costa rica forest research programme (crf) · costa rica forest research programme (crf) carate,...
TRANSCRIPT
COSTA RICA FOREST RESEARCH
PROGRAMME (CRF)
Carate, Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica
CRF Phase 162 Science Report 1 April 2016 – 31 June 2016
Jenna Griffiths, Pascal Lovell, Charlotte Watteyn
2
CRF Phase 162
Staff Members
Jenna Griffiths (JG) Research and Operations Manager (ROM)
Pascal Lovell (PL) Principal Investigator (PI)
Charlotte Watteyn(CW) Principal Investigator (PI)
Berglind Karlsdottir (BK) Assistant Research Officer (ARO)
Alex McCaffety (AC) Assistant Research Officer (ARO)
Saule Paltanaviciute Assistant Research Officer (ARO)
Katie Buckley Assistant Research Officer (ARO)
Brooke Bierhaus Field Communications Officer (FCO)
3
CRF Phase 162
Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................ 4
1.1 Natural history of Costa Rica and its wildlife conservation ............... 4 1.2 Osa Peninsula ................................................................................... 5 1.3 Aims and Objectives of Frontier CBP ................................................ 8
2 Training ................................................................................................. 10 2.2 Briefing Sessions ............................................................................. 10 2.3 Science Lectures ............................................................................. 10 2.4 Field Training .................................................................................. 11 2.5 BTECs, CoPEs and TEFLs during phase CRF162. ............................... 11
3 Research Work Programme .................................................................. 12 3.2 Survey Areas ................................................................................... 12 3.3 Projects .......................................................................................... 13
3.3.1 Estimating the Population Density of the Four Primate Species Coexisting ............................................................................................. 13 3.3.2 Mammal track study along Rio Carate, Osa Peninsula ................. 17 3.3.3 Turtle predation study along Carate and Leona beach, Osa Peninsula. ............................................................................................. 24 3.3.4 Birds of Carate lagoon, a study on the species richness and abundance ............................................................................................ 24 3.3.5 Bird species richness and abundance in primary, secondary and degraded forest..................................................................................... 29
4 References ............................................................................................ 36
4
CRF Phase 162
1. Introduction
1.1 Natural history of Costa Rica and its wildlife conservation
Costa Rica, located between Nicaragua and Panama, is one of the seven Central American
countries and covers an area of 51.100 km2. It is surrounded by the Pacific on the west and the
Caribbean on the east, creating a coast line of 1103 km and 255 km respectively. Even though
this small country covers only 0.01 percent of the earth’s surface, it contains >4% of the world’s
biodiversity, including around 12,000 plant species, 1,239 butterfly species, 838 bird species,
440 reptile and amphibian species, and 232 mammal species (Sánchez-Azofeifa et al., 2002;
IUCN, 2006; World Resources Institute, 2006; National Biodiversity Institute, 2007). The high
species richness has been attributed to two main factors; its geographical location and climatic
conditions. The fact that Costa Rica is situated between North and South America means it can
serve as a species corridor between these two continents. Furthermore, it lies halfway between
the Tropic of Cancer and the equator, leading to an annual average temperature of 27 °C, with
very little fluctuations throughout the year. Therefore, the seasons in this area are defined by
precipitation, not temperature, resulting in a distinct dry and wet season. The dry season starts
around November/December and continues through April/May, after which the rainy season
begins. The southern Pacific lowlands receive a particularly high degree of average annual
rainfall (about 7,300 mm) (Baker, 2012). Although more than one-fifth of Costa Rica is protected,
further action must be taken in order to raise, or at least sustain the current level of biodiversity
(World Resources Institute, 2006).
Costa Rica is one of the world’s leading countries in environmental sustainability and
conservation (Fagan et al., 2013), however, this has not always been the case. Like many other
countries throughout the world, Costa Rica has been the site of extensive deforestation over the
past few centuries. Up until the 1960s, activities such as logging and hunting seriously
threatened the biodiversity in this region, resulting in over half of the country’s forests being cut
down and many species being driven to the verge of extinction (Henderson, 2002). The poaching
of turtles for the fatty calipee and collection of turtle eggs for example, has severely depleted
populations of endangered black turtles (Chelonia mydas) and vulnerable olive ridley turtles
(Lepidochelys olivacea) that use Costa Rica’s coastlines as nesting sites. Similarly, the hunting of
Costa Rica’s wild cat species, peccaries and tapirs for their meat, skins and other body parts, has
significantly reduced wild populations. Since the 1960s, some of these issues have been
5
CRF Phase 162
controlled through the implementation of several reforestation programs, legislation, education
and the creation of protected areas, now representing almost 27% of the country’s surface area
(The World Bank Group, 2015). Costa Rican law currently protects 166 species from being
hunted, captured and traded, yet illegal hunting still occurs, including in protected areas (Baker,
2012). Deforestation and habitat fragmentation outside of the country’s protected areas and
national parks is still a significant problem due to expanding human populations and related
increases in economic pressure. Additionally, the projected impacts of climate change are also
likely to have significant adverse effects on Costa Rican biodiversity (Baker, 2012). Due to the
high levels of biodiversity and multiple threats placed on Costa Rica it is important to conduct
research to determine the health of the ecosystem and its species. Massive deforestation and
the resulting biodiversity crisis have already increased awareness and interest in conservation
of tropical habitats worldwide (Wilson, 1992), but the real practice requires a basic
understanding of the native fauna and flora; and since tropical forests are not single,
homogeneous, biotic formations (Gentry, 1990), the biodiversity of these areas must be
understood on a local, as well as regional, level.
1.2 Osa Peninsula
The Osa Peninsula is located in the southwest of Costa Rica and covers an area of 1093 km²
(Henderson, 2002). The peninsula contains the last remnants of tropical broadleaved evergreen
lowland rainforest on the Central American Pacific slope (Kappelle et al. 2002) and has a very
high species richness of about fifty percent of Costa Rica’s biodiversity. Furthermore, this area
inhabits several endemic species such as the Cherrie’s Tanager (Ramphocelus costaricensis), the
Red-backed squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedii)) and the Golfo Dulce poison dart frog
(Phyllobates vittatus). Since these and more species are only found in this area, it makes the Osa
Peninsula the ideal location for conservation research (Larsen & Toft 2010).
Three main forest types can be found in the Osa Peninsula; Tropical Wet, Premontane Wet and
Tropical Moist forest, with elevations ranging between 200 and 760 m (Santchez-Azofeifa et al.,
2002). The variation in topography leads to a highly variable climate, with an average annual
rainfall of 5500 mm, a mean temperature of around 27 °C and humidity levels almost never
dropping below 90% (Cleveland et al, 2010). There are about 12,000 people living in the Osa
Peninsula, mainly settled in small and scattered villages. The most important sources of income
in this region are agriculture (rice, bananas, beans and corn), livestock (cattle), gold mining,
6
CRF Phase 162
logging and, more recently, the expanding eco-tourism industry (Carrillo et al., 2000).The human
population is increasing at a rate of 2.6% annually, which is incredibly high compared to 1.3% in
the rest of the country and 1.14% globally (Sánchez-Azofeifa et al., 2001). As a result of the
growing popularity of ecotourism, there has been a rise in the number of hospitality business
along the road, from Puerto Jimenez to Carate, since the 1990s (Minca and Linda, 2002). This
has caused growing concern for the sustainability of the region’s environmental resource
demands (Sánchez-Azofeifa et al., 2001).
The Frontier’s Costa Rica Forest Research (CRF) programme began in July 2009 in collaboration
with the local non-governmental organisation, Osa Conservation, based at the Piro site (N
08°23.826, W 083°20.564) in the southeast of the Osa Peninsula. In October 2015, Frontier
moved to Carate, located in the southwest of the Osa Peninsula. The site is a prime location for
carrying out both forest and shoreline surveys as there is relatively easy access to both the
primary and secondary forest, as well as pristine beach habitat. The long term objectives of the
project are to provide information on the dispersal and diversity of faunal communities in the
Golfo Dulce Forest Reserve, with the aim of increasing protections and connectivity in the area,
whilst also investigating the effects of climate change, deforestation and other anthropogenic
impacts on the terrestrial communities of Costa. There are five core faunal study groups within
CRF; primates, sea turtles, wild cats and other mammals, herpetofauna and bird
Figure 1. Map of the Osa Peninsula, showing Carate, our area of study http://www.vivacostarica.com/costa-rica-
maps/costa-rica-maps-southern-pacific.html.
