competitiveness of the polish agriculture sector after 4 years of eu membership

38
Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership Miroslaw Zielinski Unilob Poland

Upload: karly-mendez

Post on 02-Jan-2016

24 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership Miroslaw Zielinski Unilob Poland. Short characteristic of Polish agriculture. All pictures : 10.000 meters altitude. ldfhlflf. small, carved-up farms poor living standards ¼ of population → 6% GDP. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Miroslaw Zielinski

Unilob Poland

Page 2: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Short characteristic of Polish agriculture

Page 3: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Page 4: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

All pictures :

10.000 meters altitude

Page 5: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

ldfhlflf

Page 6: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

-small, carved-up farms

-poor living standards

- ¼ of population → 6% GDP.

Page 7: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Relatively young and active population

Page 8: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Dichotomic farming sectorDichotomic farming sectorSince 1989 Polish agriculture and rural areas have undergone tremendous changes but still are way behind the rest of the economy.

Today there are almost 3 mln farms, 2/3 of them > 1ha

Average farm size: 6,59 ha (all farms included)

Average farm size: 8,44 ha (in the group of farms > 1ha)

Huge regional diversity: Northern regions – average 14 ha, Southern only 2,1 ha

Size of farms Share in farm number

Share in farming land

Smallest farms < 2ha 47,1% 5,8%

Largest farms > 50ha 0,8% 26,7%

Page 9: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

                                                     

                                                                

Page 10: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Share and place of Polish agriculture in Europe (in %)

Main Agricultural Production

Page 11: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Main Agricultural Production

Poland occupies the leading position in apple, in all types of berries and outdoor vegetables, e.g. onions, cabbage and cauliflowers production.

•   poultry •   sausages and hams•   meat (pigs, cows, horses)•   flowers•   milk and milk related products•   eggs

Other main EU export products:

Page 12: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Agricultural holdings = small areas + to many employees + not effective production means

Individual farmers – mostly self sustainable approach.

Animal production - small intensity of breeding. Market-oriented holdings – developing and growing fast. 

Agricultural production conditions differ in Poland, especially as compared to EU agriculture.

Page 13: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

ldfhlflf

Page 14: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

ldfhlflf

Page 15: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

ldfhlflf

Page 16: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

ldfhlflf

Page 17: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

ldfhlflf

Page 18: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Available at our web: www.unilob.pl/agro2007.pdf

Page 19: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Current strength of Polish agriCurrent strength of Polish agri--foodfood tradetrade

between Poland and EUbetween Poland and EU

In 2006, the process of increasing importance of EU countries as trading partners for Poland continued.

In the export structure of 2006, EU Member States constituted 76.8%, and goods imported from the European Union – 63.1%.

The second largest group of Poland’s trading partners is the Commonwealth of Independent States, with 10.1% share in the export and 2.9% in the import of Poland.

Foreign trade in agri-food products in 2005-2006 broken down by groups of states (EUR million)

Page 20: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2002 2004 2005 2006 2007

Import

Export

Source: Polish Food Conquers Europe, “Rzeczpospolita”

In bn euro

Current strength of Polish agriCurrent strength of Polish agri--foodfood tradetrade between Poland and EUbetween Poland and EU

Page 21: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Primary fears of EU accession related to agriculture

Page 22: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

• Importance of sharing experience with potential future EU members

• History - Potential estimated costs of adjustment processes and integration

• Fears: 1. Shortage of own funds or low state budget will not allow to use structural funds,

2. Inflow of agricultural products,

3. Complicated bureaucratic rules to comply with,

4. Restrictions in production – quotas,

5. Closing down many agri-food enterprises,

6. Big cost of compliance and adjusting to EU hygienic regulations,

7. Foreigners will buy the Polish land

Page 23: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Public opinions – statistical information

after 4 years of EU membership

Page 24: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Public perception  

The public opinion research conducted in April 2007:- 86% of citizens declares themselves EU votaries- 7% declares themselves as opponents.

Public satisfaction with EU membership

86%

7% 7%votaries

opponents

neutral

High level of public acceptance to EU proves we are satisfied with membership. The level of EU supporters is growing year by year.

Page 25: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

In August 2004 39% of citizens were convinced that integration brings more advantages than loses.

 After 4 the first 3 positive effects graduated almost equally to:

• 35% open borders and freedom of traveling within EU• 35% benefits to agriculture and farmers• 30% open labor market for Polish citizens  

In 2008 75% of Poles agree with benefits to agriculture – that is 16% more than in 2007.

The most comfortable group are farmers (55%) and employees at individual (62%)

According to Center of Public Opinion Research (CBOS):

Page 26: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Governmental opinions:  

- agricultural sector + rural areas, significantly influenced by the effects of the economic growth, - establishment of new jobs, - possibility to influence the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), - Polish foreign trade in agri-food products demonstrate that agriculture and processing are doing well, 

- Polish food recognized in Europe and beyond.

Page 27: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT 

Domestic and European Union funds

- Since 2004 more resources goes to agricultural and rural support.

- Polish + EU budgets for implementation of the CAP and structural programmes.  

- In 2004-2006, totalled PLN 89,800 million.

Domestic and European Union funds for agricultural and rural support in2004-2006

Page 28: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Domestic and European Union funds for agricultural and rural support in 2004-2006

(excluding KRUS)

0

2

4

6

8

10

2004 2005 2006

Domestic

EU

In bn PLN

Page 29: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Growth of prices of agricultural land

and

negotiated temporary protective periods

in land turnover

Page 30: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Land prices vary greatly from region to region. New owners are mostly seeking to take land out of agricultural use, in order that they might gain higher prices from its sale.

The prices of agricultural land in Poland < UE-27 average but > Czech Republic & Lithuania.

Page 31: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Projections of price increase for the agricultural land: -         direct farming subsidies,-         agricultural production financially rewarding,-         the demand for land exceeds supply. Polish Land More Expensive Than German  

In Brandenburg, in early 2008 the land was cheaper than in Poland wherehe price amounted €2729 per hectare.

Negotiated temporary protective periods in land turnover

- sensitive negotiations with EU

- the longest 12-year protective period in land turnover

- exemptions to individual farmers who lease and cultivate the land for 3-7 years

- ways of evading land turnover limitation

Page 32: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Benefits and disadvantages of EU accession

 

Page 33: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Benefits for agriculture:

- Direct supplemental payments for land cultivation

- EU subsidies for farmers for complying with environment protection rules,

- Subsidies for farmers for cultivating deficit agricultural products

- Improved products quality and hygienic standards of cultivation and farming

- Abolition of trade limitation among EU members countries

- Limitation of food import from non EU markets decreases the competition

- Food export subventions for farmers

- Polish farmers receive earlier and higher pensions

 

Page 34: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Disadvantages for agriculture:

- High cost of introduction of EU norms

- Direct land supplemental payments makes the some farmers lazy

- Unequal subsidies within EU lower competitiveness

- Lower ability to obtain subsidy and structural funds

-Often empty promises of big money out of reach

Page 35: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

Summary - Conclusions

The accession of Poland to the European Union turned out to be beneficial.

The Polish market was not flooded with the products from EU.

The Polish exports increased.

The labor productivity and the quality of products is higher.

Page 36: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

3 summary points

• Farmers are the first, the biggest direct beneficiares of EU integration,

• Polish agricultural products turn to be competitive at UE market,

• Integration with EU caused improvement of market conditions of Polish agriculture.

Page 37: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

WWW.UNILOB.PL

Page 38: Competitiveness of the Polish Agriculture Sector after 4 Years of EU Membership

Unilob – Miroslaw Zielinski