiston Road, East Tamaki from Light Industry to General Business zone, as shown on Plan B attached to the submission.

79 Ormiston Road, East Tamaki



The submitter is requesting GB and cites the presence of large format DIY retail stores which are not possible in LI zone. The Council proposes that trade suppliers such as Bunnings and Mitre 10 are permitted in the LI zone. Refer to evidence of Jeremy Wyatt for Auckland Council, Topics 051-054. Maintaining the site as LI zone reduces the potential of creating reverse sensitivity on adjacent industrial sites and Te Irirangi Drive provides separation to the residential areas to the east. Any new areas of GB are subject to a number of criteria, set out in Policy 7 and 8 of B3.1 of the RPS, which includes distributional effects on centres, transport, effects on quality compact urban form, and industrial land. The site does not meet the criteria. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

1424-1 Gordon and Kaye Porteous Family Trust (Attn: Gordon J C Porteous)



Unit 13, 15 Bishop Lenihan Place, Botany



Do not support change of zone from LI to MU zone. While the site is located on an main arterial road (Te Irirangi Drive), this road creatres a buffer between the residential development areas to the east and the surrounding industrial land. The current use on the site which includes live work units is protected by existing use rights. Sufficient residential growth is being planned and developed around Botany Junction and within Flat Bush. Further residential development in this location has the potential to create reverse sensitivity issues in this location. Retention of the LI zone is the most approporiate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change No No

5676-1 Home Base Botany Limited (Attn: Iain McManus)


S3 Rezone 'The Bishop's Estate' - 16 Bishop Dunn Place, 1 and 5 Bishop Browne Place and 2 Bishop Croke Place, Flat Bush from Light Industry to General Business.

16 Bishop Dunn Place, 1 and 5 Bishop Browne Place and 2 Bishop Croke Place, Flat Bush



Do not support change of zone from LI to GB zone. Current activities on the site can operate under existing use rights. Any new areas of GB are subject to a number of criteria, set out in Policy 7 and 8 of B3.1 of the RPS which includes distributional effects on centres, transport, effects on quality compact urban form, industrial land and reverse sensitivity. This site is in close proximity to Botany Junction and the developing Flat Bush town centre to the east. Rezoning to GB will not give effect to the centres strategy/hierachy in the RPS.

No change No No

4274-108 Minister of Police (Attn: Justine Bray)


S3 Retain the Light Industry Zoning of 50 Ormiston Road, Flat Bush

50 Ormiston Road, Flat Bush


East Tamaki LI LI N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support the retention of the LI zone. The site is suitable for LI, located on a main arterial route, and surrounded by land zoned LI. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives on the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

1427-1 S and G Gutry Family Trust (Attn: Steve Gutry)



Unit 13, 15 Bishop Lenihan Place, Botany



Do not support change of zone from LI to MU zone. While the site is located on an main arterial road (Te Irirangi Drive), this road creatres a buffer between the residential development areas to the east and the surrounding industrial land. The current use on the site which includes live work units is protected by existing use rights. Sufficient residential growth is being planned and developed around Botany Junction and within Flat Bush. Further residential development in this location has the potential to create reverse sensitivity issues in this location. Retention of the LI zone is the most approporiate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S3 Rezone land on Ti Rakau Drive, east Tamaki as shown in the submission [refer to page 28/104] from Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings to Mixed Use.

53, 51A, 51, 49, 47C, 47B, 47A, 47V Huntington Drive, Botany


Botany THAB MU N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change of zone from THAB to MU. The site is already partly occupied by residential units, the sites is on a RFN and close to Botany MC. Immediately to the east of the sites is an area of THAB. Retention of the THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

5256-119 The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Auckland (Attn: Iain McManus)


S3 Rezone the Bishop's Estate at 28 & 32 Bishop Dunn Place, East Tamaki (excluding the Korean Parish land) to General Business.

28 & 32 Bishop Dunn Place, East Tamaki



Do not support change of zone from LI to GB zone. Current activities on the site can operate under existing use rights. Any new areas of GB are subject to a number of criteria, set out in Policy 7 and 8 of B3.1 of the RPS which includes distributional effects on centres, transport, effects on quality compact urban form, industrial land and reverse sensitivity. This site is in close proximity to Botany Junction and the developing Flat Bush town centre to the east. Rezoning to GB will not give effect to the centres strategy/hierachy in the RPS.

No change No No

Planner's Position

SUBSUBMITTER

NAME TOPIC



REQUESTED ZONE

RELEVANT OVERLAYS,



PROPOSED ZONE







S3 Rezone land on Ti Rakau Drive, east Tamaki as shown in the submission [refer to page 28/104] from Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings to Mixed Use.

53, 51A, 51, 49, 47C, 47B, 47A, 47V Huntington Drive, Botany


Botany THAB MU N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change of zone from THAB to MU. The site is already occupied by residential units, the sites i on a RFN and close to Botany MC. Immediately to the east of the sites is an area of THAB. Retention of the THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

2955-1 Udy Investments Limited


S3 Rezone all properties that have access from Bishop Lenihan Place, East Tamaki from Light Industrial to Mixed Use.

Bishop Lenihan Place, East Tamaki



Do not support change of zone from LI to MU zone. While the site is located on an main arterial road (Te Irirangi Drive), this road creates a buffer between the residential development areas to the East and the surrounding industrial land. The current use on the site which includes live work units is protected by existing use rights. Sufficient residential growth is being planned and developed around Botany Junction and within Flat Bush. Further residential development in this location has the potential to create reverse sensitivity issues in this location. Retention of the LI zone is the most approporiate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change No No

123-1 A M Finnigan and Ellis Gould Tinos Trustee Limited (Attn: J G Goodyer)


S10 Rezone 2 Ryan Pl (also known as 607 Great South Rd), 5 Ryan Pl, and surrounding properties (to a depth of one lot), at Manukau Central, from Light Industry to General Business

2 Ryan Pl, 5 Ryan Pl, Manukau

Business to Other Business Zone (excludes mixed use and centres zones)

Manukau LI GB N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning of LI to GB. The RPS seeks to retain LI zoned land as a priority where possible. The GB zoning allows for a broader range of activity including retail and simlar functions. The RPS seeks to provide for sufficient LI zoned land while limiting zoning available for retail, etc outside the commerical centres. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the LI zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

5883-1 AMP Capital Property Portfolio Limited et al (Attn: David Haines)


S10 Rezone the Manukau Supa Centa, Manukau from General Business to Metropolitan Centre [specific sites identified in the map in the submission refer page 10/48]. 72 and 100 Cavendish Drive, 51 Lambie Drive, 55 Lambie Drive, 61 Lambie Drive

72 and 100 Cavendish Drive, 51 Lambie Drive, 55 Lambie Drive, 61 Lambie Drive

Centres Hierarchy Manukau GB MC N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from GB to MC. The property falls within High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA) overlay areas and is adjacent HI zoned area. The MC zoning would allow for signficant residential development and potential reverse sensitivity issues. Retention of the current GB zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and gives effect to the centres strategy/hierarchy in the RPS.

No change No No

1606-4 Benjamin Ross Highbrook and Manukau City Central Business

S10 Rezone Manukau Metropolitan centre and surrounds as identified in the submission [page 78/80][refer points numbered 1,2 and 5 for new zones proposed].

Manukau Metropolitan centre

Centres Hierarchy Manukau MC/MHS/MU M (Super Centre)C / MU

N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support expanding MC zoning of the Manukau Metroplitian Centre. The submitter seeks to create a Manukau Metropolitan "Super' Centre zone. Retention of the current MC zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and gives effect to the centres strategy/hierarchy in the RPS.

No change No No

6096-78 Bunnings Limited (Attn: Bronwyn Carruthers)


S10 Retain the General Business Zoning at 55 Lambie Drive, Manukau.

55 Lambie Drive, Manukau.


Manukau GB GB N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support retention of GB zoning. The GB zone at 55 Lambie Drive provides an appropriate transtion between the Manukau Metropolitan Centre and the LI and HI zoning to the west. Retention of the GB zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the GB zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

3821-2 David Tam Highbrook and Manukau City Central Business

S10 Rezone majority of Self land (Puhinui) to be Mixed Housing Suburban [specific site not specified]. This site is specific, referring to all land owned by Mr Self.

