condition-based lubrication using ultrasonic technology.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Condition-Based Lubrication Using Ultrasonic Technology.pdf
1/4
Tags: industrial lubricants
Determining when to lubricate bearings and how much lubrication to apply are two of the perplexingissues facing technicians responsible for maintaining bearings. Underlubrication can cause a bearing to
wear out before its time. Applying too much lubrication often can lead to catastrophic results to the
bearing or long-term damage to motor coils and windings.
Traditionally, lubrication scheduling has been time-based. Equipment suppliers often recommend
lubrication schedules based on hours of operation. In addition, they frequently provide instructions on
the amount of lubricant to be applied during these scheduled maintenance procedures. It is common forclients to be told to lubricate at short-term intervals and to add what appears to be excessive amounts
of grease. In one instance, a client was advised to lubricate motor bearings every two to three weeks
and to add one ounce of grease. The origin of these suggestions leads one to speculate that they are
often based on some unknown factors that have no real-world application.
Lubrication intervals are based on a simple premise: keep equipment running optimally by preventing a
bearing from running dry and causing catastrophic damage. It is a solid preventive concept. However,
there is a balance that must be struck between preventing lubrication starvation and gross
overlubrication.
To accomplish the goal of equipment optimization, it is best to know when to lubricate and when to
cease applying lubricants to a bearing. This can be accomplished with a condition-based lubrication
strategy. Simply put, the condition of the bearing determines when to lubricate. If a bearing is working
properly and does not demonstrate any changes that warrant adding lubrication, the bearing should be
left alone. Should conditions change and a bearing demonstrate a need for lubrication, then a lubricant
should be applied. Monitoring the bearing as the lubricant is applied will also help determine how much
to add and when to stop the application.
Ultrasound technology is ideally suited for condition-based lubrication methods. To understand why,
one must understand the technology of ultrasound, how ultrasound is produced by bearings, and how
ultrasound-monitoring instruments can help maintain optimal lubrication levels in bearings.
ition-Based Lubrication Using Ultrasound Technology http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Articles/
4 09/03/2010 1
-
8/12/2019 Condition-Based Lubrication Using Ultrasonic Technology.pdf
2/4
The technology is based on the sensing of high-frequency sounds. Ultrasound starts at 20,000 cycles
per second, or 20 kilohertz (kHz). This is considered the high-frequency threshold at which human
hearing stops. Most ultrasonic instruments will sense from 20 kHz up to 100 kHz. The range of human
hearing covers frequencies from 20 cycles per second (20 Hz) up to 20 kHz. The average human will
often hear up to 16.5 kHz and no more.
Ultrasound InstrumentationInstruments based on the technology of airborne/structure-borne ultrasound are referred to as
ultrasonic translators. They receive the inaudible high-frequency sounds and electronically translatethem into the audible range through a process called heterodyning. The heterodyning method works in
a similar fashion to an AM radio. While we cannot hear radio waves, this method helps us easily identify
different voices and musical instruments when we listen to the radio. Similarly, this heterodyning
process provides an accurate translation of ultrasound produced by operating equipment and enables
users to readily identify one sound component from another. Most ultrasonic translators provide
feedback in two ways: through headphones and on a meter where the amplitude of these sounds can be
viewed as intensity increments or as decibels (dB).
Ultrasound MonitoringImagine a properly installed bearing. It has been given the right amount of lubricant and is in perfect
alignment. As it rolls around the raceway, any stress it may have is evened out by the lubricant, and itmoves stress-free. As it does, it produces a recognizable rushing sound akin to the sound of air leaking
out of a tire. This rushing sound is referred to as white noise. It includes all sounds, both low and high
frequencies. The high-frequency waves generated by this white noise are more localized than those of
the lower frequencies. Using an ultrasonic translator, these signals can be detected with little or no
interference from other mechanical noises generated by other components, such as a shaft or another
bearing close by. (As opposed to vibration meters, which detect vibratory displacements of rolling
elements, the ultrasound translator will detect friction.)