8
CRF Phase 162
1.3 Aims and Objectives of Frontier CBP
Under the umbrella of the research program, the specific aims and objectives of Frontier CRF
are:
1. To estimate the population density, distribution and feeding preferences of the four
primate species present in Carate, Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica; and compare these among
the different habitat types present in this area.
2. To assess mammal species richness and abundance along Rio Carate by searching for
natural tracks in and near the riverbed.
3. To assess nest success and turtle nest predation by conducting morning and night turtle
patrols along two beaches, Playa Carate and Playa Leona.
4. To determine bird species richness and abundance in and around the lagoon of
pejeperrito in Carate; and to see how changes in environmental variables affect the
presence of these species.
5. To compare the bird species richness and abundance between primary, secondary and
degraded forests, by performing point counts along the different trails, focusing on 44
forest bird species selected on several criteria, such as endemism, IUCN status,
ecological function and migratory features.
6. *To gather information about the amphibian and reptile species richness in the primary,
secondary and degraded forests of Carate, Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica.
*The points in italic are the studies that are still in their initial phases. We are currently working
on developing the methods to carry out these studies.
10
CRF Phase 162
2 Training
The volunteer Research Assistants (RAs) and newly appointed staff members receive a number of
briefing sessions on arrival (Table 1), followed by regular science lectures and field training (Table 2)
throughout their deployments. The CRF research program also supports candidates completing the
BTEC Advanced Certificate, Advanced Diploma in Tropical Habitat Conservation, the Certificate of
Personal Effectiveness (CoPE) and the Teach English as a Foreign or second Language (TEFL) (Table 4).
2.2 Briefing Sessions
All the people newly arriving to CRF get an introduction towards the aims of the research program, the
methodologies used and the research output of the individual projects. Furthermore, they get an
update on the achievements of CRF through a general Science presentation; this is an introduction to
the Frontier Costa Rica Forest Research Program in Carate. Additionally, all volunteers and staff are
given a health, safety and medical briefing, of which they are tested on before participating in any field
activity. Volunteers undertaking any kind of the previous mentioned qualification courses are given an
introductory briefing before they begin the assessments.
Table 1. Briefing sessions conducted during Phase CRF162
Briefing Session Presenter
Introduction to the Frontier Costa Rica Forest Research Programme JG, CW
Health and Safety Briefing and Test CW, BK, AC, SP
Medical Briefing and Test CW, BK, AC, SP
Introduction to the BTEC, CoPE & TEFL Qualifications JG, CW
Introduction to Surveying and Monitoring ALL
Camp Life and Duties JG, CW
2.3 Science Lectures
A broad program of science lectures is offered at CRF, providing information and training the different
aspects of research going on in our study area. Lectures are presented using PowerPoint and give a
better understanding about the biology and ecology of the studied species. Furthermore, they give an
insight in the methods and data analysis used by CRF and considerations made when planning research
projects.
Lectures are scheduled with the following objectives:
To allow every volunteer and member of staff to attend each presentation at least once during
deployment, regardless of length of stay.
To meet the time requirements for BTEC assessments.
11
CRF Phase 162
Name BTEC Title and Type Mentor
Bea Tropical Habitat Conservation – Advanced Certificate BB, SP
Lucia Tropical Habitat Conservation – Advanced Certificate AR
Marianne Tropical Habitat Conservation – Advanced Certificate BK
Eleanor Tropical Habitat Conservation – Advanced Diploma AC, KB
To avoid conflict with other activities, maximizing attendance
To provide detailed training on specific software and applications used in conservation, such as
GPS.
Attendance of lectures is compulsory.
Table 2. Science lectures delivered during Phase CRF162.
Science Lecture Presenter
Primates JW, AC
Terrestrial birds ALL
Lagoon birds BK
Turtle patrol survey JG
Mammal tracks and GPS workshop JG
Amphibians and Reptiles BK
Climate change ALL
2.4 Field Training
All volunteers and newly appointed staff members receive field training. Training is hands-on and
provides an opportunity to become familiar with the field equipment used during surveys. These
sessions are held before starting every survey, to inform volunteers and new staff members about the
way the survey is carried out and to assure accurate data collection. Both in the field and on camp site,
various identification books are present to teach how to identify flora and fauna species.
2.5 BTECs, CoPEs and TEFLs during phase CRF162.
Frontier offers volunteer Research Assistants an opportunity to gain internationally recognised
qualifications based around teamwork, survey techniques, environmental conservation and effective
communication of results. The BTEC in Tropical Habitat Conservation can be done in a four week
program (Advanced Certificate) or a ten week program (Advanced Diploma). Table 4 gives an overview
of the BTECs carried out during this phase.
Table 3. BTECs, CoPEs and TEFLs during phase CRF 162.
12
CRF Phase 162
3 Research Work Programme
3.2 Survey Areas
All the fieldwork is carried out in Carate, located in the southwest of the Osa Peninsula. The research
in this area began in November 2015. The landscape is heterogeneous, composed of lowland moist
primary, secondary and coastal forest, and disturbed forest. Dominant tree species include; Ficus
insipida, Ceiba pentandra, Attalea butyracea, Carapa guianensis, Castilla tunu, Spondias mombin,
Hyeronima alchorneoides, Chimarrhis latifolia, Fruta dorada, Caryocar costaricense, Ocotea insularis,
Pouteria torta, and Inga allenii. Mean annual rainfall and temperature for the area is 5,000-6,000 mm
and 26-28 °C respectively; the dry season extends from the end of December until March. Different
trails have been selected, including the different types of habitat and with different degrees of usage
and disturbance (table 4). These trails are used as survey transects for the eight different projects.
Most of the trails are narrow and machete-cut. The exact habitat types present on the trails is not yet
known, for example, it is highly possible that Luna ridge contains a mix of primary and secondary
forest. In order to assess this in more depth GIS work is being undertaken and in-depth habitat studies
are required, perhaps with the help of drones to get more knowledge about all the different habitat
types present in Carate and surroundings.
Table 4. Current trails used for the research carried out in Carate S coordinates of the start and the end of the trail, as well as the length (km).
Trail Name (code) Transect Length (km)
GPS Coordinates START trail
GPS Coordinates END trail
Disturbed forest Attalea Loop (with some secondary forest patches)
1 km 08º26'11.14 N 83º26'16.99 W
08º26'29.60 N 83º29'02.37 W
Road 1.8 km 08º26'28.37 N 83º26'25.73 W
08º26'28.11 N 83º27'16.33 W
Secondary forest Shady Lane 2.5km 08º44'44.59 N
83º27'49.54 W 08º26'48.19 N 83º28'52.97 W
Beach Trail (mix of coastal and secondary forest) 2 km 08º26'36.69 N 83º44'63.16 W
08º26'50.30 N 83º29'02.37 W
Leona Loop 2km 08º26'56.09 N 83º29'04.37 W
08º26'56.39 N 83º29'05.16 W
Gallery forest Rio Carate 2.5 km 08º44'22.75 N
83º46'31.56 W 08º27'37.30 N 83º27'48.69 W
Primary forest Leona Ridge 4 km 08º26'48.19 N
83º28'52.97 W 08º26'54.51 N 83º29'05.16 W
Luna Ridge 9 km 08º26'29.63 N
83º27'16.62 W
08º26'28.54 N 83º26'56.86 W
13
CRF Phase 162
Turtle patrols take place on two beaches; Playa Carate and Playa Leona. River Rio Carate passes
through the survey areas, bordering the National park of Corcovado, and has an important function in
providing water and food for animals when they move out of the park.