286 Portage Road, Mangere


Puhinui RP MHS Precincts: • Mana Whenua Management• Mangere PuhinuiInfrastructure Overlays:• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Aircraft Noise Notification Area (57 dBA)• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Moderate Aircraft Noise AreaNotural Heritage Overlay:• Outstanding Notural Features, ID 22, Crater HillHistoric Heritage Overlay:• Sites and Places of Value to Mana Whenua


Do not support the rezoning of 286 Portage Road, Mangere from RP to MHS. The land is outside the RUB and is subject to the ONF overlay for Crater Hill, and has significant cultural heritage and landscape value to Mana Whenua. Retention of the RP zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the RP zone and gives effect to the RPS, including B8.2 by maintaining the site's capability, flexibility and accessibility for primary production.

No change No No



S10 Retain Mixed Housing Suburban at 11,25,13,15,21,17,23,19,7,9, PANTERA WAY, Manurewa.

11,25,13,15,21,17,23,19,7,9, PANTERA WAY, Manurewa.

Mixed Housing Urban/Mixed Housing Suburban/Single House Expansion/Contraction

Manukau MHS MHS N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support the retention of the MHS zoning for these sites. These properties are a significant distance from the RFN and are not close to the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. This area is mainly of suburban dwellings. The MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Retain Mixed Housing Suburban at 3,5, PANTERA WAY, Manurewa.

3,5, PANTERA WAY, Manurewa.



Support the retention of the MHS zoning for these sites. These properties are a significant distance from the RFN and are not close to the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. This area is mainly of suburban dwellings. The MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Retain Mixed Housing Suburban at 8,4,6, PANTERA WAY, Manurewa.

8,4,6, PANTERA WAY, Manurewa.



Support the retention of the MHS zoning for these sites. These properties are a significant distance from the RFN and are not close to the Manukau Metropoliian Centre. This area is mainly of suburban dwellings. The MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Retain Neighbourhood Centre at 4 NOEL BURNSIDE ROAD. Wiri.

4 NOEL BURNSIDE ROAD. Wiri.

Centres Hierarchy Manukau NC NC N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support retention of current NC zone. This NC zoning at Noel Burnside Road, Wiri can has a role and function for the surrounding Papatoetoe residential area and the Wiri industrial area. Retention of the NC zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the centres strategy and hierarchy in the RPS.

No change No No






Manukau NC NC N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support the retention of the NC zoning for this site. The NC zone provides for a variety of local shops that service both residential and industrial areas.These properties are a significant distance from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre. The NC zone complements the neighbourhood's built character and retention of the NC zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

Planner's Position

SUBSUBMITTER

NAME TOPIC



REQUESTED ZONE

RELEVANT OVERLAYS,



PROPOSED ZONE










Manukau NC NC N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support the retention of the NC zoning for this site. The NC zone provides for a variety of local shops that service both residential and industrial areas.These properties are a significant distance from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre. The NC zone complements the neighbourhood's built character and retention of the NC zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 4, ZIRCON PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

4, ZIRCON PLACE Spot zoning Manukau MHS THAB N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change from MHS to THAB zoning. This property is remote from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre and significant distance from the RFN . In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. The MHS zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 14, CELADON PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

14, CELADON PLACE, Spot zoning Manukau MHS THAB N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change from MHS to THAB zoning. This property is remote from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre and asignificant distance from the RFN. In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. The MHS zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 767A-767D,765A-765C, GREAT SOUTH ROAD,14A-14D,12A-12F, IONo PLACE, Papatoetoe from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

767A-767D,765A-765C, GREAT SOUTH ROAD,14A-14D,12A-12F, IONo PLACE, Papatoetoe



SUPPORT IN PART; PARTIAL CHANGE

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent to the RFN. THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC zone and the area does not have high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU Yes No



S10 Rezone 3, GREAT SOUTH ROAD, Manurewa from Mixed Housing Suburban to Mixed Housing Urban.

3, GREAT SOUTH ROAD,

Spot zoning Manukau MHS MHU N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; CHANGE OF ZONE

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent to the RFN route. In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU Yes No



S10 Rezone 8, TOPAZ PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

8, TOPAZ PLACE, Spot zoning Manukau MHS THAB N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change from MHS to THAB . The site is significant distance from Manukau Metropolitian Centre or TC zone. It is also a significant distance from the RFN. In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. The MHS zone complements the suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 5, TREVOR HOSKEN DRIVE,2, TOURMALIN PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

5, TREVOR HOSKEN DRIVE,2, TOURMALIN PLACE,



Do not support change from MHS to THAB . The site is significant distance from Manukau Metropolitian Centre or TC zone. It is also a significant distance from the RFN. The MHS zone complements the suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 13, ATKINSON AVENUE, Papatoetoe from Single House to Mixed Housing Suburban.13, ATKINSON AVENUE, P

3, ATKINSON AVENUE, Papatoetoe

Spot zoning Papatoetoe SH MHS HANA DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change from SH to MHS. This property falls within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA). The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. As such there are reverse sensitivity constraints. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the SH zone. In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 15, COSTAR PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Mixed Housing Urban.

15, COSTAR PLACE Spot zoning Manukau MHS MHU N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change in zone from MHS to MHU . The site is significant distance from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre and THAB zone as well as a significant distance from the RFN. In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. The MHS zone complements the suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 4, CELADON PLACE,17-19, TOURMALIN PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

4, CELADON PLACE,17-19, TOURMALIN PLACE,

Spot zoning Manukau MHS THAB N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change in zone from MHS to THAB . The site is remote from from Manukau Metropolitian Centre and a significant distance from the RFN. In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. The MHS zone complements the suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 12, BURRELL AVENUE, Wiri from Single House to Mixed Housing Urban.

12, BURRELL AVENUE, Wiri

Spot zoning Manukau SH MHU HANA DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change in zoning from SH to MHU. The site is significant distance from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre and is subject to the High Aircraft Noise Overlay (HANA) and as such there are reverse sensitivity constraints. The sie is also not close to THAB. In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 25, FREYBERG AVENUE, Papatoetoe from Single House to Mixed Housing Suburban.

25, FREYBERG AVENUE, Papatoetoe

Spot zoning Papatoetoe SH MHS N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change from SH to MHS. This property falls within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA). The area is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. As such there are reverse sensitivity constraints. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the SH zone. In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 278,278A, PUHINUI ROAD,6, BURRELL AVENUE, Papatoetoe from Single House to Mixed Housing Urban.

278,278A, PUHINUI ROAD,6, BURRELL AVENUE, Papatoetoe

Spot zoning Papatoetoe SH MHU N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change from SH to MHU zoning. The site is significant distance from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre and property falls within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA). The area is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. As such there are reverse sensitivity constraints. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the SH zone. In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 8, BURRELL AVENUE,272, PUHINUI ROAD, Papatoetoe from Single House to Mixed Housing Urban.

8, BURRELL AVENUE,272, PUHINUI ROAD, Papatoetoe



No change No No

Planner's Position

SUBSUBMITTER

NAME TOPIC



REQUESTED ZONE

RELEVANT OVERLAYS,



PROPOSED ZONE







S10 Rezone 8, BURRELL AVENUE,272, PUHINUI ROAD, Papatoetoe from Single House to Mixed Housing Urban.

8, BURRELL AVENUE,272, PUHINUI ROAD



No change No No



S10 Rezone 775,777,779,781,773, GREAT SOUTH ROAD, Papatoetoe from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

775,777,779,781,773, GREAT SOUTH ROAD, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe MHS THAB N/A SUPPORT IN PART; PARTIAL CHANGE

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent to the RFN .THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC zone and the area does not have high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU Yes No



S10 Rezone 98,88,102,90,100,92,106,94,104,96, TREVOR HOSKEN DRIVE,55,57,51,53,49, KERRS ROAD, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

98,88,102,90,100,92,106,94,104,96, TREVOR HOSKEN DRIVE,55,57,51,53,49, KERRS ROAD,


Manukau MHS THAB N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change from MHS to THAB zoning. The sites in question are remote from the MC or TC zoning and a significant distance from the RFN. Retention of the mHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 11,10,13,12,15,14,4,6,9, AMETHYST PLACE,38,58,48,46,54,44,42,50,52,62,64, DRUCES ROAD,77,61,73,79, KERRS ROAD,1,3, CELADON PLACE,47, TREVOR HOSKEN DRIVE, Wiri from Mixed House Suburban and Single House to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

