consultancy report ref: 9383-r01 - the woolly...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ISVR Consulting, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 2162 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2728 Email: [email protected] Web: www.isvr.co.uk
Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01
Submitted to: Mr Tim Simmons The Woolley Shepherd Secret Meadow Weekmoor Milverton Taunton TA4 1QE
Prepared by:
John Fithyan Laboratory Manager Approved for issue by:
Andy Varley (MIOA) Senior Consultant
Sound absorption tests on a range of sheep’s wool based materials
February 2015
9383-R01
![Page 2: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Contents
Contents
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3
2. Measurement Method .................................................................................................... 5
3. Results ............................................................................................................................ 6
3.1 Ambient Conditions 6
3.2 Test results 6
Tables 1 to 6: Sound Absorption Coefficients
Figures 1 to 3: Photographs of the test samples inside the reverberation chamber
Appendix 1 Instrumentation and Calibration
Appendix 2 Acoustic Environment
![Page 3: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 3 of 20
1. Introduction
ISVR Consulting were engaged by The Woolley Shepherd, to undertake
measurements on a range of products to establish their sound absorption coefficient
(aS) or equivalent sound absorption area (Aobjm2) depending on the product being
tested.
The sound absorption measurements were performed in the Reverberant Suite of the
Rayleigh Laboratories of the ISVR, University of Southampton. The tests were
carried out on the 10th
February 2015.
The measurements were carried out in accordance with BS EN ISO 354: 2003
‘Acoustics – Measurement of sound absorption in a reverberation room’.
When a sound source operates in an enclosed space, the level to which reverberant
sound builds up, and the subsequent decay of reverberant sound when the source is
stopped, are governed by the sound-absorbing characteristics of the boundary
surfaces, the air filling the space, and objects within the space. In general, the fraction
of the incident sound power absorbed at a surface depends upon the angle of
incidence. In order to relate the reverberation time of an auditorium, office,
workshop, etc, to the noise reduction that would be effected by an absorbing
treatment, knowledge of the sound-absorbing characteristics of the surfaces, usually in
the form of a suitable average over all angles of incidence, is required. Since the
distribution of sound waves in typical enclosures includes a wide and largely
unpredictable range of angles, a uniform distribution is taken as the basic condition
for the purposes of standardization. If, in addition, the sound intensity is independent
of the location within the space, the sound distribution is called a diffuse sound field,
and the sounds reaching a room surface are said to be at random incidence.
The sound field in a properly designed reverberation room closely approximates a
diffuse field. Hence, sound absorption measured in a reverberation room closely
approximates the sound absorption that would be measured under the basic conditions
assumed for standardization.
![Page 4: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 4 of 20
BS EN ISO 354: 2003 ‘Acoustics – Measurement of sound absorption in a
reverberation room’ specifies a method of measuring the sound absorption coefficient
of acoustical materials used as wall or ceiling treatments, or the equivalent sound
absorption area of objects, such as furniture, persons or space absorbers, in a
reverberation room.
The materials tested were described as follows:
Standard wall panel
Limpets
Clouds
The standard wall panels are rectangular panels designed to be mounted onto walls.
They can be used individually or combined to cover larger areas of wall.
The limpets are a bit like a scalloped rectangle and are designed to be fitted flush onto
ceilings. They would normally be installed individually but one ceiling might have
multiple limpets fitted.
The clouds are similar to the limpets but they are designed to hang from ceilings.
The materials were tested as either individual (discrete) absorbers or as plane
absorbers depending on their application.
The results obtained can be used for comparison purposes and for design calculation
with respect to room acoustics and noise control.
![Page 5: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 5 of 20
2. Measurement Method
The averaged reverberation rimes (RT60) in 1/3 octave bands were determined for the
empty chamber in the frequency range 100 Hz to 5000 Hz, as described in the
standard, using an interrupted broad band noise. Thirty two decays were measured,
(eight microphone combinations at each of four sound source locations).
