conole skg forum
Post on 18-Oct-2014
1.667 views
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
+
Personal Learning Environments: interface between physical & virtual spaces
Gráinne Conole, The Open University, UKSKG First ForumLa Trobe University, 28/05/09
Blog:www.e4innovation.com
Grimscote, NorthamptonshireUK, February 2009
+Overarching questions
What is personalisation?
What is the relationship between Government rhetoric and actual practice?
How can technologies support personalisation?
What is the relationship between technologies, physical and virtual spaces and pedagogy?
+Personalisation: Definition
To endow with personal or individual qualities of characteristics
To design or produce (something) to meet someone’s individual requirements
+Origins and quotes Hopkins
Reaction against traditional education: limitations of space, constraints of the curriculum, lack of innovation
Challenge “To connect the possibility of truly personalised pedagogy with the promise of more flexible, responsive, and transparent systems of organisation”
Miliband Excellence and equity; flexibility with accountability and a personal
focus
Leadbeater Learners actively engaged in setting their own targets, devising
their own learning plans and choosing from a range of ways to learn
Järvelä “How could the collaborative process in personalised learning be
regulated in order to favour the emergence of these types of interactions? How can technology be designed to enhance personalised learning environments in ways that increase the possibilities that such rich interactions occur?” OECD, 2006
+From PLE to PDE…
What does your Personal Digital Environment consist of?
What does it say about you?
What do you do (types of activity)?How do you do it (what tools do you use)?Where do you do it (locations and contexts)?
+My Personal Digital Learning Environment
InformationWriting (Word)Finding (Google) Blogging (Wordpress)Presenting (Powerpoint)Recording (Audacity)
CommunicationWriting (Email)Talking (Mobile & skype)Texting (SMS & twitter)Learning (Audio conferencing)Presenting (Video conferencing)
Hardware: Laptop, iphone, ipod, portable hard disk, camera, flip video camera
Learning, research, work
Where: Dining room table, hot desking space, hotel rooms, airport lounges
Function Pre 2005 Now..
Text/Data Word, Excel Google docs
Presentation Powerpoint Slideshare, podcasts, YouTube
Finding info Google Google+, RSS feeds
Managing info Bibliographic tools, repositories, e-journals
Social bookmarking, blogs, wikis
Personal management
Microsoft exchange Shared calenders & to do lists
Communication Email, forums, chat Skype, elluminate, social networking
Visualisation Mindmaps Compendium, mind42, cohere
Shift from information to communication
Co-evolution of tools and practice
Conole, forthcoming in Lee and McLoughan
+Convergence
What are the characteristics of new technologies?
What are the characteristics of good pedagogy?
Can you map one to the other?
+Converging practices
Modern technologies Modern pedagogy
Web 2.0 practices
Location aware technologies
Adaptation & customisation
Second life/immersive worlds
Google it!
Badges, World of warcraft
User generated content
Blogging, peer critique
Cloud computing
From individual to social
Contextualised and situated
Personalised learning
Experiential learning
Inquiry learning
Peer learning
Open Educational Resources
Reflection
Distributed cognition
+
Properties of learning spaces
Characteristics of good pedagogy
Affordances of new technologies
Intersections
PersonalisedSituativeSocialExperientialReflective
AdaptiveContextualNetworkedImmersiveCollective
FurnitureEquipmentLightLayoutNoise
+Buzz words
What words do you associated with the concept of personalisation?
+Policy rhetoric buzz words
Individual
Learner centered
Adaptive
Flexible
Self improving
Empowering
Equitable
Inclusive
Niche
Ownership
Creative
Community
Evolving
Empowerment
Individualism
Adaptable
+Questions
How is personalisation instantiated in Australian policy rhetoric?
How does this translate into funding support and educational initiatives?
Is there evidence of a change in practice (general and/or specifically because of educational interventions?)
