corporate presentation - husky energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Corporate PresentationMay 2015
![Page 2: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Balanced Growth Strategy Delivering
2
![Page 3: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Performance Highlights 2010 – 2014
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
'10 '11 '12 '13 '14
CD
N $
Mill
ions
Cash Flow from Operations
200
250
300
350
'10 '11 '12 '13 '14
MB
OE/
D
Production
Production Growth Guidance
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
'10 '11 '12 '13 '14
CD
N $
Mill
ions
Adjusted Net Earnings
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
'10 '11 '12 '13 '14
MM
BO
E
2P (proved plus probable) Reserves
3
![Page 4: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Balance Sheet Strength
4
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
Husky
Q1 2015 Debt to Capital Employed Comparison*
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
'10 '11 '12 '13 '14
Husky - Debt to Capital Employed
Average: 19%
*Peers: CNRL, Cenovus, Encana, Imperial Oil, Suncor, Talisman – at Mar. 31, 2015
• Investment grade credit rating• S&P: BBB+
• Moody’s: Baa2
• DBRS: A (low)
• Financial flexibility• Unused credit facilities: $3.6 billion
(Q1 2015)
• Debt to Capital Employed of 22% (Q1 2015)
![Page 5: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2015 Guidance
• Capital spending• Major projects behind us
• Shifting capital towards short payback opportunities
• Dialing back capital in flexible development areas
• Production guidance• New production weighted towards
end of ’15
• Balancing towards low sustaining capital projects
0
100
200
300
400
2014 2015F
MB
OE/
D
Production Guidance: 325,000 – 355,000 boe/day
Forecast Range
Natural GasCanadaNatural Gas AsiaPacificHeavy Oil &BitumenLight / Medium Oil& NGLs
0
1.7
3.4
5.1
2014 2015F
CD
N $
Bill
ions
Capital Expenditures: $3.0-$3.1 Billion
Corporate
Downstream
Asia Pacific
Atlantic
Oil Sands
Heavy Oil
Western Canada
5
![Page 6: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Efficiencies – Improving Margins
• Procurement process realizing savings• $1.3 billion in procurement savings
since ‘10
• Locked in $475M of $400-600M targeted operational savings for ‘15
• Identifying efficiencies
• Focus on improving margins• Higher price realization products
• Reduced operating costs
• More capital left for growth
-
600
1,200
1,800
'10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15F
CD
N $
Mill
ions
Cumulative Procurement Savings
$1.3Bn total savings
6
![Page 7: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Foundation Transformation – Heavy Oil
7
Rush Lake
• Thermal portfolio continues to expand• 22,300 bbl/d in ‘10 to 54,600 bbl/d in ‘14
• Four in-flight projects to add 34,500 bbl/d of new production by the end of ‘16
• Low sustaining capital requirements
2010 (~90K)
2014 (~121K)
Annual Production from Heavy Oil (bbls/d)
Thermal Heavy Oil Production Non-Thermal Heavy Oil Production
25% 45%
![Page 8: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Thermal Oil Economics
Metrics Target1
Construction Time ~2 years
Start up to Peak Production < 3 months
SOR Target 2.0 early years
Sustaining Capital per bbl2,3 $5 - $7
Capital Efficiencies per bbl2,3 $40,000
Life of Project 15 Years +
Recoveries Target >50%
Operating Cost per bbl ~$10 for first 2 years
Operating Netback per bbl2 Q1 2015: $22.68
1. Based on actual results as of September 30, 20142. Non-GAAP measure, please see advisories3. Based on estimated plant name plate capacity
8
Foundation Transformation – Thermal Portfolio
Thermal Project
First Oil Date
Current/ Forecasted Net
Production Rate (bbls/d)3
Status
Pikes Peak 1984 4,000
Prod
ucin
g
Bolney Celtic 1996 18,900
Paradise Hill 2012 4,300
Pikes Peak South 2012 11,900
Rush Lake pilot 2012 1,700
Sandall 2014 5,700
Rush Lake Q3 2015 10,000
Nea
r-Te
rmEdam East Q3 2016 10,000
Edam West Q4 2016 4,500
Vawn Q4 2016 10,000
Lloyd Thermal 1 2017 -2019
3,500
Mid
-Te
rm
Lloyd Thermal 2 10,000
Lloyd Thermal 32020+
10,000
Long
-Te
rm
Lloyd Thermal 4 10,000
![Page 9: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Foundation Transformation – Western Canada
9
Ansell
• ’14 base production from Western Canada ~146,000 boe/d (62% gas)
• Resource play production has grown from ~14,000 boe/day in ‘10 to ~34,000 boe/day in ‘14
• Current focus: Ansell Cardium/Wilrich• Producing ~19,000 boe/day• Large land base: ~120,000 net acres