Rezone 11,10,13,12,15,14,4,6,9, AMETHYST PLACE,38,58,48,46,54,44,42,50,52,62,64, DRUCES ROAD,77,61,73,79, KERRS ROAD,1,3, CELADON PLACE,47, TREVOR HOSKEN DRIVE, Wiri


Manukau SH THAB N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change from MHS and SH to THAB zoning. The sites in question are remote from the MC or TC zoning and a significant distance from the RFN. The SH zoned sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is appropriate Retention of the MHS and SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 1,9,5,7, RATA VINE DRIVE,11,13,11A,17,13A,3,5,7,9,1/15,2/15, BEGONIA PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

1,9,5,7, RATA VINE DRIVE,11,13,11A,17,13A,3,5,7,9,1/15,2/15, BEGONIA PLACE, Wiri



Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent to the RFN . THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC zone and does not have high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS

MHU Yes No



S10 Rezone 10,8A,2,2A,6,8,4, BEGONIA PLACE,7A,1,3,5,7,9, ENID PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

10,8A,2,2A,6,8,4, BEGONIA PLACE,7A,1,3,5,7,9, ENID PLACE, Wiri




Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent to the RFN . THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC zone and does not have high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS

MHU Yes No



S10 Rezone 44A-44F,38,42,40, RATA VINE DRIVE,11,13,15,19,1,3,5E,5D,5G,5F,5A,5C,5B, AZALEA PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

44A-44F,38,42,40, RATA VINE DRIVE,11,13,15,19,1,3,5E,5D,5G,5F,5A,5C,5B, AZALEA PLACE, Wiri




Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent to the RFN. THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC zone and does not have high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU Yes No



S10 Rezone 8,2,6, LAURELIA PLACE,2,4B,4A, RATA VINE DRIVE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

8,2,6, LAURELIA PLACE,2,4B,4A, RATA VINE DRIVE, Wiri




Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent to the RFN . THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC zone and does not have high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU Yes No



S10 Rezone 24,10,12,20,14,22, LAURELIA PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

24,10,12,20,14,22, LAURELIA PLACE, Wiri





MHU Yes No



S10 Rezone 1,3,5A,7, LAURELIA PLACE,10,12,18,16, RATA VINE DRIVE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

1,3,5A,7, LAURELIA PLACE,10,12,18,16, RATA VINE DRIVE, Wiri



Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent to the RFN .THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC zone and does not have high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU Yes No



S10 Rezone 15, LAURELIA PLACE,24,10,12,20,14,22,16,18,8, FELICIA PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

15, LAURELIA PLACE,24,10,12,20,14,22,16,18,8, FELICIA PLACE, Wir




MHU Yes No



S10 Rezone 11,25,13,27,15,21,17,23,19,39,31,37,26,35,29,33,3,5,7,41, FELICIA PLACE,10,12,20,14,16,18,6,8, AZALEA PLACE,32,36,34, RATA VINE DRIVE,21, LAURELIA PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

11,25,13,27,15,21,17,23,19,39,31,37,26,35,29,33,3,5,7,41, FELICIA PLACE,10,12,20,14,16,18,6,8, AZALEA PLACE,32,36,34, RATA VINE DRIVE,21, LAURELIA PLACE, Wiri




MHU Yes No



S10 Rezone 25,27,21,19,31,35,33,37A-37E,1/29-4/29, RATA VINE DRIVE,4,1/6-6/6, ENID PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

25,27,21,19,31,35,33,37A-37E,1/29-4/29, RATA VINE DRIVE,4,1/6-6/6, ENID PLACE, Wiri





MHU Yes No

Planner's Position

SUBSUBMITTER

NAME TOPIC



REQUESTED ZONE

RELEVANT OVERLAYS,



PROPOSED ZONE







S10 Rezone 17 RATA VINE DRIVE. 2 ENID PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing Suburban to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings.

17 RATA VINE DRIVE. 2 ENID PLACE, Wiri





MHU Yes No

839-7872 Housing New Zeala Highbrook and

S10

Rezone 11 MEADOWCOURT DRIVE, Manukau from Mixed Housing Suburban to Mixed Housing Urban.

11 MEADOWCOURT DRIVE, Manukau

Spot zoning

Manukau MHS MHU Aircraft noise (Mana)


Do not support change from MHS to MHU zoning. This would create spot zone within this block. (This was the only submission within this area.) Spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. The MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone 26A BALLANCE AVENUE. Papatoetoe from Single House to Mixed Housing Suburban.

26A BALLANCE AVENUE. Papatoetoe

Spot zoning

Papatoetoe SH MHS Aircraft noise (HANA)/Air Quality


Do not support change from SH to MHU zoning. The property falls within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA). The area is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. As such there are reverse sensitivity constraints. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the SH zone. In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

978-2 King Yu Law Highbrook and Manukau City Central

S10 Rezone 18 Druces Road, Manukau Central and surrounding area to Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings

18 Druces Road, Manukau Central



Do not support change from MHS to THAB. The site is remote from Manukau Metroplitian Centre or TC zoning. It is also a significant distance from the RFN. The MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

5274-2 Manukau Central Business Association Incorporated (Attn: Charlotte McCort)


S10 Rezone Manukau Metropolitan Centre and surrounds from Metropolitan Centre to Super Metropolitan Centre zone [refer submission point 1 for details of this zone] and General Business and Light Industry to Mixed Use. Refer submission for map of proposed changes [page 48/50].


Centres Hierarchy Manukau MC/GB//LI MC/MU N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support expanding MC zoning of the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. The submitter seeks to create a Manukau Metropolitan "Super' Centre zone. There are a range of constraints including aircraft noise (HANA). The issue of a potential Manukau Super Metropolitan Centre has been addressed previously in evidence on topic 051-054. Retention of the current zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the relevant zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

4279-22 Minister for Courts (Attn: Justine Bray) Highbrook and

S10 Retain the Metropolitan Centre Zone over the Manukau District Court.

30 Manukau Station Road, Manukau


Manukau MC MC N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support the current MC zoning of the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. Retention of the current MC zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the MC zone objectives and gives effect to the centres strategy/hierarchy of the RPS.

No change No No

4274-107 Minister of Police (Attn: Justine Bray) Highbrook and

S10 Retain the Metropolitan Centre Zoning of 42 Manukau Station Road, Manukau

42 Manukau Station Road, Manukau



Support the current MC zoning of the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. Retention of the current MC zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the MC zone objectives and gives effect to the centres strategy/hierarchy of the RPS.

No change No No

5723-371 Progressive Enterprises Limited (Attn: AnNo McCoNochy)


S10 Rezone the land at 277 [infer 229] Browns Road, Manurewa [infer from General Business] to Local Centre or General Business. 229 Browns Road

277 [infer 229] Browns Road, Manurewa


Manukau GB GB/LC N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from GB to LC . Support the retention of the current GB zoning at 229 Brown Street. The GB zoning is next to LI zoning and close to the Wiri HI zoning. It will provide for activities less appropriate for, or not able to locate in centres and will manage reverse sensitivity effects. Retention of the current GB zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the GB zone objectives and gives effect to the centres strategy /hierarchy of the RPS.

No change No No

6257-31 Rockgas Limited (Attn: Rosemary Dixon)


S10 Rezone 286 Puhinui Road, Papatoetoe from Neighbourhood Centre to Light Industry

286 Puhinui Road, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe NC LI N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change from NC zoning to LI zoning. The site is a suitable location for neighbourhood centre. There are a range of local retail businesses in the centre. There is also residential development in the area. The NC zoning better reflects the existing use. The NC zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the centres strategy/hierarchy of the RPS.

No change No No

4128-3 Runford Investments Limited (Attn: James Hook)


S10 Rezone 10 Pacific Events Centre Drive and 834 Great South Road, Wiri, from Mixed Use to a zone equivalent to Business 5 of the operative District Plan - Manukau Section 2002.

10 Pacific Events Centre Drive and 834 Great South Road


Manukau MU LI Stadiums & Showgrounds sub-precinct Vodafone Stadium


Do not support rezoning from MU to possible ALTERNATIVE business zone. The site is in close proximity to a MU zone, Manukau MC and the RTN. While there is no direct equivalent of Business 5 in the PAUP, the MU zone is the closest. The Auckland Council District Plan (Manukau Section) Business 5 zone is a mixed used zone for industry, offices and a limited range of retailing activity. The PAUP MU zone can also provide for residential development. The MU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

3866-2 Self Trust (Attn: Russell Bartlett)


S10 Rezone 'Self Trust' land [address not given, assume it is in Puhinui] to Mixed Housing Suburban.

