computational continuum mechanics in m&m smr a. v. myasnikov d.sc., senior research scientist,...

29
Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations and back

Upload: morgan-richardson

Post on 17-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR

A. V. Myasnikov

D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMRStavanger, 28th April, 2006

From Seismics to Simulations and back

Page 2: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

1. Streamline Reservoir Simulations;

2. Finite-difference/volume simulations of poroelastic waves propagation in partially saturated layers;

3. Rheological monitoring for pay-zones

High Road Steps:

Page 3: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

Theorem #1: If Reservoir simulations, then Streamline technologies.

Theorem #2: If Streamline technologies, then FrontSim.

From Seismics to Simulations:

Page 4: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

FrontSim:

I. Development of an effective 1D simulators for multi-component two-phase flows

II. Development of 3 Phase Compressible Dual Porocity Models

III. Extanding of Front Tracking Technology beyond two phase black oil model

IV. Effective parallelizing of pressure solverV. … and so on ….

Page 5: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

a) To increase the performance by development of high

resolution modern techniques (TVD, ENO, AMR, Front

Tracking)

b) To take the PVT-flash procedure off the hydrodynamic

“body” of the code

c) To search for improved algorithms for representation of

phase equilibrium in terms of alternative thermodynamic

variables.

Development of an effective 1D simulators for multi-component two-phase flows

Page 6: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

Results: a) I order vs. II order high compressive TVD schemes

I order schemeII order scheme “exact” solution

The same C1-CO2-C4-C10 mixture

Grid =

200 pts

200 pts instead of 800!

Page 7: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

( ) ( ),

and are known by

approximation of binodal

k k kC A C B γ γ

A B

1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1

Standard Alternative

, ,..., , , ,..., ,C CN NC C C C C γ

Alternative Set of Independent Variables

Bubble pointsDew points

Tie lines

Plait point

Two-phase domain

Tie-line extension

C1, C2

C1, γ

OilGas

1C C

2 1,...,C

m mNC C γ

Tie-line equation:

Page 8: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

C1-CO2-C4-C10 mixture Red – 1D ECLIPSE

Black – -parametrisation

Results: b) PVT-flash procedure is taken off:

20 times CPU advantage!

Page 9: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

One Remarkable Feature of Alternative Variables

THEOREM: The image of a Riemann problem solution for the

auxiliary system

coincides with the projection (red circles) of the C- image (red line)

of a Riemann problem solution for the general system

γ

γ γ

(blue line) 0k kA B

(not proved yet…)

Page 10: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

“direct” I order scheme

“projective” scheme

Results: c) “projective” scheme – 3 effective components instead of 100

Some problems

in the vicinity of

the root corner

points!

Page 11: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

II. Implementation of DPSP 3-Phase Compressible Model into FrontSim

Porous Matrix continuum

Fracture continuumFractured Porous medium

Page 12: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

DPSP Results: 3 Phase compressible flowOil production rate vs time FrontSim

Eclipse

Water saturation

matrix

fracture

Page 13: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

1. Streamline Reservoir Simulations;

2. Finite-difference/volume simulations of poroelastic waves propagation in partially saturated layers;

3. Rheological monitoring for pay-zones

High Road Steps:

Page 14: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

Finite volume and finite difference

schemes for acoustic/elasticity equations:

1. Godunov’ s finite volume scheme of 1st order

accuracy in space and time and its “2nd order” TVD

extension;

2. Two step finite different Virieux’s-like staggered

grid scheme

3. >>>

+ non-reflecting boundary conditions

Page 15: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

15 Initials

Wavelet Propagation by Virieux or Godunov (rough grid)

Virieux

SOG

FOG

1.7t 1.3t 0.9t 0.5t 0.1t

Page 16: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

16 Initials

FLAC

SOG

FOG

1.7t 1.3t 0.9t 0.5t 0.1t

Wavelet Propagation by Virieux or Godunov (finer grid)

Page 17: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

17 Initials

N-R conditions in 2D Elasticity (SOG)“exact”