The sample of absorbent material was introduced into the chamber and either laid out
on the floor or hung from the ceiling in accordance with the guidelines given in the
standard. The test arrangement was chosen depending on whether the sample was a
discrete absorber or a plane absorber. In the case of the plane absorbers the edges of
the sample were covered with metal plate to prevent the edges from absorbing any of
the sound waves.
Once the sample was positioned in the chamber, the averaged reverberation time
spectrum was determined as before.
The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase in
absorption due to the absorbent material relative to the empty chamber, was found.
For the plane absorbers the coefficient of absorption (aS) in each 1/3 octave band was
calculated. The results are shown as a value between 0 and 1 where 1 signifies total
absorption and 0 signifies no absorption. NB. In practice the test method can give
values greater than 1 which can be confusing. Where a value of greater than 1 is
given for a plane absorber it has been caused by edge effects of the test sample.
For the discrete absorbers the equivalent sound absorption area (Aobjm2) in each 1/3
octave band was calculated. The sound absorption property of discrete objects is
quantified by the equivalent sound absorption area expressed as m2 per object. This is
the area of a 100% fictive absorbing surface which would absorb the same amount of
sound as the object in question.
![Page 6: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 6 of 20
3. Results
3.1 Ambient Conditions
Barometric pressure 101.1 kPa
Temperature 15.0 C
Relative Humidity 44 %
3.2 Test results
The results in the tables below are given as either the coefficient of absorption (aS) or
as the equivalent sound absorption area (Aobjm2) depending on the type of sample
being tested.
In the case of the plane absorbers where the results are given as the coefficient of
absorption (aS), BS EN ISO 11654 can be used to express the spectrum of results as a
sound absorption class. The classes range from A to E where A is the top class. The
standard is not applicable to single items, such as the limpets and clouds measured
during these tests.
NB. There are other standards, namely ASTM C4423-09a that can be used to express
the sound absorption test spectrum as a single number. ASTM C423 uses the term
Noise Reduction Coefficient (NRC) although this is being replaced by Sound
Absorption Average (SAA). Both the NRC and SAA terms have values between 0 and
1 where 1 indicates total absorption. ASTM C423 test procedures should be used
when calculating the NRC or SAA value. In this report we have used BS EN ISO 354
to determine the sound absorption coefficient. The methods in the two standards
differ slightly. However for indication purposes I have used the BS EN ISO 354
values to calculate an NRC and SAA value for the materials we tested.
Table 1 shows the results with 20 individual wall panels butted together to form a
large rectangle. The outer edges of the rectangle were covered to prevent them
absorbing more sound.
![Page 7: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 7 of 20
Table 2 shows the results with 20 individual wall panels butted together to form a
large rectangle. The outer edges of the rectangle were left uncovered and therefore
absorbed more sound.
Table 3 shows the results when the 20 wall panels were tested as discrete absorbers.
The results are given as the equivalent sound absorption area (Aobjm2).
Table 4 shows the results with 25 individual limpets butted together to form a large
sample. The outer edges of the sample were left uncovered and therefore absorbed
more sound.
Table 5 shows the results when the 25 limpets were tested as discrete absorbers. The
results are given as the equivalent sound absorption area (Aobjm2).
Table 6 shows the results when the 8 clouds were tested as discrete absorbers. The
results are given as the equivalent sound absorption area (Aobjm2).
Figures 1 to 3 show photographs of the samples under test.
![Page 8: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 8 of 20
Table 1: Standard wall panels butted together with outer edges covered
Customer:
Frequency AbsorptionHz as
100 0.28
125 0.30
160 0.42
200 0.52
250 0.75
315 0.90
400 1.00
500 1.01
630 1.01
800 1.03
1000 0.98
1250 1.01
1600 0.99
2000 0.99
2500 0.97
3150 0.97
4000 0.97
5000 0.94
BS EN ISO 11654
Sound absorption
class = A
Test Standard: BS EN ISO 354
Project No: 9383
NRC 0.95
SAA 0.93
All sample panels butted together. Edges covered
Using the ISO 354 test data above to calculate the ASTM C 423-09a
descriptors, which is not strictly correct, you would get these values:
Airborne sound absorption measured in a reverberation chamber.
