copyright © 2016 wolters kluwer all rights reserved chapter 7 experimental design i— independent...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Chapter 7Experimental Design I—Independent Variables
2Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
The Research Process
Evidence-based practice
Search for answers
Design and development of a study
• Funding• Human and animal use
approval• Pilot studies
• Preliminary data
Conduct of the study
Collection of the dataLaboratory analysis of data
Statistical analysis of data
Manuscript preparation
Peer review
Publication of manuscript
The Body of Knowledge• Anecdotal observations
• Scientific literature base
If found
If not found
If rejected
If accepted
3Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Key Terms
Alternate/research hypothesisBetween-group/-subject independent variableBiasBlindConfounding or intervening variableConstantControl groupCounterbalancingDependent variableDouble blindExclusion criteriaExperimental researchExternal validityHawthorne effect
Inclusion criteriaIndependent variableInternal validityMultivariateNon-experimental researchNull hypothesisPlacebo effectPowerQuasi-experimental researchResearch designTreatment/interventionUnivariateVariableWithin-group/-subject independent variable
4Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Planning the Research Design
• Research design is the process by which investigators determine how to answer their research question(s)
• Flaws in research design typically cannot be overcome by editing or statistical analysis
5Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Identifying Variables
• A variable is some characteristic or factor that can have different values and is either subject to change or can be manipulated as an intervention
• Variables may be independent, dependent, constant, or confounding
6Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Identifying Variables
Independent Variable
Intentionally controlled or manipulated
Treatment or intervention
May be multiple levels
May be group classification
Known factor
Dependent Variable
Outcome for which researcher hopes to elicit an effect
“What is measured”
Unknown factor
7Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Independent Variables: Levels
• Examining the effects of different doses of a drug or supplement is an example of multiple levels of a single independent variable
• How different doses affect male and female mice is an example of multiple independent variables
Fig. 7-1
8Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Independent Variables: Types
• Between-group (or between-subjects) independent variable: different group of subjects for each level of the variable
• Within-group (or within-subject) independent variable: each subject is tested at each level of the independent variable
Fig. 7-1
9Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Identifying Variables
Between-Group/-Subject
Well suited to animal studies
Random group assignment can reduce within-group variability;
matching might be preferred
Within-Group/-Subject
Each subject serves as his/her own control
More demanding of the participants
Powerful statistical design
Reduces sample size and need for randomization
Requires longer time period, including accounting for wash-out
10Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Overview of Research Design Dimensions
Design Primary Use Randomized? Degree of Control
Retrospective or Prospective?
Emphasis on Validity
Non-Experimental
Description, examine relationships
No Low Either
Quasi-Experimental
Causal inferences
No Low/moderate
Either External
True Experimental
Causal inferences
Yes High Prospective Internal
Table 7-4
11Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Experimental Design: Control Group
• Control group: measured at the same time points as the treatment group(s) but receives no treatment
• Placebo: dummy treatment that does not affect the dependent variable(s)
• Blinding: keeping participants (single blind) and ideally both participants and study personnel (double blind) naïve to the study treatment to limit bias
12Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Experimental Design: Control Group
• Placebo effect: subjects receiving the placebo may experience a benefit even though they aren’t receiving any treatment
• Hawthorne effect: subjects may perform better due to being observed
13Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Experimental Design: Selecting Subjects
• Identify the study population, and obtain a representative sample• Weigh the ability to improve retention (convenience sample) against
having a more representative sample• The degree to which the sample represents the population of
interest affects the power of the study• Inclusion criteria are the stated subject characteristics• Exclusion criteria restrict subject participation
14Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Experimental Design: Controlling Variability & Bias
• Using randomization or matching to assign subjects to groups reduces other factors affecting the dependent variable
• Controlling for confounding or intervening variables reduces threats to internal validity
• Minimizing signal-to-noise ratio better enables the impact of the independent variable on the dependent variable to be observed
• Systematic errors occur when measurement error is in one direction• Random errors may occur in any direction and typically have a net
zero effect
15Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Summary
• Research design requires balance, weighing the pros and cons of a number of experimental choices
• There is a trade-off between controlling variables and real-world applicability
• Planning is key for avoiding confounding factors