contract year 1 review environmental quality modeling mary f. wheeler the university of texas at...

17
Contract Year 1 Review Environmental Quality Modeling Mary F. Wheeler The University of Texas at Austin 16 May 2002

Post on 21-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Contract Year 1 ReviewEnvironmental Quality Modeling

Mary F. Wheeler

The University of Texas at Austin

16 May 2002

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 2

FA Technical Overview

• Accurate, adaptive, parallel, conservative discretization methods for flow and transport on unstructured meshes

• Scalable linear and nonlinear solvers• Multiphysics applications• Multiphase flow capabilities• Error estimators and indicators• Parameter and uncertainty estimation• Integration of emerging computational tools for large data

sets, grid/metacomputing, interactive steering, scientific visualization, mesh partitioning, and code couplings

Top Priorities in EQM:

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 3

FA Technical Overview (cont.)

CORE:• Staffing (P. Luong left in Feb 2002, replaced by J. Hensley in Apr

2002)

• Weekly reports

• User contacts

FOCUSED EFFORTS:• EQM 001: Enhancing the capabilities of a three-dimensional nearshore

ocean circulation model system (Univ. of Southern Mississippi)

• EQM 002: Improved solvers in TABS (Duke)

• EQM 003: Improvements to ADH and CE-QUAL-ICM (UT-Austin)

Efforts: Contract Year 1

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 4

FA Technical Overview (cont.)

FAPOC’s CORE EFFORTS:

• Getting contracts in place

• Formulate EQM strategy with user advisory panel and CTA lead

• Staffing issues — on-site personnel

• Weekly reports

• Frequent contact with CPOC

• Visibility — attended conferences, workshops, invited talks on PET- and EQM-related activities

Efforts: Contract Year 1 (cont.)

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 6

Metrics—TechnicalEQM User Codes Impacted by PET:

• CE-QUAL-ICM (and variants): water quality model

• ADCIRC: coastal and estuarine circulation model

• CH3D: ocean and coastal circulation model

• ADH: Adaptive Hydraulics

• TABS: ocean and coastal circulation model

• UTPROJ: conservative projection code

• FEMWATER: single phase and air/water flow code

• SHORECIRC: shore circulation model

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 7

Metrics—Technical

Tools Introduced to the Community:

• UTPROJ: conservative projection code, used to link TABS and CE-QUAL-ICM

• Velocity Reconstruction from Fluxes: used in CE-QUAL-ICM

• UT Kinetic Package: geochemical reaction module for ADH

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 8

Metrics—TechnicalUser Contacts—UT Austin

USER TYPE OF CONTACT # CONTACTS PURPOSEARC phone 1 -Development of tests for ADH

partitioning algorithmERDC phone, email, office visits 186 -User Advisory panel

-Discuss improvements to CE-QUAL-ICM-Collaboration for TABS3D to CE-QUAL-ICM linkage-Technical update on parallel CH3D-Develop test problems for ADH-Enhancements to ADH-Needs for existing codes and research-Technology transfer from CSM to DOD users (spec. FEMWATER)-PARSSIM modules and manuals-EQM strategy, white papers, updates-Collaboration for parallel CH3D development-UTPROJ

NAVO office visits 10 -Collaboration for ADCIRC to UTPROJ linkage-Supply technical details for parallel ADCIRC

NRL email,workshops 6 -User advisory panel

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 9

Metrics—TechnicalPublications and Presentations—UT Austin

Conference Presentations: 21

Seminars: 8

Journal Articles: 14

Technical Reports: 7

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 10

EQM 001: Enhancing the capabilities of a 3D nearshore ocean circulation model

The primary goal of this project is to further develop the capabilities of the ShoreCirc circulation model system so that all users, including Naval operations planners for defense-related activities, can use it.

EQM001 Milestones—progress: • Convert code from F77 to F90• NetCDF input/output routines incorporated • API for parallelization complete – tested successfully on 2-D shallow water code• Major cleanup of code• Improvement in boundary conditions

EQM001 Deliverables• Monthly report submitted• Final report on September 31• Revised code with documentation to user community: September 31

• Funding Status: Fully funded at reduced level of $88,772 over 11/01/01 — 9/30/02

• Chandrasekher Narayanan

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 11

EQM 002: Parallel TABS MDS Model for Simulating Large Scale Environmental Transport Processes

Objective: To deliver a parallel version of TABS MDS model integrated with an iterative solver and preconditioner

EQM002 Milestones—progress:

• The code now has an accurate parallel iterative solver.

