control of flexible pneumatic robot arm using...
TRANSCRIPT
CONTROL OF FLEXIBLE PNEUMATIC ROBOT ARM USING
MASTER DEVICE WITH PNEUMATIC BRAKE MECHANISM
Mohd ALIFF*, Shujiro DOHTA*, Tetsuya AKAGI and Takafumi MORIMOTO*
* Graduate School of Engineering, Okayama University of Science, 1-1, Ridai-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-0005, Japan
(E-mail: [email protected])
ABSTRACT
In this paper, a novel structure for bilateral control in master-slave system is presented. From our previous study, it is
needed to apply the brake mechanism on the master arm and it perhaps can be a bilateral control by taking into account
the force factor in both master-slave arms. The compact and lightweight brake mechanism can avoid patients from
injury by limiting and stopping the movement of master arm when it moves in the dangerous area or angle during the
therapy. The control system consists of flexible pneumatic cylinders, potentiometers, quasi-servo valves, accelerometers
and a microcomputer. The proposed analytical model of the master-slave control will be explained and the control
performances of the brake system were investigated. The results from experiments show that the proposed model has a
potential for application on robot arm. Thus, this master-slave control with brake mechanism has a great potential for
application in rehabilitation field.
KEY WORDS
Pneumatic robot arm, Flexible pneumatic cylinder, Master-slave control, Rehabilitation device, Bilateral control
NOMENCLATURE
( 1 line space )
e : deviation of the cylinder length
KD : differential gain
KI : integral gain
KP : proportional gain
L : cylinder length (displacement)
r : distance from the center of the round stage
to the center of the slide stage in the
cylinder
R : radius of curvature of the cylinder
u : control input (duty ratio)
Vx , Vy , Vz : output differential voltages from the
accelerometer
α : bending direction angle from X-axis
β : bending angle from Y-axis
Subscripts:
m : master arm
s : slave arm
0 : central tube
1 , 2 , 3 : location number of the flexible cylinder
Copyright © 2014 JFPS. ISBN 4-931070-10-8
Proceedings of the 9th JFPS International Symposiumon Fluid Power, Matsue, 2014
Oct. 28 - 31, 2014
822
3C2-3
INTRODUCTION
One of the social problem in Japan is the percentage of
elderly population is continuously increasing while
birthrates continue its decline. The numbers continue to
increase year after year and are raising concerns of
professionals from a variety of fields including social
science, medical science and engineering. Nowadays,
many studies have shown that robots can be beneficial
to healthcare in a variety of ways from supporting in
lifting patients [1], to performing complex surgery [2].
Among the numerous robots designed to deliver arm
therapy, MIT-MANUS [3], ARM-GUIDE [4], and
MIME [5] are three representative devices that have
been tested extensively with patients. MIT-MANUS can
support patient in executing reaching movements in
horizontal plane. However, a better improvement in
shoulder strength and function needs arms to be trained
in vertical direction as well, so ARM-GUIDE and
MIME which can give training in a three-dimensional
workspace were developed. ARM-GUIDE that allows
the patient to exercise against gravity can be used as
diagnostic tool and a treatment tool for addressing arm
impairment. However, these robotic arms are heavy in
weight and must be fixed on walls and poles. This
causes the limited space in motion and patients are
easily to feel excess fatigue. Furthermore, these robots
are complex to set up by patients themselves and are not
suitable for rehabilitation training program at home [6].
The purpose of our study is to develop a flexible and
lightweight actuator and to apply it to a flexible robot
arm and rehabilitation device. Novel types of the
flexible pneumatic actuator that can be used even if the
actuators are deformed by the external forces have been
proposed and tested [7], [8]. We have also proposed and
tested the flexible robot arm with simple structure by
using the rod-less type flexible pneumatic cylinders [9].
This robot arm has three degrees-of-freedom that is
bending, extending and contracting. The master-slave
control is adopted into the robot arm as a control
method in order to be used in rehabilitation field. The
master-slave control is necessary when a physical
therapist wants to give a rehabilitation motion to a
patient. During rehabilitation, the therapist will control
the movement of the robot by holding the master arm
and move it repeatedly according to conditions and
needs of patient, and at the same time, the patient will
follow the movement by holding the slave arm.
