copyright © 2005 fujitsu techno research limited dispute resolution needs and experience takashi...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2005 FUJITSU TECHNO RESEARCH LIMITED
Dispute Resolution Needs and ExperienceDispute Resolution Needs and Experience
Takashi Iwata
Managing Director
Fujitsu Techno Research Limited
April 26, 2005
Conference on
Dispute Resolution in
International Science and
Technology CollaborationWorld Intellectual Property Organization
Arbitration and Mediation Center
Geneva, Switzerland
Copyright © 2005 FUJITSU TECHNO RESEARCH LIMITED
Fujitsu at a GlanceFujitsu at a Glance
Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan Revenue: 4.7 trillion yen (US$45 billion) R&D Expenditure: 250.9 billion yen (US$2.4 billion) Employees: 156,000 worldwide Principal Business Areas: Software & Services, Computing & Communications Platforms, Electronic Devices
Fujitsu is a leading provider of customer-focused IT and communications solutions for the global marketplace.
2
Copyright © 2005 FUJITSU TECHNO RESEARCH LIMITED
Dispute Resolution NeedsDispute Resolution Needs
1. Options for dispute resolution
Litigation
ADR (arbitration, mediation, etc.)
2. It is better that various options are available for various situations
3. Advantages of ADR in general
Flexible resolution
Business resolution possible
Decision by experts available
Confidential, quick and inexpensive
One-time resolution of all disputes
3
Copyright © 2005 FUJITSU TECHNO RESEARCH LIMITED
International Science and Technology CollaborationInternational Science and Technology Collaboration
ADR : An arbitration clause (all cases)
Fujitsu Case -- International Agreements
(1) Joint Research and Development Agreements
ADR (40%)No ADR (60%)
4
Copyright © 2005 FUJITSU TECHNO RESEARCH LIMITED
International Science and Technology CollaborationInternational Science and Technology Collaboration
ADR : An arbitration clause (majority cases) A mediation clause (recently)
cf. Domestic Agreements No ADR clause, but a good faith discussion clause (almost all cases)
Fujitsu Case -- International Agreements
(2) Patent (or other intellectual property) License Agreements
ADR (54%)No ADR (46%)
5
Copyright © 2005 FUJITSU TECHNO RESEARCH LIMITED
Dispute Resolutions for Various SituationsDispute Resolutions for Various Situations
1. Collaboration Disputes
Situations:
After collaboration agreements are made, disputes arise
regarding ambiguities of the provisions of the agreements.
Disputes arise while collaboration activities are being done
without written agreements.
The best dispute resolution depending on the situation:
Relationship with the other party
Negotiation history
Status of the projects, etc. 6
Copyright © 2005 FUJITSU TECHNO RESEARCH LIMITED
Dispute Resolutions for Various SituationsDispute Resolutions for Various Situations
2. IPR Infringement Disputes
Situation:
Usually, there is no collaboration or license agreement before
disputes occur.
It is difficult to agree on ADR after such occurrence.
Dispute resolution:
Litigation (typically)
Court-led or -suggested ADR (mandatory or semi-mandatory)
7
Copyright © 2005 FUJITSU TECHNO RESEARCH LIMITED
Fujitsu’s Experience Fujitsu’s Experience
Case Court Why mediation? Mediator
1 Patent Infringement
Litigation
(Electronic device patent)
Virginia,
US
Agreement
Upon suggestion
of the court
Magistrate Judge
2 Patent Infringement
Litigation
(Computer peripheral patent)
California, US
Agreement
after
consideration
obligated by
the court rule
Private mediator
Successful Mediation
8
Copyright © 2005 FUJITSU TECHNO RESEARCH LIMITED
Fujitsu’s Experience Fujitsu’s Experience
Case Court Why mediation? Mediator1 Trade Secret
Misappropriation Litigation(Certain computer system)
New York, US
Court rule Private mediator
2 Patent Infringement Litigation(Flat panel display patent)
California, US
Agreementafterconsiderationobligated bythe court rule
Private mediator
3 Patent Infringement Litigation(Flat panel display patent)
Delaware, US
Court rule Magistrate Judge
Unsuccessful Mediation
9
Copyright © 2005 FUJITSU TECHNO RESEARCH LIMITED
Fujitsu’s ExperienceFujitsu’s Experience
1. Reasons For Successful Mediation:
Before the mediation, both parties had understood each other’s
position to some extent.
Both parties were prepared to compromise.
2. Reasons For Unsuccessful Mediation:
Both parties insisted on their respective positions.
Mediation was held untimely.
10
Copyright © 2005 FUJITSU TECHNO RESEARCH LIMITED
Effectiveness of MediationEffectiveness of Mediation
Mediation is useful for resolution of disputes:
Flexibility to return to the situation of disputes (cf. arbitration)
Resolution on the parties’ initiative and decision
Usefulness of business resolution
Especially, in case of collaboration, the parties are not hostile
and wish to, or are inclined to, continue business relationship.
However, mediation may be useless if the parties do not understand
each other’s position and are not prepared to compromise.
11
Copyright © 2005 FUJITSU TECHNO RESEARCH LIMITED