286 Portage Road, Mangere


Puhinui RP SP MHS Precincts: • Mana Whenua Management• Mangere PuhinuiInfrastructure Overlays:• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Aircraft Noise Notification Area (57 dBA)• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Moderate Aircraft Noise AreaNotural Heritage Overlay:• Outstanding Notural Features, ID 22, Crater HillHistoric Heritage Overlay:• Sites and Places of Value to Mana Whenua


Do not support the rezoning of 286 Portage Road, Mangere from RP to MHS. The land is outside the RUB and is subject to the ONF overlay for Crater Hill, and has significant cultural heritage and landscape value to Mana Whenua. Retention of the RP zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the RP zone and gives effect to the RPS, including B8.2 by maintaining the site's capability, flexibility and accessibility for primary production.

No change No No

5064-1 Southpark Properties Limited (Attn: Daniel Minhinnick)


S10 Rezone 622 Great South Road, Papatoetoe to General Business zone.

622 Great South Road, Papatoetoe

Spot zoning Papatoetoe LI GB N/A DO NOT SUPPORT RETAIN; SUPPORT ALTERNATIVE ZONE

Support change from LI to MU zoning. The large is next to the RFN and close to the Manukau MC . The MU zoning provides for range of activities including business and residential. The MU zoning reflects current use of land which is used primarily as a caravan park that provides for medium term accomodation. The proposed GB zone would not provide for residential use. The MU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MU Yes No

Planner's Position

SUBSUBMITTER

NAME TOPIC



REQUESTED ZONE

RELEVANT OVERLAYS,



PROPOSED ZONE





6386-223 Te Akitai Waiohua Waka Taua Trust (Attn: Nick Roberts)


S10 Retain the Rural Production zone in the Puhinui area on land either side of Puhinui Road, east of the South-western Motorway and east of the airport.

Puhinui area Rural Urban Boundary (RUB) and rezoning

Puhinui RP RP Precinct: • Mangere Puhinui• Mana Whenua ManagementInfrastructure Overlays:• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Aircraft Noise Notification Area• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Moderate Aircraft Noise Area• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – High Aircraft Noise AreaNotural Heritage Overlay:• Outstanding Notural Features, ID 22, Crater Hill• Outstanding Notural Features, ID 166, Pukaki Lagoon Volcano

DO NOT SUPPORT RETAIN; SUPPORT ALTERNATIVE ZONE

Do not support the retention of the RP zone. The Council has undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Council’s position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. Rural zoning is not appropriate within the RUB. Rezoning the land to LI and LL, subject to precinct provisions to manage the effects of future development on the cultural landscape values of Puhinui, and to ensure that staged development of the land is co-ordinated with the provision of infrastructure is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the LI and LL zones, and gives effect to the RPS.

LI and LL Yes No



S10 Rezone land surrounding Manukau Metropolitan Centre, as shown in the submission [refer to page 50/104] from General Business and Mixed Use to Mixed Use and Metropolitan Centre.



Manukau GB/MU MC/MU N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change in zoning from GB to MU and /or MC zoning. These properties are within the HANA, as such there are reverse sensitivity constraints and are not suitable for residential development. The GB and MU zones are the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoneand give effect to the RPS including the centres strategy/hierarchy .

No change No No



S10 Rezone land surrounding Manukau Metropolitan Centre, as shown in the submission [refer to page 50/104] from General Business and Mixed Use to Mixed Use and Metropolitan Centre.

Area Wide Combined rezoning and precinct submissions

Manukau GB/MU MC/MU N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change in zoning from GB to MU and /or MC zoning. These properties are within the HANA, as such there are reverse sensitivity constraints and are not suitable for residential development. The GB and MU zones are the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoneand give effect to the RPS including the centres strategy/hierarchy .

No change No No

2748-27 The Warehouse Limited (Attn: Paula BrosNohan)

Highbrook and S10 Retain the Metropolitan Centre at Cavendish Drive [between Lambie Drive and Great South Road], Manukau.

Metropolitan Centre at Cavendish Drive



Support rentention of the MC zone. The MC zone provides for the Manukau Metropolitian Centre and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the centres strategy/hierarchy of the RPS.

No change No No

6851-1 Times Trust (Attn: Deanne D'Souza)


S10 Retain Mixed Use Zoning of 736 Great South Rd, Manukau

736 Great South Rd, Manukau


Manukau MU MU N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support retention of MU zone. The expansion of the MU zone under the notifified PAUP provides support for the Manukau Metropolitan area and allows for residential development if appropriate. The MU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

3371-21 Toa Greening Highbrook and S10 Retain the metropolitan town centre zone for Manukau

Metropolitan Town Centre zone



Support retention of MC zone for the Manukau Metropolitan area. The MC zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MC zone and gives effect to the centres strategy /hierarchy of the RPS.

No change No No

4013-1 Van Den Brink 652 Limited (Attn: Emma Bayly)


S10 Retain the General Business zone for 652 Great South Road, Manukau

652 Great South Road, Manukau


Manukau GB GB N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Suppport retention of the GB zone. This property is within the HANA and as such there are reverse sensitivity constraints. The GB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS including the centres strategy/hierarchy.

No change No No

2968-391 Westfield (New Zealand) Limited (Attn: Francelle Lupis)

Highbrook and S10 Retain Metropolitan Centre Zoning over Westfield's site in Manukau, as shown in 'Submission 9 Schedule 2: Map of Westfield's site in Manukau' on p 27/43 vol 4 of submission. [23/43 vol 4]

Manukau Metropolitan Centre Westfield



Support retention of MC zone for the Manukau Metropolitan area. The MC zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MC zone and gives effect to the centres strategy /hierarchy of the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone land on Lambie Drive and Druces Road, Manurewa as shown in the submission [refer to page 35/104] from Mixed Housing Suburban and Light Industry to Public Open Space and Special Purpose Zone.

Lambie Drive and Druces Road, Manurewa

Special Purpose Manukau MHS/LI POS/SP N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning of LI and MHS zoned areas to POS zoning. This land for the most part is not owned by Auckland Council. Part of this owned by Bethesda Residential Village, part byTransit NZ and part by ACPL. POS is therefore not appropriate, especially in the absence of landowner agreement. The LI, MHS and THAB zoning provide the most appropriate ways to achieve the objectives of the relevant zones and give effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone land on Marble Place, Manurewa as shown in the submission [refer to page 36/104] from Mixed Housing Suburban to Special Purpose.

Marble Place, Manurewa

Special Purpose Manukau MHS SP N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to SP zoning. The land is held as private property and the surrounding sites are zoned MHS. The MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No



S10 Rezone land on Lambie Drive and Druces Road, Manurewa as shown in the submission [refer to page 35/104] from Mixed Housing Suburban and Light Industry to Public Open Space and Special Purpose Zone.

Lambie Drive and Druces Road, Manurewa as

Special Purpose Manukau MHS/LI POSSP N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning of LI and MHS zoned areas to POS zoning. This land for the most part is not owned by Auckland Council. Part of this owned by Bethesda Residential Village, part byTransit NZ and part by ACPL. POS is therefore not appropriate, especially in the absence of landowner agreement. The LI, MHS and THAB zoning provide the most appropriate ways to achieve the objectives of the relevant zones and give effect to the RPS.

No change No No

Planner's Position

SUBSUBMITTER

NAME TOPIC



REQUESTED ZONE

RELEVANT OVERLAYS,



PROPOSED ZONE







S10 Rezone land on Marble Place, Manurewa as shown in the submission [refer to page 36/104] from Mixed Housing Suburban to Special Purpose.

MHS Special Purpose Manukau MHS SP N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to SP zoning. The land is held as private property and the surrounding sites are zoned MHS. The MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

867-88 New Zealand Fire Service Commission


S3 Retain the zoning at 341 East Tamaki Road, East Tamaki (Otara Fire Station) as Light Industrial.

341 East Tamaki Road, East Tamaki



Support the retention of the LI zone for this zone. Site is an appropriate location for LI fronting two arterial roads and located adjacent to other sites zoned LI. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change No No

867-89 New Zealand Fire Service Commission


S10 Retain the zoning at 15A Lambie Drive, Manukau Central (Papatoetoe Fire Station), as Light Industrial.

