composite nanofloral clusters of carbon nanotubes and activated alumina: an efficient sorbent for...
TRANSCRIPT
Accepted Manuscript
Composite nano floral clusters of Carbon Nano tubes and Activated alumina:
An efficient sorbent for heavy metal removal
Nalini Sankararamakrishnan, Meha Jaiswal, Nishith Verma
PII: S1385-8947(13)01123-6
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.070
Reference: CEJ 11175
To appear in: Chemical Engineering Journal
Received Date: 25 June 2013
Revised Date: 14 August 2013
Accepted Date: 16 August 2013
Please cite this article as: N. Sankararamakrishnan, M. Jaiswal, N. Verma, Composite nano floral clusters of Carbon
Nano tubes and Activated alumina: An efficient sorbent for heavy metal removal, Chemical Engineering Journal
(2013), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.070
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Composite nano floral clusters of Carbon Nano tubes and Activated alumina: An efficient 1
sorbent for heavy metal removal 2
3
Nalini Sankararamakrishnan$*, Meha Jaiswal$,# and Nishith Verma$,@ 4
$Centre for Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, 5
Kanpur, U.P. 208016, India 6
@Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, U.P. 7
208016, India 8
#Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramoday Vishwavidyalay, Satna, Chitrakoot, M.P. 485331, India 9
10
*author for correspondence, Tel: 915122596360, Email: [email protected] 11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Abstract 25
Carbon nano tubes (CNTs) were grown over Fe- and Ni-doped activated alumina (AA) by 26
chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and washed with acid to produce nano floral clusters (NCs). 27
The produced NCs were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy 28
Dispersive X-ray (EDAX), Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) surface area analyzer, Raman 29
and Fourier Transform Infra Red (FTIR) Spectroscopy. Batch mode experiments were used to 30
study the effect of various operating conditions such as pH and contact time on the adsorbent 31
capacity for Cr(VI) and Cd(II) . It was found that maximum adsorption of Cr(VI) took place at 32
pH 2 and for Cd(II) in the pH range of 7 to 9. The measurements of the sorption capacity of NC 33
revealed that it had the saturation capacity of 264.5 and 229.9 mg g-1 for both Cr(VI) and Cd(II) 34
respectively. Sorption data were fitted by both Langmuir and Freundlich models. 35
Thermodynamic parameters such as ΔS, ΔH and ΔG indicated the suitability of NC for the 36
removal of Cr(VI) and Cd(II). The results indicate that NC is a promising candidate for the 37
treatment of heavy metals from waste water industrial effluents. 38
39
Key Words: CNTs, Alumina, Cr(VI), Cd(II), CVD, Nano Clusters, Adsorption 40
41
42
43
44
45
1. Introduction 46
In the past decades, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have attracted considerable attention owing to the 47
unique structural and excellent mechanical, conductive and thermal properties [1-3]. High 48
sorption capability of chemical pollutants by CNTs is attributed to its hollow and layered 49
nanostructure with a characteristically large surface area [4-6]. CNTs have been found useful for 50
the removal of various contaminants such as Pb(II) [7], Ni [8], Cu [9] and Cd [10]. Owing to the 51
high sorption potential towards heavy metals, both multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) 52
[11] and functionalized MWCNTs [12,13] have been reported for the solid phase extraction of 53
many heavy metal ions from various environmental matrices. Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) 54
technique is cost effective technique to synthesize CNTs in large amounts and variety of 55
substrates like activated carbon fibres [14], activated carbon [15-17] and porous substrates such 56
as MgO [18 – 20] , Al2O3 [21-22] and SiO2 [23] are used. Compared to a flat substrate coated by 57
metal catalyst, a three-dimensional porous substrate coated catalyst has the advantage of higher 58
available metal content per substrate mass and a higher catalyst active surface [24, 25] . It is also 59
well known that activated alumina is one of the widely used adsorbents for metal sorption [26]. 60
Thus use of activated alumina will serve the dual purpose as the porous substrate to hold the 61
catalyst and an effective adsorbent as well. With these advantages in mind, this study is focused 62
on the synthesis of CNTs over activated alumina (AA) by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) 63
using benzene as the carbon source. The as-prepared composite floral clusters were characterized 64
by various techniques such as SEM, EDAX, BET surface area, X-Ray Diffraction spectroscopy, 65
FTIR and Raman and applied to the removal of model heavy metal ions, namely, Cr(VI) and 66
Cd(II) from aqueous solution. 67
2. Materials and Methods 68
2.1 Substrate preparation 69
Around 6 g of AA (particle size < 0.4 mm) obtained from Bhargava Industries, Surat, 70
India) was placed in 20 ml of ethanol and sonicated for 3 to 4 h and heated until the ethanol was 71
vaporized completely. Next, 0.5 g of Fe(III)-nitrate and 0.3 g Nickel sulphate in 20 ml of 72
