construction defect action reform act crs § 13-20-801 et. seq

21
CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS § 13-20-801 et. seq. Panacea or Pain?

Upload: tibor

Post on 23-Jan-2016

79 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS § 13-20-801 et. seq. Panacea or Pain?. Purpose of CDARA. Streamline Construction Defect Litigation Respond to multi-party lawsuits over “technical” code violations Limit shotgun lawsuits. Definitions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS § 13-20-

801 et. seq.

Panacea or Pain?

Page 2: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Purpose of CDARA

Streamline Construction Defect LitigationRespond to multi-party lawsuits over “technical” code violationsLimit shotgun lawsuits

Page 3: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Definitions

Construction Professional – Architect, Engineer, Contractor, Subcontractor, Developer, Builder, Builder Vendor, or inspector.Action – civil action or arbitration for damages loss to or loss of use.

Page 4: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Notice Requirements

In Writing List of DefectsPersonal Service or Certified Mail90 Days Pre-suit for Commercial75 Days Pre-suit for residential

Page 5: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Inspections

“Reasonable” access within 30 daysScope of inspection If defect list is amended, a new inspection is allowed.

Page 6: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Post-Inspection Action

Offer to Make RepairsOffer a “sum certain” for settlement

Page 7: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Response

Description of InspectionFindingsScope of Required Remedial WorkSchedule for Work

Page 8: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Post-Offer Options

Accept or Reject within 15 daysIf rejected, claimant may sue If Accepted: Payment as per terms of offer or Repairs must be as per offer including

schedule

Page 9: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Results of Non-Compliance by Plaintiff

Non-JurisdictionalSuit may be stayed pending compliance

Page 10: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Result of Failure to Respond By Construction Professional

Potential for treble damages under CCPA

Page 11: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Result of Failure to Comply with Offer

Exposure to treble damages under CCPA

Page 12: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Failure to Comply with Offer

Claimant may sue on the offer orClaimant may sue on the original defect

Page 13: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Defenses for Construction Professional

Claimant’s Failure to Cooperate

Page 14: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Limitation on Claims

If a negligence action is based on code violation actual damage is required.“Other” tort claims not limitedContract claims not limitedWarranty claims not limitedStatutory violation (except building code) not limited

Page 15: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Limitation of Damages

Limited to “actual” damages, unless: Claimant proves CCPA violation and

The monetary offer is less than 85% of recovery or

The reasonable cost of repair as offered is less than 85% of the amount awarded.

Page 16: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Noneconomic Damages

Noneconomic damages and derivative noneconomic damages limited to $250,000.00 See 13-21-102.5(2)(a) and 13-21-102.5(2)(b)

Page 17: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Definition of Damages

Damages – The Lesser of (1) Fair market value without the defect (2) Replacement cost or (3) Reasonable cost to repair.

Page 18: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Unresolved Issues

Punitive Damages – Does the failure to include them in the definition of damages mean they are not available?Actual Damages – Are damages limited to only those categories in the definition?

Page 19: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Unresolved Issues

Economic and Non-Economic Damages – Are damages for annoyance, aggravation, inconvenience, etc. recoverable as “personal injury” subject to the $250,000 cap? How many “increments” of $250,000 can be awarded in the same lawsuit?

Page 20: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

Constitutional Questions

Is the differing treatment of residential and commercial properties a violation of equal protection?Is the treatment of construction professionals differently from all others a violation of equal protection?Does the inspection requirement violate an owner's due process rights?

Page 21: Construction Defect Action Reform Act CRS  § 13-20-801 et. seq

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP at Lee & Assocaites

CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP AT LEE & ASSOCIATES, LLC