contents: aim & objectives findings recommendations 1 study to assess the scope of and collect...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
STUDY TO ASSESS THE SCOPE OF AND COLLECT AVAILABLE
STATISTICS AND META-DATA ON FIVE CRIME TYPES AND
PROPOSE HARMONISED DEFINITIONS AND COLLECTION
PROCEDURES FOR THESE TYPES OF CRIME FOR THE EU MEMBER
STATES AND THE ACCEDING COUNTRIES
A Study financed by the European Commission – DG JLS
A presentation by
ERNESTO U. SAVONA and BARBARA VETTORI
for the meeting of the Task Force “Statistics on crime, victimisation and criminal justice”
Luxembourg, 17-18 October 2006
http://www.transcrime.it
2
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
The study aimed at contributing to the development of statistics on crime and criminal justice, which are comparable over time and across countries in the EU.
In order to reach this aim, the Study set itself two objectives:
1. to collect data on five specified crime types, and relevant meta-data and highlight similarities and differences in the way the Member States have defined and collected the statistics;
2. to propose, on the basis of an analysis of the collected meta-data, harmonised definitions and collection procedures for these types of crime.
AIM & OBJECTIVES
Aim & objectives
3
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
The focus of the Study was on five crime types that have not received much attention in previous initiatives, i.e.:
1. corruption;
2. fraud, excluding that affecting the financial interests of the European Communities;
3. illicit trafficking in cultural goods, including antiques and works of art;
4. counterfeiting and piracy of products;
5. the sexual exploitation of children and child pornography.
THE FIVE CRIME TYPES
Aim & objectives
4
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Corruption:
1) with reference to passive and active corruption in the public sector, all EU countries criminalise it. However, full comparability of national statistics on this criminal conduct has not yet been reached, due to asymmetries in the different national definitions
2) with reference to passive and active corruption in the private sector, only about half of the EU countries have made this an offence
3) there are five further illicit behaviours related to the crime type ‘corruption’, all scattered and scarcely harmonised across EU countries
COMPARING THE DEFINITIONS OF THE 5 CRIME
TYPES ACROSS THE EU COUNTRIES: SIMILARITIES
AND DIFFERENCES
Findings
5
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Fraud:
1) with reference to fraud related to computers, less than half the MSs possess such an offence in their criminal code
2) with reference to a) fraud related to specifically adapted devices, and b) fraud with payment instruments (i.e. cheques, credit cards, etc.), even fewer MSs possess such a specific offence in their criminal code
3) with reference to further illicit behaviours related to the crime type ‘fraud’, these are a myriad of miscellaneous offences, scattered and scarcely harmonised across EU countries
Findings
6
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Illicit trafficking in cultural goods:
1) some countries totally lack specific criminal legislation on the protection of cultural goods
2) with reference to illicit export of cultural goods, full comparability of national statistics on this criminal conduct has not yet been reached, due to asymmetries in the different national definitions
3) with reference to further illicit behaviours related to the crime type ‘illicit trafficking in cultural goods’, these are miscellaneous offences, scattered and scarcely harmonised across EU countries
Findings
7
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Counterfeiting and piracy of products:
1) with reference to the three criminal conducts defined at the EU level, i.e. 1) trademark infringement, 2) copyright infringement and 3) infringement of a patent, supplementary protection certificate, national plant variety right, designations of origin or geographical indications and geographical designations, though some asymmetries in national definitions still exist, many steps have been undertaken to date by the EU countries towards a comparability of national statistics on these conducts
2) with reference to further illicit behaviours related to the crime type ‘counterfeiting and piracy of products’, these are four offences, scattered and, in most cases, scarcely harmonised across EU countries
Findings
8
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Sexual exploitation of children and child pornography:
1) all 22 EU countries, following the EU definition of child, define him as any person under 18 years
2) with reference to sexual exploitation of children, there is an almost total convergence among the 22 countries herein analysed
3) with reference to child pornography, there is a total convergence of all 22 countries herein analysed
4) with reference to further illicit behaviours related to the crime type ‘sexual exploitation of children and child pornography’, the main one is ‘trafficking in children for sexual exploitation’, in relation to which statistical comparability is problematic
Findings
9
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
- the variables on which official statistics are collected on the crime types;
- collecting organisations;
- time of the data collection;
- data collection criteria.