As the lubrication level in a bearing falls or deteriorates, the potential for friction increases. There will
be a corresponding rise in the ultrasound amplitude level that can be noted and heard. The method to
determine when to lubricate and when to stop applying lubrication with ultrasound instruments is assimple as setting a base line, setting inspection schedules and monitoring as during lubrication
applications.
Setting a BaselineA baseline for a bearing reflects the decibel level at normal
operating conditions with no observable defects and with
adequate lubrication. There are three methods for setting a
baseline:
Comparison: When there is more than one bearing of the
same type, load and rpm, multiple bearings can becompared. Each bearing is inspected at the same test point
and angle. The decibel levels and sound quality are
compared. If there are no substantial differences, (less
than eight dB) a baseline dB level is set for each bearing.
1.
Set while lubricating: While lubrication is being applied,
listen until the sound level drops and then begins to rise. At that point, no more lubricant is
added and the dB value is used as the baseline.
2.
Historical: Bearing dB levels are obtained from an initial survey and compared 30 days later. If
there is little (less than eight dB) to no change in dB, then the base line levels are set and will be
3.
ition-Based Lubrication Using Ultrasound Technology http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Articles/
4 09/03/2010 1
-
8/12/2019 Condition-Based Lubrication Using Ultrasonic Technology.pdf
3/4
used for comparison for subsequent inspections.
Setting Inspection SchedulesEquipment criticality, as it relates to production, environmental and operational consequences, is the
primary factor in selecting and setting frequencies for assessing mechanical systems. After the baseline
inspection has been performed, a monthly interval should be sufficient. For bearings with high decibel
levels that have been subsequently lubricated, it might be necessary to test more frequently to note
any possible changes. If a bearing is in a failure mode, the lubricant will temporarily mask the fault.
However, the fault will quickly produce a rise in the dB level. In some instances this will happen inminutes, in others, days.
Monitoring as You LubricateA bearing that exceeds eight dB over a set baseline can be presumed to need lubrication. Once a
bearing has been identified for lubrication, knowing when to stop applying the lubricant will prevent
overlubrication. This is accomplished in one of three ways:
Calculate the quantity based on the bearing manufacturers guidelines, and apply that quantity of
lubricant and no more. This has little dependence on ultrasonic methods, is subjective, and is
often poorly executed.
1.
The lubrication technician monitors the bearing with an ultrasonic instrument as the lubricant isbeing applied. Lubricant is applied slowly until the decibel level drops to the baseline level.
2.
If it is not possible to use a dB level as a guide, the lubricant is applied until the sound drops off
and begins to rise. At that exact moment, the technician stops applying the lubricant.
3.
Ultrasound Bearing InspectionUltrasonic inspection and monitoring is the most reliable method for detecting incipient (the very
beginning of) bearing failure. The ultrasonic warning appears prior to a rise in temperature or an
increase in low-frequency vibration levels. This method of inspecting bearings is useful in recognizing
the beginning of fatigue failure, brinelling of bearing surfaces, and an excess or lack of lubricant.
Detecting Signs of FailureIn ball bearings, as the metal in the raceway, roller or ball bearing begins to fatigue, a subtle
deformation begins to occur. This condition will produce irregular surfaces, which will cause an increase
in the emission of ultrasonic sound waves. A change in amplitude from the original reading is an
indication of one of two conditions: prefailure or lack of lubrication and incipient bearing failure. An
eight dB increase over baseline accompanied by a constant rushing noise suggests lubricant failure (dry
bearing surfaces). When an ultrasonic reading exceeds any previous reading by 12 dB accompanied by
crackling noises, it can be assumed that the bearing has entered the beginning of the failure mode.
