corporate parenting name roll no. ritesh chhadwa 03 gopal kadkade 12 dipesh kotecha 15 jayesh name...

19
Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Upload: anthony-benson

Post on 19-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Corporate Parenting

Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Page 2: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55
Page 3: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

The Corporate Parent as Intermediary

The parent has no automatic right to exist. To justify its existence, the parent should be able to demonstrate that its businesses perform better in aggregate than they would as a series of individual, stand-alone entities.

Page 4: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

What is Corporate Parenting?

Corporate Parenting is a strategy employed by highly centralized and diversified firms with large resource pools.

It views the corporation in terms of resources and capabilities that can be used to build business units value as well as generate synergies across business units.

Page 5: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

How Parents Create Value

Stand-alone influence Linkage influence

Central functions and services

Corporate development

Page 6: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Parenting Styles

StrategicPlanning

StrategicControl

FinancialControl

PlanningInfluence

High

Low

Control Influence

Flexible TightStrategic

TightFinancial

Page 7: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Parenting Styles (Cont’d)

• The Strategic Planning Style

• Strategic Planning style parents are closely involved with their businesses in the formulation of plans and decisions. They typically provide a clear overall sense of direction, within which their businesses develop their strategies and take the lead on selected corporate development initiatives.

• The Strategic Control Style

• Strategic Control style parents basically decentralize planning to the businesses but retain a role in checking and assessing what is proposed by the businesses. Thus, businesses are expected to take responsibility for putting forward strategies, plans, and proposals in a “bottom-up” fashion, but the parent may sponsor certain themes, initiatives, or objectives, and will only sanction proposals that meet an appropriate balance of strategic and financial criteria.

Page 8: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Parenting Styles (Cont’d)

• The Financial Control Style

• Financial Control style parents are strongly committed to decentralization of planning. They structure their businesses as stand-alone units with as much autonomy as possible, and with full responsibility for formulating their own strategies and plans.

Page 9: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

The Importance of Fit

• In order to create value, the parent must do more than simply avoid creating misfits. It must have some skills or resources that are specially helpful to its businesses. It must help its businesses address opportunities to improve their performance that they would fail to realize by themselves. Different opportunities can be realized only by applying different parenting skills or characteristics.

• The essence of successful parenting is therefore to create a fit between the way the parent operates – the parent’s characteristics – and significant improvement opportunities that exist in its particular businesses. The parent’s skills are not good or bas in any absolute sense; their value depends on the nature and needs of their businesses.

Page 10: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Corporate Parenting – Good fit or Not? Corporate parenting generates corporate strategy by focusing

on the core competencies of the parent corporation and on the value created from the relationship between the parent and its businesses

  If there is a good fit b/w the parent’s skills and resources and the needs

and opportunities of the business units corporation is likely to create value

  If there is not a good fit corporation is likely to destroy

value

Page 11: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Developing a Corporate Parenting Strategy

First, examine each business unit (or target firm

in the case of acquisition) in terms of it critical

success factors.

Second, examine each business unit (or target firm) in terms of areas in which performance can be improved. These are considered to be parenting opportunities. For Example, two businesses can gain economies of scope by combining their sales forces or share manufacturing and logistics skills

Third, analyze how well the parent corporation fits with the business unit (or target firm). Corporate headquarters must be aware of its own strengths and weaknesses in terms of resources, skills, and capabilities

Page 12: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Three Roles of Corporate

Page 13: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Parenting-Fit Matrix

Edge of Heartland

Heartland

Alien Territory

Low

High

HighLow

FIT between parenting opportunities and parenting characteristics

MIS

FIT

bet

wee

n cr

itica

l suc

cess

fac

tors

an

d p

are

ntin

g ch

arac

teris

tics

Ballast

Value Trap

Page 14: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

HeartLand Business

Heartland Businesses should be at the heart of the corporation’s future.

These Heartland Businesses have opportunities for improvement by the parent, and the parent understands their critical success factors well.

These businesses should have priority for all corporate activities

Page 15: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Edge-of-Heartland Businesses In these businesses some parenting characteristics fit the business, but

other do not.

The parent may not have all the characteristics needed by a unit, or the parent may not really understand all of the units strategic factors.

E.g.: a unit in this area may be very strong in creating its own image through advertising – a critical success factor in its industry. The corporate may however not have this strength and tends to leave this to its advertising agency. If the parent forced the unit to abandon its own creative efforts in favor of using the corporation’s favorite ad agency, the unit may struggle.

Such business units are likely to consume much of the parent’s attention, as the parent tries to understand them better and transform them into Heartland Businesses

Page 16: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Ballast Businesses

Ballast Businesses fit very comfortably with the parent corporation but contain very few opportunities to be improved by the parent.

Like cash cows may be important sources of stability and earnings. But if environmental changes, ballast could move to alien territory.

Therefore corporate decision makers should consider divesting this unit as soon as they can get a price that exceeds the expected value of future cash flows. E.g.: IBM’s mainframe business

Page 17: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Alien Territory Businesses

Alien Territory Businesses have little opportunities to be improved by the corporate parent, and a misfit exists between the parenting characteristics and the units strategic factors.

There is little potential for value creation but high potential for value destruction on the part of the parent.

Corporation must divest this unit while it still has value

Page 18: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55

Value Trap Businesses Value Trap Businesses fit well with parenting opportunities,

but they are a misfit with the parent’s understanding of the units’ CSF.

This is where the corporate headquarters can make its biggest error. It mistakes what it sees as opportunities for ways to improve the business units’ profitability or competitive position.

E.g.: To make the unit a world-class manufacturer (because the parent has world-class manufacturing skills) it may not notice that the unit is primarily successful because of its unique product development and niche marketing expertise

Page 19: Corporate Parenting Name Roll No. Ritesh Chhadwa 03 Gopal Kadkade 12 Dipesh Kotecha 15 Jayesh Name 28 Santosh Vishwakarma 55