ethanol was added to the treated AA. This mixture was stirred and heated for 1h at 80 ˚C. 73
2.2 Synthesis of NCs 74
An indigenously assembled vertical CVD apparatus was used for the preparation of NCs. 75
Fig. 1 describes the schematic representation of CVD reactor used in the study. The details of the 76
assembly are described elsewhere [14]. Around 3 g of the catalyst prepared by the procedure 77
described in the above section was placed in the furnace and calcined at nitrogen atmosphere for 78
2 h at 450˚C. Further, the reduction was carried out at 550˚C for 2 h using hydrogen gas at 100 79
cc per min and 2 bar , followed by the pyrolysis of benzene vapor. During pyrolysis the 80
temperature was raised to 750˚C. Pyrolysis was carried out for 2 h to ensure complete growth of 81
CNTs. The product was washed with 0.01 N HCl in a sonicator. Ni(II) nitrate and Fe(III) nitrate 82
act as catalysts for the growth of CNTs. During calcinations both Fe and Ni salts are converted 83
to their respective oxides, and then to metallic state when reduced under H2 atmosphere [14]. Fe 84
and Ni metals catalyze the formation of NCs on AA. Washing with HCl ensures the removal of 85
the metals from the tip of the produced NCs. 86
2.3 Adsorption Batch Experiments 87
Batch experiments were carried out with synthetic solutions of Cd(II)/Cr(VI) in 100 mL 88
flasks with stopper. The flasks were placed in an incubator shaker (orbital stirring rate = 100 89
rpm) at room temperature (~ 30 oC). The contact time of the solutions with the adsorbents was 90
maintained at 4 h. After equilibration, the solutions were filtered with Whatman No. 42 filter 91
paper, diluted and analyzed for Cd(II) and Cr(VI). Unless otherwise stated the parameters used 92
for the tests were: sample volume = 20 mL, sorbent dose = 2.5 g L-1, initial metal ion 93
concentration = 100 mg L-1, equilibration time = 4 h. The initial solution pH was maintained at 2 94
and 7.5 for Cr(VI) and Cd(II), respectively. For pH studies the pH of the solution was varied 95
from 1 to 10 keeping the other conditions constant. For equilibrium studies the initial metal ion 96
concentration was varied from 100 to 2000 mg/l. Thermodynamic studies were conducted by 97
equilibrating Cr(VI)/ Cd(II) solutions using the above mentioned conditions at three different 98
temperatures namely 25, 35 and 45˚C. Kinetic studies were conducted by equilibrating 20 ml of 99
500 mg L-1 of Cr(VI)/Cd(II) at a dose rate of 2.5 g L-1 and the amount of Cr(VI)/Cd(II) adsorbed 100
were monitored at regular intervals of time. 101
2.4 Metal concentration analysis 102
Dissolved Cadmium in water was determined by Aanalyst 400 Perkin Elmer Atomic 103
Absorption Spectrophotometer using an air-acetylene burner. The measurements were done at 104
wavelength of 228.8 nm using a slit width of 0.7 nm. Hexavalent Cr in water was determined by 105
spectrophotometry using diphenylcarbazide method [27] after suitable dilutions. The test 106
samples were filtered using Whatman 0.45 mm filter paper, and the filtrates after suitable 107
dilutions were analyzed. Control experiments showed that no sorption occurred on either 108
glassware or filtration systems. All assays were carried out in triplicate and only mean values are 109
presented. 110
3. Results and Discussion 111
3.1 Characterization of the nano clusters (NC) 112
The field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Supra 40 VP, Zeiss, 113
Germany) was used to observe the surface morphology of NC. The samples were gold coated to 114
improve their conductivity to obtain good images. Additionally, EDX elemental spectra of a few 115
spots on the samples were taken for determining the elemental compositions. We present here 116
the representative images and spectra of the samples. 117
Fig. 2 describes the SEM images of the prepared adsorbents at different magnifications 118
(figs 2(a), 2(b) and 2(c). NCs may be observed on the surface of the adsorbents. The presence of 119
Fe, Ni and Al in the material was confirmed from the EDAX graph (Fig.2(d)). The elemental 120
mapping of the acid washed composite (Figs. 2(e), 2(f), 2(g)) revealed the uniform distribution 121
of Fe, Al and Ni particles. From EDAX graph the weight percentages of Al, Fe and Ni were 122
found to be 20.8, 0.8 and 8.6% respectively. The TEM image of NC is shown in Fig.3 where 123
CNTs with Fe-Ni particles were observed. 124
The FT-IR spectra of plain CNT, activated alumina and NC (Fig.4) were acquired by 125
Tensor 27 (Bruker, Germany) in the attenuated total reflectance (ATR) mode using Ge crystal. 126
The sample chamber was continuously purged with nitrogen during the measurement. The broad 127
absorption band around 3428 cm−1 for NC (Fig.4c) could be attributed to the O-H stretching of 128
the adsorbed water molecules and intra-molecular hydrogen bonding. The bands between 2850 – 129
2950 cm-1 observed in Fig. 4 C are due to the symmetrical and assymetrical stretching of –CH 130
vibrations of –CH3 and –CH2 groups. Carbonyl stretching of plain CNT (Fig. 4A) is observed at 131
1628 cm-1, whereas the vibration of activated alumina (Fig. 4B) at 1634 cm-1 is due to the 132
stretching Al-OH framework. In the case of NC (a composite of AA and CNT) (Fig.4C), a 133
strong band is observed at 1626 cm-1 which arises due to the merging of carbonyl and Al-OH 134