• The parallel code development is in progress

EQM002 Deliverables

• The work is progressing satisfactorily with no problems thus far

• The parallel code will be delivered in 09/02

• Funding Status: Fully funded at $170,665 over 11/01/01 — 9/30/02

• P.I.: Prasada RaoCivil & Environmental Engineering

Duke University, Durham, NC

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 12

EQM 003: Enhancements to the Adaptive Hydrology Model and CE-QUAL-ICM

In this project, we will provide enhancements to the Adaptive Hydrology (ADH) Model, a hydrodynamics code written by engineers at the ERDC, and CE-QUAL-ICM, a water quality model also developed at the ERDC. The planned enhancements include incorporation of reactive strategies and air-water models and transport methods in CE-QUAL-ICM

EQM003 Milestones—progress:

• Reactive transport module delivered to Charlie Berger in January 2001 for incorporation into ADH

• DG methods implemented for transport in CE-QUAL-ICM and ADCIRC

• Two-phase air-water model developed

EQM003 Deliverables

• Written progress reports

• Incorporation and testing of DG and other two-point, upwind schemes in CE-QUAL-ICM and reactive transport module incorporated into ADH

• Comparison to Richards’ equation model

• Funding Status: Fully funded at reduced level of $128,506 over 11/01/01—10/30/02

• P.I.: Mary Wheeler and Clint Dawson

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 13

Core Financial SummaryComponent 1 Task 4 EQM Core Budget Analysis

$13,148

$26,296$39,444

$52,592

$86,792

$120,992

$134,140

$174,610

$210,821

$243,236

$290,583

$340,862

$0

$12,500 $12,500 $12,500

$121,703 $121,703 $121,703

$155,581 $155,581

$346,906 $346,906 $346,906

-$13,148 -$13,796

-$26,944

-$40,092

$34,911

$711 -$12,437-$19,029

-$55,240

$103,670

$56,323

$6,044

$345,788 $345,788 $345,788 $345,788 $345,788 $345,788 $345,788 $345,788 $345,788 $345,788 $345,788 $345,788

-$100,000

-$50,000

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

$300,000

$350,000

$400,000

Jun-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov-01 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02

Total Expenditures

Total Funding

Funding - Expendituress

Total Funding Commitment

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 14

Staffing• Mary Wheeler is FAPOC• Clint Dawson is Sr. Researcher• Phu Luong was on-site from inception through 18

Feb 2002• Jeff Hensley assumed on-site duties 15 Apr 2002• Victor Parr has been on staff since inception• Two post-doctoral researchers will be leaving in the

summer, to be replaced shortly thereafter• Two graduate students have also been employed

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 15

Summary

• Much time and effort spent getting contracts in place

• EQM on-site staffing in good shape

• Projects are proceeding as planned, with reduced efforts due to budget cuts

• EQM team members are highly visible in the community and involved with DOD users

• Some projects, identified as high priority by EQM users, have been cut drastically;  e.g., multiphysics couplings and conservative projections algorithms (UTPROJ)

• Funding issues have made staff retention and planning difficult

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 22

Project Financial SummaryFocused Effort EQM 001 Budget Analysis

$4,672$9,344 $8,999

$7,255$10,510

$43,621$41,808 $41,808 $41,808

$95,262

$88,331 $88,331 $88,331 $88,331 $88,331 $88,331 $88,331

$37,136$32,464 $32,809

$88,007

$77,821

$44,710

$95,262 $95,262 $95,262 $95,262

$88,331 $88,331 $88,331 $88,331 $88,331 $88,331 $88,331

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

$100,000

$120,000

Nov-01 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Sep-02

Total Expenditures

Total Funding

Funding - Expenditures

Total Funding Commitment

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 23

Focused Effort EQM 002 Budget Analysis

$0 $0 $0 $0

$12,919

$30,666

$58,665

$86,707

$114,799

$142,891

$170,665

$0 $0 $0 $0

$30,666 $30,666

$170,665 $170,665 $170,665 $170,665 $170,665

$0 $0 $0 $0

$17,747

$0

$112,000

$83,958

$55,866

$27,774

$0

$170,665 $170,665 $170,665 $170,665 $170,665 $170,665 $170,665 $170,665 $170,665 $170,665 $170,665

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

$100,000

$120,000

$140,000

$160,000

$180,000

Nov-01 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Sep-02

Total Expenditures

Total Funding

Funding - Expenditures

Total Funding Commitment

Project Financial Summary

13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 24

Focused Effort EQM 003 Budget Analysis

-$20,000

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

$100,000

$120,000

$140,000

$160,000

Oct-01 Nov-01 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Sep-02

Total Expenditures

Total Funding

Funding - Expenditures

Total Funding Commitment

Project Financial Summary