BS EN ISO 354:2003
Woolly Shepherd
Construction tested
Standard Wall Panel
Highfield, Southampton Test date: 27/01/2015
University of Southampton Tested by: J.Fithyan
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
100 1000 10000
Sound A
bsorp
tion C
oeffic
ient a
s
Frequency, Hz
Sound absorption coefficient
![Page 9: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 9 of 20
Table 2: Standard wall panels butted together with outer edges left uncovered
Customer:
Frequency AbsorptionHz as
100 0.29
125 0.30
160 0.44
200 0.53
250 0.71
315 0.91
400 1.01
500 1.06
630 1.07
800 1.04
1000 1.04
1250 1.07
1600 1.08
2000 1.08
2500 1.07
3150 1.06
4000 1.08
5000 1.07
BS EN ISO 11654
Sound absorption
class = A
Test Standard: BS EN ISO 354
Project No: 9383
NRC 0.95
SAA 0.97
Using the ISO 354 test data above to calculate the ASTM C 423-09a
descriptors, which is not strictly correct, you would get these values:
All sample panels butted together. Edges left uncovered
Woolly Shepherd
Airborne sound absorption measured in a reverberation chamber.
BS EN ISO 354:2003
Construction tested
Standard Wall Panel
Highfield, Southampton Test date: 27/01/2015
University of Southampton Tested by: J.Fithyan
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
100 1000 10000
Sound A
bsorp
tion C
oeffic
ient a
s
Frequency, Hz
Sound absorption coefficient
![Page 10: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 10 of 20
Table 3: Twenty individual standard wall panels tested as discrete absorbers
Customer:
Frequency AbsorptionHz Aobjm
2
100 0.19
125 0.25
160 0.38
200 0.47
250 0.62
315 0.77
400 0.83
500 0.89
630 0.92
800 0.91
1000 0.91
1250 0.94
1600 0.93
2000 0.94
2500 0.95
3150 0.96
4000 0.97
5000 0.95
Test Standard: BS EN ISO 354
Project No: 9383
Highfield, Southampton Test date: 27/01/2015
University of Southampton Tested by: J.Fithyan
All sample panels moved apart. Edges left uncovered
Airborne sound absorption measured in a reverberation chamber.
BS EN ISO 354:2003
Woolly Shepherd
Construction tested
Standard Wall Panel
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
100 1000 10000
Equiv
ale
nt
sound a
bsorp
tion p
er
wall
panel A
ob
jm2
Frequency, Hz
Sound absorption coefficient
![Page 11: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 11 of 20
Table 4: Limpets butted together with outer edges left uncovered
Customer:
Frequency AbsorptionHz as
100 0.37
125 0.41
160 0.56
200 0.60
250 0.81
315 0.95
400 0.99
500 1.08
630 1.09
800 1.10
1000 1.07
1250 1.08
1600 1.09
2000 1.10
2500 1.08
3150 1.06
4000 1.06
5000 1.04
BS EN ISO 11654
Sound absorption
class = A
Test Standard: BS EN ISO 354
Project No: 9383
NRC 1.00
SAA 1.00
All samples butted together. Edges left uncovered
Using the ISO 354 test data above to calculate the ASTM C 423-09a
descriptors, which is not strictly correct, you would get these values:
Airborne sound absorption measured in a reverberation chamber.