3.3 Projects
3.3.1 Estimating the Population Density of the Four Primate Species Coexisting
Introduction
Throughout Costa Rica, four different primate species can be found; the Central American squirrel
monkey (Saimiri oerstedii), the mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata), the geoffroy’s spider
monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) and the white-faced capuchin (Cebus capucinus). The Osa Peninsula is the
only part of Costa Rica where these four new world primate species occur together, making this place
a very interesting area for study (Carrillo et al., 2000). Primates are predominantly frugivorous,
therefore, they have an important ecosystem function as seed dispersers, making them vital for
maintaining the plant diversity within the forest (Julliot, 1997; Garber et al., 2006). Generally, primate
species are highly sensitive to land conversion for agricultural purposes and development, clear
cutting, selective logging, hunting and the pet trade (Cropp and Boinski, 2000). In Costa Rica, primates
are mainly threatened by increased rates and amounts of forest loss and fragmentation, and
infrastructural changes for the country's booming tourism industry. In Panama, they have fared even
worse since deforestation has been extensive and unregulated (Boinski & Sirot 1997; Boinski et al.
1998). The development of agribusinesses for oil palm and banana plantations is a serious component
of habitat destruction and fragmentation. Logging roads, clearings for telephone and electric power
lines, or other practices leading to forest fragmentation restrict populations to smaller forest areas,
decreasing their ability to find food during times of the year when food abundance is lowest (e.g. dry
season) and leading to declines of genetic diversity, which in turn affects the population health and
stability (Boinski et al. 1998).
Since October 2015 Frontier CRF has been surveying the presence of the four primate species in Carate.
The overall research aim is to gain more knowledge about the distribution of the four primate species
in this area of the Golfo Dulce Reserve. By comparing the richness and abundance of primate species
between the different habitat types, we can gain more information regarding management and policy
decisions on a local level. Until now, density estimates are lacking for the Central American squirrel
monkey and the white-faced capuchin, which makes them key to survey, however, focus is also placed
on the red listed spider and howler monkeys.
14
CRF Phase 162
The Central American squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedii) is one of the five species of squirrel monkeys.
Their status on the IUCN list is Vulnerable, with decreasing populations (IUCN, 2008). The main threats
are habitat loss due to logging and agriculture. They inhabit the lowland rainforests of Pacific Costa
Rica towards Western Panama. They are an arboreal and diurnal species, depending on a diet of
insects, leaves, fruits, barks, flowers and nectar, and foraging in the low and middle levels of primary
and secondary Forests. Group sizes range from 20 to 75 individuals that are travelling between 2.5 and
4.2 km per day (IUCN, 2008). The white-headed capuchin (Cebus capucinus), also known as the white-
faced or white-throated capuchin, has a very important ecological function within the forest ecosystem
by dispersing pollen. They are Least Concern on the IUCN list but their main threats include tree logging
and clear-cutting because these activities drastically reduce suitable habitats. Other threats include
the capturing for the pet trade and hunting for their meat. Like the squirrel monkeys, the capuchins
are diurnal and arboreal species with a diet of mainly fruits and insects. They range from Honduras all
the way down to Ecuador and are highly adaptive species, meaning they can occupy various habitats,
but usually occur in tropical evergreen and dry deciduous forests. Their group size ranges from 4-40
individuals, with a mean average of 16 and they travel on average 2 km a day (IUCN, 2008). The Golden
mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata) is found in Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Panama and Guatemala,
mostly in the older areas of evergreen primary forest as well as secondary and semi- deciduous
forest. They have an important function as seed dispersers and germinators and their dung is an
important food source for several dung beetle species. Their status on the IUCN list is Least concern
(IUCN, 2008). They are diurnal, arboreal species with a diet that mainly consists of leaves, giving them
low amounts of energy which makes them rest for most of the day. Their main threats are forest
destruction and fragmentation. The group size ranges from 10-20 individuals, but can reach up to 40
individuals. The males are characterized by a very obvious white scrotum when they reach sexual
maturity and have an enlarge hyoid bone which allows them to create a loud howling noise, usually
displayed at dawn and dusk (IUCN, 2008). The Geoffroy’s spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) is native to
Costa Rica and Panama and is currently Endangered with a decreasing population (IUCN, 2008). They
are diurnal and arboreal species, mainly inhabiting the upper layers of the forest, and have a diet of
fruits, leaves and sometimes insects, seeds, barks and flowers. Their threats are habitat loss and
hunting for their meat and the pet trade. The group size ranges from 20-40 individuals that are living in
a fission-fusion society, meaning that they split into subgroups during the day and congregate again
during the night (IUCN, 2008).
Material and Methods Data was collected by walking six different trails (Beach trail, Road, Attalea loop, Luna ridge, Leona
loop, Shady lane) and conducting total counts of all the primates encountered. The surveys started
between 05.30 and 06.00 am, to cover peak primate activity and thus increasing detection
15
CRF Phase 162
probability. A minimum of three observers walked at a constant speed of 2 km/h, including regular
stops every 100m as recommended by Peres (1999). The six trails were divided into three main
habitat types; primary (Luna ridge, Leona loop), secondary (Beach trail, Shady lane) and degraded
(Road, Attalea loop) forests. Each trail was walked in one way, and not more than once a week. The
surveys were done in fair weather because of reduced detection probability in adverse weather
conditions. As phase two included the start of the reason, there were some problems with cancelling
surveys because of adverse weather conditions. When encountering a monkey troop, an observation
time of maximum 30 minutes was set. This provided enough time to assure a reliable count of all the
individuals without disturbing them for too much time (Pruetz & Leasor 2003). All individuals seen at
the same time and exhibiting the same general behaviour (i.e., resting, moving or foraging) were
considered to be part of the same group (Chapman et al., 1995). Where possible, secondary data on
group composition (i.e. gender and age; adult, juvenile, infant) was also recorded. Furthermore, the
behaviour (i.e. resting, moving or foraging) upon encounter, the duration of observation, the
perpendicular distance from the trail to the geometric centre of the group at first sighting, height of
the group in the tree and direction of travelling was noted. This study was non-invasive and according
to the legal requirements of Costa Rica (Costa Rican Government Decree 31514-MINAE). Any kind
of abnormal or aggressive behaviour towards the observers by individual primates was responded to
by moving on as quickly as possible.
Results
A comparison was made between the abundance of the different primate species of the six different
trail types (Luna ridge, Leona ridge, Shady lane, Beach trail, Attalea loop, Road) (figure 2), that are
divided in three main habitat types (primary, secondary and degraded forest). A Kruskal-Wallis test
was carried out, since there are more than 2 groups to compare and the data didn’t fulfill the
requirements to carry out a parametrical test. The p-value is lower than 0.05, meaning that there is a
significant difference between the groups (here: trails) in mean amount of individuals per primate
species. On average, the lowest amount of primates was found on the trails with primary forest,
whereas the highest amount was encountered on the trails with secondary and degraded forest.
Squirrel and capuchin monkeys were not encountered in Leona and Luna ridge, which are the trails
containing primary forest. They were only present on the other trails, which are the ones containing
secondary and degraded forest. The other two primate species were found on all the trails, but more
on the trails that hold secondary and degraded forest.
16
CRF Phase 162
Figure 2: Mean abundance of individuals per primate species encountered on the six different trails.
Discussion
During this phase, focus was placed on the abundance of the four primate species among the six
different trails. The results so far showed the opposite of what was expected. More primates were
seen in the secondary and disturbed forests than in the primary forests. One reason for this could be
that they use the disturbed forest patches as a corridor to move in between secondary and primary
forest patches. Since primate groups cannot be followed during the whole day, it is difficult to know
where exactly they are foraging so the data collected thus far cannot be relied upon. Therefore, it
would be preferable to focus on the overall distribution of the primates in Carate and their trophic
preferences.
A general study on their distribution will be established in the next phase and their richness and
abundance among the different types of habitat will be compared. More research is needed to find
suitable methods, for example, the use of line transects, and a laser range finder to make better
estimates about the distances of the primate groups from the observation point on the trail, etc.
This will involve a more in-depth literature study during the next phase in which we hope to
implement the new methods.
17
CRF162
3.3.2 Mammal track study along Rio Carate, Osa Peninsula
Introduction
In general, protected areas are the backbone of conservation and are supposed to safeguard the
species inside the area. However, many protected areas don’t function in the way they should (e.g.