COMPARING THE DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES
FOR THE FIVE CRIME TYPES ACROSS THE EU
COUNTRIES: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES
The data collection procedures for the five crime types were compared in terms of:
Findings
10
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations1) in one or more countries, there is a lack of statistical information on
trafficking in cultural goods and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography
2) in almost all the EU countries, when information on a given crime type is available, statistics are often collected on variables which are not tailored to the peculiarities of this crime type
3) in some EU countries, when information on a given crime type is available, this does not always cover all three key phases of criminal proceedings (reporting, prosecution and sentencing)
4) in many EU countries, when information on a given crime type is available, this does not always cover all three key elements of the criminal event: i.e. offence, offender, victim. Specifically, in most countries insufficient attention is paid to gathering information on victim
COMPARING THE VARIABLES ON WHICH OFFICIAL
STATISTICS ARE COLLECTED ON THE FIVE CRIME TYPES
ACROSS THE EU COUNTRIES: SIMILARITIES AND
DIFFERENCES
Findings
11
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
5) in many EU countries, when information on a given crime type is available, some important variables are lacking with reference to the offence, such as those related to the place where the offence has been committed (locus commissi delicti), to the modus operandi and to the harm caused by the crime
6) in the vast majority of the EU countries, when information on a given crime type is collected, some important variables are lacking with reference to the offender, such as those related to the perpetrator’s motives, the causal factors of perpetrating, the perpetrator’s socio economic status and level of education
7) in those few countries which collect information on victims with reference to a given crime type, the amount of this information is generally quite narrow and limited to some basic characteristics of the victims, such as age and sex
8) when information is gathered on a given crime type, the level of detail of the data collection system varies greatly across the EU countries, ranging from countries collecting info on a limited and narrow set of variables to countries collecting info on many and very detailed variables
Findings
12
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
COMPARING THE ORGANISATIONS COLLECTING
OFFICIAL STATISTICS ON THE FIVE CRIME TYPES
ACROSS THE EU COUNTRIES: SIMILARITIES AND
DIFFERENCES
1) there is a diversity among countries in the organisations in charge of the collection of data on the five crime types
2) only few countries seem to have a central body coordinating data collection
Findings
13
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
COMPARING THE TIME OF THE DATA COLLECTION ON
THE FIVE CRIME TYPES ACROSS THE EU COUNTRIES:
SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES
1) the time of data collection on the five crime types varies remarkably between countries in relation to the same phase of criminal proceedings
Findings
14
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
COMPARING THE DATA COLLECTION CRITERIA FOR THE FIVE
CRIME TYPES ACROSS THE EU COUNTRIES: SIMILARITIES
AND DIFFERENCES
1) with reference to data collection criteria for police statistics, there is no uniformity as far as the counting unit is concerned
2) with reference to data collection criteria for police statistics, there is no uniformity as far as the so called ‘principal offence rule’ is concerned
3) with reference to data collection criteria for police statistics, there is no uniformity as far as the counting of multiple offences is concerned
4) with reference to data collection criteria for police statistics, there is uniformity as far as the counting of an offence committed by more than one person is concerned
Findings
15
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
5) with reference to data collection criteria for prosecution statistics, there is uniformity as far as the counting of cases brought before a court is concerned
6) with reference to data collection criteria for prosecution statistics, there is no uniformity as far as the counting of sanctions imposed by the prosecutor (or by the court, but without a formal court hearing), based on the defendant’s admission of guilt, is concerned
7) with reference to data collection criteria for prosecution statistics, there is a degree of uniformity as far as the counting of sanctions negotiated between the prosecutor and the defendant without an admission of guilt is concerned
Findings
16
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
8) with reference to data collection criteria for prosecution statistics, there is a degree of uniformity as far as the counting of dropped proceedings is concerned
9) with reference to data collection criteria for prosecution statistics, there is no uniformity as far as the counting of unknown offenders is concerned
10) with reference to data collection criteria for prosecution statistics, there is no uniformity in relation to the counting of a given individual proceeding, if more than one person is involved
11) with reference to data collection criteria for prosecution statistics, there is uniformity as far as the counting of multiple offences is concerned
Findings
17
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
12) with reference to data collection criteria for prosecution
statistics, there is uniformity as far as the counting of a
person subject to two or more proceedings in one year is
concerned
13) with reference to data collection criteria for prosecution
statistics, there is no uniformity as far as the inclusion in
prosecution statistics of data collected by other authorities
(apart from the prosecutors or examining judge) is
concerned
14) with reference to data collection criteria for conviction
statistics, there is uniformity as far as the counting of a
person who is convicted of more than one offence of the
same type is concerned
15) with reference to data collection criteria for conviction
statistics, there is no uniformity as far as the counting of a
person who is dealt with for more than one offence in the
same year is concerned
Findings
18
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations Recommendation 1: action should be taken at the EU level to invite the few countries that have not yet done so, to bring their definition of corruption in the public sector into line with the existing EU standards by incorporating corruption of a foreign public official into it
Recommendation 2: action should be taken at the EU level to invite the countries that have not yet done so, to bring their definition of corruption in the public sector into line with the existing EU standards by expressly differentiating between corruption of an official for a) having him act in accordance with his duties or b) in breach of his duties
RECOMMENDATIONS AIMED AT IMPROVING THE CURRENT
COMPARABILITY OF STATISTICS ON THE CRIME TYPE
‘CORRUPTION’ IN THE EU COUNTRIES BY HARMONISING
DEFINITIONS
Recommendation
s
19
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Recommendation 3: action should be taken at the EU level to invite the numerous countries that have not yet done so, to bring their definition of corruption into line with the existing EU standards by incorporating active and passive corruption in the private sector into it
Recommendation 4: action should be taken at EU level to develop common EU definitions for corruption-related criminal conducts not yet addressed by harmonisation initiatives - i.e. trading in influence in the public sector (both active and passive), bribery of electorate (both active and passive) and intermediation in corruption - and invite the EU countries to collect separate statistics on them
Recommendation
s
20
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Recommendation 5: action should be taken at the EU level to invite the countries that have not yet done so, to insert into their national legislation the criminal conduct ‘fraud related to computers’, on the basis of the EU definition
Recommendation 6: action should be taken at the EU level to invite the countries that have not yet done so, to insert into their national legislation the criminal conducts ‘fraud related to specifically adapted devices’ and ‘fraud with payment instruments (i.e. cheques, credit cards, etc.)’
