cooperative engagement capability (cec) · cooperative engagement capability (cec) executive...

2
NAVY PROGRAMS Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) Executive Summary The surface shp verson of Cooperatve Engagement Capablty (CEC) remans operatonally effectve and sutable. However, deficiencies in target tracking and engagement have been identified that will not be corrected until an improved track correlaton system, currently under development, s avalable. System The CEC s a system of hardware and software that allows surface ships (USG-2 variant) and E-2 aircraft (USG-3 varant) to share radar data. It conssts of two man hardware peces: - Cooperatve Engagement Processor (CEP) to collect and fuse radar data - Data Dstrbuton System (DDS) to exchange the CEP data with other CEC-equipped units An open archtecture upgrade usng commercal off-the-shelf (COTS) components s under development. Mission Ships and aircraft equipped with CEC: Accomplsh ar defense mssons by sharng a comprehensve stuatonal awareness of all ar contacts Have a hgher lkelhood of ar defense msson accomplishment because a CEC-equipped ship can fire mssles at a hostle ar contact wthout that shp havng actual radar contact Prime Contractor • Raytheon equipped with SSDS-based combat systems operating with CEC-equipped Aegis destroyers. Intal ndcatons show that testers dd not gather enough data during the FOT&E period to allow for a complete evaluation of CEC reliability when integrated with the SSDS Mark 2 Mod 2. Recommendations Status of Previous Recommendations. The Navy satisfied one of the two recommendations from FY05, but did not address any of the FY06 recommendations. • FY08 Recommendations. The Navy should: 1. Update the Test and Evaluation Master Plan to include details of CEC FOT&E testing with the Joint Lightweight Elevated Sensor System and the Navy Integrated Fire Control – Counter Ar capablty. 2. Ensure testers gather required data for a complete evaluaton of CEC relablty when ntegrated wth the SSDS Mark 2 Mod 2. Activity Commander, Operational Test and Evaluation Force (COTF) conducted FOT&E of CEC in February 2008 in USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) and USS New Orleans (LPD-18). Testing examned the ntegraton of CEC wth the Shp Self-Defense System (SSDS) Mark 2 Mod 1 (installed in USS Ronald Reagan) and with the SSDS Mark 2 Mod 2 (installed in USS New Orleans). COTF accomplished the FOT&E in accordance with a DOT&E-approved test plan. COTF has not yet publshed a report on results of ths testng. COTF initiated planning for FOT&E of CEC equipped with a new signal data processor that the Navy will install on the E-2D aircraft. Assessment The USG-2 variant of CEC remains operationally effective and suitable; however, deficiencies in target tracking and engagement contnue to occur and wll not be corrected untl an mproved track correlaton system s successfully developed and avalable. Initial indications show that limited CEC operator proficiency dd not support a complete evaluaton of end-to-end combat system nteroperablty wth a strke group composed of shps CEC 115

Upload: others

Post on 01-Feb-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • n A v Y P r o G r A M S

    Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC)

    Executive SummaryThe surface sh�p vers�on of Cooperat�ve Engagement Capab�l�ty (CEC) rema�ns operat�onally effect�ve and su�table. However, deficiencies in target tracking and engagement have been identified that will not be corrected until an improved track correlat�on system, currently under development, �s ava�lable.

    System• The CEC �s a system of hardware and software that allows

    surface ships (USG-2 variant) and E-2 aircraft (USG-3 var�ant) to share radar data. It cons�sts of two ma�n hardware p�eces:- Cooperat�ve Engagement Processor (CEP) to collect and

    fuse radar data- Data D�str�but�on System (DDS) to exchange the CEP data

    with other CEC-equipped units• An open arch�tecture upgrade us�ng commerc�al off-the-shelf

    (COTS) components �s under development.

    MissionShips and aircraft equipped with CEC: • Accompl�sh a�r defense m�ss�ons by shar�ng a comprehens�ve

    s�tuat�onal awareness of all a�r contacts

    • Have a h�gher l�kel�hood of a�r defense m�ss�on accomplishment because a CEC-equipped ship can fire m�ss�les at a host�le a�r contact w�thout that sh�p hav�ng actual radar contact

    Prime contractor• Raytheon

    equipped with SSDS-based combat systems operating with CEC-equipped Aegis destroyers.

    • In�t�al �nd�cat�ons show that testers d�d not gather enough data during the FOT&E period to allow for a complete evaluation of CEC reliability when integrated with the SSDS Mark 2 Mod 2.

    recommendations• Status of Previous Recommendations. The Navy satisfied one

    of the two recommendations from FY05, but did not address any of the FY06 recommendations.

    • FY08 Recommendations. The Navy should: 1. Update the Test and Evaluation Master Plan to include

    details of CEC FOT&E testing with the Joint Lightweight Elevated Sensor System and the Navy Integrated Fire Control – Counter A�r capab�l�ty.

    2. Ensure testers gather required data for a complete evaluat�on of CEC rel�ab�l�ty when �ntegrated w�th the SSDS Mark 2 Mod 2.

    Activity• Commander, Operational Test and Evaluation Force (COTF)

    conducted FOT&E of CEC in February 2008 in USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) and USS New Orleans (LPD-18). Testing exam�ned the �ntegrat�on of CEC w�th the Sh�p Self-Defense System (SSDS) Mark 2 Mod 1 (installed in USS Ronald Reagan) and with the SSDS Mark 2 Mod 2 (installed in USS New Orleans). COTF accomplished the FOT&E in accordance with a DOT&E-approved test plan. COTF has not yet publ�shed a report on results of th�s test�ng.

    • COTF initiated planning for FOT&E of CEC equipped with a new signal data processor that the Navy will install on the E-2D aircraft.

    Assessment• The USG-2 variant of CEC remains operationally effective

    and suitable; however, deficiencies in target tracking and engagement cont�nue to occur and w�ll not be corrected unt�l an �mproved track correlat�on system �s successfully developed and ava�lable.

    • Initial indications show that limited CEC operator proficiency d�d not support a complete evaluat�on of end-to-end combat system �nteroperab�l�ty w�th a str�ke group composed of sh�ps

    CEC 115

  • n A v Y P r o G r A M S

    116