+Learner entitlement framework
BECTA, UK
Personalised learning which reflects learners’ interests, preferred approaches, abilities and choices, and tailored access to materials and content
+Actual practice: Learning 2.0
IPTS, 2008
+Value
+7 dimensions of Personal Learning1. Development of key skills
2. Improvement of student learner skills
3. Encourage learning through motivation
4. Learning environments for collaborative learning
5. New models of assessment
6. Technology as personal, cognitive and social tools
7. Teachers are keyJärvelä (2006)
+1. Key skills
Students taught to use conceptual and factual knowledge in purposeful activities in authentic environments
WISE project – (SecondReiff Aachen School of Architecture) Authentic real-time modeling environment in Second Life for Architecture students
Ancient Spaces – (British Columbia) students move in a virtual world, to get new insight into the subject matter (Ancient Spaces)
Focus Examples
+2. Learner skills
Improvement of student learner skills
Personal Inquiry Project – development of inquiry-based learning skills for students to enhanced their understanding of Science
Mundo des estrellas – young people in hospitals, interactive gaming, life swapping and sharing of experience
Focus Projects
+3. Motivation
Encourage learning through building motivation
Multiple delivery channels and media: Content on iTunes, podcasts and YouTube videos as alternatives to text, student generated content
Notschool – virtual home schooling for disaffected children
Focus Examples
+4.Collaboration
Designing new learning environments for collaborative learning
CSCL pedagogical patterns – Jigsaw, ArgueGraph, Concept Grid script
LeMill – teacher sharing and collaboration, social tagging of resources
Wlker’s Wikinomics – collaborative co-construction of understanding of Economics
Focus Examples
+5. Assessment
Devising new models of assessment
REAP project – distillation of good practice in assessment into a set of guiding principles
Utilization of technologies to support diagnostic, formative and summative assessment, as well as peer assessment
Focus Example
+6. Appropriation
The use of technology as a personal, cognitive and social tool
SCHOME – a rich multimedia environment, focus is gifted students, an open pedagogy approach
Pebblepad: e-Portfolio, a “Personal Learning System”
Focus Examples
+7. Support
Remembering that teachers are key
OU Learning Design Initiative – range of tools, methods and approaches to support the learning design process
Olnet – global network to support researchers and users of Open Educational Resources
Focus Example
+The VLE/LMS is dead!
Loosely coupled
Integrated systems
Personalised tools
Institutional tools
Student controlled
Institutional controlled
+Designing for personalisation Need for new approaches to design for learning
Foregrounding characteristics of personalisation
Utilising the affordances of new technologies
Transferable concept and meaning Open source, open
services, open educational resources
Explicit
Shareable
Adaptable
Repurposed
Open
Transfer between Government rhetoric and practice Two-way dialogue, two-
way learning
Tailored, contextualized
Building cumulatively
Individualized
Reused for different purposes
Personalised
MA MA
MA
12 3
ba
c+
Internet
Mobile
TV
Radio
Smart
+A mediating layer
Designer DesignHas an inherent
Learning Activity or an OER
Creates
Vygotsky
Mediating artifacts
Mediating artifactsLesson plansStep by step guidesOnline toolsPedagogical patterns“Expert other”
Can we develop new innovative mediating artifacts?How can we make the design more explicit and sharable?
User
+Personlised design
+Design, use, reuse
Designer
OER
Design
Creates
Deposits
Deposits
Learner A
OER
DesignLearner B
Tutor
Chooses
UsesQuiz + beginners route
UsesQuiz + advanced route
Repurposes & deposits
Process designPrior designs & resources New designs
Clouds in Cloudworks
Pedagogical Patterns
OER repositories
New OER & designs
+Final thoughts What does personalisation mean in a technology-enhanced
environment?
How do we take account of a digital divide that is ever narrower but deeper?
What new digital literacy skills will learners and teachers need ?
True personalisation will require a radical rethinking of the curriculum,
Personalisation challenges existing norms about assessment
Key challenge is to produce new pedagogical models which marry the affordances of personalisation with the best affordances of technologies
There is a blurring of the boundaries of formal and informal education; what is the role of personalised learning across these contexts?