RECOMMENDATIONS AIMED AT IMPROVING THE CURRENT
COMPARABILITY OF STATISTICS ON THE CRIME TYPE
‘FRAUD’ IN THE EU COUNTRIES BY HARMONISING
DEFINITIONS
Recommendation
s
21
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• RecommendationsRecommendation 7: action could be taken at the EU level to develop common EU definitions for fraud-related criminal conducts not yet addressed by harmonisation initiatives - i.e. credit fraud, insurance fraud; fraud on goods; benefit/subsidy fraud - and invite the EU countries to adopt and collect separate statistics on them
Recommendation
s
22
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Recommendation 8: action should be taken at the EU level to invite the countries to insert into their national legislation the criminal conduct ‘illicit export of cultural goods’, on the basis of the EU definition, and to collect separate statistics on it
Recommendation 9: action could be taken at EU level to develop common EU definitions for illicit trafficking in cultural goods-related conducts not yet addressed by harmonisation initiatives - i.e. unlawful excavation of cultural goods, theft of cultural goods, receiving stolen cultural goods, illicit sale/exchange/offer of cultural goods - and to invite the EU countries to adopt and collect separate statistics on them
RECOMMENDATIONS AIMED AT IMPROVING THE CURRENT
COMPARABILITY OF STATISTICS ON THE CRIME TYPE
‘ILLICIT TRAFFICKING IN CULTURAL GOODS’ IN THE EU
COUNTRIES BY HARMONISING DEFINITIONS
Recommendation
s
23
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Recommendation 10: action should be taken at EU level to invite the countries to insert into their national legislation the criminal conduct ‘infringement of a patent, supplementary protection certificate, national plant variety right, designations of origin or geographical indications and geographical designations and illicit export of cultural goods’, on the basis of the EU definition, and to collect separate statistics on it
Recommendation 11: action could be taken at the EU level to develop a common EU definition for counterfeiting of food, and to invite the EU countries to adopt and collect separate statistics on it
RECOMMENDATIONS AIMED AT IMPROVING THE CURRENT
COMPARABILITY OF STATISTICS ON THE CRIME TYPE
‘COUNTERFEITING AND PIRACY OF PRODUCTS’ IN THE EU
COUNTRIES BY HARMONISING DEFINITIONS
Recommendation
s
24
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Recommendation 12: action should be taken at the EU level to invite the countries that have not yet done so, to insert into their national legislation the offence ‘recruiting a child into prostitution or into participating in pornographic performances’, on the basis of the EU definition
Recommendation 13: action could be taken at the EU level to invite the EU countries to fully comply with the EU definition of trafficking in human beings for the purposes of labour exploitation or sexual exploitation and, in the framework of this offence, to have a separate data collection system for ‘trafficking in children for sexual exploitation’
RECOMMENDATIONS AIMED AT IMPROVING THE CURRENT
COMPARABILITY OF STATISTICS ON THE CRIME TYPE
‘SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN AND CHILD
PORNOGRAPHY’ IN THE EU COUNTRIES BY HARMONISING
DEFINITIONS
Recommendation
s
25
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Recommendation 14: action should be taken at the EU level to invite all countries to pay attention to the collection of statistical information on all five of the crime types
Recommendation 15: action should be taken at the EU level to invite all countries to also collect some “specific variables” tailored on the peculiarities of a given crime type
Recommendation 16: action should be taken at the EU level to invite all countries to collect statistical information on all three key phases of criminal proceedings (reporting, prosecution and sentencing)
RECOMMENDATIONS AIMED AT IMPROVING THE CURRENT
COMPARABILITY OF STATISTICS ON THE FIVE CRIME TYPES
IN EU COUNTRIES BY HARMONISING THE VARIABLES ON
WHICH OFFICIAL STATISTICS ARE COLLECTED
Recommendation
s
26
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Recommendation 17: action should be taken at the EU level to invite all countries to collect – for each of the three key phases of criminal proceedings – variables on all three key elements of the criminal event (i.e. offence, offender, victim)
Recommendation 18: action should be taken at the EU level to invite all countries to collect – for each of the three key phases of criminal proceedings – key variables related to the offence, such as the locus commissi delicti, the modus operandi and the harm caused by the crime