stretching vibrations. Stretching and bending vibrations of Al-O-Al are also observed in the 135
spectrum of NC (Fig.4C) at 820 and 592 cm-1 with a slight shift compared to the virgin activated 136
alumina [28]. Form the above discussions, it is evident that NC consists both alumina and nano 137
carbon. 138
The adsorbent (NC) prepared in this study was analyzed for the specific surface area, 139
pore volume, and PSD by N2-physisorption using Autosorb-1C instrument (Quantachrome, 140
USA). Chemisorption analysis was also carried out to measure the active metal surface area. 141
The multipoint Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) surface area was measured from the 142
nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm. The BET surface area of NC was found to be 203 143
m2g1. The total pore volume was found to be 0.345 ccg-1 and average pore size was 6.79 nm. 144
Some examples of specific surface areas reported for CNTs are 80.9 m2 g-1 [29] , 90.2 m2 g-1 145
[30], 74 m2 g-1 [31]. High specific surface area in NCs indicates higher adsorption capacity of 146
the solutes which is discussed later in this article. The Raman spectra of NC (Fig.5) showed two 147
characteristic peaks at 1333 cm-1 (D band) and 1585 cm-1 (G band). The G band originates from 148
the in-plane tangential stretching of the carbon-carbon bonds in graphene sheets, whereas the D 149
band originates from either defect sites in the hexagonal framework of multi walls carbon 150
nanotubes (MWCNTs) or the presence of amorphous carbon [32]. The ratio between the areas of 151
these two bands (AG/AD) has been used to quantify the degree of purification [33-35] of multi-152
wall carbon nanotubes. The higher intensity of D band compared to G band indicates the 153
presence of amorphous carbon in the structure. For the present material, the ratio is calculated as 154
0.993, indicating the presence of disordered graphite components in NCs. The X-ray diffraction 155
measurements were carried out to examine the structure of the floral clusters (Fig.6). The peak 156
observed at 26.0° is the characteristic (002) reflection of graphitic peak arising due to the 157
presence of MWCNTs in the sample. The peaks observed at 32°, 38° and 44° correspond to the 158
standard body-centered cubic (bcc) phase of iron (JCPDS no. 06-0696) [36]. Three distinct 159
reflections, located at 2θ = 38° (311 reflection), 45.9° (400) and 67.1° (440), which were 160
assigned to γ-alumina [37] were also observed. Additional peaks observed at 36.5°, 44.0°, 161
51.5°and 61.5° are attributed to the presence of nano crystalline Ni-O [38]. 162
3.2. Effect of initial pH 163
Initially, zero point charge of the sorbent (pHzpc) was determined through the plots of 164
pHfinal versus change of initial and final pH (ΔpH) in 0.01M KNO3 solution. The pHzpc of NC 165
was found to be 7.2 (Fig.7). The effect of initial pH on the adsorption behavior Cd(II) and Cr(VI) 166
was examined using NC as the sorbent (Fig. 8). The pH was adjusted between 2 to 10 using 167
either hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide (0.1M). No efforts were made to maintain the pH 168
throughout the adsorption tests and equilibration was carried out for 2h. 169
Speciation diagram of Cr(VI) at various pH values [39] are depicted in Fig.9. It evident 170
that at acidic pH values, the predominant species of hexavalent chromium are salts of chromic 171
acid (H2CrO4), hydrogen chromate ion (HCrO4−) and chromate ion (CrO4
2−), depending on the 172
pH. H2CrO4 predominates at pHs less than about 1.0, HCrO4− at pHs between 1.0 and 6.0, and 173
CrO42− at pHs above about 6.0. The dichromate ion (Cr2O7
2−), a dimer of HCrO4−, is formed at 174
concentrations higher than 1 g/L. The equilibrium reactions between various forms chromium 175
ions could be depicted in the following equations [40, 41]. 176
177
H2CrO4 H+ + HCrO4
- (1) 178
HCrO4- H+ + CrO4
2- (2) 179
2HCrO4- Cr2O7
2- + H2O (3) 180
With increase in pH, the degree of protonation of the surface reduces gradually and hence 181
adsorption is decreased. Fig. 8 shows the decrease in Cr(VI) adsorption at high pH values. The 182
pHzpc of the sorbent was found to be 7.2. Thus below pH 7.2.5, the carboxylic groups and 183
hydroxyl groups of carbon are fully protonated. Thus an electrostatic interaction takes place 184
between the positively charged sorbent molecules and chromate anion. Further the hydroxyl 185
groups on the surface of NCs could act as electron donors and reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) [42]. 186
Thus, in further experiments the initial pH for Cr(VI) adsorption experiments were carried out at 187
pH 2. It was found that after equilibration the final pH was around 1.9. 188
Exactly a reverse effect is observed with cadmium ions. (Fig.8). Maximum adsorption is 189
observed in the pH range of 7.5 – 9.0. Cadmium ions exists as Cd2+, Cd(OH)+, Cd(OH)2 in the 190
pH range of 1 – 11 (fig.7b). Thus further experiments, were carried out at pH 7.5 to prevent 191
precipitation of Cd(OH)2. Since the pHzpc of NC is 7.2, at pH values >7.2 the surface of the 192
NCs are negatively charged arising due to the presence of carboxyl groups and there exists an 193
