cosmic ray activation of germanium in geant4 · comparison of different models • i tried out all...
TRANSCRIPT
Cosmic Ray activation ofGermanium in Geant4
Janicsko Jozsef
LNGS Nov.2007,JJ
Introduction
• Since the release of geant4.9.0 is possible to simulate materialswith different isotopic composition, the default behaivior of G4,is to identify elements based on A and Z
• Available data incomplete ...
• Several theory driven physics models available in G4 as well
• Geant4 is a general purpose MC, all detector simulations arebased on, would be nice to do all in one MC
• My baseline for comparison: I. Barabanov et al., NIM B 251(2006) 115-120 (and the simmilar internal note)
LNGS Nov.2007,JJ 1/11
68Ge
• First try with the Bertini-cascade: Production cross section of68Ge by neutrons on different Ge isotopes
• It works ...
SHIELD code Geant4
E [MeV]210 310
X s
ecti
on
[m
bar
n]
-210
-110
1
10
210
Production X section of Ge68 by neutrons on diff. targets ’QGSP_BERT_HP’
Ge76Ge74Ge73Ge72Ge70
LNGS Nov.2007,JJ 2/11
• Protons are a bit different. Don’t get excited, the flux of cosmicprotons is a few order of magnitudes smaller (than of theneutrons) in the relevant energy range
SHIELD code Geant4
E [MeV]210 310
X s
ecti
on
[m
bar
n]
-210
-110
1
10
210
Production X section of Ge68 by protons on diff. targets ’QGSP_BERT_HP’
Ge76Ge74Ge73Ge72Ge70
LNGS Nov.2007,JJ 3/11
60Co
SHIELD code Geant4
E [MeV]210 310
X s
ecti
on
[m
bar
n]
-110
1
Production X section of Co60 by neutrons on diff. targets ’QGSP_BERT_HP’
Ge76Ge74Ge73Ge72Ge70
LNGS Nov.2007,JJ 4/11
Comparison of different models
• I tried out all relevant models in Geant4.
E [MeV]210 310
X s
ecti
on
[m
bar
n]
-210
-110
1
10
210
Production X section of Ge68 by protons in natural Ge
QGSP_BERT_HP
QGSP_BIC_HPQBEC_HP
QBBC_HP LHEP_BERT
LHEP_PRECO_HP
QBBC
QBBCGQBECQGSP_BERTQGSP_BERT_NQE
QGSP_BERT_TRVQGSP_BIC
Horiguchi ’83
E [MeV]210 310
X s
ecti
on
[m
bar
n]
-110
1
10
210
Production X section of Ge68 by neutrons in natural Ge
QGSP_BERT_HP
QGSP_BIC_HPQBEC_HP
QBBC_HP LHEP_BERT
LHEP_PRECO_HP
QBBC
QBBCGQBECQGSP_BERTQGSP_BERT_NQE
QGSP_BERT_TRVQGSP_BIC
Horiguchi ’83
LNGS Nov.2007,JJ 5/11
60Co
E [MeV]210 310
X s
ecti
on
[m
bar
n]
-210
-110
1
10
Production X section of Co60 by protons in natural Ge
QGSP_BERT_HP QGSP_BIC_HPQBEC_HP QBBC_HP LHEP_BERTLHEP_PRECO_HPQBBCQBBCGQBECQGSP_BERTQGSP_BERT_NQEQGSP_BERT_TRVQGSP_BICNorman ’05
E [MeV]210 310
X s
ecti
on
[m
bar
n]
-210
-110
1
10
Production X section of Co60 by neutrons in natural Ge
QGSP_BERT_HP QGSP_BIC_HPQBEC_HP QBBC_HP LHEP_BERTLHEP_PRECO_HPQBBCQBBCGQBECQGSP_BERTQGSP_BERT_NQEQGSP_BERT_TRVQGSP_BIC
Conclusion: BERT is OK for 68Ge (and below 1 GeV), BIC(BinaryCascadeModel) better for 60Co and in general, above 1GeV
LNGS Nov.2007,JJ 6/11
Comparison with other MC
• See: H. Gomez et al. arXiv:0708.3987v1 nucl-ex, IDEA reportetc.
