corporate quality training...people with hemophilia, end- stage kidney disease, primary immune...
TRANSCRIPT
Corporate Quality Training Ledge Walking Technology
Quick and Painless
Boise State Tim Gillum PhD.
Kery Mortenson MS, CPT
Company Overview
Saving Lives Baxter is a global, diversified healthcare company applying innovative science to develop specialty therapeutics and medical products that save and sustain lives. Baxter products are infused, injected or inhaled more than two billion times annually—or six million times a day—to treat life-threatening acute or chronic medical conditions. People with hemophilia, end-stage kidney disease, primary immune deficiency and a range of other diseases depend on our products at their times of most urgent need.
Desired Outcomes
3
Achieve business Results Apply Systems thinking
Learner centric approach Value
Establish effective Partnerships
It starts with a bar napkin
4
Initiatives
Solution
Tax, Staff Benefit or Business Driver
Key behaviors
It all starts with a bar napkin
Identify your top three initiatives – 1. – 2. – 3.
Separate your solution into the following bucket – Formal Instructional Learning solution – Non- instructional learning solution – Combined solution
How is the proposed solution perceived by leadership and the organization? – Tax – Staff benefit – Business driver
5
List the top 3-5 performance initiatives for your organization.
Separate them into one of the following two buckets. * Note: If the initiative fits into both buckets, list them in both
Instructional Non-instructional
For the instructional solutions, further separate them into one of the following 3 buckets.
Tax Staff Benefit Business Driver
For the non-instructional solutions, further separate them using Gilbert’s 6 Cell Matrix.
Data Instruments Incentives
Knowledge/Skills Capacity Motives
For the instructional solutions in the business driver bucket, complete the following impact map.
For the non-instructional solutions, rate each one for effort and benefit (1 low – 3 high). Then place them on the chart.
Supervisor Effectiveness
Learning Objectives
Behaviors Key Results Organizational Goals
*Note: Leverage Curricula blitz to reduce tax to essential NVA Training
Measure the impact of the performance solution
2012 Gillum & Mortenson
Ledge Walking Technology
6
Identify most and least successful trainees
Conduct in-depth interviews with
selected samples
Credible and documented “cases”
of success
Knowledge of factors that drive
impact
Standards and Tools
7
Standards Ledge Walking Tools
Focuses on Results & Outcomes Magic wand
Takes a Systemic View Determine Cause
Rapid Performance Analysis Effort/Benefit Matrix
Adds Value Establishes Partnerships with Clients and Stakeholders
Stone soup Yes And…
Sustain solutions Isolate and evaluate key behaviors
Impact Map Success Case
Simple execution and reporting Evaluate Results and Impact
Scorecard (ROE)
Getting to Results – Desired State
The Magic Wand Technique If you were to wave a magic wand over this issue and the next morning you
came into work and desired state has occurred – what would it look like? Who is the target audience and what would they be doing differently?
What’s Different What would desired state look like and what would be different? How would you recognize success or failure?
The Leader in the Elevator Speech If you were to meet the CEO in an elevator,. How would your describe the
success of your initiative in 30 seconds or less?.
8
Systems Thinking - Human Performance Technology
Information Instrumentation Motivation
DATA INSTRUMENTS INCENTIVES Data and Information
Metrics Communication and
Feedback
Tools Resources Work environment
Incentives Consequences Rewards
Rooted in the Environment/ Organization
KNOWLEDGE CAPACITY MOTIVES Skills Knowledge Behavior
Individual capacity Recognition Motivation Expectations
Rooted in the Individual Worker
9
Thomas Gilbert Fundamentals of Human Performance Technology Published by ISPI 2010
10
Targeted Solutions DATA and
INFORMATION Performance Gaps
Solution(s)
Effort/Benefit
Unclear role expectations for supervisor and manager
Create global role profile for supervisors and managers. Plant managers and HR review new role profile with supervisors
L/H Quick Win
Inconsistency in procedures lends itself to variable interpretation of standards
Leverage outputs of document harmonization H/H Long term
Manager inconsistency in evaluating supervisor performance
Develop robust assessment criteria using outputs from solution A. Align/create Supervisor evaluation to new role profile
L/M Dependent on
Solution A
Current metrics are lagging – not leading indicators
Require supervisors to routinely perform “Gemba Walks” with employees on critical process parameters
L/H Quick win
Current goal setting contributes to unclear expectations
Remove current impediments to goal setting process that drive the wrong behaviors.
M/M Long term
A
C
D
E
B
ROE Scorecard
11
97 91
97
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Value ContentQuality
InstructorEffectiveness
Needs ImprovementMeet/Exceed
Target : 80% Learner ROE
Impact Map
Knowledge and Skills
Critical On-The-Job Behaviors Key observable behaviors
Individual or Team
Key Results
Organizational Goals
• State the business case for the urgency and significance of ‘getting it right’
• Articulate the
importance of your role as an approver
• Describe the benefits of
correctly approving documents
• Explain the
consequence of incorrectly approving documents
• Apply the approval
criteria checklist when approving documents
Schedule sufficient time to
perform a thorough review per standards
Consistently use the
approval criteria checklist when reviewing records
Respond to Record Owners
with a confirmation that their approval is complete
Communicate return
decision and rationale with Owner using approval criteria checklist as reference
Improved confidence and
consistency in correctly approving or rejecting records per approval criterion
Process extensions <5% have no more than 2 extensions
Improved First Pass Acceptance above the baseline mark
Improved effectiveness by monitoring the recurrence
Achieve key performance metrics that improve operational excellence
Clear line of sight to achieving business impact
Do This To Accomplish This So That
Predictable Impact
13
COSTS
RETURN
? % DID NOT TRY IT
AT ALL
? % TRIED IT TO SOME EXTENT BUT
GAVE UP
? % TRIED IT AND
GOT POSITIVE RESULTS
UNREALIZED VALUE
Robert O. Brinkerhoff Ed.D., The Success Case Method
Success Case Impact
Key Behavior Survey Respondent data Implications
Be available to approve records 33% implemented behavior with positive results
42% already doing this
Improved timeliness
Use approval checklist when reviewing documentation
17% Implemented behavior with positive results
25% already doing this
Reduced variation and improved consistency in reviewing records.
Respond to Owners that their approval is complete
50% were already doing this 25% plan to implement
Schedule sufficient time to perform a thorough review of records
50% were already doing this 50% plan to implement
Approval consistency
Communicate return decision and rationale with Owner using approval criteria checklist as reference
58% plan to implement 25% were already doing this 17% implemented but were
unsure of results
Need to add crucial dialog skills into the course to increase application
Provide guidance to the Owners and/or team members
50% were already doing this 25% plan to implement
Increased Pro-active support
Baxter Confidential 14
Culture Pulse
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
Pulse Check
% Nov
Organization is excited about the challenges and feels supported. Confused and uncertain about the future direction and how to get there
Ledge Walking Principles
• Don’t assume that people see your value • Successful performance folks should minimize
the spotlight – It is not about us – it is about the business results
• Phone call away -Ongoing availability coaching/mentoring
• Let the business leaders sell your successes • Continual network inside and outside = CI • Share selflessly – Pay it forward
Lessons Learned
• What did you learn about yourself?
• What tools were helpful?
• Has the perception of your role changed? How? • What will you do differently going forward?