electrostatic interaction followed by the complexation of Cd(II) ions. It was also observed that 194
after equilibration the final pH changed from 7.5 to 6.19. This could be attributed to the release 195
of proton during the complexation and the inherent acidity of NCs. Experiments were also 196
conducted to evaluate the amount of catalyst metals ions namely Fe(III) and Ni(II) leached 197
during sorption. It was found that at pH ~ 2 (optimum pH for Cr(VI) adsorption) around 0.8 and 198
0.9 mg L-1 of Fe(III) and Ni(II) leached into the solution respectively and at pH 7.5 (optimum 199
pH for Cd(II)) the amount of Fe(III) and Ni(II) leached were found to be < 0.1 mg L-1 . 200
3.3 Sorption Equilibrium 201
Equilibrium studies were conducted at pH 2 for Cr(VI) and pH 7.0 for Cd(II). The 202
resulting data were analyzed with the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms. The data were found 203
to be best fitted the Langmuir isotherm, which assumes a monomolecular layer on the surface of 204
the adsorbent. The linearized form of the Langmuir isotherm equation is: 205
1/qe = 1/QbCe + 1/Q (4) 206
Where, qe is the amount of solute adsorbed (mg g-1) at equilibrium and Ce is the equilibrium 207
concentration (mg L-1). The empirical constants Q and b denote the monolayer capacity and 208
energy of adsorption, respectively, and were calculated from the slope and intercept of plot 209
between 1/Ce and 1/qe . 210
Fig. 10 describes the linearized Langmuir adsorption plots for the nanoclusters. The 211
maximum adsorption capacity for Cd(II) and Cr(VI) using NC as adsorbent was found to be 212
229.9 and 264.5 mg g-1 of NC respectively. The values obtained for various Langmuir constants 213
are shown in Table 1. Some of the earlier work using adsorbents like activated alumina, activated 214
carbon, MWCNT and functionalized MWCNT are listed in the Table 2. For example using 215
activated alumina and activated carbon Mor et al. [45] reported a capacity of 7.44 and 12.87 mg 216
g-1 for Cr(VI) respectively. Guanghhui et al [46] reported a nano composite consisting of 217
nanometer AlO(OH) loaded on the fiberglass with activated carbon fibers yielding a capacity of 218
128.5 mg g-1 towards Cd(II) removal. Comparing the carbon based or activated alumina based 219
adsorbents reported in the literature, to the best of our knowledge, the capacities obtained for 220
these two metals are the highest (Table 2). Enhanced capacities could be attributed to the 221
presence of amorphous carbon (as evident from Raman studies), CNT and alumina (evident from 222
XRD and FTIR studies) in the composite. In addition to their excellent adsorption capacity, the 223
presence of both CNTs and alumina will result in good mechanical and thermal stability [47,48]. 224
It should be worthwhile mentioning that these nano clusters were synthesized indigenously in 225
our laboratory and with these high capacities and stabilities have enormous potential as 226
adsorbents for the application in waste water treatment. 227
A further analysis of Langmuir model could be arrived based on a dimensionless equilibrium 228
parameter (RL) [49]. 229
01
1
bCRL +
= (6) 230
where Co is the initial concentration of Cr(VI) or Cd(II) and ‘b’ is the Langmuir adsorption 231
equilibrium constant (ml/mg). The value of RL indicates the isotherm shapes to be favorable 232
(0<RL<1), linear (RL =1), irreversible process (RL =0) or unfavorable process (RL <1). For an 233
initial concentration of 100 mg/l RL values for Cd(II) and Cr(VI) were found to be 0.599 and 234
0.592 respectively. These values suggest the adsorption of both the metal ions with NC is a 235
favorable process. 236
The freundlich equilibrium isotherm model describes adsorption by heterogeneous 237
energetic distribution of adsorption sites accompanied by interaction between solute molecules. 238
It is commonly expressed as 239
fee KCn
q loglog1
log += (7) 240
Where, qe is the amount of solute adsorbed (mg/g) at equilibrium and Ce is the equilibrium 241
concentration (mg L-1). The n and Kf are the Freundlich parameters, for values range 1 < n < 10, 242
which indicated adsorption is considered to be favorable. From the results (Table 1) it is evident 243
the values of n ranged from 1.38 to 1.84 with a regression coefficient of 0.88 to 0.97. These 244
values signify good affinity between the Cd(II)/Cr(VI) ions with the nano clusters. 245
3.4 Kinetic and Thermodynamic parameters 246
Kinetics studies were conducted to ascertain the time required to attain the equilibrium between 247
the adsorbent and Cd(II) and Cr(VI) solutions. In both Cd(II) and Cr(VI) amount adsorbed 248
increased rapidly and reached equilibrium at 1.5 and 2 h for Cr(VI) and Cd(II) respectively 249
(Fig.11). The kinetic adsorption parameters for both the systems were modeled by the pseudo 250
second order model [50]. 251
qe
t
qekqt
t +=2'
1 (8) 252
Where k’ the pseudo second-order rate constant of adsorption (g/mg/min) qe and qt are the 253
amounts of metal ion sorbed (mg g-1) at equilibrium and at time t, respectively. Linear plots of 254
t/qt Vs t for Cd(II) and Cr(VI) systems yielded straight line with correlation coefficients of 0. 255
992 and 0.999, respectively. The calculated values of various constants are tabulated in Table 3. 256