15A Lambie Drive, Manukau Central


Manukau LI LI N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support retention of Light Industry zone. The site is currently used by the Papatoetoe Fire Service. The site has existing use rights. Emergency services, which includes fire stations, are permitted in the LI zone. The LI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the LI zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

878-5 Waste Disposal Services


S3 Retain the Heavy Industry zoning of the Waste Disposal Services site at Neales Road, East Tamaki.

33 Neales Road, East Tamaki


East Tamaki HI HI N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support the retention of the HI zoning for the site. The site carries out waste disposal activities which have the potential to create odour and reverse sensitivity issues. As such it is an appropriate activity in the HI zone surrounded by a buffer of LI zoned land. Retention of the HI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the HI zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change No No

1221-1 Counties Manukau Pacific Trust


S10 Retain the Special -Purpose Major Recreation Facility zoning of 770R Great South Rd, Manukau

770R Great South Rd, Manukau

Special Purpose Manukau SP-MRF SP-MRF N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support retention of SP - Major Recreation Facility zone for Pacific Events Cultural Centre. This is the appropriate zoning for the Pacific Events Centre. The SP - Major Recreation Facility zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

2260-1 Chalmers Properties Limited


S10 Retain the zoning of 11 Dalgety Drive, Wiri as Light Industry.

11 Dalgety Drive, Wiri Heavy Industry Zone (HIZ) and Light Industry Zone (LIZ)

Manukau LI LI N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support retention of LI zone. The LI zone provides a buffer between the HI zone and the residential zonings of the area. Retention of LI is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the LI zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

3159-1 CDL Land New Zealand Limited


S10 Rezone 8 Diversey Lane, Wiri (Section 9 SO 64216 [infer 460605], Section 18 SO 433595 and Section 16 SO 433595), from Heavy Industry to Light Industry.

8 Diversey Lane, Wiri (Section 9 SO 64216 [infer 460605], Section 18 SO 433595 and Section 16 SO 433595),


Manukau HI LI N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from HI to LI zone. Rezoning to LI would result in the loss of scarce heavy industrial land. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area. Retention of HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)

No change No No

4320-1 Drinkrow Industrial Estate Limited


S3 Retain Heavy Industry zone on Drinkrow Industrial Estate land [former East Tamaki Quarry]

Harris Road and Crooks Road, East Tamaki



Support retention of the HI zone. This cluster of HI zoning around the Drinkrow Industrial Estate provides an area for industrial activities. The area is surrounded by a band of LI to create a buffer to residential sites. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

5256-120 The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Auckland


S3 Rezone 28 and 32 Bishop Dunn Place to the new requested Special Purpose - Places of Worship.

28 and 32 Bishop Dunn Place, East Tamaki.

Special purpose East Tamaki LI SP - Places of Worship

N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change from LI to SP - Places of Worship. Council's position on the SP - Places of Worship zone is to remove it from the PAUP. Refer to evidence of Trevor Mackie Topic 055. No change is recommended and the notified zone of LI should be retained. Existing use rights will allow the activities on site to continue.

No change No No

5259-174 Hugh Green Limited


S10 Retain the Heavy Industry zone for 210 and 216 Roscommon Road, Wiri.

210 and 216 Roscommon Road, Wiri.


Manukau HI HI N/A ACCEPT IN FULL; SUPPORT RETAIN

Support retention of HI zone. RPS addresses the need to retain HI zoning within Auckland where possible. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)

No change No No

5883-4 AMP Capital Property Portfolio Limited et al


S10 Rezone the land at 70 - 100 Plunket Avenue, Manukau from Heavy Industry to Light Industry [refer also to point number 3].

70 - 100 Plunket Avenue, Manukau



Do not support rezoning from HI to LI zones. Rezoning to LI would result in the loss of scarce heavy industrial land The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area. Importantly, retaining Plunket Avenue HI zoning provides for larger HI zoned block and a better protection against possible reverse sensitivity effects that could arise. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)

No change No No

5947-2 AML Limited and Allied Concrete Limited


S3 Retain Tamaki Site (45 Cryers Road, East Tamaki) as Heavy Industry zone.

45 Cryers Road, East Tamaki



Support the retention of the HI zoning for the site. This zone provides for activities with a reduced level of amenity. The HI zone surrounded by a buffer of LI zoned land. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the HI zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change No No

6096-76 Bunnings Limited Highbrook and Manukau City Central Business

S3 Rezone 94 Cryers Road, East Tamaki and the surrounding sites fronting Cryers Road from 90 Cryers Road through to Trugood Drive, from Heavy Industry to Light Industry.

90, 94, 110, 120 Cryers Road and 41 Trugood Drive, East Tamaki


East Tamaki HI LI N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support change of zone from HI to LI. Refer to evidence of Mr Roger Eccles for Auckland Council topic 051-054. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and South Auckland in particular. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the HI zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change No No

6193-24 Goodman Property Trust


S10 Rezone 70-100 Plunket Ave, Manukau from Heavy Industry to Light Industry.

70 - 100 Plunket Avenue, Manukau



Do not support rezoning from HI to LI zones. Rezoning to LI would result in the loss of scarce heavy industrial land The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area. Importantly, retaining Plunket Avenue HI zoning provides for larger HI zoned block and a better protection against possible reverse sensitivity effects that could arise. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)

No change No No

6933-1 Frucor Beverages Limited


S10 Retain Heavy Industry zone for 93 and 97 Plunket Ave and 22 Orb Ave, Wiri.

93 and 97 Plunket Ave and 22 Orb Ave, Wiri.


Manukau HI HI N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support retention of rezoning to HI zone. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)

No change No No

7109-36 PACT Group (New Zealand) Limited


S3 Retain the Heavy Industry zoning of 100 Harris Rd, East Tamaki. ALTERNATIVEly rezone 100 Harris Rd and the surrounding sites bounded by Harris Rd, Neales Rd, Carpenter Rd and Stonedon Dr, East Tamaki to Light Industry subject to the amendments to this zone

100 Harris Rd, East Tamaki




No change No No

7109-42 PACT Group (New Zealand) Limited


S3 Retain the Heavy Industry zoning of 43 Cryers Rd, 63 Neales Rd and 29 Carpenter Rd, East Tamaki

43 Cryers Rd, 63 Neales Rd and 29 Carpenter Rd, East Tamaki




No change No No

Planner's Position

SUBSUBMITTER

NAME TOPIC



REQUESTED ZONE

RELEVANT OVERLAYS,



PROPOSED ZONE





2466-31 Wiri Business Association Incorporated


S10 Rezone Light Industry (south/west of the Wiri area (in the block to the west of Roscommon Road and north of Kiwi Tamaki Road; and the area around to the west of Hautu Road and Ha Crescent) to Heavy Industry, as stated in the submission [refer page 16/49 a

west of Roscommon Road and north of Kiwi Tamaki Road


Manukau LI HI N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; CHANGE OF ZONE

Support rezoning from LI to HI under the Operative Plan the area is zoned Quarry zone. The former Quarry zone operated under similar controls as HI zoning and as a consequence it is less likely that reverse sensitivity issues will arise. This provides an opportunity to extend the existing HI zoning within the former quarry area. Rezoning to HI is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the HI zone and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)

HI Yes No

2466-32 Wiri Business Association Incorporated


S10 Rezone the Heavy Industry area, bound by the railway line in the east, Dalgety Drive and Kerrs Road, Hobill Avenue in the west, and Wiri Station Road to the north) to Light Industry, as stated and shown in a map in the submission [refer page 17/49].

railway line in the east, Dalgety Drive and Kerrs Road, Hobill Avenue in the west, and Wiri Station Road., Manukua



Do not support rezoning from HI to LI zoning. Support retention of rezoning to HI zone. Rezoning to LI zone would result in the loss of scarce heavy industrial land. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area. Retention of the HI zonings the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)

No change No No

3698-66 Atlas Concrete Limited (Wiri)


S10 Retain Heavy Industry zoning on 101 Roscommon Road, Wiri.

101 Roscommon Road, Wiri.


Manukau HI HI N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support retention of rezoning to HI zone. The RPS address the need to retain HI zoning within Auckland where possible. PAUP aims to provide enough HI zoned land to meet Auckland long term business and employment needs. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)

No change No No

3698-67 Atlas Concrete Limited (Wiri)


S10 Require residential areas within the Air Quality Sensitive Activity Restriction overlay buffer areas to be zoned single dwelling.

Area Wide Mixed Housing Urban/Mixed Housing Suburban/Single House Expansion/Contraction

Auckland Wide SH/MU/LI SH N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Support retention of SH zoning where practicable to limit reverse sensitivity constraints and loss of amenity in relation to residential zoning. In reality this can only be applied where there is an existing SH zone and this is not always the case as there may be other residential zoning with existing use rights in an area with reverse sensitivity constraints. The SH zoning is the most appropriate way to manage reverse sensitivity effects, to achieve the objectives of the zoning gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

3738-11 Manukau Harbour Restoration Society


S10 Rezone land in the vicinity of wharves, jetties and boat ramps around the Manukau Harbour foreshore to provide for parking and other support activities.

Area Wide Public Open Space Auckland wide. POS-IR POS-IR N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Most ramps and jetties are in POS zones that allow for car parking areas or reserve area that provided for supporting activities. The notified POS is the most appropriate way to achieve the relevant objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

5682-16 Wiri Oil Services Limited


S10 Amend the zoning of sites to the south of the Wiri Oil TermiNol, between the termiNol boundary and Hautu Drive, from Light Industry to Heavy Industry.

Hautu Drive Heavy Industry Zone (HIZ) and Light Industry Zone (LIZ)

Manukau LI HI N/A SUPPORT IN FULL; CHANGE OF ZONE

Support rezoning from LI to HI Under the Operative Plan the area is zoned Quarry zone. The former Quarry zone operated under similar controls as HI zoning and as a consequence it is less likely that reverse sensitivity issues will arise. This provides an opportunity to extend the existing HI zoning within the former quarry area. Rezoning to HI is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the HI zone and gives effect to thee RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)

HI Yes No

5819-6 Fletcher Building Group


S3 Retain the Light Industry zone at 27 Smales Road, East Tamaki.

27 Smales Road, East Tamaki.



Support retention of the LI zone. The site is located within the East Tamaki industrial area where there is a heavy industry core surrounded by light industry activities. Retaining this cluster of industrial activities is supported with light industry creating a buffer between HI and residential areas. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to acheive the objectives of the LI zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change No No

5791-61 Carter Holt Harvey Limited


S10 Rezone 195 Browns Road, Manurewa from Light Industry to Heavy Industry.

195 Browns Road, Manurew


Manukau LI HI N/A DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT RETENTION OF NOTIFIED ZONE

Do not support rezoning from LI to HI. Proposed HI zone directly opposite Browns Road MHS area. The LI zone provides a higher threshold for air quality and better protects the amenity of residential areas. Retention of the LI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)

No change No No

1889-9 James Kirkpatrick Group Limited


S10 Submission incorrectly coded to Topic 017 - RUB South. As identified in paragraph 5.1 of the Council's evidence in chief for the Southern RUB in the vicinity of Puhinui, the submission will be considered in the Council's evidence for Topic 081 Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas). Submission seeks to rezone the block of land bounded by State Highway 20 to the east, State Highway 20B/Puhinui Road to the north, Prices Road to the west and Puhinui Stream to the south, Wirifrom Rural Production to General Business.

The block of land bounded by State Highway 20 to the east, State Highway 20B/Puhinui Road to the north, Prices Road to the west, and Puhinui Stream to the south. The Southern Gateway Consortium constituting a number of individual companies are the majority owners of this block of land.


Puhinui RP GB Precinct: • Mangere PuhinuiInfrastructure Overlays:• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Aircraft Noise Notification Area• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Moderate Aircraft Noise Area• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – High Aircraft Noise AreaHistoric Heritage Overlay:• Sites and Places of Value to Mana Whenua

DO NOT SUPPORT CHANGE; SUPPORT ALTERNATIVE ZONE

The request to rezone this block of land (i.e. the Southern Gateway Consortium’s land) from RP to GB is not supported as it will not give effect to B3.1 of the RPS. The Council has undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Council's position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. LI zoning of the land is consistent with the Council’s position to rezone all the land south of Waokauri Creek (including the Consortium’s land) to LI, and is compatible with the LI and HI zoning respectively of the nearby Noel Burnside/Diversity Lane area, and Mclaughlins Road area. Rezoning to LI is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the LI zone and gives effect to the RPS.

LI Yes No

Planner's Position

SUBSUBMITTER

NAME TOPIC



REQUESTED ZONE

RELEVANT OVERLAYS,



PROPOSED ZONE





4813-1 Tunicin Investments Limitedand Airface Limited


S10 Submission incorrectly coded to Topic 017 - RUB South. As identified in paragraph 5.1 of the Council's evidence in chief for the Southern RUB in the vicinity of Puhinui, the submission will be considered in the Council's evidence for Topic 081 Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas). Submission seeks to rezone the block of land bounded by State Highway 20 to the east, State Highway20B/Puhinui Road to the north, Prices Road to the west and Puhinui Stream to the south, Wiri from Rural Production to General Business.






LI Yes No

4845-2 Southern Gateway Consortium


S10 Submission incorrectly coded to Topic 017 - RUB South. As identified in paragraph 5.1 of the Council's evidence in chief for the Southern RUB in the vicinity of Puhinui, the submission will be considered in the Council's evidence for Topic 081 Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas). Submission seeks to rezone the block of land bounded by State Highway 20 to the east, State Highway20B/Puhinui Road to the north, Prices Road to the west and Puhinui Stream to the south, Wirifrom Rural Production to General Business.






LI Yes No

4938-1 Landplan Property PartnersManukau Limited and ReadingProperties Partners Limited


S10 Submission incorrectly coded to Topic 017 - RUB South. As identified in paragraph 5.1 of the Council's evidence in chief for the Southern RUB in the vicinity of Puhinui, the submission will be considered in the Council's evidence for Topic 081 Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas). Submission seeks to rezone the block of land bounded by State Highway 20 to the east, State Highway20B/Puhinui Road to the north, Prices Road to the west and Puhinui Stream to the south, Wirifrom Rural Production to General Business.






LI Yes No

Planner's Position

SUBSUBMITTER

NAME TOPIC



REQUESTED ZONE

RELEVANT OVERLAYS,



PROPOSED ZONE





5145-7 Auckland Developers Group


S10 Submission incorrectly coded to Topic 017 - RUB South. As identified in paragraph 5.1 of the Council's evidence in chief for the Southern RUB in the vicinity of Puhinui, the submission will be considered in the Council's evidence for Topic 081 Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas). Submission seeks to provide residential and business growth in Drury, Alfriston, Karaka, Flat Bush and Puhinui.Reject development in Paerata

Puhinui Peninsula Rural Urban Boundary (RUB) and rezoning

Puhinui RP GB Precinct: • Mangere Puhinui• Mana Whenua ManagementInfrastructure Overlays:• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Aircraft Noise Notification Area• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Moderate Aircraft Noise Area• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – High Aircraft Noise AreaNotural Heritage Overlay:• Outstanding Notural Features, ID 22, Crater Hill• Outstanding Notural Features, ID 166, Pukaki Lagoon VolcanoHistoric Heritage Overlay:


The request to provide residential and business growth is supported in the Puhinui Peninsula. The Council has undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Council’s position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. Rezoning the land from RP to LI and LL zoning (to provide for future business and residential development and growth) is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the two zones and gives effect to the RPS.

LI and LL Yes No

5277-188 The Urban Design Forum NewZealand


S10 Submission incorrectly coded to Topic 017 - RUB South. As identified in paragraph 5.1 of the Council's evidence in chief for the Southern RUB in the vicinity of Puhinui, the submission will be considered in the Council's evidence for Topic 081 Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas). Submission seeks to rezone land on the Puhinui Peninsula as shown in the submission [refer to page 31/104] fromRural to Future Urban.


Puhinui RP FU Precinct: • Mangere Puhinui• Mana Whenua ManagementInfrastructure Overlays:• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Aircraft Noise Notification Area• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Moderate Aircraft Noise Area• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – High Aircraft Noise AreaNotural Heritage Overlay:• Outstanding Notural Features, ID 22, Crater Hill• Outstanding Notural Features, ID 166, Pukaki Lagoon VolcanoHistoric Heritage Overlay:


The request to rezone the land from RP to FU is not supported. The Council has undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Council’s position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. Rezoning the land from RP to LI and LL, subject to precinct provisions to manage the effects of future development on the cultural landscape values of Puhinui, and to ensure that staged development of the land is co-ordinated with the provision of infrastructure; is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the two zones and gives effect to the RPS.

