conversational coherence com 370--john r. baldwin
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Conversational Conversational CoherenceCoherence
COM 370--John R. BaldwinCOM 370--John R. Baldwin
![Page 2: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Conversational Conversational EffectivenessEffectiveness
(Thompson, 2003, Ch. 6)(Thompson, 2003, Ch. 6)
Setting the sceneSetting the scene: : Ex: a tough discussionEx: a tough discussion
Social contextSocial context Physical contextPhysical context RelationshipRelationship Mood/state of mindMood/state of mind Speech genreSpeech genre PurposePurpose
![Page 3: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Elements of Effectiveness Elements of Effectiveness (informal)(informal)
(Thompson, 2003, Ch. 6)(Thompson, 2003, Ch. 6)
Balance of phatic communicationBalance of phatic communication Other-awareness (mindfulness)Other-awareness (mindfulness)
Process versus outcome focusProcess versus outcome focus Self-observation, other-observationSelf-observation, other-observation
Acknowledge feelings (EQ)Acknowledge feelings (EQ) Awareness of “face” Awareness of “face” Assertiveness (vs. agressiveness, passivenessAssertiveness (vs. agressiveness, passiveness Nonverbal awarenessNonverbal awareness Reframing: Reframing:
E.g., complaint E.g., complaint request; addressing racism request; addressing racism Open- versus closed statements: The keyOpen- versus closed statements: The key
![Page 4: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Avoiding DiscriminationAvoiding Discrimination(Thompson, 2003, Ch. 6)(Thompson, 2003, Ch. 6)
A view towards “political correctness”A view towards “political correctness” Avoid language thatAvoid language that
Excludes: Excludes: “Chairman,” “the lawyer. . . he"“Chairman,” “the lawyer. . . he" Depersonalizes : Depersonalizes : “the handicapped.” “They are “the handicapped.” “They are
affectionate, aren’t they?”affectionate, aren’t they?” Stigmatizes : Stigmatizes : “Black sheep” “A ___ excuse.” “That’s “Black sheep” “A ___ excuse.” “That’s
so ____!”so ____!” Reinforces stereotypes : Reinforces stereotypes : “So, what team do you play “So, what team do you play
on?”on?” Legitimizes discrimination : Legitimizes discrimination : “domestic violence”“domestic violence” [Is Offensive] : [Is Offensive] : “Chairman,” “the lawyer. . . he"“Chairman,” “the lawyer. . . he"
![Page 5: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Types of CoherenceTypes of Coherence
Global coherenceGlobal coherence: : “A goal-oriented plan “A goal-oriented plan that offers overall control and is that offers overall control and is functionally related to local surface functionally related to local surface connections” connections”
Local coherenceLocal coherence: : “Relations between “Relations between utterances, sentences, or propositions utterances, sentences, or propositions that are pairwise and structured as that are pairwise and structured as sequential continuations” (Ellis, 1999, p. sequential continuations” (Ellis, 1999, p. 90)90)
CohesionCohesion: : [More below…][More below…]
![Page 6: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Two types of Two types of rulesrules
ConstitutiveConstitutive: : what what makes it what it is?makes it what it is?
RegulativeRegulative: : how how does one do it? does one do it? (deontic logic, p. 40)(deontic logic, p. 40)
Example: Sarcasm in Example: Sarcasm in organizational cultureorganizational culture
![Page 7: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Hierarchy of MeaningsHierarchy of Meanings
TEXT CONTEXTS
Content Speech Act
Episode
Relationship/Contract
Self-concept
Cultural Patterns
![Page 8: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Life script/self-concept
Relationship
Episode
Speech Act
Text
Ex: Ex: “Would you stop that?!”“Would you stop that?!”CultureCulture
![Page 9: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Local CoherenceLocal Coherence
““Local organization . . . Is concerned with Local organization . . . Is concerned with the pragmatic relations among actual the pragmatic relations among actual components of a text. At its rawest level, components of a text. At its rawest level, a text is an unbroken string of a text is an unbroken string of expressions—words, phrases, and expressions—words, phrases, and speech acts. speech acts. Local coherence Local coherence is “from is “from below” or “bottom up” and focuses on below” or “bottom up” and focuses on how meanings in a text are linked up to how meanings in a text are linked up to form and contribute to more general and form and contribute to more general and complex meaningscomplex meanings” (Ellis, p. 110)” (Ellis, p. 110)
![Page 10: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Local CoherenceLocal Coherence
CohesionCohesion: : The interrelation between The interrelation between surface forms of conversationsurface forms of conversation…”when …”when one element of a message cannot be one element of a message cannot be understood without referring to what understood without referring to what presupposes it” (Ellis, p. 111).presupposes it” (Ellis, p. 111).
Ex: Ex: “Bundle the papers with string. Then “Bundle the papers with string. Then place them on the curb. place them on the curb.
![Page 11: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Types of CohesionTypes of Cohesion
ReferenceReference:: Something in text refers to Something in text refers to something else (e.g. pronouns)something else (e.g. pronouns) Exophoric: Not within textExophoric: Not within text Endophoric: Within text (before or after)Endophoric: Within text (before or after)
SubstitutionSubstitution: : Replaces one word with a Replaces one word with a substitute word or similar phrase, word, or substitute word or similar phrase, word, or clauseclause
EllipsisEllipsis: : When a word or phrase is not said, When a word or phrase is not said, but is understood; that is, a “meaning slot” is but is understood; that is, a “meaning slot” is emptyempty
![Page 12: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Types of CohesionTypes of Cohesion ConjunctionConjunction: : Show “how information in one part Show “how information in one part
of text is related to what preceded it” (p. 114)—a of text is related to what preceded it” (p. 114)—a “semantic” rather than structural relationship “semantic” rather than structural relationship between elements: Conjunctions, compound between elements: Conjunctions, compound adverbs, prepositional phrases.adverbs, prepositional phrases. AdditiveAdditive AdversativeAdversative CausalCausal TemporalTemporal And others (locational, etc.)And others (locational, etc.)
Lexical CohesionLexical Cohesion: : Most complex; achieved Most complex; achieved through vocabulary selection with words that are through vocabulary selection with words that are synonymous, near synonymous, or in synonymous, near synonymous, or in superordinate relationship with one anothersuperordinate relationship with one another
![Page 13: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Cohesion and…Cohesion and…
Effective communicationEffective communication: “Communicators who are : “Communicators who are adept…” (p. 116)adept…” (p. 116)
Speech actsSpeech acts: “their meaning and function are : “their meaning and function are determined locally…” (p. 124) (subcodes)determined locally…” (p. 124) (subcodes)
SequencingSequencing: : contingency-relevance rulecontingency-relevance rule (p. 129). (p. 129). Initiations: RecognizeInitiations: RecognizeIdentifyIdentifySocial RecognitionSocial Recognition ““Demand ticketDemand ticket” (p. 133)” (p. 133) Topic-shift markers: Topic-shift markers: (p. 136): Well, Now, BTW(p. 136): Well, Now, BTW Preface/followPreface/follow
RegulatingRegulating behavior (p. 132)behavior (p. 132)
![Page 14: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Types of Discourse Types of Discourse (The Mysterious Ch. 9)(The Mysterious Ch. 9)
AttributesAttributes DebateDebate CeremonyCeremony MeetingMeeting Convers.Convers.
Number Number of peopleof people
TopicTopic
Turn Turn orderorder
Turn Turn lengthlength
![Page 15: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Interruptions & OverlapsInterruptions & Overlaps
TRPTRP: : Turn-Relevant PlaceTurn-Relevant Place TCU: TCU: Turn-constructional units. Our utterances Turn-constructional units. Our utterances
(“turns”) may be made up of several of these(“turns”) may be made up of several of these
InterruptionInterruption: 2: 2ndnd speaker comes in in place speaker comes in in place other than TCU (i.e., where TCU is “not other than TCU (i.e., where TCU is “not projected.”projected.”