Further to ascertain, whether the adsorption through diffusion is the sole rate determining step, 257
the kinetic data obtained were modeled through Weber- Morris intraparticle diffusion model [51] 258
given by the following equation 259
Ctkqt += 5.0int )( (9) 260
Where qt is the amount of Cr(VI)/Cd(II) adsorbed at a given time t and kint is the intraparticle 261
diffusion constant. The plot obtained for Cd(II) and Cr(VI) with NCs are shown in Fig. 12. The 262
values obtained from this model are given in Table 3. It is evident from the plots that the slope of 263
the plot of qt Vs √t is not a straight line passing through the origin which confirms that in 264
addition to intraparticle diffusion, the adsorption process is controlled by chemisorptions and 265
external diffusion processes also. 266
The common thermodynamic parameters such as ΔS°, ΔH° and ΔG° were calculated from the 267
adsorption data [52]. First, Kc, the equilibrium constant was determined by eq. (3) 268
e
AC C
CK = (3) 269
where, CA( mg L-1) is the concentration of solute in the aqueous phase and Ce is the equilibrium 270
concentration (g/l). ΔG° was calculated using the following equation: 271
KcRTG ln−=Δ � (4) 272
where R is the gas constant, T is the temperature in Kelvin. Using Van’t Hoff equation (5) the 273
value of ΔS and ΔH was determined: 274
RT
HSKc
303.2303.2log
�� Δ−Δ= (5) 275
Based on the above-calculated data, a linear plot of log Kc vs. 1/T was drawn for both Cd(II) and 276
Cr(VI). Using these plots, ΔS° and ΔH° were determined from the intercept and slope, 277
respectively. The data obtained are presented in Table 4. Chemisorption is indicated by the 278
positive values of ΔS° and ΔH° for both metal ions. The positive value of the entropy indicates 279
the irreversibility and stability of adsorption [53]. Also, the negative value of ΔG° indicates the 280
feasibility and spontaneity of the process. 281
4 Conclusions 282
Novel floral nano clusters were synthesized by CVD using alumina as the substrate. The 283
prepared clusters were characterized by various spectral techniques and applied to the removal of 284
Cr(VI) and Cd(II). The adsorption equilibrium data were best fitted by Langmuir model. The 285
various model parameters were evaluated from the adsorption data. The monolayer adsorption 286
capacity calculated from the Langmuir model for NC (264.5 and 229.9 mg g-1 for Cr(VI) and 287
Cd(II) respectively)) was found to be considerably higher than that those reported in the 288
literature for other adsorbents. High capacity is attributed to the presence of activated alumina, 289
CNT, amorphous carbon and various surface functional groups such as carboxyl, carbonyl and 290
hydroxyl present in the clusters. Thus, indigenously prepared nanoclusters with very high surface 291
area, mechanical strength and adsorption potential paves way to the synthesis of unique brand of 292
adsorbents for cleaning up the environment. 293
Acknowledgement Funding from Organization for prevention of chemical weapons (OPCW) to 294
carry out this work is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank Department of 295
Science and Technology unit on Nanoscience at IIT Kanpur for providing the SEM facility. 296
297
References 298
[1] J. Sandler, M. S. P. Shaffer, T. Prasse, W. Bauhofer, K. Schulte, A. N. Windle, 299
Development of a dispersion process for carbon nanotubes in an epoxy matrix and the 300
resulting electrical properties, Polymer. 40(1999) 5967–5971. 301
[2] A. B. Dalton, S. Collins, E. Munoz, J. M. Razal, V. H. Ebron, J. P. Ferraries, J. N. 302
Coleman, B. G. Kim, R. H. Baughman, Super-tough carbon-nanotube fibers, Nature. 423 303
(2003) 703-706. 304
[3] A. Modi, N. Koratkar, E. Lass, B. Wei, P. M. Ajayan, Mi-niaturized gas ionization sensors 305
using carbon nanotubes, Nature. 424 (2003) 171–174. 306
[4] Y. Tian, B. Gao, V.L. Morales, L. Wu, Y. Wang, R. Muñoz-Carpena, C. Cao, Q. Huang, L. 307
Yang, Methods of using carbon nano tubes as filter media to remove aqueous metal ions, 308
Chem.Eng.J. 210(2012) 557-563. 309
[5] T.A. Kurniawan, M.E.T. Sillanpää, M.Sillanpää, Nanoadsorbents for remediation of 310
aquatic environment: Local and practical solutions for global water pollution problems, 311
Crit.Rev.Env.Sci.Technol. 42 (2012) 1233-1295. 312
[6] G.P. Rao, C.Lu, F.Su, Sorption of divalent metal ions from aqueous solutions using Carbon 313
nano tubes : A review, Sep.Pur.Technol. 58(2007) 224-231. 314
[7] M. A. Atoeh, O. Y. Bakather, B. A.Tawbini, A. A. Bukhari, F. A. Abuilaiwi, M. B. 315
Fettouhi, Effect of Carboxylic Functional Group Functionalized on Carbon Nanotubes 316
Surface on the Removal of Lead from Water, Bioinorg Chem Appl. (2010) 603978 DOI: 317
10.1155/2010/603978. 318
[8] I. Mobasherpour, E. Salahi, M. Ebrahimi, Removal of divalent nickel cations from 319
aqueous solution by multi-walled carbon nano tubes equilibrium and kinetic processes, 320
Res. Chem. Intermed. (2012) 38 2205–2222. 321
[9] Y. Li, F. Liu, B. Xia, Q. Du, P. Zhang, D. Wang, Z. Wang, Y. Xia, Removal of copper 322
from aqueous solution by carbon nanotube/calcium alginate composites, J. Hazard. 323
Mater.177 (2010) 876-880. 324
[10] Y. H. Li , J. Ding, Z. Luan, Z. Di, Y. Zhu, C. Xu, D. Wu, B. Wei, Competitive adsorption 325