N-R BC

Page 18: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

18 Initials

Artificial attenuation in buffer zones (PML)Top and bottom– rigid walls

u

v

0vA 2vA 5vA

Page 19: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

1. Streamline Reservoir Simulations;

2. Finite-difference/volume simulations of poroelastic waves propagation in partially saturated layers;

3. Rheological monitoring for pay-zones

High Road Steps:

Page 20: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

20 Initials

Experimental (?) data, no fit by viscoelastic and classical Biot models

Uniform elastic media

Layered media, no pay-zone

Layered media, pay-zone

Page 21: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

21 Initials

0p u

t xu p

ut x

1D for visco-X-ticity:

Bottom boundary

1 1 1 1, , ,E

3 3 3 3, , ,E

2 2 2 2, , ,E

u(x,t) p(x,t)

lx

lh

Top boundary

Top boundary:

/u x f

Bottom boundary:

nonreflecting

(Korneev, Goloshubin, et al. Geophysics, 2004, 69, 522)

Page 22: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

One phase models: conservation laws

0t

V

d

dt

vF P

:de

divdt

qJ P V

TP P

1. Continuity equation:

2. Equations of motion:

3. Dynamic momentum equations:

4. Energy equation:

Page 23: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

Linear and nonlinear liquids

(1/ )ds de dT p

dt dt dt

(1/ , )e e s

2

1 1: , 0

dsdiv T div

dt T T T q

q s

JJ Π v J

002

1 1 1:

ST div

T T T qJ v Π v

- definition of “fluid”

- Gibbs identity

Generelized Onsager relations for nonlinear processes:

0

32 00, ,

S

S

T div

T div

1

q

Φ vΦ vJ Π

v v

Page 24: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

2

2

s Newtonian liquid

s s Hard plastic liquid

s s Viscoplastic liquid

The simplified diagram of the process of displacement oil by gas. Their movement paths are shown with arrows.

One phase liquids: conservation laws

0t

V

32

0S

dp

dt div

ΦvF

v v

032

0 :S

S

deT p div

dt div

Φv v

v vSome special cases:

Page 25: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

Linear and nonlinear solids

:de ds e d

Tdt dt dt

ε

ε

( , )e e s ε

2

1 1: : 0

e dT

T T T dt

q

εJ P v

ε

Definition of “solid”

- Gibbs identity

1

2 0ε g - g - Strain tensor

Page 26: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

Elastic solids

2

1 1: : 0

e dT

T T T dt

q

εJ P v

ε

By definition: elastic is the medium where all isothermal process are reversible

0: : 0

S e d

dt

εP v

ε

So that: e

P

ε

0Sd d

ifdt dt

0ε g

v e

Page 27: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

Non-elastic models

Let:

: : 0e

pP e e eε

As before,

: 0e

pP P eε

0,d d

dt dt

0p pg ε

e e e

( ),

pp

e Pe

/

/

d dt e

d dt

e ε

e ε ε- System of ODE

2 /e

d dt viscoelastisity

p pe e e ε

ε

elastic plasticity p pe e

Page 28: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

1. Comprehensive study of acoustic/seismic feature of rhelogicaly complex multiphase single-layered pay-zone

2. The same for multiple-layered zones

3. Through inverse problem to 4D seismic

Rheological monitoring: what is that?

Page 29: Computational Continuum Mechanics in M&M SMR A. V. Myasnikov D.Sc., Senior Research Scientist, SMR Stavanger, 28 th April, 2006 From Seismics to Simulations

Biot M.A. Nonlinear and semilinear rheology of porous solids. J. Geophys. Res. 1973. 78. 4924

Biot M.A. Variational irreversible thermodynamics of heat and mass transfer in porous solids: new concepts and methods. Q. Appl. Math. 1978. 36. 19

Biot M.A. New variational-lagrangian irreversible thermodynamics with applications to viscous flow, reaction-diffusion and solid mechanics. Advances in Applied Mechanics. 1984. 24. 1-91.

Backgreoung: