CONSULTANT EVALUATION FORM

1. Information on assignment:

Name of Consultant:

Assignment: (select): Project Identification Project/Program Feasibility Study Project/Program Design Project/Program Management Project/Program Monitoring Project/Program Evaluation Project/Program Approval Documents Technical Advice Audit Review or Study Information Communications Technology Development of TORs/Procurement Support Risk Management Results Based Management Support Training/Capacity Building

Sector (if appropriate): Agriculture Democratization Economics Education Financial Services/Microfinance Gender Equity Governance Health HIV/AIDS Human Rights Infrastructure Services Peace Building Private Sector Development Trade

Start and End Date:

Value of Contract (fees and expenses):

Location:

Name and Telephone number of the Contract Manager:

2. Rate the consultant’s performance for each of the following qualities against the following scale:

0 Not Applicable 1 Poor 2 Improvement Needed3 Satisfactory 4 Very Good 5 Excellent

Best Practice RatingStrategic thinkingDemonstrates strategic thinking and the ability to see the “big picture”TeamworkDemonstrates the ability to work effectively within a team environmentProject Management and PlanningDemonstrates effective project and program planning skillsReportingProduces clear and concise reportsTechnical and Professional SkillsDemonstrates appropriate qualifications and/or technical expertise in their specialist fieldContract managementDelivers agreed services and outputs on time and within budgetRelationship managementDevelops and maintains effective working relationships with key stakeholders and funders of projectsCommunicationDemonstrated effective oral and written communication skillsCross-CulturalCommunicates effectively in cross-cultural situations and understands culture and protocolHonesty and integrityDemonstrates a professional and ethical approachFlexibilityDemonstrates a flexible, responsive and pragmatic approach, works well under pressure and can manage urgent short-term assignments or changesAverage Score (add score divide by 11)

3. Where you have given rating(s) of 1 or 2, what was it that the consultant did not do, or did not do well, which led you to give this rating?

4. Did you discuss your observations/concerns with the consultant?

5. Following on from the ratings given in question 2, what are the consultant’s main strengths?

6. What are the consultant’s main limitations or areas for development?

7. Do you have any additional comments?

The information that you provide is confidential however as it is used in evaluating the consultant’s performance and may affect their ability to get future work the consultant will be provided with a copy of the evaluation and allowed to comment on it. In the event that the consultant and the contract manager cannot agree on their assessment, the matter will be referred to the adjudication panel of the Canadian Association of International Development Consultants, which will review the Terms of Reference (TORs) and the work produced to complete the TORs and provide an independent assessment of the consultant’s performance.

Signature:

CIDA Contract Manager

I agree with the above assessment:

Consultant