of Pb , Cu and Cd ions from aqueous solutions by multiwalled carbon nanotubes, Carbon. 326
41 (2003) 2787-2792. 327
[11] A.F. Barbosa, M.G. Segatelli, A.C. Pereira, Solid-phase extraction system for Pb(II) ions 328
enrichment based on multiwall carbon nanotubes coupled on-line to flame atomic 329
absorption spectrometry, Talanta. 71 (2007) 1512–1519. 330
[12] M.R. Nabid, R. Sedghi, A. Bagheri, M. Behbahani, M. Taghizadeh, H.A. Oskooie, M.M. 331
Heravi, Preparation and application of poly(2-amino thiophenol)/MWCNTs 332
nanocomposite for adsorption and separation of cadmium and lead ions via solid phase 333
extraction, J. Hazard. Mater. 203- 204 (2012) 93- 100. 334
[13] M. Behbahani, A. Bagheri, M.M. Amini, O. Sadeghi, M. Salarian, F. Najafi, M. 335
Taghizadeh, Application of multiwalled carbon nanotubes modified by diphenylcarbazide 336
for selective solid phase extraction of ultra traces Cd(II) in water samples and food 337
products, Food Chem. 141 (2013) 48-53. 338
[14] A. Chakraborty, D. Deva, A. Sharma, N. Verma, Adsorbents based on carbon microfibers 339
and carbon nanofibers for the removal of phenol and lead from water, J. Colloid Interface 340
Sci. 359 (2011) 228–239. 341
[15] J. Song, S. Feng, J. Zhao, J. Zheng, Z. Zhu, Activated carbon catalyzing the formation 342
of carbon nanotubes, Mater. Res. Bull. 45 (2010) 1234-1237. 343
[16] V.M. Sivakumar, A.Z. Abdullah, A.R. Mohamed, S.P. Chai, Optimized parameters for 344
carbon nanotubes synthesis over Fe and Ni catalysts VIA methane CVD Rev.Adv. Mater. 345
Sci. 27 (2011) 25-30 346
[17] Z.-H. Huang, F. Zhang, M.-X. Wang, R. Lv, F. Kang, Growth of carbon nanotubes on 347
low-cost bamboo charcoal for Pb(II) removal from aqueous solution, Chem. Eng. J. 184 348
(2012) 193-197. 349
[18] J. Logeswari, A. Pandurangan, D. Sangeetha, An efficient catalyst for the large scale 350
production of multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50 (2011) 13347-351
13354. 352
[19] S. Maghsoodi, A. Khodadadi, Y. Mortazavi, A novel continuous process for synthesis 353
of carbon nanotubes using iron floating catalyst and MgO particles for CVD of methane in 354
a fluidized bed reactor, Appl. Surf. Sci. 256 (2010) 2769-2774. 355
[20] A.P.C. Teixeira, B.R.S. Lemos, L.A. Magalhaes, J.D. Ardisson, R.M. Lago, C.A. A.P. 356
Furtado, Santos, Temperature programmed CVD: A novel technique to investigate carbon 357
nanotube synthesis on FeMo/MgO catalysts, J Nanosci. Nanotechno.12 (2012) 2661-2667. 358
[21] Y. H. Li, S. Wang, A. Cao, D. Zhao, X. Zhang, C. Xu, Z. Luan, D. Ruan, J. Liang, D. 359
Wu, B. Wei, Adsorption of fluoride from water by amorphous alumina supported on 360
carbon nanotubes, Chem.Phy.lett. 350 (2001) 412–416 361
[22] Th. Dikonimos Makris, L. Giorgi, R. Giorgi, N. Lisi, E. Salernitano, CNT growth on 362
alumina supported nickel catalyst by thermal CVD, Diam. Relat. Mater. 14 (2005) 815–819 363
[23] R.N. Othman, I.A.Kinloch, A.N.Wilkinson, Synthesis and characterisation of silica-364
carbon nanotube hybrid microparticles and their effect on the electrical properties of 365
poly(vinyl alcohol) composites, Carbon. 60 (2013) 461-470 . 366
[24] A.K.M. Fazle Kibria, Y.H. Mo, K.S. Nahm, M.J. Kim, C Synthesis of narrow-diameter 367
carbon nanotubes from acetylene decomposition over an iron–nickel catalyst supported on 368
alumina, Carbon. 40 (2002) 1241. 369
[25] H.J. Jeong, K.H. An, S.C. Lim, M.-S. Park, J.-S. Chang, S.-Eon. Park, S.J. Eum, C.W. 370
Yang, C-Y. Park, Y.H. Lee, Narrow diameter distribution of singlewalled carbon nanotubes 371
grown on Ni–MgO by thermal chemical vapor deposition, Chem. Phys. Lett. 380 (2003) 372
263. 373
[26] S. Sen Gupta, K.G. Bhattacharyya, Kinetics of adsorption of metal ions on inorganic 374
materials: A review Adv. Colloid. Interfac. 162 (2011) 39-58. 375
[27] APHA. (1995). American Public Health Association, Standard Methods for the 376
Examination of Water and Wastewater AWWA-WPCF (17th edition). Washington, USA: 377
APHA. 378
[28] D.J. Yang, B. Paul, W.J. Xu, Y. Yuan, E.M. Liu, X.B. Ke, R.M. Wellard, C. Guo, Y. Xu, 379
Y.H. Sun, H.Y. Zhu Alumina nanofibers grafted with functional groups: a new design in 380
efficient sorbents for removal of toxic contaminants from water Water Res. 44 (2010) 381
741–750. 382
[29] K. Pyrzyn´ ska, M. Bystrzejewski, Comparative study of heavy metal ion sorption onto 383
activated carbon, carbon nano tubes and carbon-encapsulated magnetic nanoparticles, 384
Colloid Surface A. 362 (2010) 102 – 109. 385
[30] K. Dasgupta, S. Kar, R. Venugopalan, R.C. Bindal, S. Prabhakar, P.K. Tewari, S. 386
Bhattacharya, S.K. Gupta, D. Sathiyamoorthy, Self-standing geometry of aligned carbon 387
nanotubes with high surface area, Mater. Lett. 62 (2008) 1989 – 1992. 388
[31] Y-H.Li, S.Wang, X.Zhang, J.Wei, C.Xu, Z.Luan, D.Wu, Adsorption of fluoride from 389
water by aligned carbon nano tubes, Mater.Research.Bull. 38 (2003) 469 – 476. 390
[32] Y. Ying, R. K. Saini, F. Liang, A. K. Sadana, W. E. Billups, Functionalization of Carbon 391
Nanotubes by Free Radicals, Org. Lett. 5 (2003) 1471-1473. 392
[33] R. Saito, H. Kataura, Optical properties and Raman spectroscopy of carbon nanotubes. 393
Carbon nanotubes: synthesis, structure and applications. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 394
(2011) pp 213–47. 395
