comparison of cleaning methods for thin film surfaces

16
Comparison of Cleaning Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Methods for Thin Film Surfaces Surfaces Lena Johnson, Mitch Challis, Ross Lena Johnson, Mitch Challis, Ross Robinson, Richard Sandberg Robinson, Richard Sandberg Group 4 Group 4 English 316 Oral Report English 316 Oral Report June 16, 2003 June 16, 2003

Upload: vern

Post on 23-Feb-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Lena Johnson, Mitch Challis, Ross Robinson, Richard Sandberg Group 4 English 316 Oral Report June 16, 2003. Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces. Applications for EUV Light Research. Multilayer Mirrors. EUV Lithography. EUV Astronomy. EUV Microscopes. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

Comparison of Cleaning Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film SurfacesMethods for Thin Film Surfaces

Lena Johnson, Mitch Challis, Ross Robinson, Lena Johnson, Mitch Challis, Ross Robinson, Richard SandbergRichard Sandberg

Group 4Group 4English 316 Oral ReportEnglish 316 Oral Report

June 16, 2003June 16, 2003

Page 2: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

EUV Lithography

Images from www.schott.com/magazine/english/info99/

EUV AstronomyEUV Microscopes

www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/xray-inside-cells.html

Applications for EUV Light ResearchMultilayer Mirrors

Page 3: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

How small is that?How small is that? Want to reflect EUV (extreme Want to reflect EUV (extreme

ultraviolet) light (50-5 nm or 10ultraviolet) light (50-5 nm or 10-7 -7 cm)cm)

Image from http://imagers.gsfc.nasa.gov/ems/waves3.html

Page 4: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

The ProblemThe Problem Organic contaminants collect on the Organic contaminants collect on the

surface (Junk).surface (Junk).– Interferes with measuring optical Interferes with measuring optical

constantsconstants

Example with visible lightExample with visible light

Page 5: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

QuestionQuestion: : How do we effectively remove contaminants?How do we effectively remove contaminants?

OutlineOutline1.1. Measurement Measurement

methodsmethods2.2. Cleaning methods Cleaning methods

-Opticlean-Opticlean®®

-Plasma Etch-Plasma Etch-UV lamp-UV lamp

3.3. ConclusionsConclusions

Page 6: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

Video Video Measurement methodMeasurement method

– EllipsometryEllipsometry

Cleaning methods testedCleaning methods tested– OpticleanOpticlean– UV LampUV Lamp– Plasma EtchPlasma Etch

Page 7: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

450

14318 16

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Add

ition

al T

hick

ness

)

1

Short Exposure Contamination Experiment (10 sec)

Spit onTouched with bare fingers (10s)Dipped in Deionized W aterTouched and rubbed with latex glove (10s)

Page 8: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

OpticleanOpticlean®® Process leaves Process leaves hydrocarbon residuehydrocarbon residue

• Opticlean® significantly removes contaminants, but leaves a residue

• Ellipsometric ResultsOpticlean® residuethickness on two runs:1) 17 Ångstroms2) 22 Ångstroms

• Opticlean® made by Dantronix Research and Technologies, LLC

• Ellipsometer Type: J.A. Woollam Co., Inc Multi-Wavelength Ellipsometer (EC110)

http://www.dantronix.com

http://www.jawoollam.com/

Page 9: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

Does the OpticleanDoes the Opticlean®®

process damage process damage thin films?thin films?

Scanning Electron Scanning Electron Microscope showed no thin Microscope showed no thin film damage, nor trace of film damage, nor trace of materials used in thin films materials used in thin films on pulled of on pulled of OpticleanOpticlean® ®

films (U, Sc, Va).films (U, Sc, Va).

X-Ray Photoelectron X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy found no Spectroscopy found no trace of materials used in trace of materials used in thin films on pulled of thin films on pulled of OpticleanOpticlean® ® ..

Page 10: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

XPS revealed components of OpticleanOpticlean®®, but not heavier metals used in thin films.

Prominent thin-film lines: U-380 eV, V-515 eV, Sc-400 eV

Photon Energy (eV)

Pho

tons

(Cou

nts)

97 eV (Si 2p)

148 eV (Si 2s)

281 eV (C 1s)527 eV (O 1s)684 eV (F 1s)

Page 11: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

Cleaning residue with “Matrix” Cleaning residue with “Matrix” Plasma EtchPlasma Etch

RF Plasma Etching with ORF Plasma Etching with O2 2 PlasmaPlasma– 0.120 Torr Pressure0.120 Torr Pressure– 250W RF (max 350)250W RF (max 350)– 0.75 SCCM O0.75 SCCM O22 flow flow– No extra heat appliedNo extra heat applied

Good for removing Good for removing polymers, but not bulk polymers, but not bulk contaminants (i.e. Dust)contaminants (i.e. Dust)

Oxygen plasma plus Oxygen plasma plus mechanical sputtering mechanical sputtering removes surface layersremoves surface layers

RF

Page 12: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

Plasma ResultsPlasma ResultsMatrix System

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Minutes In Plasma

Cha

nge

in th

ickn

ess

(Å)

Page 13: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

UV Lamp UV Lamp

Page 14: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

UV ResultsUV Results

UV Lamp

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

0 5 10 15 20 25

Time Under UV Lamp (s)

Cha

nge

in

Thic

knes

s (

Ǻ)

Page 15: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

ConclusionConclusion

Recommended Procedure:Recommended Procedure:– UV lamp for 5 minutesUV lamp for 5 minutes

Method Effectiveness Cleaning Time Ease of Use Notes

Opticlean® Left residue Must wait for polymer to cure

Can be difficult to peel off.

Good for dust etc..

Oxygen Plasma Effective. Cl not completely removed

Setup takes a few minutes. Clean under a minute

Equipment in clean room. Complex to

setup.

Builds up silicon dioxide

Eximer UV Lamp Effective 1 to 5 minutes Very easy Less silicon dioxide

buildup then plasma.

Opticlean® + Oxygen Plasma

Effective Possible 1 Å residue or oxide

Long, plasma setup and polymer

cure time.

Complex clean room equipment

and skill needed to peel

Page 16: Comparison of Cleaning Methods for Thin Film Surfaces

ConclusionConclusion

Recommended Procedure:Recommended Procedure:– UV lamp for 5 minutesUV lamp for 5 minutes

Method Effectiveness Cleaning Time Ease of Use Notes

Opticlean® Left residue Must wait for polymer to cure

Can be difficult to peel off.

Good for dust etc..

Oxygen Plasma Effective. Cl not completely removed

Setup takes a few minutes. Clean under a minute

Equipment in clean room. Complex to

setup.

Builds up silicon dioxide

Eximer UV Lamp Effective 1 to 5 minutes Very easy Less silicon dioxide

buildup then plasma.

Opticlean® + Oxygen Plasma

Effective Possible 1 Å residue or oxide

Long, plasma setup and polymer

cure time.

Complex clean room equipment

and skill needed to peel