OverlapOverlap: : 22ndnd speaker comes in at/near TCU speaker comes in at/near TCU ““ContinuerContinuer”: ”: Overlap that continues S1’s turnOverlap that continues S1’s turn LRRMLRRM: : Listener-Response Relevant MomentsListener-Response Relevant Moments
![Page 16: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Conversation issuesConversation issues
Participants and non-participantsParticipants and non-participants Type of relationship (friends versus Type of relationship (friends versus
acquaintances)acquaintances) Demographic differences (e.g., gender)Demographic differences (e.g., gender) Specific genre of conversation (job Specific genre of conversation (job
interview, therapy, openings, closings)interview, therapy, openings, closings)
![Page 17: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Global CoherenceGlobal Coherence
““Global coherence Global coherence presupposes the presupposes the existence of a general structure that is existence of a general structure that is related to ideas such as topic, theme, related to ideas such as topic, theme, gist, or goal of discourse. It focuses on gist, or goal of discourse. It focuses on what is most central or prominent about a what is most central or prominent about a discourse and acts as an overall discourse and acts as an overall executive manager of language, acts, executive manager of language, acts, and sequences” (Ellis, p. 110)and sequences” (Ellis, p. 110)
![Page 18: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Aspects of Global Aspects of Global CoherenceCoherence
Topicality:Topicality: Subject of theme of Subject of theme of discourse or text—the element that holds discourse or text—the element that holds an entire text or portion of text together. an entire text or portion of text together. The importance of topicThe importance of topic Determining conversational relevanceDetermining conversational relevance Focus (implicit, explicit)Focus (implicit, explicit) ForegroundingForegrounding
![Page 19: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
1a: The little puppy stepped on a wasp.1a: The little puppy stepped on a wasp. 1b: The puppy was very upset.1b: The puppy was very upset. 1c: It started to buzz furiously.1c: It started to buzz furiously.
2a: The book was really good. 2a: The book was really good. ItIt was well was well written.written.
3a: The book was really good. The 3a: The book was really good. The author is very skilled.author is very skilled.
![Page 20: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Aspects of Global CoherenceAspects of Global Coherence
Schema(ta):Schema(ta): ““higher-level data structures for higher-level data structures for representing concepts in memoryrepresenting concepts in memory”—memory ”—memory structures or sets of “knowledge” we use to structures or sets of “knowledge” we use to interpret experienceinterpret experience Person schemaPerson schema Event schemaEvent schema Self schemaSelf schema Role schemaRole schema Ex: Van Dijk’s (1987) example of stereotypesEx: Van Dijk’s (1987) example of stereotypes
![Page 21: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Aspects of Global CoherenceAspects of Global Coherence
Scripts:Scripts: Similar to an “event schema,” a script is a Similar to an “event schema,” a script is a ““knowledge structure that depicts a typical knowledge structure that depicts a typical sequence of events for a common situationsequence of events for a common situation” (p. ” (p. 95). We use these for situations like “getting ready 95). We use these for situations like “getting ready for class” or “asking for date.”for class” or “asking for date.” What are some common scripts you can think of?What are some common scripts you can think of? What are some ways scripts (and other schema) can What are some ways scripts (and other schema) can
differ?differ? Scripts assume information shared by participants.Scripts assume information shared by participants.
![Page 22: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Ex: Claire painted the wall with a roller.Ex: Claire painted the wall with a roller. Ex: Julie polished her surfboard.Ex: Julie polished her surfboard. Ex: Zack ordered a steak.Ex: Zack ordered a steak.
When it arrived, he picked up his X to eat it.When it arrived, he picked up his X to eat it. John needed money. He got a gun and walked John needed money. He got a gun and walked
into a liquor store. He told the owner he wanted into a liquor store. He told the owner he wanted some money. The owner gave John the some money. The owner gave John the money.money.
Scripts suggest that we get much meaning from Scripts suggest that we get much meaning from these utterances that is not present within these utterances that is not present within either the semantics or syntax !either the semantics or syntax !