LI and LL Yes No

5280-190 The New Zealand Institute ofArchitects


S10 Submission incorrectly coded to Topic 017 - RUB South. As identified in paragraph 5.1 of the Council's evidence in chief for the Southern RUB in the vicinity of Puhinui, the submission will be considered in the Council's evidence for Topic 081 Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas). Submission seeks to rezone land on the Puhinui Peninsula as shown in the submission [refer to page 31/104] fromRural to Future Urban.


Puhinui RP FU Precinct: • Mangere Puhinui• Mana Whenua ManagementInfrastructure Overlays:• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Aircraft Noise Notification Area• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – Moderate Aircraft Noise Area• Aircraft Noise – Auckland Airport – High Aircraft Noise AreaNotural Heritage Overlay:• Outstanding Notural Features, ID 22, Crater Hill• Outstanding Notural Features, ID 166, Pukaki Lagoon VolcanoHistoric Heritage Overlay:


The request to rezone the land from RP to FU is not supported. The Council has undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Council’s position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. Rezoning the land from RP to LI and LL, subject to precinct provisions to manage the effects of future development on the cultural landscape values of Puhinui, and to ensure that staged development of the land is co-ordinated with the provision of infrastructure; is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the two zones and gives effect to the RPS.

LI and LL Yes No

ATTACHMENT D: Analysis of Area-Wide Submissions SUBMISSION POINT SUBMITTER NAME SUMMARY

3698-67

Atlas Concrete Limited (Wiri)

Require residential areas within the Air Quality Sensitive Activity Restriction overlay buffer areas to be zoned single dwelling.

3738-11

Manukau Harbour Restoration Society

Rezone land in the vicinity of wharves, jetties and boat ramps around the Manukau Harbour foreshore to provide for parking and other support activities.

ATTACHMENT E: Planning Maps

Zelanian Drive

Bisho

pLenihan Place

Ballyward Close

Gortin Close

Lush

in

gton Place

Cotte

sm

o r e Place

Bernish Place

Ormiston Road

Highb

rook Drive

Morestead Avenue

Gran

sna L

ane

Leix le

p La n

e

Opi to

Way

Kella

wayD

r ive

Transpo rtPlace

Kilbaha Close

Ballyroney Place

Feen

y Crescent

Derg Place

Srah PlaceBallydonega

n Ris e

Polaris Place

PaulS

tevens

onPlace

BruceRo der ic

kDriv

e

NewarkP lace

Lissle

tonDr

i ve

Waiouru Road

Wand

o Lane

Pukekiwiriki Place

Progressive Way

Ron D

river

P lace

Ston edon Drive

Papatoetoe,Hunters Corner,

Middlemore, MangereEast, Wymondley

Papatoetoe

Otara

Pakuranga, Farm Cove,Pakuranga Heights,

Burswood, Golflands

Botany, Point ViewDrive, Dannemora,

Flat Bush

Flat Bush, Botany JunctionFlat Bush and

Botany Junction

Laidl

awWa

y

Guy s Road

Huntington

Drive

TeKoha Road

Greenmount Drive

Pukekiwiriki Place

Cryers Road

Trugood Drive

Highbrook Drive

Business Parade North

Allens Road

Harri

s Roa

d

Sprin

gs R

oad

Smales Road

Haven Drive

Lady Ruby Drive

NeilparkDr

ive

Kerwyn Avenue

Accent Drive

Riplington Road

Matar angi R

oad

BirminghamRoad

Kellaw

ayDrive

Oneroa Roa d

Crooks Road

Jarvi

s Way

Offen hause r Drive

RedcastleD rive

Waihi Way

Amuri Place

Analie Place

Heritage Way

Bostock Place

BasaltPlace

S

kip

L a ne

Lorien Place

CaptainsC r escent

Belcoo Crescent

Milli n gton Place

SayesClose

Parkwood Place

UnderwoodStreet

Halid

ayPla

ce

Reg Savory Place

Beale

Place

Liffey

Drive

Nandina Avenue

Co rrofinDrive

Barm

acPla

ce

Korde

l Place

Shankill Pl a ce

Hilbo

rn R

oad

BishopDunnPlace

StonedonDr ive

Zelanian Drive

Neales RoadEchelon Place

Frans

hell Crescent

Lilyba nk CrescentSir Woolf Fisher Driv e

ElKobar Drive

Ross

Reid Place

ArwenPla

ce

RaOr

a Driv

e

W aiouru Road

Blackb

urnRo

ad

Andromed a Cresce

nt

Carpe

nter R

oad

SirWi

lliamA

venu e

LEGENDSubmission Area Unit

Properties subject to a submissionAmendRetain

Unitary Plan Zone - As NotifiedSpecial PurposeLarge LotSingle HouseMixed Housing SuburbanMixed Housing UrbanTerrace Housing and Apartment BuildingsFuture UrbanGreen Infrastructure CorridorRural and Coastal SettlementNeighbourhood CentreLocal CentreTown CentreMetropolitan CentreCity CentreMixed UseGeneral BusinessBusiness ParkLight IndustryHeavy IndustryRural ConservationCountryside LivingRural CoastalMixed RuralRural ProductionPublic Open Space - ConservationPublic Open Space - Informal RecreationPublic Open Space - Sport and Active RecreationPublic Open Space - CommunityPublic Open Space - Civic SpacesStrategic Transport CorridorRoad [i]Defence [rcp/dp]Ferry Terminal [rcp/dp]Minor Port [rcp/dp]Marina [rcp/dp]Mooring [rcp]General Coastal Marine [rcp]Water [i]Coastal TransitionHauraki Gulf Islands

Rural Urban Boundary [rps] as notified

Indicative Coastline

Submission Area UnitZoning submissions and zones as notified

0 300 600150 m

Date: 19/01/2016

S3Highbrook

Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan

South

Note : Submissions mapped include Topic 080 and 081

Papatoetoe,Hunters Corner,

Middlemore, MangereEast, Wymondley

Papatoetoe

Otara

Pakuranga, Farm Cove,Pakuranga Heights,

Burswood, Golflands

Botany, Point ViewDrive, Dannemora,

Flat Bush


Botany Junction

Oneroa Roa d

S

kip

L a ne

BishopDunnPlace

Shankill Pl a ce

Laidl

awWa

y

Guy s Road

HuntingtonDrive

Kellaway

Drive

Greenmount Drive

Co rrofinDrive

Pukekiwiriki Place

Cryers Road

Trugood Drive

BirminghamRoad

Highbrook Drive

Business Parade North

TeKoha Road

Allens Road

Harri

s Roa

d

Sprin

gs R

oad

Smales Road

Haven Drive

Lady Ruby Drive

NeilparkDr

ive

Kerwyn Avenue

Accent Drive

Riplington Road

Lilyb

a nk Crescent

Mata ra ngi R

oad

StonedonDri ve

Feeny

Crescent

Belcoo Crescent

Crooks Road

Jarvi

s Way

Off e nhaus erDr

ive

Saidia Place

Waihi Way

Amuri Place

RedcastleD rive

Analie Place

Heritage Way

Bostock Place

BasaltPlace

Lorien Place

Sir Woolf Fisher Driv e

SayesClose

Parkwood Place

Underwood Street

Frans

hell Crescent

Halid

ayPla

ce

Reg Savory Place

Beale

Place

Liffey

Drive

Nandina Avenue

Barm

acPla

ce

Korde

l Place

Andromeda Cresce

ntHil

born

Roa

d

W aiouru Road

Zelanian Drive

Echelon Place

ElKobar Drive

Ross

Reid Place

ArwenPla

ce

RaOr

a Driv

e

Blackb

urnRo

adCa

rpente

r Roa

d

SirWi

lliamA

venu e

Neales Road


Area of change

Area of change - out of scope

Revised zoneSpecial PurposeLarge LotSingle HouseMixed Housing SuburbanMixed Housing UrbanTerrace Housing and Apartment BuildingsFuture UrbanGreen Infrastructure CorridorRural and Coastal SettlementNeighbourhood CentreLocal CentreTown CentreMetropolitan CentreCity CentreMixed UseGeneral BusinessBusiness ParkLight IndustryHeavy IndustryRural ConservationCountryside LivingRural CoastalMixed RuralRural ProductionPublic Open Space - ConservationPublic Open Space - Informal RecreationPublic Open Space - Sport and Active RecreationPublic Open Space - CommunityPublic Open Space - Civic SpacesStrategic Transport CorridorRoad [i]Defence [rcp/dp]Ferry Terminal [rcp/dp]Minor Port [rcp/dp]Marina [rcp/dp]Mooring [rcp]General Coastal Marine [rcp]Water [i]Coastal TransitionHauraki Gulf Islands