Caro & Scholte, 2007; Russel & Cuthill, 2009; Craigie et al., 2010). Effective protection to maintain
healthy species richness and abundance can vary with the location and size of the area. Furthermore,
abiotic and biotic as well as indirect and direct human activities occurring close to the borders of the
reserve, such as firewood collection, cattle grazing, bush fires, fishing and hunting, are affecting all the
organisms living in or crossing the periphery of the reserve (Laurance, 2010). With increasing human
disturbance, mammals often move to the central parts of protected areas while areas closer to the
park boundaries may be less attractive due to the negative effects of human activities along the edges.
Despite the fact that these so-called edge effects can have big consequences regarding conservation
issues (e.g. Primack, 2010), this topic has received little attention. Most of the studies have been
focusing on large carnivore species (e.g. Revilla et al., 2001; Slotow & Hunter, 2010), showing that their
large individual home ranges are extending the boundaries of the decreasing reserve areas, leading to
a movement outside the reserves via buffer zones, however, the threats outside the reserves block
these species from moving out of the reserve. Instead, they often have to move back towards the
centre, leading to population declines due to habitat and food competition. Despite protective
legislation, these kind of human-wildlife conflicts are common throughout Central and South America
(Zimmermann et al. 2005), as natural habitats are still being converted for agricultural purposes and
resource extraction, and poaching activities are still present along the reserve borders (Cavalcanti &
Gese 2009).
Estimating the distribution and abundance of mammals is not that easy. Especially in the case of the
Osa Peninsula, where big mammals are extending their home ranges from Corcovado National Park
towards other areas within the Osa Peninsula. This makes it even more vital to conserve and manage
these areas and the biological corridors that connect them. Information on the distribution is also vital
for the introduction of education and awareness initiatives, with the aim of preventing human-wildlife
conflict that threatens mammal populations and livelihoods across the species range (Zimmermann et
al. 2005). The aim of this study is to estimate the mammal species richness and abundance along the
river Rio Carate, which is located at the border of Corcovado National Park, the Osa Peninsula, Costa
Rica. Corcovado National Park compromises primary lowland rainforests, and serves as an important
haven for various animals and plant species. However, for many mammal species, the area of the park
18
CRF162
is not sufficient to maintain healthy populations. By using tracking techniques, we can gain knowledge
about the mammal species present in and along the border of the park, and it will give us an idea of
which mammals are moving in and out of the park. This is especially important for feline species, since
their broad distribution ranges obligate them to move in between different protected areas in order
to not override their maximum carrying capacities.
Material & Methods
Tracking mammals by following footprints is probably the oldest known method of identifying
mammal’s presence in an area (Bider, 1968). Track surveys are efficient and usually low in cost, but are
dependent on suitable field conditions and trained observers (Burnham et al, 1980; Smallwood &
Fitzhugh, 1995). Track searches were performed along the river Rio Carate, Carate, Osa Peninsula,
Costa Rica; starting at the river estuary, and going two kilometres upstream. The surveys consisted of
volunteers walking and looking for tracks in and around the riverbed. Surveys started at 7:00 am to
prevent tracks from being washed away. More than 200 mammal species are currently present in the
different forest types of Costa Rica, with this study focusing on 20 mammal species. Table 6 gives an
overview of the 19 selected mammal species. All species are found in the lowland rainforests of the Osa
Peninsula (Cavalcanti & Gese, 2009). Among the focal species’ distribution range, only the Baird’s
tapir is listed as Endangered. Many other mammal species are listed as globally Vulnerable or Near
threatened (IUCN, 2014). However, in Costa Rica, the six feline species, Neotropical river otter and
Paca are considered to be Endangered (Cavalcanti & Gese, 2009).
All mammal tracks were recorded and identified by measuring its widest point and the vertical distance
from the toes to the palm pad and by using mammal track sheets (Adapted and modified of Sanchez,
1981). The GPS position of the track was noted down as well as the direction of movement. This gave
information on the movement of individuals within a certain area. If a track of the same species was
found within 100 m from the previous track, it was not recorded and was assumed to be the same
individual. Due to the very dry substrate, which is a mix of sand and rubble, a considerable level of skill
was necessary to accurately detect and identify the tracks.
Finally, the program Estimate S was used to estimate the mammal species diversity. With this
program, we are able to estimate the Simpson’s diversity Index, which is essentially the probability of
two randomly chosen individuals (tracks) being from different species. Furthermore, an estimate of
the evenness was made, which showed how evenly distributed the species were.
19
CRF162
Table 6. Overview of the 20 selected mammal species (IUCN, 2014)
Common species name Latin species name IUCN status Costa Rica status
Baird’s tapir Tapirus bairdii Endangered Endangered
Collared peccary Peccari tajacu Least concern Least concern
White-lipped peccary Tayassu peccary Vulnerable Endangered
Red brocket deer Mazama Americana Data deficient Data deficient
Tayra Eira Barbara Least concern Least concern
Neotropical river otter Lontra longicaudis Data deficient Endangered
Striped hog-nosed skunk Conepatus semistriatus Least concern Least concern
Common opossum Dedelphis marsupialis Least concern Least concern
Water opossum Chironectes minimus Least concern Least concern
Northern tamandua Tamandua Mexicana Least concern Least concern
White-nosed coati Nasua narica Least concern Least concern
Crab-eating raccoon Procyon cancrivorus Least concern Least concern
Central American agouti Dasyprocta punctate Least concern Least concern
Paca Agouti paca Least concern Least conern
Nine-banded armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus Least concern Least concern
Puma Puma concolor Least concern Endangered
Ocelot Leopardus pardalis Least concern Endangered
Jaguarondi Puma yagouaroundi Least concern Endangered
Margay Leopardus wiedii Near threatened Endangered
Jaguar Panther onca Near threatened Endangered
Figure 2. Standard measurements taken; A- Track widest point and B- vertical distance from the toes to the palm pad.
20
CRF162
Results
During this second phase of the mammal track project, 16 different species were seen over 15 surveys,
of which 2 were unidentified (1 unidentified cat spp, 1 unidentified mammal species). The 14
identified species were: agouti, armadillo, Baird’s tapir, red brocket deer, collared peccary, common
opossum, crab-eating racoon, margay, Neotropical river otter, ocelot, tayra, water opossum, white-
lipped peccary, and white- nosed coati. 104 different individuals were seen over the 15 surveys. The
mean species count per sample (or in our case survey) was 6.5; meaning that on average, six different
species were seen each survey. The amount of tracks for each mammal species is given in figure 4.
Most of the tracks are from the Neotropical river otter, followed by the ocelot, Baird’s tapir, crab-
eating raccoon and white-nosed coati.
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Figure 4. Graph representing the amount of tracks found per mammal species over the 15 surveys.
The cumulative number of species encountered (y) levels off with the cumulative number of samples
(surveys) carried out over time (x) (figure 5). However, after carrying out a rarefaction, the curve does
not level off much towards the end, suggesting that the maximum number of species in the area have
not been recorded.
we have not been able to record the maximum number of species present in the area.
MEA
N E
NC
OU
NTE
R O
VER
SU
RV
EYS
MAMMAL SPECIES
21
CRF162
Sanple Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Total
Species Count 7 6 4 3 6 3 4 5 1 6 2 3 3 2 0 16
Cumulative Spcies Count
7 10 10 11 13 13 13 13 13 15 15 15 16 16 16 16
Abundance 9 9 5 8 5 5 4 16 1 10 2 5 2 4 4 89
CU
MU
LATI
VE
SPEC
IES
NU
MB
ER
Rarefaction: A statistical interpolation method of rarefying or thinning a reference sample by drawing
random subsets of individuals (or samples) in order to standardize the comparison of biological diversity on the
basis of a common number of individuals or samples.
Species accumulation curve: A curve of rising biodiversity in which the x-axis is the number of sampling units
(individuals or samples) from an assemblage and the y-axis is the observed species richness. The species
accumulation curve rises monotonically to an asymptotic maximum
number of species.
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
CUMULATIVE SURVEY NUMBER
Figure 5. The species accumulation and rarefaction curve.
Table 7. An overview of the species count, cumulative species count, abundance and cumulative sample number. The species
count gives the amount of species found in each sample (survey). The cumulative species count adds the amount of species
found in sample x to the amount of species found in sample x-1. The abundance gives the amount of individuals over all the
species found in each sample. The cumulative sample number gives the amount of samples (surveys) carried out during the
period.