• Multi-zone potential: > 700 locations
• Progressing several other Resource Plays, including:
• Strachan (Cardium)
• Wapiti (Cardium)
• Kakwa (Wilrich)
• Stolberg (Cardium)
![Page 10: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Foundation Transformation – Downstream
10
• Improved flexibility of feedstock• Strategic investment in gathering system
and storage facilities
• Increased product mix• New capital equipment and upgrades
• Expanded market access• Increased product pipeline connectivity to
Chicago, New York Harbor and Gulf Coast
• Downstream contributed almost half of net earnings in ‘14
Upgrading / Refining Facility Feedstock Crude Type
Gross Operating Capacity
(bbls/day)
Lloyd Upgrader Heavy 82,000
Lloyd Asphalt Refinery Heavy 29,000
Prince George Refinery Light 12,000
Lima Refinery Light 160,000
Toledo Refinery1 Heavy 135,000-145,000
Total Crude Refining Capacity 348,0001. Husky owns a 50% working interest in the Toledo Refinery (operated by BP)
![Page 11: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Growth Area – Asia Pacific Region
11
• Liwan 3-1 and Liuhua 34-2 production start-up • Fixed price and volume
• Q1 2015: $14.43/mmcf
• Forecast 290-320 mmcf/day (gross) in 2015
• Husky working interest:~75% May ’15, then revert to 49% W.I*
(*subject to completion of exploration cost recovery)
• Liuhua 29-1 (’17-’19)• Low cost production addition
• Will utilize existing Liwan offshore infrastructure
• 200 mmcf/day (gross)
• Indonesia gas fields (‘17-’19)• BD (liquids rich) field in construction
(~40 mmcf/day + ~2,400 boe/day)
• MDA / MBH fields in tender phase (~50 mmcf/day)
• MDK Plan of Development approved
• 4 more discoveries
Liwan Gas Project
![Page 12: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• Sunrise Energy Project producing• Phase 1 ramping up to ~60,000 bbls/d (gross)
by end of ‘16 (Husky 50% W.I. / operator)• ~170 years project life at ~60,000 bbls/d
• Approvals in place for 200,000 bbls/d (gross)
• Achieving operational efficiencies• Custom mobile drilling rig improving drill time
• New pad design reducing footprint by ~30%
Growth Area – Oil Sands
12
Sunrise Energy Project
![Page 13: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• Satellite extensions stabilizing production• South White Rose Extension expected mid ’15
• Peak production of ~15,000 boe/day
• Combines gas injection and oil production to improve returns
• North Amethyst field production expected Q3 ‘15
• Peak production of ~5,000 boe/day
• Targeting deeper zone beneath main field
• West White Rose assessment continues
• Flemish Pass• New basin discovered
• 18-month delineation program underway, began Oct. ‘14
Growth Area – Atlantic Region
13
SeaRose FPSO
![Page 14: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Near-term production adds of ~85,000 bbls/day by end ‘16
Line of Sight to Near-Term Projects
14
Hardisty and Patoka Expansion
Rush Lake Thermal
Edam West Thermal
Edam East Thermal
Vawn Thermal
South White Rose Extension
North Amethyst Hibernia
Sunrise Energy Project Phase 1
Wapiti Cardium
Strachan Cardium
Ansell Multi-zone
Kakwa Wilrich
Sask. Gathering System Expansion
Stolberg Cardium0
85
YE2014 YE2015 YE2016
MB
OE/
D
Thermal
Atlantic
Sunrise
Production Projects
Infrastructure Projects
![Page 15: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
2016(Forecast Exit Rate)
Structural Change – Leaving More Capital for Growth
2010(287 mbbl/d)
2012(301.5 mbbl/d)
2014(340.1 mbbl/d)
8% 12% 23% ~41%
15
Low Sustaining Capital Production* Remainder of Total Production
*Low Sustaining Capital Production includes Thermal, Oil Sands and Liwan
![Page 16: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Balanced Growth Strategy Delivering
• Healthy balance sheet • Structural changes and efficiencies have increased resiliency of business and lowered
sustaining capital requirements• Clear line of sight to production and reserves growth• Flexible, diverse portfolio of near, mid and long-term projects paced for best market
opportunities• Focused integration capturing full value• Strong dividend
16
![Page 17: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Advisories
17
Forward-Looking Statements and Information
Certain statements in this presentation are forward-looking statements and information (collectively “forward-looking statements”), within the meaning of the applicable Canadian securities legislation, Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts.
Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements that express, or involve discussions as to, expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as "will likely result", "are expected to", "will continue", "is anticipated", “is targeting”, "estimated", "intend", "plan", "projection", "could", “aim”, "vision", "goals", "objective", "target", "schedules" and "outlook"). In particular, forward-looking statements in this presentation include, but are not limited to, references to:
• with respect to the business, operations and results of the Company generally: the Company’s general strategic plans and growth strategies; the Company’s 2015 production guidance, including weighting of production among product types; the Company’s 2015 capital expenditures guidance, including weighting of expenditures among business segments; targeted timeline for, and value of, procurement process savings; forecast 2016 exit rate for the Company’s low sustaining capital production;
• with respect to the Company's Asia Pacific Region: 2015 forecast for daily volume of production from the Company’s Liwan Gas Project; anticipated timing of first gas from the BD, MDA/MBH and MDK gas fields; anticipated volumes of production from the BD and MDA/MBH fields; anticipated timing of first production and daily volume of production from the Liuhua 29-1 field;
• with respect to the Company's Atlantic Region: anticipated daily production through 2016 for the Atlantic Region’s near term projects; anticipated timing of first production and net peak daily production from the Company’s South White Rose Extension project; anticipated timing of first production and net peak daily production from the Company’s North Amethyst Hibernia-formation well;
• with respect to the Company's Oil Sands properties: forecast for, and anticipated timing of, net peak daily production from Phase 1 of the Company’s Sunrise Energy Project; anticipated daily production through 2016 for the Sunrise Energy Project; estimated project life of the Sunrise Energy Project; expected effect of new pad design on land disturbance; and
• with respect to the Company's Heavy Oil properties: anticipated timing of first production and daily volumes of production from the Company’s Rush Lake, Edam East, Edam West and Vawn heavy oil thermal projects; anticipated daily production through 2016 for the Company’s near term thermal projects; anticipated timing of and daily volumes of production from the Company’s mid- and long-term thermal projects.
In addition, statements relating to "reserves" are deemed to be forward-looking statements as they involve the implied assessment based on certain estimates and assumptions that the reserves described can be profitably produced in the future. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves and in projecting future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures. The total amount or timing of actual future production may vary from reserve and production estimates.
Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected by the forward-looking statements presented in this presentation are reasonable, the Company’s forward-looking statements have been based on assumptions and factors concerning future events that may prove to be inaccurate. Those assumptions and factors are based on information currently available to the Company about itself and the businesses in which it operates. Information used in developing forward-looking statements has been acquired from various sources including third party consultants, suppliers, regulators and other sources.
Because actual results or outcomes could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements, investors should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, which contribute to the possibility that the predicted outcomes will not occur. Some of these risks, uncertainties and other factors are similar to those faced by other oil and gas companies and some are unique to Husky.
The Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2014 and other documents filed with securities regulatory authorities (accessible through the SEDAR website www.sedar.com and the EDGAR website www.sec.gov) describe risks, material assumptions and other factors that could influence actual results and are incorporated herein by reference.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and, except as required by applicable securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all of such factors and to assess in advance the impact of each such factor on the Company’s business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. The impact of any one factor on a particular forward-looking statement is not determinable with certainty as such factors are dependent upon other factors, and the Company's course of action would depend upon its assessment of the future considering all information then available.
![Page 18: Corporate Presentation - Husky Energy · 2018-12-03 · presentation are forward-looking and not historical facts. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062920/5f0261177e708231d403fb91/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Advisories
18
Non-GAAP Measures
This presentation contains certain terms which do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and are therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. None of these measurements are used to enhance the Company's reported financial performance or position. With the exception of adjusted net earnings and cash flow from operations, there are no comparable measures to these non-GAAP measures in accordance with IFRS. These non-GAAP measures are considered to be useful as complementary measures in assessing Husky's financial performance, efficiency and liquidity. These terms include:
• Adjusted Net Earnings is a non-GAAP measure comprised of net earnings excluding extraordinary and non-recurring items such as after-tax property, plant and equipment impairment charges and after-tax inventory write-downs not considered to be indicative of the Company's on-going financial performance. Adjusted net earnings is a complementary measure used in assessing Husky's financial performance through providing comparability between periods.
Adjusted Net Earnings:2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
GAAP Net Earnings 1,258 1,829 2,022 2,224 947Impairment, net of tax 622 204 - 52 -Inventory write-downs 135 1 1 2 23Adjusted Net Earnings 2,015 2,034 2,023 2,278 970
• Cash Flow from Operations, which should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than “cash flow – operating activities” as determined in accordance with IFRS, as an indicator of financial performance. Cash flow from operations is presented in the Company’s financial reports to assist management and investors in analyzing operating performance by business in the stated period. Husky’s determination of cash flow from operations may not be comparable to that reported by other companies. Cash flow from operations equals net earnings plus items not affecting cash which include accretion, depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment, exploration and evaluation expense, deferred income taxes, foreign exchange, gain or loss on sale of assets and other non‐cash items.
Cash flow from Operations:2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
GAAP cash flow – operating activities 5,585 4,645 5,193 5,092 2,222Settlement of asset retirement obligations 167 142 123 105 60Income taxes paid 661 433 575 282 784Interest received (7) (19) (34) (12) (1)Change in non-cash working capital (871) 21 (847) (269) 7Non-GAAP cash flow from operations 5,535 5,222 5,010 5,198 3,072
• Debt to Capital Employed equals long-term debt, long-term debt due within one year and commercial paper divided by capital employed. Capital employed equals long-term debt, long-term debt due within one year, commercial paper and shareholders’ equity.
• Sustaining capital on a per unit basis is calculated as annual capital expenditures divided by plant design throughput.
• Capital efficiency on a per unit basis is calculated as initial project capital expenditures divided by plant design throughput.
• Operating netback is a common non-GAAP metric used in the oil and gas industry. Management believes this measurement assists management and investors to evaluate the specific operating performance by product at the oil and gas lease level. The operating netback was determined as realized price less royalties, operating costs and transportation on a per unit basis.
Disclosure of Oil and Gas Information
Unless otherwise stated, reserve estimates in this presentation have an effective date of December 31, 2014 and represent Husky's share. Unless otherwise noted, historical production numbers given represent Husky’s share.
The 2P (proved plus probable) reserves disclosed on slide 3 have an effective date of December 31 of the year indicated. The breakdown of these reserves into proved and probable reserves can be found in the Company’s Annual Information Forms for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010 filed with securities regulatory authorities (accessible through the SEDAR website www.sedar.com and the EDGAR website www.sec.gov).
The Company uses the terms barrels of oil equivalent (“boe”), which is calculated on an energy equivalence basis whereby one barrel of crude oil is equivalent to six thousand cubic feet of natural gas. Readers are cautioned that the term boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. This measure is primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent value equivalence at the wellhead.
All currency is expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise directed.