Computer-Based Learning for Kids

The Problem

Price Middle School – Needs Improvement List

State Officials are closely monitoring our progress

Focus on SWD Population have are not meeting expectations in reading

Price CRCTM Reading Results:2011 -50% below proficiency2012 -55% below proficiency

The traditional classroom is notworking... What can we do?

We need to solve the problem :What we know

“Students with learning disabilities struggle with reading skills and since students learn new information in school by reading; these difficulties often increase the academic struggles students with learning disabilities face.” (Stetter & Hughes 2011)

A computer based intervention approach to improving reading comprehension for target Tier II and Tier III students.

During Study SkillsDuring ConnectionsCollect Data

We need something new: A Solution -What I propose

We know learning styles vary…Computer based programs can accommodate

different learning styles.Visual LearnersAuditory learnersPassive learners (game-based online activities)

“Auditory output is particularly important for individuals with lds and others with reading difficulties. Among the types of auditory information available in multimedia are music, sound, effects, and digitized speech.” (Lewis 1998)

What we Know & What the research says

Two out of three students in each intervention group and all students in the Baseline Group showed improvement on the Gates-MacGinitie comprehension test. (Stetter & Hughes 2011)

Believe that the learning process can be enhanced through integrating multimedia as it provides users control over the delivery of information and supports interactivity. (Neo, Tan, 2012)

Major findings suggest that a computer-based program for teaching a collection of reading comprehension strategies (e-PELS) resulted in more improvement in reading comprehension performance than traditional instruction, and the effectiveness of e-PELS was particularly strong for lower-achieving students. (Ponce, Lopez, & Mayer 2012)

Findings from computer-based reading studies

Both intervention groups seemed to enjoy working on the computer to help them with their reading …and preferred it to teacher instruction. (Stetter & Hughes 2011)

In computer-based class rooms with integrated learning systems classrooms, students are motivated to learn. They enjoy working on computers, and they like the animated characters, voice capabilities, and full-color graphics. Because they can progress at their own pace, and because they receive immediate feedback, students remain engaged. (Dusen & Worthen 1995)

Computers can impact motivation for reluctant learners

Individualize & Differentiated LearningLearning theory suggests that an individualized

program that caters to specific learning needs will lead to greater student gains, while also decreasing the gap between low-and high ability students. (Dusen & Worthen 1995 ) ILS

Data TrackingAssessment files that contain individualized

reports, including specific learning objectives covered, time required on task, customizable reports.

Other Benefits:

Quick overview Mixed-method approach to literacy instruction among struggling

readers in the upper elementary and middlegrades.

Combination of… Teacher-directed instruction Computer-based reading lessons Independent reading Targets upper elementary through high school students who

score below proficiency on state performance assessments

“Implementation of the READ 180 Enterprise intervention in an afterschool setting had a positive impact on reading comprehension and vocabulary scores on the SAT 10.” (Capotosto, Hartry, & Fitzgerald 2011)

Read 180

Graph represents Average CST ELA Scores for READ 180 and non-READ 180 Comparison Students From Spring 2006 to Spring 2007

Desert Sands Unified School District,La Quinta, California Read 180 Study Results

A computer based intervention approach to improving reading comprehension for our Tier II and Tier III students.

During Study SkillsDuring ConnectionsCollect Data

I ask for permission to move forward

Stetter, M., & Hughes, M. (2011). Computer Assisted Instruction to Promote Comprehension in Students with Learning Disabilities. International Journal Of Special Education, 26(1), 88-100.

Van Dusen, L. M., & Worthen, B. R. (1995). Can Integrated Instructional Technology Transform the Classroom?. Educational Leadership, 53(2), 28-33.

Neo, M., Neo, K., & Tan, H. (2012). Applying Authentic Learning Strategies in a Multimedia and Web Learning Environment (MWLE): Malaysian Students' Perspective. Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology - TOJET, 11

Kim, J. S., Capotosto, L., Hartry, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2011). Can a Mixed-Method Literacy Intervention Improve the Reading Achievement of Low-Performing Elementary School Students in an After-School Program? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial of READ 180 Enterprise. Educational Evaluation And Policy Analysis, 33(2), 183-201

Ponce, H. R., Lopez, M. J., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Instructional Effectiveness of a Computer-Supported Program for Teaching Reading Comprehension Strategies. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1170-1183

Lewis, R. B. (1998). Assistive Technology and Learning Disabilities: Today's Realities and Tomorrow's Promises. Journal Of Learning Disabilities, 31(1), 16-26,54.

http://read180.scholastic.com/reading-intervention-program/research

References