BS EN ISO 354:2003
Woolly Shepherd
Construction tested
Limpets
Highfield, Southampton Test date: 27/01/2015
University of Southampton Tested by: J.Fithyan
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
100 1000 10000
Sound A
bsorp
tion C
oeffic
ient a
s
Frequency, Hz
Sound absorption coefficient
![Page 12: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 12 of 20
Table 5: Twenty-five individual limpets tested as discrete absorbers
Customer:
Frequency AbsorptionHz Aobjm
2
100 0.23
125 0.26
160 0.36
200 0.42
250 0.54
315 0.64
400 0.69
500 0.75
630 0.75
800 0.76
1000 0.75
1250 0.77
1600 0.77
2000 0.76
2500 0.76
3150 0.76
4000 0.76
5000 0.72
Test Standard: BS EN ISO 354
Project No: 9383
Highfield, Southampton Test date: 27/01/2015
University of Southampton Tested by: J.Fithyan
All samples moved apart. Edges left uncovered
Airborne sound absorption measured in a reverberation chamber.
BS EN ISO 354:2003
Woolly Shepherd
Construction tested
Limpets
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
100 1000 10000
Equiv
ale
nt
sound a
bsorp
tion p
er
limpet
Ao
bjm
2
Frequency, Hz
Sound absorption coefficient
![Page 13: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 13 of 20
Table 6: Eight individual clouds tested as discrete absorbers
Customer:
Frequency AbsorptionHz Aobjm
2
100 0.22
125 0.28
160 0.42
200 0.44
250 0.73
315 1.01
400 1.18
500 1.34
630 1.43
800 1.50
1000 1.50
1250 1.52
1600 1.49
2000 1.46
2500 1.43
3150 1.42
4000 1.36
5000 1.29
Test Standard: BS EN ISO 354
Project No: 9383
Highfield, Southampton Test date: 27/01/2015
University of Southampton Tested by: J.Fithyan
Airborne sound absorption measured in a reverberation chamber.
BS EN ISO 354:2003
Woolly Shepherd
Construction tested
Clouds
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
100 1000 10000
Equiv
ale
nt
sound a
bsorp
tion p
er
clo
ud A
ob
jm2
Frequency, Hz
Sound absorption coefficient
![Page 14: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 14 of 20
Figure 1: Standard wall panels
![Page 15: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 15 of 20
Figure 2: Limpets
![Page 16: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 16 of 20
Figure 3: Clouds
![Page 17: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 17 of 20
Appendix 1: Instrumentation and Calibration
1.1 Measuring Equipment
1.1.1 Noise Generation
Instrument Manufacturer Type Ser No Cal Due
Amplifier Cambridge Audio A1 V2.0 1201-1711 Not required
Loudspeaker - - - Not required
1.1.2 Noise Measurement
Instrument Manufacturer Type Ser No Cal Due
Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4165 1297127 August 15
Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4165 1297134 August 15
Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4165 1651334 August 15
Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4189 2566078 August 15
Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4189 2573634 August 15
Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4189 2573635 August 15
Pre-amplifier Brüel & Kjær 2669 2552964 September 15
Pre-amplifier Brüel & Kjær 2669 2552965 September 15
Pre-amplifier Brüel & Kjær 2669 2549629 September 15
Pre-amplifier Brüel & Kjær 2669 2572332 September 15
Pre-amplifier Brüel & Kjær 2669 2572333 September 15
Pre-amplifier Brüel & Kjær 2669 2572334 September 15
Freq Analyser Brüel & Kjær 3560C 2447709 October 15
Freq Analyser Brüel & Kjær 3560B 2609169 October 15
Mic Calibrator Brüel & Kjær 4231 2594478 September 15
1.2 System Calibration
The noise measuring system was calibrated by applying the microphone calibrator (type
4231) to the transducer and adjusting the analyzer to the reference level at the beginning
of the measurement session. The level was also checked at the end of the session to
ensure that no drift or fault had occurred.
The above equipment is calibrated against the transfer standards below.
