constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle peter thornton...
Post on 15-Jan-2016
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle
Peter Thornton
Terrestrial Sciences Section
Climate and Global Dynamics Division
NCAR
![Page 2: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Relevance of the terrestrial carbon cycle to studies of the global climate:
• Biophysical characteristics of the land surface depend on the interactions between surface weather, atmospheric composition and chemistry, and vegetation ecophysiology: leaf area, canopy height, Bowen ratio, relative abundance of different plant functional types.
• Atmospheric concentration of CO2 depends, in part, on the dynamics of the terrestrial carbon cycle, with important variation at seasonal, interannual, decadal, and longer timescales.
![Page 3: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Research questions:
• What are the current dynamics of the terrestrial carbon cycle?
• What are the likely future trends in source/sink strengths under different emission and landuse change scenarios?
• How do current dynamics and likely future trends depend on coupling with climate and atmospheric chemistry?
• How much model detail is required to capture the dominant spatial and temporal modes of variation in the current and likely future terrestrial carbon cycles?
• How can coupled climate and carbon cycle models be evaluated?
![Page 4: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
GEP
Re
NEE
MR
HR GR
GEP = gross ecosystemproduction
Re = total ecosystemrespiration
NEE = net ecosystemexchange
MR = maintenancerespiration
GR = growthrespiration
HR = heterotrophicrespiration
![Page 5: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Coupled
![Page 6: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Land-Atmosphere Nitrogen Cycle
![Page 7: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Effects on NEE of natural and anthropogenic disturbances:
Simulation based on recorded disturbance history at Harvard Forest
NE
E (
gC m
-2 y
r-1)
![Page 9: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Effects on NEE of anthropogenic changes in atmospheric composition and chemistry:
![Page 10: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Terrestrial carbon cycle model evaluation over gradients in climate and disturbance
history
Evaluation based on observations of carbon and water budget components from seven evergreen needleleaf forest Fluxnet
sites
Fluxnet collaborators:
B.E. Law, H.L. Gholz, K.L. Clark, E. Falge, D.S. Ellsworth, A.H. Goldstein, R.K. Monson, D. Hollinger, M. Falk, J. Chen, J.P.
Sparks
![Page 11: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Based on DeFries et al., 2000
![Page 12: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Location of Fluxnet sites included in this study
Base map: average annual precipitation for
1980-1997
![Page 13: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Location of seven ENF Fluxnet sites in climate space
Grey region: Complete climate space for the U.S. (lower 48)
Black region: Climate space occupied by evergreen needleleaf forest in the U.S (lower 48)
![Page 14: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
SiteAge
(yrs)Disturbance History
Leaf long.
(yrs)
Historical Ndep
(gN m-2 yr-1)
Current Ndep
(gN m-2 yr-1)
Young Stands
BL 10 1990: clearcut, replanted 3 0.22 0.22
DU 171983: clearcut, slashburn, replanted
2 0.18 0.50
FL 101990: clearcut, slashburn, replanted
2 0.19 0.30
Mid-aged Stands
HL 90 1910: selective harvest 5 0.16 0.29
NR 95 1905: harvest 5 0.12 0.30
Old Stands (multiple age classes)
ME45-250 1750: stand-replacing fire,
1850: fire, 1950: fire4 0.18 0.18
WR 0-500 1550: stand-replacing fire 8 0.32 0.32
Summary of site characteristics
![Page 15: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Blodgett Forest, CA
Howland Forest, ME
Duke Forest, NC
Niwot Ridge, CO
Metolius NRA, OR
Gainesville, FL
Wind River Crane, WA
![Page 16: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Modeling Protocol
1. Using the Daymet surface weather database as the model driver at all sites.
2. Spinup simulation to bring C and N pools into steady state: repeated 18-year record of surface weather. Using assumed levels of [CO2]atm and Ndep circa 1795 AD.
3. Ensemble of site history simulations, with increasing [CO2]atm (IS92a), increasing Ndep from anthropogenic sources (following Holland et al., 1997), and disturbance history as recorded at each site. All simulations ending at 2000 AD.
4. Evaluation of ensemble statistics at current stand age, comparison against historical observations where possible.
![Page 17: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Daymet database of daily surface weather drivers: climate summary
![Page 18: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Disturbance history ensembling:
Each member consists of a disturbance history simulation initiated in a different year of the cyclic 18-year surface weather record.