[34] V. Datsyuk, M. Kalyva, K. Papagelis, J. Parthenios, D. Tasis, A. Siokou, Chemical 396
oxidation of multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Carbon 46 (2008) 833–840. 397
[35] S. Osswald, M. Havel, Y. Gogotsi, Monitoring oxidation of multi-walled carbon 398
nanotubes by Raman spectroscopy, J Raman Spectrosc. 38 (2007) 728–736. 399
[36] F. Zhao, H. Duan, W. Wang, Synthesis and characterization of magnetic Fe/CNTs 400
composites with controllable Fe nanoparticle concentration, Physica B, 407 (2012) 2495–401
2499. 402
[37] Y. Rozita, R. Brydson and A.J. Scott , An investigation of commercial gamma-Al2O3 403
nanoparticles, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 241(2010) 012096, doi:10.1088/1742-404
6596/241/1/012096. 405
[38] J. Shi, E.Wu, A fast and facile synthesis of mesoporous nickel oxide Microporous and 406
Mesoporous Mater. 168 (2013) 188–194. 407
[39] Dionex, Determination of Cr(VI) in water, wastewater and solid waste extracts, Technical 408
Note 26 LPN 34398-01 1M 7/96, Dionex Corporation, 1996. http://www1.dionex.com/en-409
us/webdocs/4428_tn26.pdf 410
[40] N.R. Bishnoi, M.Bajaj, N.Sharma, A.Gupta, Adsorption of Cr(VI) on activated rice husk 411
carbon and activated alumina, Biores.Technol, 91 (2004)305 – 307. 412
[41] B.M. Weckhuysen, I.E. Wachs, R.A. Schoonheydt, Surface chemistry and spectroscopy 413
of chromium in inorganic oxides, Chem. Rev., 96 (1996), 3327–3349. 414
[42] P. Miretzky, A.F.Cirelli, Cr(VI) and Cr(III) removal from aqueous solution by raw and 415
modified lignocellulosic materials: A review, J. Hazard. Mater. 180 (2010) 1-19. 416
[43] M. A. Tofighy, T. Mohammadi, Adsorption of divalent heavy metal ions from water 417
using carbon nanotube sheets, J. Hazard. Mater.185 (2011) 140–147. 418
[44] Atlas of Eh-pH diagrams, Inter comparison of Thermodynamic databases. Geological 419
Survey of Japan, Open File Report No. 419. 420
[45] S. Mor, K. Ravindra, N.R. Bishnoi, Adsorption of chromium from aqueous solution by 421
activated alumina and activated charcoal, Bioresour. Technol, 98 (2007) 954-957. 422
[46] L. Guanghui, W. Peipei, L. Qiong, H.Wei, Removal of Cd (II) by Nanometer 423
AIO(OH)Loaded on Fiberglass with Activated Carbon Fiber Felt as Carrier, Chin. J. Chem. 424
Eng. 5 (2008) 805-811. 425
[47] L. Kumari , T. Zhang, G.H. Du, W.Z. Li , Q.W. Wang, A. Datye, K.H. Wu, Thermal 426
properties of CNT-Alumina nanocomposites, Compos.Sci.Technol, 68 (2008) 427
2178 – 2183. 428
[48] G.D. Zhan, J.D. Kuntz, J. Wan, A.K. Mukherjee, Single-wall carbon nanotubes as 429
attractive toughening agents in alumina-based nanocomposites. Nature Mater, 2 (2003) 430
38–42. 431
[49] N. Sankararamakrishnan, Dixit, A., Iyengar, L., Sangria, R. Removal of hexavalent 432
chromium using a novel cross linked xanthated chitosan, Bioresour.Technol. 97 (2006) 433
2377-2382. 434
[50] Y.S. Ho. Review of second-order models for adsorption systems, J.Hazard.Mater. 136B, 435
(2006) 681 – 689. 436
[51] W.J.Weber, J.C.Morris, Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solutions, 437
J.Sanit.Eng.Div.Am.Soc.Civ.Eng. 89 (1963) 31 – 60. 438
[52] P. Perrot, (1998). A to Z of Thermodynamics. Oxford University Press. 439
[53] L. Panda, B. Das, D. S. Rao, B. K. Mishra, Application of dolochar in the removal of 440
cadmium and hexavalent chromium ions from aqueous solutions. J. Hazard. Mater.192 441
(2011) 822–831. 442
[54] J. Hu, C. Chen, X. Zhu, X. Wang, Removal of chromium from aqueous solution by using 443
oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes, J. Hazard. Mater.162 (2009) 1542–1550. 444
[55] M. A. Atieh, O.Y. Bakather, B. S. Tawabini, A. A. Bukhari, M. Khaled, M. Alharthi, M. 445
Fettouhi, and F. A. Abuilaiwi, Removal of Chromium (III) from Water by Using Modified 446
and Non modified Carbon Nanotubes, J Nanomater. 2010 (2010) 9 pages. 447
[56] G. D. Vukovi, A. D. Marinkovi, M. Coli, M. E. Ristic, R. Aleksic, A. A. Peric-Grujic, P. 448
S. Uskokovic, Removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions by oxidized and 449
ethylenediamine-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Chem. Eng. J. 157 (2010) 450
238–248. 451
[57] O. Moradi, The Removal of Ions by Functionalized Carbon Nanotube:Equilibrium, 452
Isotherms and Thermodynamic Studies, Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 25 (2011) 229–240. 453
[58] Y. H. Li, S.Wang, Z. Luan, J. Ding, C. Xu, D. Wu, Adsorption of cadmium(II) from 454
aqueous solution by surface oxidized carbon nanotubes, Carbon 41(2003) 1057-1062. 455
[59] M. A. Atieh, Removal of Chromium (VI) from polluted water using carbon nanotubes 456
supported with activated carbon, Procedia Environ. Sci. 4 (2011) 281-293. 457
458
459
460
461
List of Figures 462
Fig.1 Schematic representation of vertical furnace CVD reactor containing activated alumina 463
Fig.2 SEM and EDAX and Elemental mapping of Nano Clusters 464
Fig.3 TEM image of Nano Clusters 465
Fig 4. FTIR spectra of Activated alumina, Plain CNT and Nano Clusters 466
Fig . 5 Raman Spectra of Nano clusters 467
Fig. 6 X-Ray Diffraction spectra of Nano Clusters 468
Fig.7 Determination of Zero point charge of NC in 0.01 M KNO3 469
Fig. 8 Effect of initial pH on the adsorption behavior of Cr(VI) and Cd(II) by NC 470
Fig. 9. Speciation diagram of Cr(VI). Source: Dionex [39] 471