![Page 23: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Global Coherence: Global Coherence: NarrativesNarratives
Narratives:Narratives: Stories told in interaction with Stories told in interaction with characters, events, time sequence. They can be characters, events, time sequence. They can be true or false, but are generally assumed to be true true or false, but are generally assumed to be true by the speaker.by the speaker. How long must a narrative be?How long must a narrative be? PreferentialPreferential or or ObligatoryObligatory rules? rules? Narrative must surround a “Narrative must surround a “narratable eventnarratable event”” RepairsRepairs can be used to fix problems in referencing, can be used to fix problems in referencing,
sequencing, or evaluatingsequencing, or evaluating Repairs can be initiated by the speaker or hearerRepairs can be initiated by the speaker or hearer
E.g., E.g., insertions, retrackinginsertions, retracking
![Page 24: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Narrative reportabilityNarrative reportability
Teller’s involvement (if hearer knows the Teller’s involvement (if hearer knows the teller)teller)
Culturally significant informationCulturally significant information ““Inherently and permanently reportable” Inherently and permanently reportable”
versus “reportable in context”versus “reportable in context”
![Page 25: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
NarrativeNarrativeA typical narrative has these components:A typical narrative has these components: SettingSetting OrientationOrientation ComplicationComplication ResolutionResolution EvaluationEvaluation ConclusionConclusion [How are van Dijk’s prejudiced narratives [How are van Dijk’s prejudiced narratives
different? Why is this important?]different? Why is this important?]
![Page 26: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Narrative Rules: who & Narrative Rules: who & what? (Metts)what? (Metts) Contexting ruleContexting rule: :
SpeakerSpeaker When/how?When/how?
Relevant to the topic Relevant to the topic At prior topic close (e.g., the “lull”)At prior topic close (e.g., the “lull”) Introduced with relevance accounted forIntroduced with relevance accounted forOff-topic, but with prefatory signalOff-topic, but with prefatory signalMay be similar in “theme” (e.g., May be similar in “theme” (e.g.,
embarassment, failure, joy)embarassment, failure, joy)
![Page 27: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Alignment ruleAlignment rule: : HearerHearer Wait for interruptionWait for interruption Can express “minimal responses of Can express “minimal responses of
attention and appreciation” at attention and appreciation” at Listener Listener Response Relevant MomentsResponse Relevant Moments (LRRMs)(LRRMs)
![Page 28: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Concision rules:Concision rules: I. I. Unnecessary Events: Unnecessary Events: Omit Omit
“subevents” not necessary for “subevents” not necessary for understanding.understanding.
II. II. Audience familiarity: Audience familiarity: Shorten Shorten narratives with which audience is narratives with which audience is familiar.familiar.
![Page 29: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Comprehension rulesComprehension rules:: I. I. ReferencingReferencing: : avoid vague references to avoid vague references to
people, places, events not understood by hearerpeople, places, events not understood by hearer II. II. SequencingSequencing: : narrative should have logical narrative should have logical
(sequential) order(sequential) order III. III. EvaluatingEvaluating: : For narrative to be understood, For narrative to be understood,
you must “evaluate” the central action, indicate you must “evaluate” the central action, indicate meaning of narrative at that point in the meaning of narrative at that point in the conversation.conversation.
![Page 30: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Appropriateness rulesAppropriateness rules:: I. I. [Formality][Formality]: : Story should match Story should match
appropriate level of formality for the appropriate level of formality for the situatuationsituatuation
II. II. [Altercasting][Altercasting]: : Avoid stories that cast Avoid stories that cast your interaction partner (i.e., make a “role your interaction partner (i.e., make a “role bid”) in a role that she or he would not bid”) in a role that she or he would not appreciate in the context.appreciate in the context.
[might there be others?][might there be others?]
![Page 31: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Narrative Receipt RuleNarrative Receipt Rule:: Responding rule:Responding rule: Assume the narrative fit Assume the narrative fit
within the interaction context. “At the first within the interaction context. “At the first indication of the narrative’s completion, you indication of the narrative’s completion, you must offer an implicative turn that indicates must offer an implicative turn that indicates your understanding or appreciation of for the your understanding or appreciation of for the evaluative point of the narrative”evaluative point of the narrative”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqx1JO-g2pw
![Page 32: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
ApplicationApplication
CMM: normative and constitutive rulesCMM: normative and constitutive rules SchemaSchema Cohesion: Cohesion:
Local (utterance by utterance)Local (utterance by utterance) GlobalGlobal
Effectiveness (per Thompson)Effectiveness (per Thompson) Narrative rulesNarrative rules
![Page 33: Conversational Coherence COM 370--John R. Baldwin](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052701/56649e695503460f94b65592/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
The FuneralThe Funeral http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfDyTU
iL8xs