copyright law spring 2004 class 4 professor fischer columbus school of law the catholic university...

22
COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

Upload: ruby-bruce

Post on 25-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004

CLASS 4Professor Fischer

Columbus School of Law

The Catholic University of America

January 28, 2004

Page 2: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

Differences Between Copyright and Other Intellectual Property

• Other than copyrights, what other forms of intellectual property are there?

Page 3: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COPYRIGHTS AND OTHER FORMS OF INTELLECTUAL

PROPERTY

• Patent Law (e.g. Bell v. Catalda (2d Cir. 1951) -- CB p. 52

• Trademark Laws (e.g. Frederick Warne v. Book Sales, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 1979)) -- CB p. 65

Page 4: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

Patents

• Protect inventions - right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or importing for 20 years (utility)

• Constitutional basis for Patent Act (35 U.S.C. s. 1 et seq.)

• How do you obtain patent rights and how long do they last?

Page 5: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

REQUIREMENTS FOR PATENTABILITY (Utility

Patent)• Patentable subject matter• Novelty• Utility• Non-obvious to people with

ordinary skill in the art• REMEMBER: Catalda case

Page 6: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

HOW DO YOU GET A PATENT?

• File a patent application • Comply with

Description/Enablement/Disclosure requirement

• Pay a Fee• Rigorous PTO examination process• Getting a patent is very expensive and time

consuming compared to getting a copyright!•

Page 7: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

TRADEMARKS• Protects symbols/brands from unauthorized or

confusing use by others• Not because they are especially creative or novel• But because they signify a single source of a

product and a consistent level of quality to customers

• Protects reputation and goodwill - relates to use, not invention or authorship

• Duration: 10 years renewable if used• CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS for TMS?

Page 8: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

Constitutional Basis for TMs

• Commerce Clause of U.S. Constitution: Art. I cl. 1 s. 3

• Federal TM statute is the Lanham Act, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq.

• Also state, common law protection

Page 9: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

Can there be overlap between

• Copyrights and patents?

• Copyrights and trademarks?

Page 10: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

COPYRIGHTABILITY

• What are the two statutory requirements for copyright protection?

Page 11: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

COPYRIGHTABILITY

Two statutory requirements for copyright protection in s. 102(a)

• 1. Original work of authorship

• 2. Fixation

Page 12: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

An Originality Question

• Jane writes a song. Jane never plays her song for anyone else, and consequently Emma has never heard Jane’s song. Suspend credulity and imagine that Emma writes a song that is identical to Jane’s. Is Emma’s song copyrightable?

Page 13: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

Learned Hand: Independent Creation Requirement

• “. . .[I]f by some magic a man who had never known it were to compose anew Keats’ Ode On a Grecian Urn, he would be an “author,” and, if he copyrighted it, others might not copy that poem, though they might of course copy Keats.”

• Sheldon v. MGM, 81 F.2d 49, 54 (2d Cir. 1936), aff’d, 309 U.S. 390 (1940)

Page 14: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

Can “Dr. Nerd” Copyright . . .

• . . . a heretofore undiscovered and unpublished manuscript of a Shakespeare play that he found while exploring the stacks of Mullen Library?

Page 15: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

Exact Copies

• Arthur, a forger, creates an exact reproduction of Rembrandt’s 1629 Self Portrait.

• Experts cannot distinguish Arthur’s copy from the original

• Is Arthur an “author” for the purposes of copyright?

Page 16: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

In Bell v. Catalda, Justice Frank stated:

• “A copyist’s bad eyesight or defective musculature, or a shock caused by a clap of thunder, may yield sufficiently distinguishable variations [to be considered original enough to be copyrighted]. Having hit on such a variation unintentionally, the “author” may adopt it as his own and copyright it.”

Page 17: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

COPYRIGHTABILITY: ORIGINALITY

REQUIREMENTTwo aspects: • (1) independent creation • (2) at least some minimal

degree of creativity • See Feist, 499 U.S. 340 (1991)

– CB p. 75

Page 18: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

ORIGINALITY OF LABELS/SLOGANS

• TO WHAT EXTENT ARE THESE COPYRIGHTABLE?

Page 19: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

Copyright Office Regulation provides that some works are not copyrightable, including:

• “Words and short phrases, such as names, titles, and slogans, familiar symbols or designs, mere variations of typographic ornamentation, lettering or coloring; mere listing of ingredients or contents.” – 37 C.F.R. § 202.1(a)

Page 20: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

WORKS OF AUTHORSHIP

• See s. 102(a) (1)-(8)

• Overlapping?

• Exclusive?

Page 21: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

STAND-UP COMICS AND COPYRIGHT

• Jay Leno: “I get ripped off. Everybody gets ripped off. There’s nothing you can do about it. You just learn to write faster.”

Page 22: COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004

FIXATION

• Like originality, fixation is required for a work to be copyrightable

• It is a constitutional requirement - a work must be a “writing” to be copyrightable