Recommendation 19: action should be taken at the EU level to invite all countries to collect – for each of the three key phases of criminal proceedings – key variables related to the offender, such as those related to the perpetrator’s motives, the causal factors of perpetrating, the perpetrator’s socio economic status and level of education
Recommendation
s
27
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Recommendation 20: action should be taken at the EU level to invite all countries to collect – for each of the three key phases of criminal proceedings – key variables related to the victims
Recommendation 21: action should be taken at the EU level to invite all countries to collect – for each of the three key phases of criminal proceedings – a minimum common set of relevant variables for each of the crime phases considered
Recommendation
s
28
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Recommendation 22: action should be taken at the EU level to invite all countries to establish a centralised body charged with coordinating data collection for each of the three key phases of criminal proceedings (reporting, prosecution and sentencing)
RECOMMENDATIONS AIMED AT IMPROVING THE CURRENT
COMPARABILITY OF STATISTICS ON THE FIVE CRIME TYPES
IN EU COUNTRIES BY HARMONISING THE COLLECTING
ORGANISATIONS
Recommendation
s
29
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations Recommendation 23: action should be taken at the EU level to invite all countries to homogenise the time for collection of statistics on the five crime types in relation to the same phase of criminal proceedings, and to decide, in agreement among all countries, if:
- with reference to the time for collection of statistics on reported crimes, to collect data when the offence is reported to the police or at a later stage, i.e. after the investigation;
- with reference to the time for statistics on convictions, to collect data before the appeal or after it
RECOMMENDATIONS AIMED AT IMPROVING THE CURRENT
COMPARABILITY OF STATISTICS ON THE FIVE CRIME TYPES
IN EU COUNTRIES BY HARMONISING THE TIME OF THE
DATA COLLECTION
Recommendation
s
30
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations Recommendation 24: with reference to data collection criteria for police statistics, action should be taken at the EU level to invite all countries to adopt:
- the offence as the counting unit for recorded crimes;
- the so called ‘principal offence rule’, which dictates that if the sequence of offences in an incident, or complex crime, contains more than one type of offence, then the most serious offence is counted;
- the criteria of counting multiple offences as two or more;
- the criteria of counting as one an offence committed by more than one person
RECOMMENDATIONS AIMED AT IMPROVING THE CURRENT
COMPARABILITY OF STATISTICS ON THE FIVE CRIME TYPES
IN EU COUNTRIES BY HARMONISING THE DATA
COLLECTION CRITERIA
Recommendation
s
31
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Recommendation 25: with reference to data collection criteria for prosecution statistics, action should be taken at the EU level to invite all countries to adopt:
- the criteria that sanctions imposed by the prosecutor (or by the court, but without a formal court hearing), based on the defendant’s admission of guilt, are excluded from prosecution statistics;
- the criteria that sanctions negotiated between the prosecutor and the defendant without an admission of guilt are excluded from prosecution statistics;
- the criteria that dropped proceedings are included in prosecution statistics;
- the criteria that unknown offenders are excluded from total figures;
- the criteria of counting individual proceedings where more than one person is involved, as one;
- the criteria of counting multiple offences as one
Recommendation
s
32
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
Recommendation 26: with reference to data collection criteria for conviction statistics, action should be taken at the EU level to invite the few countries that behave differently to adopt:
- the criteria of counting a person who is convicted of more than one offence of the same type as one;
- the criteria of counting a person who is dealt with for more than one offence in the same year as two or more
Recommendation
s
33
Contents:
• Aim & objectives
• Findings
• Recommendations
STUDY TO ASSESS THE SCOPE OF AND COLLECT AVAILABLE
STATISTICS AND META-DATA ON FIVE CRIME TYPES AND
PROPOSE HARMONISED DEFINITIONS AND COLLECTION
PROCEDURES FOR THESE TYPES OF CRIME FOR THE EU MEMBER
STATES AND THE ACCEDING COUNTRIES
A Study financed by the European Commission – DG JLS
A presentation by
ERNESTO U. SAVONA and BARBARA VETTORI
for the meeting of the Task Force “Statistics on crime, victimisation and criminal justice”
Luxembourg, 17-18 October 2006
http://www.transcrime.it