cost effective addressing with arcpad 6. green county, wi mostly rural county- population 34,000...
TRANSCRIPT
Cost Effective Addressing
With ArcPAD 6
Green County, WI
Mostly Rural County- Population 34,000 Approximately 24,000 parcels 576 square miles
1995 SW Wisconsin Digital Orthophoto Project
70% of parcels converted
AS/400 Tax & Assessment Database Program
Manual addressing mapping
GIS Progress
Project Goals
Ability to query tax roll information by site addresses in the AS/400 system
Improve address mapping maintenance capabilities
Data confidence rate in excess of 98%
Extended GIS functionality with an eye towards future web based systems
Alternative Methods
AS400 database population
Map address points using existing address map data
Contract project out to firm specializingin address projects
Limitations
Limited Budget Needed to be < $25,000
Lack of Staff/Vehicle LTE Project Staffing
Sheriff’s Dept. donated use of vehicle
Limited Implementation Time Goal was to complete < 1 year
Solution
GPS address locations using ArcPad Software
Bonus with ArcPAD
Data compatible with County’s Arcview GIS
Easy to generate address database
Provided long term solution for maintenance
GPS Decisions
How much accuracy?Resource grade vs. Survey grade2-5 meters vs. sub-meter
At what cost?Survey grade rental - $60 daily or moreResource grade purchase - $150 - $450
Project Plan
Step 1 Pre-map address points in Arcview
Step 2 Improve locations in field & add new points
w/ArcPAD Step 3
Integrate points into address mapping environment
and spatially relate to parcel numbers
Design Considerations
Attempt to account for variations in address styles, road naming, & other anomalies
Build for future 911 database integration
Generate in a format for AS/400 environment
Final Design
Parsed address format similar 911 database
Confidence point placement rating
Full address label field for mapping needs
Pre-Project Mapping
Used existing hard copy maps and checked against tax roll and “organic” databases in office
Process took approximately 4-5 weeks for 16 towns
about
In the Field
Hardware- Dell Laptop w/ Power Converter
Parcels, centerlines and County orthophoto used for background information during process
Used TracLog option to map progress
GPS Challenges
Need to acquire data in County Coordinate System
Lack of accessibility to geodetic control point
Complexity of use for project staff
Alternate GPS Plan
Test and review resource grade GPS
Process
Live viewing in ArcPAD over photo/parcels
Pull in driveway & add data
Address Capture
Add point using GPS
Results
Estimate actual accuracies closer to 2.5 meters or less
Average PDOP was 2.2 or less-as low as 1.4 Very fast – Use ArcPAD/no other software to
configure
Lessons Learned
Used 1 set of AAA batteries per 1.5 days Satellite acquisition problems Bad weather Projection of shape files
Future Project Improvements New Earthmate- WAAS Enabled
All in one GPS/GIS- Trimble GEO-CE
Application Builder – Improve Efficiency