In this paper, an analytical model of the master-slave
control will be explained and the control performances
of the brake system for a bilateral control were
investigated. The system consists of a flexible robot arm,
a microcomputer, accelerometers, small-sized
quasi-servo valves and potentiometers. The construction
of the robot arm is very lightweight and compact. The
size of the robot arm is Ø100 mm x 300 mm and the
mass is 380 g. From the viewpoint of safety,
human-friendly, precisely in attitude control, compact
construction and lightweight, this flexible mechanism
has a potential to be used in rehabilitation field.
FLEXIBLE PNEUMATIC CYLINDEFR
Flexible Pneumatic Cylinder The most extensive use of robotic technology for
medical applications has been in rehabilitation robotics,
which includes assistive robots and therapeutic robots.
The actuator to be used in rehabilitation robots has also
been studied. The actuator must be safe and does not
harm patients who use it during the therapy. The
proposed cylinder tube that is made from soft
polyurethane and is driven by pneumatic pressure is
suitable to be used in the robot arm. As the most parts of
the robot arm are air based, we can have less
complicated design and the robot can be made of
inexpensive material. These pneumatic actuators also
have long life and perform well with negligible
maintenance requirement throughout their life cycle.
Figure 1 shows the construction of a flexible pneumatic
cylinder [8]. It consists of a flexible tube as a cylinder
and gasket, one steel ball as a cylinder head and a slide
stage that can slide along the outside of the tube. The
steel ball is pinched by two pairs of brass rollers from
both sides of the ball. The operating principle of the
flexible pneumatic cylinder is as follows. When the
pressure is applied from one end of the flexible tube, the
9 mm steel ball which is in the middle of the slide stage
is pushed and moved accordingly. At the same time, the
steel ball pushes the brass rollers and then the slide
stage moves while it deforms the tube. We investigated
the minimum driving pressure of the tested flexible
pneumatic cylinder using various center distance D
(shown in Fig.1) and W between two pairs of rollers as
a design parameter. From the experiments, we found
that the distance D of 14.4 mm and the distance W of 10
mm were best [8]. In this combination between D and W,
the frictional force of the slide stage is small and the 9
mm steel ball does not get out from the slide stage.
Figure 1 Construction of flexible pneumatic cylinder
Copyright © 2014 JFPS. ISBN 4-931070-10-8 823
FLEXIBLE ROBOT ARM AND CONTROL
STSTEM
Flexible Robot Arm Figure 2 shows the construction of flexible robot arm.
The robot arm consists of two round stages: an upper
and a lower, three flexible pneumatic cylinders, an
accelerometer, a potentiometer and three slide stages.
The outer diameter of the upper and lower stage is 100
mm and the length of cylinder tube is 250. Each flexible
pneumatic cylinder is arranged so that the central angle
of two adjacent slide stages becomes 120 degrees on the
stage. An end of each flexible cylinder is fixed to the
upper stage. Two on/off control valves (Koganei Co.
Ltd., G010HE-1) or quasi-servo valves are used to drive
one flexible pneumatic cylinder. In order to control the
three flexible cylinders, six control valves are needed.
The basic operating principle of the flexible robot arm is
as follows. To make the arm extend or contract, pressure
must be applied on one end of the cylinder only. The
robot arm will extend or move upward if the pressure is
applied on the three upper ends of the cylinders. On the
other hand, the robot arm will contract or move
downward if the pressure is applied on the three bottom
ends of the cylinders. To perform a bending motion to
the right, for example, the right cylinder requires
pressure from both ends to limit movement while the
remaining two cylinders require pressure from the top to
enable movement. The robot arm will bend by
constricting one cylinder and extending the others. The
upper round stage moves in the range of 0 to 180 mm
with three cylinder tubes.
Figure 2 Construction of flexible robot arm
Analytical Model for Master-slave Control Figure 3 shows an analytical model for the master-slave
attitude control of the flexible robot arm. In this model,
we assume that the shape of each flexible pneumatic
cylinder becomes a circular arc when the arm bends. In
this figure, L, L1, L2 and L3 are the cylinder displacement
length for the central tube, cylinder 1, cylinder 2 and
cylinder 3 respectively.
