corruption in eastern europe

Upload: asabedoragata

Post on 04-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Corruption in Eastern Europe

    1/2

    Corruption in eastern Europe

    From Bolshevism to backhanders

    Corruption has replaced communism as the scourge of eastern Europe

    Apr 14th 2011 | PRAGUE AND RIGA | from the print edition

    JUTA STRIKE wont say where she has spent the past few weeks. But the fact that Latvias best-known

    anti-corruption official (pictured above) had to leave the country for her own safety, amid political

    attempts to nobble her agency, is evidence of a rising tide of sleaze in ex-communist Europe, and of th

    troubles, and even dangers, facing those who try to tackle it.

    A corruption scandal that links a political party to a private security agency is rocking the Czech

    government. In Bulgaria brazen attempts to rig a nuclear-power tender seem to have left politicians

    helpless. In Romania and Slovakia attempts to reform the judiciary have stalled. Even starry-eyed

    outsiders who win elections on anti-corruption tickets seem to be captured by the system within

    months.

    Corruption is hard to measure and varies widely. Estonia is cleaner than some west European countrie

    few easterners have a reputation worse than Greece. But it is striking that even hardened warriors in

    the war against sleaze are so gloomy. Alina Mungiu-Pippidi, a Romanian campaigner and academic,

    likens the corrosive effects of rent-seeking from corrupt governments to the curse of easy money from

    oil and gas in Russia. Anti-corruption efforts have failed to engage the wider public, she says, soactivists soon become dispirited.

    Jan Urban, a doughty Czech ex-dissident turned clean-government campaigner, agrees. You need at

    least a bit of success, he says. Activists in Czech groups with such names as Defenestration and

    Change the Politicians gleefully ousted much of the old guard in an election last year. But the new

    government has descended into squabbling, shown itself to be in hock to business interests and failed

    to deliver on its sleaze-busting promises.

    The causes are manifold. The financial crisis has made people readier to cut corners. Whistleblowers a

    ill-protected. Firms not willing to pay bribes lose out to those that are, such as Russian, and

    increasingly Chinese, competitors. Businesses fear that taking a stand will bring retribution:

  • 7/29/2019 Corruption in Eastern Europe

    2/2

    bureaucratic harassment, arbitrary tax demands or missing out on public contracts. Leverage from the

    European Union loses its force once countries have joined. Indeed, the billions of euros flooding from

    Brussels to modernise infrastructure and public services often prove a fount of corruption. Companies,

    politicians and officials collude to rig tenders, usually with impunity: legal scrutiny is weak, and voters

    seem apathetic and cynical.

    The media are given to indiscriminate barking but little biting. Puny editorial budgets mean that

    investigations fizzle out. Advertising campaigns associated with publicising EU contracts and rules give

    great power to officials and politicians wanting to reward favourable coverage. The biggest advertiser i

    Lithuania, for example, is the agriculture ministry. There is scant critical scrutiny of its activities. State

    owned industries often play a similar role.

    Profitability in the media has plunged since the financial crisis. That has made many foreign owners

    eager to unload their ailing assets; influence-hungry local tycoons have found plenty of bargains. The

    Swedish owners of Latvias main daily, Diena, sold it via an obscure chain of transactions to an

    unknown owner. Many of its senior journalists, including those involved in anti-corruption

    investigations, have left or been fired.

    The only investigative programme on Czech public television came under pressure after it scrutinised

    some startling legal manoeuvres surrounding the governments mistreatment of a foreign blood-plasm

    company. This is typical of the way in which governments of all stripes have tried to squash

    investigative journalism, says Mr Urban. Having faced down the communist-era secret police, he is no

    scared of a lawsuit against his caustic blog. But the threats continue elsewhere.

    Tycoons tilt the media field by subsidising tame outlets. Bodo Hombach, the boss of WAZ, a big Germa

    media investor, has said that the close intertwining of oligarchs and political power is poisoning the

    market. Such owners, he claimed, were buying up the media to exert political influence, not in search

    of profit. Some worry about a descent to Italian standards.

    Solutions are rare. Voters hanker for a strong hand, perhaps from the spooks. But as Russia shows,

    that cure can be worse than the disease. Ivan Krastev, a Bulgarian analyst, says that the real problem

    with corruption is the complicity it creates. We end up with shadow networks that make countriesungovernable, or governable by somebody else. Just 20 years after it regained its freedom, much of

    eastern Europe risks compromising it.