E [MeV]210 310
X s
ecti
on
[m
bar
n]
-110
1
10
210
Production X section of Ge68 by neutrons in natural Ge
QGSP_BERT_HP
QGSP_BIC_HPQBEC_HP
QBBC_HP LHEP_BERT
LHEP_PRECO_HP
QBBC
QBBCGQBECQGSP_BERTQGSP_BERT_NQE
QGSP_BERT_TRVQGSP_BIC
Horiguchi ’83
1
10
100
1000
10 100 1000 10000energy (MeV)
pro
du
ctio
n c
ross s
ectio
n (
mb
)
YIELDX (Silberberg&Tsao) Aleksandrov'91 MENDL-2P (p)
MENDL-2 (n) Horiguchi'83 ISABEL (Majorana, n)
CEM95 (p) HMS-ALICE (p) HMS-ALICE (n)
LNGS Nov.2007,JJ 7/11
Comparison with other MC 2.
E [MeV]210 310
X s
ecti
on
[m
bar
n]
-210
-110
1
10
Production X section of Co60 by neutrons in natural Ge
QGSP_BERT_HP QGSP_BIC_HPQBEC_HP QBBC_HP LHEP_BERTLHEP_PRECO_HPQBBCQBBCGQBECQGSP_BERTQGSP_BERT_NQEQGSP_BERT_TRVQGSP_BIC
0,001
0,010
0,100
1,000
10,000
10 100 1000 10000energy (MeV)
pro
duction c
ross s
ection (
mb)
YIELDX (Silberberg &Tsao) Aleksandrov'91 Norman'05
MENDL-2P (p) MENDL-2 (n) CEM95 (p)
HMS-ALICE (p) HMS-ALICE (n)
Conclusion: Geant4 in principle can reproduce these plots (andaccomodate all data points). Hybrid physics list shows strangebehaivior, under investigation ...
LNGS Nov.2007,JJ 8/11
Cosmic nucleons
E [MeV]10 210 310 410
Flu
x []
-1110
-1010
-910
-810
-710
-610
-510
-410
• Flux of neutrons and protons dropsfast above 1 GeV.
• One order of magnitude differencesbetween MC codes might besupressed by larger variations of thecosmic ray flux
nat Ge enr Ge68Ge 60Co 68Ge 60Co
QGSP BERT HP 105.01 1.09 14.48 1.03QGSP BIC HP 14.37 5.1 0.19 2.33
Total production rates computed with the isotopic abundance ofnat. and enr. Ge (/kg/day)
LNGS Nov.2007,JJ 9/11
Summary
nat Ge enr Ge68Ge 60Co 68Ge 60Co
G4 105.01 5.1 14.48 2.33Shield 83.92 2.86 5.8 3.31Ref.[1] 89 4.8 13 6.7
MC Ref.[2] 29.6 - 0.94 -Data Ref.[2] 30+-7 - - -
Summary of all known estimates (/kg/day)
[1] H. Gomez et al. arXiv:0708.3987v1 nucl-ex
[2] F.T. Avignone et al., Nucl.Phys.B (Proc Suppl.)28A,1992
LNGS Nov.2007,JJ 10/11
Conlusion
• Despite some discrepancies, Geant4 agrees with other MCcodes within the error (uncertenity) of those
• In principle Geant4 can be tuned to reproduce the data pointsshown in H. Gomez et al. arXiv:0708.3987v1 nucl-ex
• You can use it with the predefined physics lists if you know whatare you doing
• Is impossible to accomodate the data of Horiguchi’83 andAvignone’92 in the same estimate. Choose one, (G4 can doboth)
LNGS Nov.2007,JJ 11/11