Figure 3 Analytical model for attitude control
The bending direction angle α is the angle from X axis
and bending angle β is the angle from Y axis. From the
geometrical relationship shown in Fig.3, the desired
length (in a master arm) and the present length (in a
slave arm) of each cylinder L are calculated by the
following equations (1)-(4) by using the bending
direction angle α and the bending angle β.
iiii rRL cos1 (i=m,s) (1)
iiii rRL
)}3
2cos({2
(i=m,s) (2)
iiii rRL
)}3
4cos({3
(i=m,s) (3)
i
ii
LR
0 (i=m,s) (4)
Subscripts m and s indicate the desired (master arm) and
the present (slave arm), respectively. And subscript
number (1,2,3) indicates the location number of the
cylinder. R and r mean the radius of curvature of the
cylinder and the distance from the center of the round
stage to the center of the slide stage in the cylinder,
respectively. Radius r is 33mm. The bending direction
angle α, and the bending angle β are given by following
equations using the output voltage from the
accelerometer.
22
1cos
yixi
xii
VV
V
(i=m,s) (5)
)(cosmax
1
iz
zii
V
V (i=m,s) (6)
Where, Vx, Vy, and Vz mean the accelerometer output
differential voltage from the initial value. The voltages
Copyright © 2014 JFPS. ISBN 4-931070-10-8 824
Vx and Vy correspond to the angle from the horizontal
plane and Vz corresponds to the angle from the vertical
plane. Then, Vzmax means the difference of Vz between
the values in horizontal and vertical planes. By using
Eqs.(1)-(6), we can calculate the length of the three
cylinders for every bending state of the robot arm. In
our previous study [10], we confirmed that the
calculated angle agreed well with the measured value.
The error between both angles was less than 1 degree.
Master-Slave Control System We tried to construct the control system as compact and
inexpensive as possible. Figure 4 shows the schematic
diagram of the control system. The control system
consists of the slave arm, the master arm, six
quasi-servo valves and a high-speed SH/7125
microcomputer. The slave arm consists of two round
stages: an upper and a lower, three flexible pneumatic
cylinders, an accelerometer, a potentiometer and three
slide stages. The previous proposed master arm just had
an accelerometer sensor placed at the top [10]. The
attitude of the upper round stage of the slave arm is
detected with the accelerometer installed on atop of the
stage. The accelerometer can detect the bending angle
of the upper stage by measuring the change of gravity
for X,Y, and Z axis. From these values, the bending
direction angle α and the bending angle β are calculated
by using the Eq. (5) and Eq. (6).
Figure 4 Schematic diagram of control system
Figure 5 shows the block diagram of the master-slave
control system. The control is carried out as follows.
The microcomputer gets the output voltage from the
bending angles and calculates the desired length and the
present length of each flexible cylinder by using Eqs.
(1)-(4). The “length of the flexible cylinder” is defined
as a distance between the upper and the lower round
stage. By using this method, each length of the cylinder
can be controlled as a position control, and the
master-slave control can be realized.
Figure 5 Block diagram of the master-slave control
MASTER-SLAVE CONTROL USING BRAKE
MECHANISM
A bilateral system allows a human operator to perform
manipulation or sensing task in remote, hazardous or
confined environments. A bilateral system consists of a
slave robot and a master robot. The master is handled by
the human operator for controlling the slave robot and
sensing the slave environment contact forces. The
bilateral systems have many promising applications
especially in minimally invasive surgery and space and
underwater exploration, or hazardous environments
where human action is clearly restricted [12].
Commonly, the actuators used in most of bilateral
system are electrical direct-current motors. They are
easy to install, quiet and simple to control. However,
when gear-boxes are used to produce large actuation
torques, they may result in backlash and high inertia,
which are undesirable because they introduce
discontinuity and distortion in the force reflected to the
operator. In this study, we investigate the development
and control of pneumatic actuators in a bilateral system.
Compared to the electrical actuators, pneumatic
actuators have higher force-to-mass ratio and can
generate larger forces without the need for any
reduction mechanism such as a gear-box.
Pneumatic Brake Mechanism In this paper, a pneumatic brake mechanism is proposed
and tested to realize a simple bilateral control. Figure 6
shows the brake mechanism. It consist of supply port,
acrylic plate and silicon tube. This brake is very
lightweight, compact and safe to be used in robot arm
and rehabilitation field. For applying on the robot arm,
three brake mechanisms were developed and were
placed on the lower round stage of the master arm. The
operating principle of the brake mechanism is as
follows. When the pressure is applied to the supply port,
the silicon tube in the brake will inflate and at the same
time will fix the flexible pneumatic cylinder that is
placed in the middle of the brake. Transparency is the
principal performance goal in bilateral controller design.
It measures the quality of recreation of the mechanical
Copyright © 2014 JFPS. ISBN 4-931070-10-8 825
properties of the remote environment for human
operator. Abundant control theories have been proposed
to achieve high master-slave transparency when the
slave is free motion and or contact motion [13].