22
CRF162
Log
Cu
mu
lati
ve S
pec
ies
Nu
mb
er
The extrapolated species accumulation curve (figure 6), gave the equation for an estimation of how
many surveys would be needed to observe the maximum amount of species present in the area. Table
7 shows the amount of species we would have throughout the surveys. So far, 15 surveys have been
completed, revealing the tracks of 16 species. Based on the formula, around 19 different species’
tracks should have been seen, which shows that the equation gives a good estimate of reality.
1.4
1.2
1
y = 0.4495x + 0.7838
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Log Cumulative Sample Number
Figure 6. The extrapolated species accumulation curve with an equation that gives the relationship between the species
richness and the number of samples (surveys).
Sample Number
Cumulative Species Number
Log Sample Number
Log Cumulative
Species Count
1 7 0 0.84509804
2 10 0.301029996 1
3 10 0.477121255 1
4 11 0.602059991 1.041392685
5 13 0.698970004 1.113943352
6 13 0.77815125 1.113943352
7 13 0.84509804 1.113943352
8 13 0.903089987 1.113943352
9 13 0.954242509 1.113943352
10 15 1 1.176091259
11 15 1.041392685 1.176091259
12 15 1.079181246 1.176091259
13 16 1.113943352 1.204119983
14 16 1.146128036 1.204119983
15 16 1.176091259 1.204119983
23
CRF162
Furthermore, the output of Estimate S gave an estimate of the species diversity, similarly to the Simpson’s
diversity index. The Simpson’s mean (D) was 8.21, and from this the Simpson’s mean index (1-D) was
calculated with the formula 1-D = 1-(1/D) = 0.878197. Since this is close to 1, it means that there was a high
mammal species richness over all of the surveys. Using the Simpson’s diversity index, evenness (E) was
calculated with the formula E = (1/D)/S, with S being the amount of samples (surveys). The result was
0.631538, which is closer to 1, meaning that Rio Carate is characterized by a quite an evenly distributed
abundance of species.
Discussion
From the results so far we can see that there are 16 mammal species present and active around Rio
Carate. 15 surveys have been carried out, and a higher sample effort is needed to determine the true
value of the number of species found here. The extrapolation curve (Figure 6) is starting to level off at the
end, meaning that the number of species detected in this study is quite close to the number of species
present in this area (that can be detected with this methodology).
Most of the tracks were identified as Neotropical river otter, which can be mainly explained by the fact that
the surveys were carried out along the river Rio Carate. It is still interesting to see that even though it is
dry season, there are still quite a few otters present in the area. During dry seasons, mammals tend to
move to other places to look for more favourable habitats. They have to look for water and food
resources that they are not finding in the areas they used to live during the wet season. Quite a lot of
ocelot tracks were observed, as well as Baird’s tapir, crab-eating raccoon and white-nosed coati. The
presence of feline species tracks, such as the ocelot, shows that wild cats are moving in and out of
Corcovado National Park, however, more data and analysis is needed to figure out how abundant they are
and to which areas they are moving to and from.
The data during phase two was collected towards the start dry season, probably affecting the encounter
probability as it is thought that mammals move deeper into the centre of a protected area (in this case
Corcovado National Park), looking for food and water resources. In general, the composition of mammal
communities depends on the forest’s ability to support the requirements of the mammals present in the
area. Modification of habitats, such as temporal or spatial changes, may generate boundaries for species
due to the newly created patchiness in the landscape, and this has effects on the structure and dynamics
of all biological communities (Cadenasso et al., 2003). Surveys carried out over the whole year, will make it
interesting to see if there is a difference in the amount of mammal species and abundance we see during
the wet and dry seasons.
24
CRF162
During the following phase, some changes to the methodology should be made. Instead of only using
natural mammal tracks, track boxes of a previous BTEC student will be used and placed higher up the river
since observational walks have shown that there are more tracks present higher up. Data will continue to
be taken from natural tracks, but the trail will be extended higher up the river as so far only a length of
about 2km is covered. Furthermore, many mammals are shy and elusive creatures, and their adaptation to
live in the undergrowth or canopy, or their nocturnal lifestyle makes detection difficult. Over the years,
wildlife biologists have used various tracking techniques to assess mammal populations. The most
common method is to detect the tracks left in fine soil or sand (Olifiers et al. 2011), which is what we did
during this phase, however, the addition of camera traps will allow for much more efficient detection. This
method is especially efficient for inventories of cryptic animals as well as for population studies of species
for which individuals can be individually recognized by marks (Karanth, 1995; Carbone, 2001). Camera-
trapping is an important non-invasive tool for assessing patterns of mammal abundance and richness
throughout space and time, and their link with activity patterns, habitat use and reproductive information,
which are key elements for wildlife conservation research. Track surveys are efficient and usually involve
low costs, but depend on suitable field conditions and trained personnel (Burnham et al., 1980; Smallwood
and Fitzhugh, 1995). Camera-trapping on the other hand is more costly at the beginning, but is not so
dependent on the environment to be sampled, constant assistance or experienced field staff (Rappole
et al., 1985). Once camera trapping has been included in the methodology, the data from it can be
combined with the data from track surveys.
3.3.3 Turtle predation study along Carate and Leona beach, Osa Peninsula.
As the high season for the turtles that nest in this region only starts in August, turtle patrols are only
carried out from July onwards (during the next phase), and therefore the study has not been included in
this report.
3.3.4 Birds of Carate lagoon, a study on the species richness and abundance
Introduction
Coastal areas are typically characterised by a high human population density and thus activity, causing a
high pressure on the associated ecosystems, such as lagoons. Increasing human activity results in
environmental deterioration and disturbs biogeochemical processes that are going on in the lagoons
(Seitzing et al., 2005; Halpern et al., 2008; Qu & Kroeze, 2010). Due to ideal temperatures and
precipitation patterns, tropical coastal areas are very productive zones, and are therefore highly affected
25
CRF162
by anthropogenic nutrient loading compared to similar habitats at higher latitudes (Yule et al., 2010;
Smith et al., 2012).
Coastal lagoons are shallow waterbodies, spatially separated from the ocean by sandbars and barrier
islands or temporarily separated during certain times of the year (Johnston, 2000). They are highly
productive ecosystems, providing several ecosystem services valuable for society, including fisheries,
storm protection, tourism, etc. (Gönenc & Wolflin, 2005; Anthony et al., 2009). Although, little changes in
water quality can have big effects on the functioning of the lagoon, and all its associated living organisms.
The degree to which a lagoon is sensitive towards changes in water quality mainly depends on the lagoon
type, referring to its exchange rate with the ocean and its size and on the faunal and floral communities
present in and around the lagoon (Johnston, 2000). Due to the little amount of information available about
the sensitivity of lagoons towards changes in water quality, there is a need to examine which environmental
parameters affect the health of the lagoon in general, with focus on the bird communities. There are a
couple of quality parameters that are expected to have a big influence on the functioning of lagoons, such
nutrient enrichment, turbidity, toxic contamination and organic enrichment (Johnston, 2000). Especially
with changing climate, these parameters can vary, affecting the physical structure, ecological
characteristics and social values associated with lagoons. Expected shifts in physical and ecological
features range from changes in flushing regimes, freshwater inputs and water chemistry, to inundation
and habitat loss (Anthony et al., 2009). Gathering more information about coastal lagoons, especially in
the context of climate change, is critical. In this study, the bird species richness associated with a tropical
lagoon, situated in Carate, Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica, is studied; as well as their response upon changes in
environmental parameters. In addition, evidence from the few lagoon-specific studies undertaken,
suggests that once impacted (particularly by nutrient enrichment) lagoons may recover slower from
impacts due to changes in water quality. This highlights the need to identify water quality impacts within
lagoons as early as possible and suggests the need for a precautionary approach to interpreting and acting
on information that may indicate an impact (Johnston, 2000).
This study seeks to examine the health of the lagoon Pejeperro in Carate. Bird species richness and
abundance will be examined in order to understand how the lagoon is functioning. Furthermore,
information will be gathered about different environmental parameters, their change over time and the
effect on the bird diversity.