Revised Rural Urban Boundary

Submission Area UnitRevised zones

0 300 600150 m

Date: 19/01/2016

S3Highbrook


South

Note : Zone changes include Topic 080, 081 016 & 017

Pukaki Road

Retreat Dr ive

Prices Road

Papatoetoe,Hunters Corner,Middlemore, MangereEast, WymondleyPapatoetoe

ManukauCentraland Wiri

Mangere

Manurewa,Homai and

Clendon Park

Orrs Road

South-Western Motorway

RetreatDri ve

Campana Road

Prices Road

Pukaki Road







0 350 700175 m

Date: 19/01/2016

S10aPuhinui


South


Papatoetoe,Hunters Corner,Middlemore, MangereEast, WymondleyPapatoetoe

ManukauCentraland Wiri

Mangere

Manurewa,Homai and

Clendon Park

Orrs Road

RetreatDrive

Pukaki Road

South-Western MotorwayCampana Road

Prices Road


Area of change






0 350 700175 m

Date: 19/01/2016

S10aPuhinui


South


Lakewood Court

DrucesRoad

Barro wcli ffe P lace

Kiwi Tamaki Road

Hautu Drive

J e rry

Green Stre

et

Pacific Events Centre Drive

Ryan Place

Oil Termi nalR

oad

Cave

ndish Drive

Wiri Station R o

ad

Putney Way

Clendon Avenue

CeladonPlace

Marble Place

Golden Arches Place

Athy Place

Bolderwood Place

Mclau

g hlin

s Road

Bakerfield Place

Stoneh il l Drive

Mayo Road

Ha Crescent

Otara


Botany Junction

Manurewa,Homai and

Clendon Park

Puhinui

Sharkey Stre et

Ihaka Place

Wiri Station Road

Ash Road

Leyton Way

Hobill Avenue

Earl Richardson Avenue

Kiwi Tamaki Road

Wilco PlaceHautu Drive

Mclau

ghlin

s Roa

d

Isola Place

Diversey Lane

Noel Burnside Road

Lambie Drive On Ramp

Langley Road

Roscommon Road

Lambie Drive

Dalgety Drive

Pettit Place

Kerrs Road

Cavendish Drive

Druces Road

Vogler Drive

Ryan Place

Amersham Way

InverellAvenue

Ranfurly Road

Mcvilly Road

Grayson Avenue

Brett Avenue

Costar Place

Iona Place

Airport Off Ramp

RataVine Drive

Putney Way

Laurelia Pl ac

e

Plunket Avenue

TrevorHoskenDrive

Stone

hill D

rive

Manukau Station Road

Paloma Court

Ronwood Avenue


Amethyst Place

Bolderwood Place

Davie sAvenue

Balemi WayJack Conway Avenue

Burrell Avenue

IslayPlaceTourmalin Place

Lambie Drive Off Ramp

Joval Place

Narek Place

Keith Hay Drive

Aerovis ta Place

Freyberg Avenue

Ballance Avenue

Gerona Crescent

Seddon Avenue

Atkinson Avenue

Mepa l Place

Great South Road Off Ramp

Windoma Circ l e

OrbAvenue

Leith Court

Mana Place

Azalea Place

EdselWay

Nesdale Avenue

Clist Cresc ent

Oak RoadKello w

Place

Eleanor Way

Felici a Pl a

ce

OnslowAvenue

Gladding P lace

Fa lcon Road

Taco

maRoad

FreemanWay

Glasgow Avenue

Cavendish Drive Off Ramp

Chonny Crescent

Mayo Road

Ha Crescent







0 280 560140 m

Date: 19/01/2016

S10bManukau Central and Wiri


South


WiriCentralSchool

PuhinuiSchool

ManurewaHigh

SchoolHomaiSchool

ManurewaHigh School

Blind and LowVision Education

Network N

ManurewaHigh

School

Otara


Botany Junction

Manurewa,Homai and

Clendon Park

Puhinui

Sharkey Street

IslayPlace

Gladding P lace

Ihaka Place

Ash Road

Leyton Way

Te Irirangi Drive

Kiwi Tamaki Road

Wilco PlaceMcvilly Road

Fa lcon Road

Isola Place

Noel Burnside Road

LakewoodCourt

Lambie Drive On Ramp

Langley Road

Roscommon Road

Wiri Station Road

Lambie Drive

Dalgety Drive

Norman SpencerDrive

Hautu Drive

Pettit Place

Plunket Avenue

Kerrs Road

Felicia Pl a

ce

Cavendish Drive

Druces Road

Vogler Drive

Ryan Place

Amersham Way

InverellAvenue

Ranfurly Road

Grayson Avenue

Brett Avenue

RataVine Drive

Costar Place

Iona Place

Airport Off Ramp

Putney Way

Laurelia Pl ac

e

Clendon Avenue

TrevorHoskenDrive

Manukau Station Road

Paloma Court

Ronwood Avenue


DaviesAve nue

Balemi WayJack ConwayAvenue

Stone

hill D

rive

Burrell Avenue

Tourmalin Place

Lambie Drive Off Ramp

Joval Place

Narek Place

Athy Place

Keith Hay Drive

Aerovis ta Place

Freyberg Avenue

Ballance Avenue

Gerona Crescent

Seddon Avenue

Atkinson Avenue

Great South Road Off Ramp

Windoma Circ l e

OrbAvenue

Leith Court

Earl Richardson Avenue

Mana PlaceBolderwood Place

Azalea Place

EdselWay

Nesdale Avenue

Oak RoadKello w

Place

Eleanor Way

OnslowAvenue

Mclau

ghlin

s Roa

d

Taco

maRoad

FreemanWay

Hobill Avenue

Glasgow Avenue

Cavendish Drive Off Ramp

Chonny Crescent

Mayo Road

Ha Crescent


Area of change






0 280 560140 m

Date: 19/01/2016

S10bManukau Central and Wiri


South


ATTACHMENT F: Proposed Amendments outside the Scope of Submissions

SUB-REGION TOPIC AREASUB AREA

UNIT SUB AREA UNIT NAMEFULL STREET

NUMBER STREET NAME SUBURB NAME NOTIFIED ZONE PROPOSED ZONE REASON FOR CHANGE

SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 7 Alicante Avenue Manukau Central SH MHS

Support rezoning of notified SH zone to MHS as although the SH zone could be retained due to the site(s) being affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. Rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 1 Browns Road Manurewa MHS MHU

Support rezoning of notified MHS zone to MHU. The site is close to an RFN (Great South Rd) and a LC. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.





SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 83 Browns Road Manurewa SH MHS

Support rezoning of notified SH zone to MHS zone. Managing flooding risks on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.





SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 2 Costar Place Manukau Central MHS MHU

Support rezoning of notified MHS zone to MHU. The site is on a RFN (Great South Rd) and close to a LC. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 1 Great South Road Manurewa MHS MHU
















SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 888 Great South Road Manukau Central SH MHU

Support rezoning of notified MHS zone to MHU. Managing flooding risks on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The site is on a RFN (Great South Rd). The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

SUB-REGION TOPIC AREASUB AREA

UNIT SUB AREA UNIT NAMEFULL STREET

NUMBER STREET NAME SUBURB NAME NOTIFIED ZONE PROPOSED ZONE REASON FOR CHANGE

SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 890 Great South Road Manukau Central MHS MHU

Support rezoning of notified MHS zone to MHU. The site is on a RFN (Great South Rd). The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.





SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 2 Kerrs Road Manukau Central MHS MHU


SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 8 Kerrs Road Manukau Central MHS MHU

Support rezoning of notified MHS zone to MHU. The site is close to an RFN (Great South Rd). The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 5 Laurelia Place Manukau Central MHS MHU


SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 6 Orams Road Manurewa MHS MHU


SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 6A Orams Road Manurewa MHS MHU


SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 41 Pantera Way Manukau Central SH MHS

Support rezoning of notified SH zone to MHS as although the SH zone could be retained due to the site(s) being affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. Rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

SouthHighbrook and Manukau City Central Business S10b Manukau Central and Wiri 14 Rata Vine Drive Manukau Central MHS MHU








council evidence, rezoning - manukau and highbrook

Documents