Figure 6 Brake mechanism
By using this brake mechanism, it can make the
transparency in master-slave control becomes better and
more acute by stopping the master arm when the
difference in attitude position between two arms are
high. Furthermore, the pneumatic brake will limit and
prevent the continuation of such dangerous motion to an
area or angle that can be harmful to a patient who holds
the slave arm. Moreover, the brake also can stop the
master arm from moving when there is an external force
that suddenly hit on a master arm during the therapy.
These all features will be discussed in detail at
experimental results session. By applying this brake
mechanism on our robot arm, perhaps it can be a simple
bilateral control by taking into account the force factor
in both master and slave arms.
Master Device with Pneumatic Brake Mechanism Figure 7 and Figure 8 shows the construction and
overview of the master arm with pneumatic brake
mechanism, respectively. The master arm consists of an
accelerometer sensor set on the top of the upper stage,
two round stages: an upper and a lower, three flexible
pneumatic cylinders, three brakes mechanism, a central
tube, three on/off control valves and a potentiometer.
The diameter of the upper and lower round stage is 100
mm. The upper round stage can moves in the range of 0
mm to 180 mm while the lower stage is fixed. The
previous proposed master arm is more compact and
lightweight because it has only an accelerometer on
atop to give the reference attitude value. However, the
structure and features are still not enough to be used as
rehabilitation tool. The previous master arm can support
the movement on the horizontal direction only. But the
rehabilitation in wrist needs arms to be trained in
vertical direction as well, so the new master arm which
can give training in three-dimensional workspace is
developed and proposed in this paper. Furthermore, the
previous master arm does not have the bilateral concept
and cannot sense the slave environment and contact
forces. It is feared when the arm is used in therapy, the
therapist cannot feel the resistance force of the slave
arm, and will continue until the movement will
endanger the patient. Thus, despite the previous master
arm can realize the attitude control of the robot arm
very well, inadequate structure and features cause the
concern on the safety of patients when it is used in
therapy.
Figure 7 Construction of master arm with brake system
Figure 8 Overview of master arm with brake system
Control Results Figure 9(a) shows a view of master-slave control with
brake mechanism. The left arm is the master arm with
three pneumatic brakes mechanism installed on it and
the right arm is the slave arm. During rehabilitation,
human hand is put on the slave arm as shown in Fig.
9(b). For the master-slave control method the following
PID control scheme was applied.
Copyright © 2014 JFPS. ISBN 4-931070-10-8 826
dt
deKdteKeKu i
DiIipi (i=1,2,3) (7)
isimi LLe (i=1,2,3) (8)
Where, ui means the control input and ei is the deviation
of each cylinder length. KP (=8.2 [%/mm]), KI (=0.0049
[%/mm]) and KD (=38.5 [%/mm]) are the proportional
gain, the integral gain and the differential gain,
respectively. These control parameters are adjusted
based on the ultimate sensitivity method. Using the
lower duty ratio as a control input to the PWM valve,
there are exists a dead zone for output flow rate of the
valve. Therefore, the input duty ratio of the PWM valve
is always added by 22.5% to the absolute value of the
control input which is calculated by Eq. (7).
Furthermore, the state of the switching valve is decided
by the sign (positive or negative) of the control input.
Since this control scheme is embedded into the
microcomputer, we can use the valve like a typical
servo valve without complex operations.
(a) Overview (b) Rehabilitation
Figure 9 Master-slave control with brake mechanism
Figure 10 shows the control results of the cylinder 1
with brake mechanism. The blue line is the length of the
cylinder 1 of the master arm, the red line is the length of
cylinder 1 of the slave arm, the purple line is the output
voltage of the brake mechanism and the orange line is
the deviation length of the cylinder 1. The pneumatic
brake mechanism will start working when the deviation
length of the two arms reaches at some value. The
maximum deviation value for the pneumatic brake
mechanism start working had been investigated at 5 mm,
10 mm, 15 mm and 20 mm as shown in Fig. 10. The
result shows that the 5 mm, 10 mm and 15 mm of the
deviation make the brakes always work. From these
experimental results, we can conclude that, when the
maximum deviation value is becomes smaller, the
chance of the pneumatic brake mechanism will work
becomes higher. This probability is very important to
the movement of the flexible cylinder because when the
brake is always braking, the flexible cylinder cannot
move smoothly. The friction between the flexible
tube and the brake also makes it more difficult to
move. From these experiments also, we can conclude
that the best maximum deviation value for the brake
mechanism is 20 mm because this value is just right
for the brake mechanism to work besides the
pneumatic cylinder can move naturally. Figure 11
shows the master-slave control results. During the
experiment, the master arm is operated by a human
hand to be bent, extended and contracted. The control
sampling period is 2.3ms, and the PWM period of the
quasi-servo valve is 10ms.
Figure 10 Control results of the cylinder 1 with
pneumatic brake mechanism for four kinds of
maximum deviation value; 5, 10, 15, 20 mm
Furthermore, in order to be used in aged society or
disabled persons, the robots needs to be simple to set up
by patients themselves. The robot also needs to be
compact and lightweight in order to be used for
rehabilitation training program at home. Therefore, we
try to constructs the simple, compact and lightweight
bilateral control system and apply it on our robot arm.
In these figures, the blue lines are the target values of
the virtual master flexible cylinder, the red lines are the
length of the slave arm which is calculated by using
high-speed microcomputer, the purple lines are the
voltage values of the brake mechanism and the orange
lines are the deviation length between the master and
the slave arm.
Copyright © 2014 JFPS. ISBN 4-931070-10-8 827
Figure 11 Master-slave control results
In this experiment, we set the maximum deviation value
for brake mechanism to work to 20 mm. Therefore, in
these figures we can see that when the deviation length
between the master and the slave arm up to 20 mm, the
pneumatic brake mechanism which is driven by on/off
valve will start working and braking each flexible
cylinder L1, L2 and L3 of the master arm. This can give
safety to the patients by stopping the therapist from
continuing to move when the slave arm cannot trace the
position of master arm because of error or others. Brake
mechanisms will also prevent the master arm from
continuing to move to the area or angle that will harm to
the patient's wrist. These brakes also will help that the
master-slave control becomes more accurate and
transparent because the brake will stop the master arm
from moving when the deviation between two arms
becomes high. Then, when the deviation between the
two arms become smaller, where the slave arm came to
follow the movement of the master and have the same
shape and angle like the master arm, the brake is
released and the master arm will be able to work as
normal movement. Figure 12 shows the external force
experiments on the slave arm. During the experiment,
we impose the large external force directly to the upper
round stage of the slave arm to investigate how the
pneumatic brake mechanism will respond. From Fig. 12,
we can see that there is a sudden change in the red line
of the cylinders 1, 2 and 3. This is caused by the
external forces applied on the slave arm. Based on these
changes, the deviation length also changes and when it
reaches 20 mm, the pneumatic brake mechanism which
is installed on the master arm begins to move to stop the
master arm from moving.
Figure 12 External force experiments on the slave arm
As a conclusion, the installed pneumatic brake
mechanism on the master arm not only can stop the
master arm if the external force is imposed on it, but
also can prevent the master arm from moving if the
external force suddenly hit the slave arm during the
therapy session. By using this brake mechanism on the
rehabilitation field especially on our robot arm, it can
prevent and stop the therapist from continuing to move
when there is a frictional force that exists in the slave
arm. And with the ability to take into account the
external forces on slave arm, we trust that this brake
mechanism can be a simple bilateral control in
rehabilitation field. From Fig.11 also we can find that
the slave arm can detect well the position of the master
arm though sometimes large deviation occurs during the
experiments. These deviation problems can be avoided
by using the proposed pneumatic brake mechanism by
setting the deviation value at 20 mm. Thereby, we can
confirm that the effectiveness of the attitude control can
be achieved by using the proposed master arm with
pneumatic brake mechanism and proposed analytical
model. From these experimental results also we can
confirm that the proposed pneumatic brake mechanism
is working well on our master arm. This proposed
pneumatic brake can provide safety to the patient and at
Copyright © 2014 JFPS. ISBN 4-931070-10-8 828
the same time can make our master-slave control
becomes more accurate. By the features such as safety,
compact, lightweight, precise control and able to take
into account the force factor in both master and slave
arms, the effectiveness of proposed pneumatic brake
mechanism is confirmed and can be used as a simple
bilateral control in the rehabilitation field.
CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, the pneumatic actuators with the flexible
cylinder and microcontroller are chosen for the
development of the robot arm. The study focusing on
the control of flexible pneumatic robot arm using master
device with pneumatic brake mechanism can be
summarized as follows.
1) The compact, lightweight and inexpensive control
system of the flexible robot arm for master-slave control
was briefly explained. The analytical model of the
master-slave control was also discussed. The system
consists of the microcomputer, compact and
inexpensive quasi-servo valves, accelerometers and the
tested robot arm.
2) The pneumatic brake mechanism which is
lightweight, compact and simple structure was proposed
and developed. The size is about 40 mm x 40 mm and it
is very suitable to be used in our robot arm. The
experimental results show that the best deviation length
value for the pneumatic brake to work is 20 mm by
taking into account the friction and the movement of the
master arm. This brake mechanism is able to realize the
simple bilateral control of the robot arm.
3) We also had proposed and tested the master arm with
three pneumatic brake mechanisms installed on it. The
proposed master arm is important in order to give
training in three-dimensional space and for the
realization of the simple bilateral system. The result
shows that the proposed master arm can control well the
position of the robot arm. Furthermore, by taking into
account the force factor on the slave arm, the proposed
master arm with pneumatic brake mechanism can be a
simple bilateral control of the robot arm.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Finally, we would like to acknowledge that a part of this
research was supported by a research-aid fund from the
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology of Japan through a Financial Assistance
Program for QOL Innovative Research (2012-). We
wish to express our gratitude to the Ministry for their
contribution.
REFERENCES
1. Ishii, M., Yamamoto, K. and Hyodo, K.,
Stand-Alone Wearable Power Assist Suit
-Development and Availability-, Journal of Robotics
and Mechatronics, 2005, Vol.17, No.5, pp.575-583.
2. Piquion, J., Nayar, A., Ghazaryan, A., Papanna, R.,
Klimek, W. and Laroia, R., Robot-assisted
gynecological surgery in a community setting,
Journal of Robotic Surgery 3, 2009, Vol.2, pp.61-64.
3. Hogan, N. and Krebs, H.I., Interactive robots for
neuro-rehabilitation, Restorative Neurology and
Neuroscience, 2004, Vol.22, pp.349-358.
4. Reinkensmeyer, D.J., Dewald, J.P.A. and Rymer,
W.Z., Guidance-Based Quantification of Arm
Impairment Following Brain Injury: A Pilot Study,
IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering,
1999, Vol.7, pp.1-11.
5. Lum, P.S., Burgar, C.G. and Shor, P.C., Evidence for
improved muscle activation patterns after retraining
of reaching movements with the MIME robotic
system in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis,
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and
Rehabilitation Engineering, 2004, Vol.12,
pp.186-194.
6. Zheng, H., Davies, R., Zhou, H., Hammerton, J.,
Mawson, S.J., Ware, P.M. and Black, N.D., SMART
project: Application of emerging information and
communication technology to home-based
rehabilitation for stroke patients, International
Journal of Disability and Human Development,
2006, Vol.5, pp.271-276.
7. Akagi, T. and Dohta, S., Development of McKibben
Artificial Muscle with a Long Stroke Motion,
Transactions of JSME, 2007, Series C, 73-735,
pp.2996-3002.
8. Akagi, T. and Dohta, S., Development of a Rodless
Type Flexible pneumatic Cylinder and Its
Application, Transactions of JSME, 2007, Series C,
73-731, pp.2108-2114.
9. Fujikawa, T., Dohta, S. and Akagi, T., Development
and Attitude Control of Flexible Robot Arm with
Simple Structure Using Flexible Pneumatic
Cylinders, Proceedings of 4th
Asia International
Symposium on Mechatronics, 2010, pp.136-141.
10. Aliff, M., Dohta, S., Akagi, T. and Li, H.,
Development of a Simple-structured Pneumatic
Robot Arm and Its control using Low-Cost
Embedded Controller, Journal of Procedia
Engineering, 2012, Vol.41, pp.134-142.
11. Zhao, F., Dohta, S. and Akagi, T., Development and
Analysis of Small-Sized Quasi-Servo Valve for
Flexible Bending Actuator, Transaction of JSME,
2010, Series C, 76-772, pp.3665-3671.
12. Maurette, M., Boissier, L., Delpech, M., Proy, C.
and Quere, C., Autonomy and remote control
experiment for lunar rover missions, Control
Engineering Practice, 1997, 5, pp.851–857.
13. Hokayem, P. F., and Spong, M. W., Bilateral
teleoperation: An historical survey, Journal
Automatica, 2006, Vol.42, pp.2035-2057.
Copyright © 2014 JFPS. ISBN 4-931070-10-8 829