Material and methods
The study is carried out at the coastal lagoon Pejeperro, located on Carate beach, Carate, Osa Peninsula,
Costa Rica. During dry season (December-may), the lagoon is separated from the Pacific ocean, changing
the internal characteristics (e.g. salinity, nutrient concentration, turbidity). Heavy rains allow the lagoon to
26
CRF162
connect again with the ocean. The lagoon is surrounded by lowland rainforest and gets disturbed by the
activities of local fisherman and tourists staying at the surrounding eco-lodges. A group, consisting of a
minimum of three and maximum five observers, carry out the survey at two different spots close to the
lagoon. A minimum of three persons are necessary to fulfill the health and safety requirements of the
Frontier Costa Rica Project (see earlier), and a maximum of five persons allows us to minimise the
disturbance on the foraging behaviour of the birds during the survey. The spots were chosen in such a way
that we are close enough to see and identify the birds without disturbing them too much. Once arrived at
the survey point, all the different bird species present in the lagoon, on the sandbanks as well as in the
vegetation surrounding the lagoon were noted down. Not included in the study were bird species of the
lowland rainforest from right behind the lagoon since these bird species were more likely to be part of the
forest ecosystem. Birds were identified with binoculars and bird identification books (Garrigues, 2014). If
they were unidentifiable, pictures were taken and then identified back on camp.
Results
During the second phase (April – June 2016), 32 different lagoon bird species were identified in and
around the lagoon of Carate. Table 8 gives an overview of the identified lagoon bird species, grouped
by family.
Table 8: Overview of the identified lagoon bird species, grouped by family.
Herons, Sandpipers, Guls, Plovers, Ibises, Spoonbils Jacanas Rails, Other Egrets, Allies Terns, Lapwings (Threskiornithidae) (Jacanidae) Crakes, lagoon- Bitterns (Scolopacidae) Skimmers (Charadriidae) Gallinules dependent
(Ardeidae) (Laridae) (Rallidae) birds
Bare- throated
tiger heron
Sandpiper spp.
Black tern Black-billed plover
Roseate spoonbill Northern jacana
Purple gallinule
Baltimore oriole
Great egret
Solitary sandpiper
Least tern Plover spp. White ibis Black vulture
Great blue heron
Snowy plover Blue-back grosbeak
Green heron
Southern lapwing
Blue-winged teal
Little blue heron
Cherries tanager
Reddish egret
Crested caracara
Snowy egret
Great kiskadee
Tri- coloured
tiger heron
Great-tailed grackle
Yellow- crowned
night heron
Scarlet macaw
Smooth-billed ani
White- collared
seedeater
27
CRF162
The Ardeidae family is well represented in and around the lagoon (table 8). The families containing the
little birds, such as the sandpipers, terns and plovers, are less represented. Besides the typical lagoon
bird species, we also saw a number of species not exclusively found in the lagoon (scarlet macaws,
black vultures etc). Figure 6 below shows the mean amount of individuals seen per species during the
first two phases of the year.
28
CRF162
MEA
N A
MO
UN
T O
F IN
DIV
IDU
ALS
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Figure 6: Mean amount of individuals per species seen during phase 1 and 2. Discussion
This is the first time that a lagoon bird study has been carried out on this project. During the first
weeks, observers had to get to know the birds and needed more time to identify them. Now, those
conducting the surveys are more skilled and are able to spot and identify the different bird species
more easily.
From Figure 6 we can see that the species that were detected in the highest abundance were the
northern jacana, white ibis, and the bare-throated tiger heron respectively. However, these species
are very easily identified and may have skewed their detection probability to their favour.
It is hoped that, during the next phase, the effects of disturbance on the species richness and
abundance of the lagoon birds can be investigated. By comparing surveys with (human) disturbance to
surveys without (human) disturbance, we can see if kayaks, fisherman, etc. have a negative influence
on the bird diversity in the lagoon. It could be noted that observers conducting these studies also
disturb the birds present in and around the lagoon. However, since there is a high level of species
richness, it can be said that this presence has a very low effect on their behaviour or no effect at all.
Another idea is to include different environmental parameters into the study. Since it is known that
salinity, temperature, pH, depth, etc. influence the functioning of lagoon ecosystems, it is important
to know have they vary over time and if this influences the presence of bird species in and around the
lagoon. In order to carry out these extra measurements, MINAE need to be contacted and the
standard protocol for water quality monitoring needs to be followed.
Finally, the use of kayaks during the next phase of the study would be necessary in order to survey
the whole lagoon, as currently only a small area of the lagoon can be observed from the shore,
29
CRF162
making data collection difficult. This will require going into the water before sunrise, finding a fixed
spot in the lagoon and waiting until birds arrive. In this way, we don’t disturb them since we are not
moving and are stationary in the kayak.
3.3.5 Bird species richness and abundance in primary, secondary and degraded forest
Introduction
The highly heterogeneous environments of Costa Rica give rise to many species-rich communities,
particularly those within the bird families (Herzog, Kessler & Cahill, 2002). Costa Rica hosts
approximately 850 bird species, of which 160 species are endemic (Henderson, 2010). This high bird
species richness means that Costa Rica has a relatively long history of studies focusing on bird
community structure (e.g., Young et al, 1998; Blake & Loiselle, 2001; Sigel et al, 2006) and demography
(e.g., Ruiz-Gutiérrez et al, 2008; Young et al, 2008; Woltmann & Sherry, 2011). Birds provide various
important ecological functions, such as seed dispersion and pollination, and can therefore help in the
maintenance of plant communities, and even contribute towards the reforestation of fragmented
habitats (Pejchar et al., 2008). However, the majority of bird studies have been carried out in pristine
habitats with very little attention given to degraded or fragmented areas (Wilson, Collister & Wilson,
2011). Furthermore, partly due to its remoteness, little is known about the bird communities of the
Osa Peninsula despite its extraordinary species diversity and high levels of endemism (Wilson, Collister
& Wilson, 2011).
Home to approximately 375 species of birds (or 420 species according to Garrigues, 2007), including
many migratory birds and 18 endemic species (Sanchez-Azofeifa et al, 2002), the Osa Peninsula
comprises one of the largest remaining tracts of intact lowland rainforest in Mesoamerica (Barrantes
et al, 1999). This provides important habitat for a myriad of bird species. While 39% of the region is
under the protection of Corcovado National Park, in recent decades significant development,
deforestation and forest fragmentation has occurred outside of the reserve (Sanchez-Azofeifa et al,
2002).
Deforestation and fragmentation is considered the primary threat to birds in the Osa Peninsula (Osa
Conservation, 2016). Due to a human population growth rate of 2.6% (Sánchez-Azofeifa et al, 2001)
and increases in ecotourism, large areas of forest have been cleared to make space for agricultural
practices and the hospitality industry (Minca & Linda, 2002). Studies have found that in the period
between 1979 and 1997 the percentage of forested area in the Osa decreased from 97% to 89%
(Sanchez-Azofeifa et al, 2002). Furthermore, Sanchez-Azofeifa et al (2002) found that as of 1997, the
majority of the remaining forest outside of Corcovado National Park has been altered, with only 44%
30
CRF162
of the region representing mature forest. Today, the tropical forest exists as a patchwork of various
size, age and connectivity within a human-dominated landscape (Wilson, Collister & Wilson, 2002).
Particular bird groups, such as understory insectivores (Canaday, 1996; Sekercioglu et al, 2002; Sigel et
al, 2006), can be very sensitive to such changes, whilst others are able to utilise degraded and
fragmented habitats (Wilson, Collister & Wilson, 2002). Development is likely to continue in the Osa
Peninsula and thus it is of the upmost importance to understand how birds, outside of Corcovado
National Park, are being affected by these changes.
In addition to deforestation and fragmentation the birds of the Osa Peninsula are up against another
threat: climate change. This threat is not unique to the region, however, changes in temperature,
precipitation and greater climatic extremes are likely to have significant impacts on the avifauna. Due
to the fact that birds are endothermic, increased temperatures may cause greater energy use for
thermoregulation (Wormworth & Mallon, 2006). Additionally, temperature changes can indirectly
affect the birds reproduction, timing of breeding and migration (Wormworth & Mallon, 2006). For
example, shifts in temperatures cause birds to shift the timing of seasonal events such as egg laying or
migration (Wormworth & Mallon, 2006). This causes birds to be out of synchrony with other species,
particularly plants and insects, which are necessary for their survival (Wormworth & Mallon, 2006).