![Page 18: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 18 of 20
1.3 Traceability
1.3.1 Microphones and Calibrators
Microphones and Calibrators
ISVR Consulting hold two transfer standard Microphones, type 4145, serial numbers
375091 and 375617. The most recent calibration was carried out by Campbell
Associates. This is fully documented in Certificates 17840 and 17841, dated 22nd
January 2015. A transfer standard Pistonphone, type 4220, serial number 1297434
and a transfer standard calibrator, type 4231, serial number 2162524 are also held.
These were calibrated by Campbell Associates and are documented in certificate
numbers 17844 and 17842, dated 22nd
January 2015.
1.3.2 Additional Instrumentation
A Digital Voltmeter (Fluke type 8050A) and a Frequency Counter (Marconi type
2430A) are used with these Transfer Standards to calibrate the above equipment.
Both instruments were calibrated by Southern Calibration Laboratories and carry
certificates numbered 14111199 and 14111200 respectively and both are dated 25th
November 2014.
The instrumentation complies with the requirements for a type 1 instrument, as
specified in BS EN 61672:2003, BS EN 60942:2003 and BS EN IEC 61260:1996.
The Standards are traceable to the National Physical Laboratory, Teddington,
England.
![Page 19: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 19 of 20
Appendix 2: Acoustic Environment
2.1 Large Reverberation Chamber
2.1.1 Construction
The chamber is constructed of reinforced concrete and is separated from the
foundations and neighbouring walls by rubber vibration isolators. It is designed with
an inclined ceiling and non-parallel walls to ensure a uniform distribution (with
frequency) of the normal acoustic modes of the room.
2.1.2 Dimensions
Mean edge lengths 9.15 m
6.25 m
6.10 m - height
Volume 348 m3
Surface Area 302 m2
2.1.3 Walls and Ceiling
All inside surfaces of the chamber are finished with a hard gloss paint to give a high
reflection coefficient. The walls are 305 mm thick, and the ceiling, which is 460 mm
thick, includes two removable sections (1.75 m x 0.86 m) which provide access for a
chain hoist capable of carrying loads up to 2000 Kg, and an entry for a 4000 Watt
siren driven horn. Connections to the equipment in the chamber may be made via any
of five cable ports in the walls. A glazed window (305 mm x 305 mm) permits visual
observation from the control area.
2.1.4 Diffusers
Ten diffusers are hug from the ceiling of the chamber. These diffusing elements are
plywood sheets painted with gloss paint so that they have a low sound absorption.
The diffusers, which are of varying sizes are orientated at random and positioned at
different heights within the chamber. The total surface area of the diffusers is
43.2 m2.
![Page 20: Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01 - The Woolly Shepherdwoollyshepherd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/...The absorption in the chamber was calculated for the sample and the increase](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060411/5f1099a67e708231d449e795/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ISVR Consulting Report 9383-R01 / February 2015 Page 20 of 20
2.1.5 Floor Area
The floor is 305 mm thick and has a steel vibration isolated pad (2.1 m x 3.6 m) set
into it. This pad may be used for mounting test rigs or vibrators without structural
vibrations being transmitted to the chamber.
2.1.6 Doors
One set of double doors connects the chamber and the corridor, another set opens into
the small reverberation chamber and incorporates removable panels (1.07 m x 1.07 m)
for transmission loss measurements. The doorway (2.4 m x 2.0 m) may be used for
testing larger panels. The doors (2.56 m x 2.26 m x 130 mm thick) are a sandwich
construction of wood wool, wood and steel, and have an average transmission loss in
excess of 50 dB.
2.1.7 Ventilation and Lighting
At each corner of the floor there is an air inlet vent, and there are four outlet vents
situated high up on one wall. With all vents open the air is changed at a rate of
100 m3 per minute. When not required the vents are covered by steel plates and these
have diagonal stiffeners to reduce panel vibrations. The chamber is lit by six sodium
discharge lights mounted on the wall at 3 m above the floor.