concede final report
DESCRIPTION
Final report on pilot experiences within the CONCEDE projectTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
THE PROCESS OF THE PILOT EXPERIENCES
UOC
![Page 2: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Table of contents
UGC and qualityPilot experiences processResultsConclusions
![Page 3: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Learner Generated Content and quality
•Intense change by ICT introduction•Network society
The role of students and their relationship to knowledge:
•active participants in the creation of educational content•Through web2.0
· Encouraged to increase their level of involvement by producing and publishing their own content through simple tools
· User Generated Content (UGC)
LEARNER GENERATED CONTENT(LGC)
Change
QUALITY ?
![Page 4: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Pilot experiences process
![Page 5: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Piloting reporting form: context
Name of the Institution Type of Institution (fully virtual, blended learning,…)
Context In which program will be carried on this pilot? In which course? Schedule Lesson plan:
Main objectives, characteristics and ECTS Contents Pedagogical approach Activities Evaluation
![Page 6: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
UGC experience
Aim of UGC experience How long is the experience? (ECTS) User Generated Content Scenario Users User’s role Tool How many people will be involved? How to evaluate quality of UGC?
R1: students R2: teachers Dialogue
•ANNEX: Instructions for: •Students•External/Institutional actors•Dialogue exercise
Piloting reporting form: context (II)
![Page 7: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Pilot experiences process
![Page 8: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Which is the purpose?Gathering data methodsData analysis and triangulation process
Piloting Evaluation Guide (Methodology)
![Page 9: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Pilot experiences process
![Page 10: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Context Methodology Data analysis Results & discussion Conclusions
Preliminary report for discussion
![Page 11: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Pilot experiences process
![Page 12: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Results
Quality
![Page 13: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Quality criteria proposal Identification of quality criteria for LGC on
the basis of a literature review on the matter.
Referred authors: Van Assche (2006), Leacock & Nesbit (2007), BECTA (2007), Endean (2003), Ruiz, Candler, & Teasdale (2007), KMD (2007), University of California Regents (2004), FGCU (2006), Clark & Mayer (2008), Harris (2010), Johnson& Lamb (2011), Virginia Tech University Library (2011), Ehlers (2009).
![Page 14: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Quality criteria proposal
![Page 15: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Results Students perception depends on
pedagogical proposal
ContentFormatProcess
![Page 16: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Results Students perception depends on
pedagogical proposal
ContentFormatOwn project Others’ project
Process
![Page 17: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Results Students perception depends on
pedagogical proposal
ContentFormatOwn project Others’ project
Process
![Page 18: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Results Students perception depends on
pedagogical proposal
ContentFormatProcess
![Page 19: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Results
UGC is a collaboration...Participants profileSkills of collaborationOrganize the processManagement of collaboration process
Assessment process
![Page 20: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Conclusions
![Page 21: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Conclusions from pilots UGC/LGC = good experience! LGC is a motivating and effective
method for both teachers and students
LGC should focus on the quality of the process and of the end product.
Content, format and process… depending on the context
![Page 22: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Conclusions from pilots
Time factor must be considered in UGC. Any UGC purpose has to be considered to optimize students time.
Quality framework for UGC is useful
![Page 23: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
With UGC… the work is not closed! From UGC to OER: UGC >Reusability & rights > UGC repository> OER
Conclusions from project
![Page 24: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Considering the three quality categories: content, format and process.
Teachers should be aware of: context, students skills, availability of time, level of specificity of the content, how is supported the process,…
Implications for educational practitioners
![Page 25: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Gaining a deeper understanding of the students’ perception and awareness of critical issues regarding the use and reuse of LGC.
Developing and validating a quality framework in varied contexts.
Providing more detailed guidance for the implementation of LGC as a teaching strategy for learning.
Sensitizing faculty and university stakeholders on the adoption of a LGC initiative.
Future research
![Page 26: CONCEDE Final report](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061206/54775929b4af9f45598b45d8/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Thanks for your attention!
Marc Romero[[email protected]]
Maria Pérez-Mateo [[email protected]]
Montse Guitert[[email protected]]
Marcelo Maina[[email protected]]