Such changes may significantly impact species’ reproductive success, which could ultimately result in
the collapse of breeding populations in the long-run (Wormworth & Mallon, 2006). Precipitation
changes are also expected to negatively affect bird populations. Studies have shown that periods of
low or zero rainfall are correlated with lower bird populations due to reduced food availability
(Wormworth & Mallon, 2006). Furthermore, it is believed that climate change is likely to increase
extreme weather events such as drought or flooding (Wormworth & Mallon, 2006). Extreme conditions
can alter important habitats and reduce the survival rates of both young and adult birds. Moreover,
drought or floods in critical stopover areas along bird migration routes can impair migratory birds’
ability to reach their final destination (Wormworth & Mallon, 2006). Altogether, the effects of climate
change and birds responses to it will vary from species to species, thus it is critical that the different
species of the Osa Peninsula are monitored in order to determine how they are being affected.
Overall, the high species diversity and endemism of the avifauna in the Osa Peninsula coupled with the
threats of deforestation, fragmentation and climate change, highlights the need to better understand
and monitor the birds in the region. Due to the lack of scientific studies on birds in the Osa Peninsula,
Frontier aims to determine the species richness and abundance of birds in Carate in relation to their
habitat and disturbance, since bird distribution and species richness is often explained by habitat type
31
CRF162
and environmental characteristics. Therefore, owing to their sensitivity towards environmental changes,
birds are good indicators of habitat health (Wilme & Goodman, 2003). Monitoring trends in bird
diversity may help to identify species at risk of population decline or even extinction due tohuman-
induced environmental changes, such as habitat fragmentation and loss, climate change,
pollution and pet trade (Pejchar et al., 2008).
As such, the main objective is to compare the species richness and abundance between disturbed,
secondary and primary forest habitats through point count surveys, whereby the bird species are
recognized by sound and sight. In addition, Frontier aims to support the goals of the National Parks
Service in the United States of America and MINAE by monitoring migratory birds species that inhabit
both North America and migrate to Costa Rica during winter periods. Finally, due to the sensitivity of
birds to climate change, Frontier aims to monitor the bird species diversity and abundance in
conjunction with climatic changes over the long term.
Material and Methods
This study focuses on 44 bird species, and the species are selected based on the following criteria;
endemic species, data deficient/poorly studied species, specialist species, migratory species, species
under threat (according to the IUCN) and species that perform a high ecological function. Worldwide,
the most important places for habitat-based conservation of birds are the Endemic Bird Areas (EBAs).
Most of the bird species are widespread and can inhabit large ranges of habitats. Some however are
said to be endemic since they are restricted to specific areas due to food and habitat requirements.
The landscapes where these species occur are high priority for broad-scale ecosystem conservation.
EBA’s are found around the world, but most of them are located in the tropics and subtropics,
especially the tropical lowland forest and moist montane forest. Geographically, EBA’s are often
islands or mountain ranges (Birdlife International, 2008). The poorly studied species are species with
very few or deficient data available about their status, distribution, abundance, etc., which makes them
highly prioritized species to study. Specialist species are occurring in certain habitats because of
specialist habitat or food resource needs. If their habitat disappears, it is very likely that the species
disappears will disappears too. Regarding the migratory species, we are working together with the
American National Park of North America and Canada. The bird species that are migrating from north
to south during northern hemisphere winters are being studied since little information is available
about these species when they are moving towards the south. Finally, the bird species with important
ecological functions are also our focus on species, since they have important functions within the
ecosystem they live. For example, woodpeckers make holes in trees that are habitats for other species
such as bats, beetles, etc.
32
CRF162
Table 9: Overview of the selected 44 bird species on study.
Bird species common name Bird species Latin name Selected criteria
Fiery-billed Aracari Pteroglossus frantzii Endemic species to Pacific Costa Rica
and Western Panama
Chestnut-mandibled Toucan Ramphastos swainsonii Vulnerable
Black-bellied Wren Pheugopedius fasciatoventris Endemic species to Pacific Costa Rica
and Western Panama
Riverside Wren Cantorchilus semibadius Endemic species to Pacific Costa Rica
and Western Panama; Data deficient
Cherries Tanager Ramphocelus costaricensis Endemic species to Pacific Costa Rica
and Western Panama; Data deficient
Blue-crowned Manakin Lepidothrix coronata Endemic species to Pacific Costa Rica
and Western Panama
Red-capped Manakin Ceratopipra mentalis
Orange-collared Manakin Manacus aurantiacus Endemic species to Pacific Costa Rica
and Western Panama
Pale-billed Woodpecker Campephilus guatemalensis Specialist species; Ecologically
important function
Golden-naped Woodpecker Melanerpes chrysauchen Endemic species to Pacific Costa Rica
and Western Panama
Long-tailed Woodcreeper Deconychura longicauda Near threatened
Bright-rumped Atilla Attila spadiceus Disturbance indicator
Rufous Mourner Rhytipterna holerythra
Rufous Piha Lipaugus unirufus Specialist species
Tawny-Crowned Greenlet Hylophilus ochraceiceps Specialist species; Data deficient
Scarlet Macaw Ara macao Data deficient
Turquoise Cotinga Cotinga ridgwayi Endemic species to Pacific Costa Rica
and Western Panama; Vulnerable
Yellow Warbler Setophaga petechia Migratory species
Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Migratory species
Blue-winged Warbler Vermivora cyanoptera Migratory species
Black-hooded Antshrike Thamnophilus bridgesi Endemic species to Pacific Costa Rica
and Western Panama; No data
Black-cheeked Ant-tanager Habia atrimaxillaris Endemic species to the Osa Peninsula;
Endangered
Bicoloured Ant-bird Gymnopithys leucaspis
Dot-winged Antwren Microrhopias quixensis Specialist species
Ruddy-tailed Flycatcher Terenotriccus erythrurus Specialist species
Sulphur-rumped Flycatcher Myiobius sulphureipygius
Yellow-billed Cotinga Carpodectes antoniae Endemic to Costa Rica; Endangered
Baltimore Oriole Icterus galbula Migratory species
33
CRF162
Rufous-tailed Jacamar Galbula ruficauda Disturbance indicator
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Near threatened; Migratory species
Smooth-billed Ani Crotophaga ani Disturbance indicator
Common Potoo Nyctibius griseus Poor data; Vulnerable
Great Tinamou Tinamus major Poor data; Climate change indicator
Great Curassow Crax rubra Vulnerable; Climate change indicator
Spectacled Owl Pulsatrix perspicillata Ecologically important function
Crested Guan Penelope purpurascens Poor data
Marbled wood Quail Odontophorus gujanensis Near Threatened
Spot-crowned Euphonia Euphonia imitans Endemic species to Pacific Costa Rica
and Western Panama; Specialist
species
Green-shrike Vireo Vireolanius pulchellus Data deficient
Mealy Parrot Amazona farinosa Ecologically important function
White-crowned Parrot Pionus senilis Poor data; Ecologically important
function
Brown-hooded Parrot Pyrilia haematotis Poor data; Specialist species
Black-Throated Trogon Trogon rufus Poor data
Baird’s Trogan Trogon bairdii Endemic species to Costa Rica; Near
Threatened
Using point counts, estimates of the bird species richness and abundance can be made. Point counts
are a widely used method to assess the distribution patterns and relative abundance of birds in tropical
habitats (Miller et al., 1998; Sánchez-Azofeifa et al., 2001; Henderson, 2010). A point count refers to a
count carried out by someone that is standing at a fixed place, from which the target species (birds)
are counted by sight and call, and this for a fixed period of time (Bibby et al., 2000; Gibbons & Gregory,
2006; Hartley & Greene, 2012). The methodology is quite straightforward and observers can easily
gather the required data by walking a trail and stop at different points to record all the present bird
species by sound and sight. It must be said that, due to the high level of tree density within a tropical
forest, as well as the very high species diversity in this region, there is quite a high level of experience
necessary to detect and identify birds accurate. The point counts are carried out along all the different
trails; Luna ridge, Leona ridge, Shady lane, Rio Carate, Attalea loop, road. During each survey, three
point counts are carried out, separated 250 m from each other and started at 100 m from the forest
edge. Since we work with a distance radius of 0 – 30 m (1), 30 – 100 m (2) and >100 m (3), it is important
to stick with the 250 m in between the point counts to avoid an overlap of counts. Furthermore, it is
important to take into account the effort efficiency of the observers. This is why not more than three
point counts were carried out during every survey since there is a drop in focus over time, making it
important to find a compromise between collection effort and precision / accuracy (Verner,
CRF162
34
1985). Before starting the recording period of ten minutes, there is a two minute settling period to
allow the birds coming back after our disturbance from walking towards the point counts. The point
counts are permanent points, which are permanently chosen locations within a site and clearly marked
with colourful tape flags (Huff et al., 2000). All the birds that are seen and heard within the different
radius are noted down (sight: S; sound: H), as well as the flying-over and flying-thrus birds are recorded
in a separate list as respectively FO and FT.
