comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene,...

6
Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on- Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Milošev, Simon Kovač, Rihard Trebše, Vesna Levašič, and Venčeslav Pišot J Bone Joint Surg Am Volume 94(19):1756-1763 October 3, 2012 ©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Upload: lucas-ramsey

Post on 18-Jan-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Bar graph showing the percentage of major diagnoses at the time of the index operation for patients who received the various types of bearings. Bar graph showing the percentage of major diagnoses at the time of the index operation for patients who received the various types of bearings. MOM = metal-on-metal bearing, MOP = metal-on-polyethylene bearing, COC = ceramic-on-ceramic bearing, OA = osteoarthritis, ONFH = osteonecrosis of the femoral head, OASD = osteoarthritis secondary to dysplasia, PT = posttraumatic disorder, RA = rheumatoid arthritis, ID = other inflammatory diseases, and “other” = other diseases. Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1756-1763 ©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Miloev,

Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or

Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings

by Ingrid Milošev, Simon Kovač, Rihard Trebše, Vesna Levašič, and Venčeslav Pišot

J Bone Joint Surg AmVolume 94(19):1756-1763

October 3, 2012

©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Page 2: Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Miloev,

Bar graph showing the percentage of major diagnoses at the time of the index operation for patients who received the various types of bearings.

Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1756-1763

©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Page 3: Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Miloev,

Photograph showing the BICON-PLUS cementless acetabular cup (center) and the three different bearing couples: the polyethylene bearing (at right), the ceramic bearing (left, rear), and the

metal bearing (left, front) (Plus Orthopedics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland...

Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1756-1763

©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Page 4: Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Miloev,

Photograph showing the SL-PLUS cementless femoral stem (Plus Orthopedics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland, now Smith & Nephew).

Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1756-1763

©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Page 5: Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Miloev,

Comparison of mean age and mean postoperative activity for patients with three different bearing couples.

Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1756-1763

©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Page 6: Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Miloev,

Survivals for the BICON-PLUS cups with different bearing couples: metal-on-polyethylene (MOP), metal-on-metal (MOM), and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC), with revision for any reason (Fig. 4-a) and

revision due to aseptic loosening (Fig. 4-b) as the end points.

Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1756-1763

©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.