![Page 19: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Results: Decadal and longer timescale variations dominated by disturbance history
![Page 20: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Results: Decadal and longer timescale variations dominated by disturbance history
![Page 21: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Results: Relationship between NEE and GEP depends on time since disturbance, and on changing [CO2]atm and Ndep
![Page 22: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Results: Relationship between NEE and GEP depends on time since disturbance (continued)
![Page 23: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Results: NEE response to disturbance, changing [CO2]atm, and Ndep shows strong interaction effects
![Page 24: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Results: NEE response to [CO2]atm for old sites near steady state depends on the rate of increase in CO2
![Page 25: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Results: Model captures observed variability in leaf area index across the climate and disturbance history gradients
![Page 26: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Results: Model captures observed variability in evapotranspiration across the climate and disturbance history gradients
![Page 27: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Results: Model captures observed seasonality in evapotranspiration across the climate and disturbance history
gradients
![Page 28: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Results: Model tends to underestimate annual NEE, with strong biases at the warmest sites (FL, DU) and the old sites (ME, WR).
![Page 29: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Results: Model in generally poor agreement with observed seasonal cycle of NEE…
![Page 30: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Results: … but the biases are not consistently attributed to either Re or GEP.
![Page 31: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Results: … but the biases are not consistently attributed to either Re or GEP.
![Page 32: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Component Observed Model
AG NPP 173 178
BG NPP 299 235
Foliage NPP 87 89
Fine root NPP 276 227
Wood NPP 109 98
Soil C flux 780 851
NEP28 (component budget)
167 ± 69 (Monte Carlo)
300 ± 170 (Eddy covariance)
60
Model evaluation at Metolius old-growth site: Comparison to biometric measurements of carbon budget components
(all units gC m-2 yr-1)
![Page 33: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Results: Model in generally poor agreement with observed seasonal cycle of NEE…
![Page 35: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Results: Model agrees well with chronosequence estimates of NEE at the one site where they are available (FL)
![Page 36: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Results: Model in generally poor agreement with observed seasonal cycle of NEE…
![Page 37: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Problem: How to get rid of the double peak in seasonal cycle of NEE? Focus on the Duke Forest site…
GEP
Re
NEE
MR
HR GR
![Page 38: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
• Reducing the temperature sensitivity for MR and HR gives some improvement, but double peak persists.
• Excessive reduction of temperature sensitivity for HR results in low GPP due to limited N mineralization (reduced decomposition of soil organic matter).
• Have to turn to the temperature dependencies for GPP… and consider the RuBisCO enzyme.
![Page 39: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase
(RuBisCO)
• Enzyme kinetics described by Woodrow and Berry, 1988, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology.
• Enzyme activity increases exponentially with temperature (eventual irreversible decrease in activity at high temperature, as proteins denature).
• RuBisCO catalyzes the fixation of CO2 (photosynthesis) and the fixation of O2 (leading to photorespiration).
• The carboxylase and oxygenase reactions have different Michaelis-Menten coefficients, and these coefficients have different temperature dependencies.
• These differences result in an optimal temperature for photosynthesis which does not depend directly on the temperature sensitivity for the enzyme activity.
![Page 40: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
“The values listed… are calculated from measurements of the enzyme from spinach. There may, however, be small significant differences in the kinetic properties of Rubisco from different species of C3 plants.”
-Woodrow and Berry, 1988
GEP
Re
NEE
MR
HR GR
GEP
Re
NEE
MR
HR GR
Low Topt High Topt
![Page 41: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Results: There is apparently a significant variation in the kinetic parameters for RuBisCO across the climate gradient.
![Page 42: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Next steps in model parameterization and evaluation:
1. Find optimal kinetic parameters at each site, try to establish a dependency with simple climate indices that explains the variation in optimal temperature (underway).
2. Incorporate measurements from soil chambers and leaf-level gas exchange data as additional constraints. Test climate dependency of optimal temperature with these data (underway).
3. Expand the analysis to other plant functional types – deciduous broadleaf forest, evergreen broadleaf forest, and grasses (C3 and C4).
4. Bring in more extensive evaluation databases (inventory, remote sensing).
![Page 43: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56649d625503460f94a44b75/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Simulated Leaf Area Index for Evergreen Needleleaf Forest, NW U.S.
(Compute time approximately 70 hours running threaded code on lhotse)