3 2 1
Figure 8: Graphic view of the distance radius used during the point counts.
The analysis will consist of calculating biodiversity indices of the data collected for each of the different
rainforest types. Firstly, the Species Richness index will be calculated; this is simply the number of
different species detected in each habitat, and the number of unique species will also be observed.
Secondly, the Shannon Diversity index will be calculated to allow a comparison of biodiversity between
the different habitats and taking into account the abundance of each species found (the Shannon Index
discriminates against species where very few were detected, giving a better overall view on the
diversity of an area). Lastly, the Simpson’s Diversity index will be calculated, which is given as a scale
between zero and one. The closer the Simpson’s Diversity index is to zero, the lower the diversity (an
environment with a Simpson’s Diversity index of 1 will have equal numbers of all the species detected;
and an environment with an index closer to 0 will have a large abundance of one or more species
compared to the rest).
CRF162
35
Results Table 10 below shows a summary of the different indices used to calculate diversity. Table 10: Summary table of the Species Richness, Unique Species, Shannon Diversity index, and the Simpson's
Diversity index.
FOREST TYPE SPECIES RICHNESS
UNIQUE SPECIES
SHANNON INDEX
SIMPSONS INDEX
SAMPLE EFFORT
PRIMARY 17 2 2.34 0.88 11
SECONDARY 22 5 2.03 0.79 16
DISTURBED 12 1 2.18 0.84 12
GALLERY 11 0 1.48 0.67 8
From the above table, we can see that the secondary forest has the highest species richness (22) and
unique species (5), however the primary forest has the highest biodiversity indices (Shannon=2.34;
Simpson’s=0.88). The gallery forest has the lowest species richness (11), unique species (0), and both
Shannon and Simpson’s indices (1.48 and 0.67 respectively).
Discussion
From Table 10 in the results section we can see that the secondary forest has higher species richness (22)
and unique species (5) than the primary forest (17 and 2 respectively). However, after taking into account
the different diversity indices it can be concluded that although the species richness is higher in secondary
forest, it includes a lot of species that were only detected once (40% of the species detected in the
secondary forest were detected only once, compared to 12% in the primary forest). Therefore it can be
conclude that the primary forest has the highest levels of biodiversity, and this result is echoed in many
other comparative studies of biodiversity. The higher level of biodiversity in primary forest can be
attributed to lower levels of habitat degradation and fragmentation, which is known to affect bird species
worldwide, as well as the presence of a higher diversity of flora which may support specialist species
vulnerable to deforestation. The gallery forest has the lowest levels of biodiversity, with the lowest values
for both the Shannon (1.48) and Simpson’s Diversity (0.67) indices. This low value for the Simpson’s
Diversity in the gallery forest can be attributed to the fact that 50% of the individuals detected were scarlet
macaws, therefore there is a higher likelihood that two individual observations chosen at random will be
the same species. The disturbed habitat also has higher biodiversity indices than the secondary forest,
which may also be due to the fact that 41% of the individuals detected in secondary forest were scarlet
macaws, compared with 30% in the disturbed forest.
The secondary forest detected the most unique species (5), including the endangered Black-cheeked ant
tanager (detected once), and the near-threatened Marbled wood quail and Wood thrush (also both
detected only once). That there were more unique species (including species threatened with extinction)
CRF162
36
detected in the secondary forest despite there being lower levels of biodiversity when compared with
primary forest can be attributed to the fact that there was a higher sample effort there (16 compared to
11), as well as detection being simpler in more degraded habitat (it is harder to detect certain species in
denser, primary forest).
This study is still very much in its infancy, with staff members as well as volunteers still in the process of
learning bird calls and recognizing them by sound and sight. Furthermore, bird sound recording
equipment will be purchased in order to record the bird calls in the field and identify them back on
camp by using the online catalogued bird calls. This will ensure a more reliable dataset by double
checking bird call recognizing skills in the field with the recordings. Furthermore, it will be possible to
observe the accuracy of the observers before surveys are carried out.
4 References
Barrantes, G., Q. Jimenez, J. Lobo, T. Maldonado, M. Quesada, & R. Quesada. 1999. Manejo Forestal y
Realidad Nacional en la Peninsula de Osa. INBio, San Jose, Costa Rica
Blake, J. G., & B. A. Loiselle. 2001. Bird assemblages in second-growth and old-growth forests, Costa
Rica: Perspectives from mist-nets and point counts. The Auk. 118: 304–
326.
Canaday, C. 1996. Loss of insectivorous birds along a gradient of human impact in
Amazonia. Biological Conservation. 77: 63–77.
Herzog, S.K., Kessler, M., & Cahill, T.M. 2002. Estimating species richness of tropical bird
communities from rapid assessment data. The Auk. 119 (3): 749-769.
Minca, C. & Linda, M. 2002. Ecotourism on the Edge: the case of Corcovado National
Park,
Costa Rica. In: Font, X. & Tribe, J. editors. Forest tourism and recreation: case studies in
environmental management. Oxon: CABI Publishing, UK. 103-127.
Osa Conservation. 2016. Our work: Birds. Available at:
http://osaconservation.org/projects/wildlife/birds/ [16 March 2016].
CRF162
37
Ruiz-Gutiérrez, V., T. A. Gavin, & A. A. Dhondt. 2008. Habitat fragmentation lowers survival of a tropical
forest bird. Ecological Applications. 18: 838–846.
Sánchez-Azofeifa, G. A., R. C. Harriss, & D. L. Skole. 2001. Deforestation in Costa
Rica: a quantitative analysis using remote sensing imagery. Biotropica. 33: 378–384.
Sanchez-Azofeifa, G., Rivard, B., Calvo, J. & Moorthy, I. 2002. Dynamics of Tropical Deforestation
Around National Parks: Remote Sensing of Forest Change on the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica. 2002.
Mountain Research and Development. 22(4): 352-358.
Sekercioglu, C. H., P. R. Ehrlich, G. C. Daily, D. Aygen, D. Goehring, & R. F. Sandi. 2002. Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 99: 263–267. Sigel, B. J., T. W. Sherry, & B. E. Young. 2006. Avian community responses to lowland tropical rainforest
isolation: 40 years of change at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Conserv. Biol. 20: 111–121.
Wilson, S., Collister, D. & Wilson A. 2011. Community composition and annual survival of lowland
tropical forest birds on the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ornitologia Neotropical. 22:421-436.
Woltmann, S., & T. W. Sherry. 2011. High apparent annual survival and stable territory dynamics of
Chestnut-backed Antbird (Myrmeciza exsul) in a large Costa Rican rain forest preserve. The Wilson
Journal of Ornithology. 123: 15–23.
Wormworth, J. & Mallon, K. 2006. Bird Species and Climate Change: The Global Status Report version 1.0. London: Climate Risk Pty Limited. Young, B. E., D. Derosier, & G. V. N. Powell. 1998. Diversity and conservation of understory birds in the
Tilarán Mountains, Costa Rica. The Auk. 115: 998–1016.
Young, B. E., T. W. Sherry, B. J. Sigel, & S. Woltmann. 2008. Nesting success of Costa Rican lowland rain forest birds in response to edge and isolation effects. Biotropica. 40: 615–622.