Fig.10. Adsorption Isotherms and Linearized Langmuir adsorption Iostherms of Cr(VI) and 472
Cd(II) on nano clusters 473
Fig.11. Adsorption kinetics of Cd(II) and Cr(VI) on nano clusters 474
Fig.12 Weber-Morris Intraparticle diffusion model plot 475
List of Tables 476
Table 1. Langmuir and Freundlich Model Constants 477
Table 2. Comparison of adsorption capacities of CNT’s or Modified CNT’s as adsorbents for the 478
removal of Cadmium and Chromium ions 479
Table 3. Kinetic data for the adsorption of dichromate and Cd(II) by NC 480
Table 4. Thermodynamic parameters on the adsorption of Cr(VI) and Cd(II) on Nano Clusters 481
482
483
12
3
6
7
4
58
484
485
Fig.1 Schematic representation of vertical furnace CVD reactor containing activated 486
alumina 487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
1 Gas inlet 2 Gas outlet 3 Thermal sensor 4 Perforated disc 5 Sample holder 6 Moving furnace 7 Quartz tube 8 Activated alumina
499
500
501
Fig.2 SEM, EDAX and elemental images of Nano Clusters 502
(b)
(c) (d)
(f)
(a)
(g)(e)
(h)
503
504
505
506
507
Fig.3 TEM image of Nano Cluster 508
509
510
511
512
513
Fe/Ni catalyst particles
3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 50020
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Wavelength
% o
f Tra
nsm
itten
ce
3428
2923
1626
820
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
% o
f Tra
nsm
itten
ce
1628
A
B
C
A - Plain CNT
B - AA
C - NC
1634
575
3443
514 515
Fig 4. FTIR spectra of Activated alumina, Plain CNT and Nano Clusters (NC) 516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
Fig . 5 Raman Spectra of Nano clusters 531
532
533
534
535
536
537
D-Band G-Band
20 30 40 50 60 70 80120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
Ni-O
Ni-O
Ni-Oγ-
Alu
min
a (3
11)
γ-Alumina (400)
Inte
nsi
ty
Angle
γFe(
111)
αFe(
110)CN
T(0
02)
γ-Alumina (440)
Ni-O
538 539
540
Fig. 6 X-Ray Diffraction spectra of Nano Clusters 541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
Fig.7 Determination of Zero point charge of NC in 0.01 M KNO3 552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
Fig.8 Effect of initial pH on the adsorption behavior of Cr(VI) and Cd(II) by NC 575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
Fig. 9.a. Speciation diagram of Cr(VI). Source: Dionex [39], b. Eh-pH diagram of Cd(II) 587
species [44] 588
589
590
(a)
(b)
591
592
593
594
595
0 200 400 600 800 1000 12000
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.080.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
1/q
e
1/Ce
R2 0.97Intercept 0.00435
Slope 0.64216
0.000
0.008
0.016
0.024
0.032R2 0.92737Intercept 0.00378Slope 0.54715
Cd(II)Cr(VI)
Am
ou
nt
of
Cr(
VI)
/Cd
(II)
ad
sorb
ed (
mg
/g)
Equilibrium Concentration (Ce) (mg/l)
596
597
Fig.10 Adsorption Isotherms and Linearized Langmuir adsorption Iostherms of Cr(VI) 598
and Cd(II) on nano clusters 599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
Fig.11. Adsorption kinetics of Cr(VI) and Cd(II) on nano clusters 611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.460
80
100
120
140
160 Cd(II) Cr(VI)
Am
ou
nt
of
Cr(
VI)
/Cd
(II)
ad
sorb
ed (
mg
/g)
(t)0.5
627
Fig.12 Weber-Morris Intraparticle diffusion model plot 628
629
630
631
632
Table 1. Langmuir and Freundlich Model Constants 633
634
Langmuir Constants Freundlich constants Species
Qmax
(mg/g)
b R2
RL
(Co = 100 mg/l) n kf R2
Cd(II) 229.9 0.0067 0.97 0.599 1.845 7.727 0.88
Cr(VI) 264.5 0.0069 0.93 0.592 1.382 3.249 0.97
635
636
637
638
Table 2. Comparison of adsorption capacities of CNTs or Modified CNTs as adsorbents for the removal of Cadmium and Chromium ions
Adsorbent pH Metal Ion Capacity (mg/g)
Reference
CNT sheets 7.0
Cd(II) 92.59
[43]
MWCNT 5.0 Cd(II) 10.86
[10]
Oxidized MWCNT 2.0 Cr(VI) 2.69
[54]
Non modified Carbon nanotubes
7.0 Cr(III) 0.37
[55]
CNT (Amino-functionlization)
8.0 Cd(II) 25.7
[56]
SWCNTs-COOH 5.0 Cd(II) 77.00
[57] AlO(OH) loaded activated carbon fiber
5.8
Cd(II)
142.85
[46]
Oxidized CNT 6.5 Cd(II) 128.5
[58]
Activated Carbon supported CNT 3.0 Cr(VI)
9.0
[59]
Activated alumina-CNT nano clusters 2.0 Cr(VI) 264.5 Present Work
Activated alumina-CNT nano clusters 7.5 Cd(II) 229.9 Present Work
Table 3. Kinetic data for the adsorption of dichromate and Cd(II) by NC
Pseudo Second Order model constants Weber-Morris Model Analyte
Qe (mg/g) K’
(gmg-1h-1)
R2 Kint
(mgg-1h-0.5)
R2
Cr(VI) 142.8 0.025 0.992 63.044 0.80
Cd(II) 200.0 00.049 0.999 44.692 0.88
Table 4. Thermodynamic parameters on the adsorption of Cr(VI) and Cd(II) on Nano Clusters
Ion t (°C) T(K) 1/T CA(g/l) Ce(g/l) Kc lnKc Log Kc ∆G(kJ/mol) ∆S (J/mol) ∆H [kJ/(mol/K)]
25 298 0.00335 0.09219 0.0078 11.804 2.468 1.072 -6.1188
35 308 0.00324 0.08044 0.0196 4.112 1.414 0.614 -3.6226 -27.08 -73.18
Cd(II)
45 318 0.00314 0.0649 0.0351 1.849 0.615 0.267 -1.6258
25 298 0.00335 0.08723 0.0128 6.831 1.921 0.834 -47.6292
35 308 0.00324 0.07892 0.0211 3.744 1.320 0.573 -33.8207 -14.465 -405.5
Cr(VI)
45 318 0.00314 0.07098 0.0290 2.446 0.894 0.388 -23.6581
Research Highlights
Synthesis of Nanoclusters of Fe doped CNT and AA for the first time Structural characterization High surface area, hence a very high adsorption capacity Removal of both cationic and anionic contaminant (Cd(II) and Cr(VI)) Potential candidate for cleaning variety of water contaminants.