connected everything 2018 brewnet-v2 · 2018. 7. 3. · intelligent cloud connected sensors for...
TRANSCRIPT
BREWNETIntelligent cloud connected sensors for economic small scale
process optimisation
Dr Nicholas WatsonUniversity of Nottingham
Email: [email protected]
Dr Syed Ali Raza ZaidiUniversity of Leeds
Email: [email protected]
Network Plus: Industrial Systems in the Digital Age Conference 2018– Looking Beyond Industry 4.0
BREWNET Introduction• Project motivation• Consortium• Project methodology
Ultrasonic sensor• Sensor design• Signal and data processing• Results from brewery• Impact acceleration account follow on work
Internet‐of‐Things
Summary• Lessons Learnt• Future Roadmap
Agen
da
• LPWAN• Sensor Node Design• Overall Solution• Open Issues
Traditional processes still dominate
1700 Breweries within the UK.
Fermentation effects beer quality and downstream
processes
Opportunity for fermentation PAT
New technologies must be:1) Cost effective 2) Simple to use
Motivation
Consortium
RobNigel Rix (KTN)Quality control
Nik Watson Josep Escrig Escrig Nengjia Ren
Consortium
Syed Ali Raza Maryam Hafeez
1. Process sensors 2. Cloud empowered gateway3. User‐centeredpredictive analytics
Methodology
Sensor Prototype
Probe with US and temperature sensor Tri‐Clamp port for sensor housing
2000 Litre Fermenter
Probe design
Initial sensor attached to laptop streaming data to the cloud
Data analysis
1st Reflection 2nd Reflection
Delay between reflections
Amplitude 1streflection
Data analysis methods:• Ultrasonic velocity• Reflection amplitude • STD of reflection amplitude
• Frequency content analysis• Machine learning • Temperature calibrations
Brewery results
Challenges: 1) Acquiring sufficient labelled data for machine learning 2) Variability
Brewery results
Further DevelopmentEPSRC Impact Accelerating funding provided to further develop sensor technology• What is the most suitable data processing method• What is the cheapest cost a sensor can be built for
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
18/06/2018 19/06/2018 20/06/2018 21/06/2018 22/06/2018 23/06/2018
ABV (%
)
Date
ABV% Batch‐1 VS Batch‐2
batch‐1 ABV% (Tilt density)batch‐2 ABV% (Tilt density)batch‐1 ABV% (Manual density)batch‐2 ABV% (Manual density)
IoT for Food & Drink Manufacturing
IoT for Food and Beverage ManufacturingOperational EfficiencyPerformance analytics, Fault Diagnostics and Predictive Maintenance
Process EfficiencyProduction process optimization.Cost and waste reduction.Plant automation.
Food SafetyQuality control.Evidence for regulatory compliance.Traceability.
Supply Chain OptimizationTransparency.Logistic optimization.
BREWNET Network Architecture
Time
Time
Time
Ultrasonic Transducer
Fermenter
Temperature & pH Sensor
Probe
Housing for Transducer
Microcontroller Unit
Communication Unit
Gateway
Cloud Server
Prediction Engine
Brewery Manager Smartphone Dashboard
Connectivity: Sensor to Gateway
LoRA
Key Features
• Spectrum Occupancy: Unlicensed• Frequency Band: 868 MHz, 433 MHz and 900 MHz• LoRA Link Budget:
Receiver Sensitivity of -136 dBmTX Power of 14 dBm150 dB Link Budget, i.e., 22 km LoS and 2 km NLoS
Low costLow cost
Extended CoverageExtended Coverage UE Complexity ReductionUE Complexity Reduction
Battery LifetimeBattery Lifetime
Spread SpectrumSpread Spectrum
Low Duty CycleLow Duty Cycle
Claim: It can operate successfully at ranges exceeding 15 km in suburban settings and more than 2 km in dense urban environments. It can achieve over 10‐year battery life and it can
operate in networks comprising up to 1 million nodes.https://www.digikey.co.uk/en/articles/techzone/2016/nov/lorawan‐part‐1‐15‐km‐wireless‐10‐year‐battery‐life‐iot
LoRA Measurements
100% 100% 99%
71%
46%
94%87%
79%
30%
10%
90%
61%
45%
3% 0%0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
200 400 600 800 1000
Packets R
eveive Rate
Distance (m)
Multi‐Spreading Factor against Packets Receive Rate
SF12SF9
‐10%0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%110%
200 400 600 800 1000
Packets Re
veive Ra
te
Distance (m)
Multi‐Spreading Factor against Packets Receive Rate
SF12SF9
LoRA Coverage
• Theoretical Computation of Coverage• Height factor for Gateway
• Tall Building/Mast• Drone based channel sounding
• Antenna selection• Directional antenna may help
• Protocol Level Optimization• Frequency Hopping• Packet Data reduction and Long SF• Output power configuration• Chain Architecture
LoRA Coverage
4km 20% PRR
Sensing Node Design
Ultrasonic Signal Processing
MCU & CommunicationSPI
SPITemperature RTD
Overall Design
Power Management
RTD
LoPY
Amplifier ASIC
US PROBE
Application Server
MULTITECH CONDUITGateway
MQTT Broker
MQTT Client
Subscribe
LoRA/WiFi
MQTT ClientDB Endpoint
Publish
ML Engine
Dashboard
Node 1…n
MQTT Client API
Visualization API
Research Directions
Chicken & Egg Problem• Data vs. ConnectivityIntelligent Networking• Self-organization of LPWANContainerization• Cloud and Fog ComputingFuture Proof Design• Hardware Abstraction• Protocol Abstraction
Bor, Martin and Roedig, Utz (2017) LoRa Transmission Parameter Selection. In: 2017 13th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS) :. IEEE, pp. 27‐34. ISBN 9781538639917
Dissemination & Future Plans
Invited talks:• Appetite for Engineering (October 2017)• UK‐China 2nd Food Detection Forum (November 2018)• Mondelez Global Analytical Forum (December 2017)• KTN 47th Intelligent Sensing Program – Sensing in Manufacturing (March 2018)
• The Future of Food Safety Conference (May 2018)• Two publications in preparation (Sensor design and analytics & IoT)
Future funding plans:• Further BREWNET work (Multiuse sensors, integrating weather data)
• Sensors in harsh environments• Low cost sensors and IoT for agri‐tech/precision farming
Summary
Lessons Learnt:• Combining technologies is challenging (compatibility, robustness)• Machine learning maybe not the most suitable approach for products with
acceptable large variability (e.g. craft beer)• Need to publish standardized framework for IoT projects• Need for Self‐organization & hardware abstraction
Summary:• Project showed that sensors can be used to determine the alcohol content
in a fermenter and be used to predict optimal end point• There are various different data processing methods, ultrasonic velocity is
the most common but also the most expensive• Commercial prototype sensor under development• IoT is key enabler for manufacturing, however future proofing the IoT
platforms is non‐trivial and design framework itself is evolving.