This information was originally discovered through experimentation performed by NASA on ball
bearings.1In tests performed while monitoring bearings at frequencies from 24 through 50 kHz,
researchers found that the changes in amplitude indicated incipient failure before any other indicatorsincluding heat and vibration changes. An ultrasonic system based on detection and analysis of
modulations of bearing resonance frequencies provides subtle detection capabilities, whereas
conventional methods are incapable of detecting slight faults.
As a ball passes over a pit or fault in the race surface, it produces an impact. A structural resonance of
one of the bearing components vibrates or rings by this repetitive impact. The sound produced is heard
as a qualitative change in the headphones, usually as a crackling sound and observed as an increase in
amplitude in the monitored ultrasonic frequencies of the bearing.
Lubrication Procedures
ition-Based Lubrication Using Ultrasound Technology http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Articles/
4 09/03/2010 1
-
8/12/2019 Condition-Based Lubrication Using Ultrasonic Technology.pdf
4/4
It is imperative to consider two elements of potential failure: lack of lubrication and overlubrication.
Normal bearing loads cause an elastic deformation of the elements in the contact area providing a
smooth elliptical distribution. But bearing surfaces are not perfectly smooth. For this reason, the actual
stress distribution in the contact area will be affected by a random surface roughness. In the presence
of a lubricant film on a bearing surface, there is a dampening effect on the stress distribution, and the
acoustic energy produced will be low.
Should lubrication be reduced to a point where the stress distribution is no longer present, the normalrough spots will make contact with the face surfaces and increase the acoustic energy. These normal
microscopic deformities will begin to produce wear and the possibilities of small fissures may develop,
contributing to the prefailure condition. Therefore, aside from normal wear, the fatigue or service life of
a bearing is strongly influenced by the relative film thickness provided by an appropriate lubricant.
The appropriate amount of lubrication is important. If a bearing is overlubricated, the bearing element
or cage can be pushed (pressed) excessively by the lubricant causing additional wear of the bearing.
Too much lubricant causes churning and fluid friction. The heat from the fluid friction, coupled with the
squeezing effect of churning, serves to drive the oil of the thickener prematurely, the oil dissipates
through the seals and into the housing, and is lost.
On the other hand, if there is not enough lubricant, the bearing will rub on the solid surface, again
causing friction and wear on the bearings. Either case is detrimental to the life of the bearing. Using
airborne/structure-borne ultrasound takes the guesswork out of lubrication.
Important ConsiderationsAs with any technology, there is no one-size-fits-all application procedure. For example, there are some
limitations of estimated regrease intervals/volumes using standard equations. One of the problems with
time-interval lubrications is that there are different applications for different bearings, which vary
among facilities. For example, a food-processing plant may use an application in which machinery is
steamed down every day for cleaning. Another facility might not follow the same procedure because it
may operate in a different environment that does not require cleaning as frequently, while anothermight have many airborne particulates that could contaminate the bearing. Because of this kind of
variability, one can only guess what the lubrication cycle should be. It depends on what a facility is
producing and under what situations the machinery is operating.
Additionally, there are some considerations regarding where, when and how an ultrasonic approach can
be used. For example, if a facility approaches lubrication haphazardly, in a disorganized fashion, or
relies solely on sound quality as a determining factor, the effectiveness of the program can be
compromised. One needs to track bearing condition over time, setting baseline levels and determining
dB changes over that baseline to indicate the need to lubricate or not. Such a program helps personnel
understand exactly what they are looking at.
There may be situations in which it is difficult to gain access to some bearings. If the fitting tube is a
conductive metal such as copper, the bearing can still be tested and a lubrication action level set. If the
fitting is of a nonsound-conductive material such as plastic, a separate conductive metallic wave guide
can be installed so that the bearing can be monitored.
The waveguide can be isolated from structure-borne noise of the machine (the mounting point) via
rubber isolation material.
Reference
1. NASA Tech Brief. Report B72-10494. August 1972.
ition-Based Lubrication Using Ultrasound Technology http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Articles/
4 09/03/2010 1