correlational research
DESCRIPTION
EDU 702 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH. MARLINA BT ZUBAIRI NORLIN BT ABD GHAFAR FARADILLAH BT MD RAMLI ZURIANA BT SAARI. Definition. To identify the relationships between two or more variables - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CORRELATIONALRESEARCH
MARLINA BT ZUBAIRINORLIN BT ABD GHAFAR
FARADILLAH BT MD RAMLIZURIANA BT SAARI
EDU 702 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
![Page 2: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Definition
To identify the relationships between two or more variables
Relationship the range of score on one variable is associated with the range of score of the other variable
![Page 3: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
When to use
As a first step prior to experimentation When experiments cannot be conducted (e.g. for ethical reason) Data collected through : - observations - surveys and questionnaire - archived information
![Page 4: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Characteristics
Variables cannot be manipulated
Cannot prove a causal relationship
Only examine the possibilities that one variable might cause something to happen
![Page 5: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Purpose
Help us to understand related events, conditions and behaviours : explanatory studies
To make predictions of how one variable might predict another : prediction studies
Variables used : i) predictor variable ii)criterion variable
![Page 6: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The procedure
![Page 7: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
1. Problem selection
Based on experience or theory 3 types of problems :1. Is variable X related to variable Y?2. How well does variable P predict variable
C?3. What are the relationships among a large
no. of variables, and what predictions can be made that are based on them?
![Page 8: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2. Sample
? appropriate population
< 30 = inaccurate estimate of the degree of the relationship
> 30 = provide meaningful results.
![Page 9: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
3. Instruments
Choose appropriate instruments Must yield quantitative data. Administrating instruments – e.g.: test,
questionaires etc. Observation Must show evidence of validity
![Page 10: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
4. Data collection
Explanatory study – short time needed to collect data on both variables
Prediction study – longer time needed to measure the criterion variables compared to prediction variables.
![Page 11: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
5. Data analysis and interpretation
Correlation coefficient is produced when variables are correlated.
In decimals between 0.00 and +1.00 or -1.00.
![Page 12: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Data analysis If closer to +1.00 or -1.00 = stronger
relationship If + sign = high scores on both variables. If – sign = high on one v but low on the other. If at / near 0.00 = no relationship exists
![Page 13: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Data analysis
r scores range from -1 to +1
r= +1, perfect positive relation example of a positive r: GPA and scores on SAT
r= -1, perfect negative relation example of a negative r: drinking in college and GPA r= 0, no relation example of a near zero r: hair length and GPA
![Page 14: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Examples of topic Example - Health psychologist is interested in
testing the claim that people with more friends tend to be healthier.
Example - Health psychologist described surveys two groups of people: hospital patients being treated for chronic diseases and healthy community members.
![Page 15: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Correlation example High Self-esteem (A) and GPA (B)
Is (A) related to (B)? Or is it the other way around? Or, are there other factors that cause both (A) and (B)?
Raw Data:
Name Self Esteem Score GPATim 42 3.8Bart 10 1.4
Kelsey 15 2.5Kim 22 3.1
![Page 16: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Correlation example
See scatter plot of dataSelf-esteem and GPA data
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
self-esteem
GP
A Series1
![Page 17: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Correlation example Two independent conducted studies found that
there is no causal relationship between these two factors. They are correlated because both of them are correlated to some other factors: intelligence and family social status.
**Correlations do NOT tell us that one variable CAUSES the other variable
![Page 18: CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051416/56814579550346895db24ba6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Conclusion Strengths
– Can study a broad range of variables– Can look at multiple variables at one time– Large samples are easily obtained
Weaknesses– Relationships established are associational, not
causal– Individuals not studied in-depth– Potential problems with reliability and validity of self-
report measures