comparing renewable sources of energy a presentation by jinita shah, jonathan li, and melissa king
TRANSCRIPT
Comparing Renewable Sources of
Energy
Comparing Renewable Sources of
Energy
A Presentation by Jinita Shah, Jonathan Li, and Melissa King
A Presentation by Jinita Shah, Jonathan Li, and Melissa King
Why Worry About Alternatives?
Why Worry About Alternatives?
• Fossil fuels are limited• Burning of fossil fuels produces harmful greenhouse gases• Increase in greenhouse gases are believed to be the cause of
global warming• Rapid changes in temperature will have extreme effects on
ecosystems and natural processes such as wind patterns
• Fossil fuels are limited• Burning of fossil fuels produces harmful greenhouse gases• Increase in greenhouse gases are believed to be the cause of
global warming• Rapid changes in temperature will have extreme effects on
ecosystems and natural processes such as wind patterns
http://www.illinoisfamily.org/content/img/f32925/global-warming.jpg http://www.politicaldogs.org/news/global-warming.gifhttp://www.inkcinct.com.au/Web/CARTOONS/2005-256C--global-warming.gif
Thesis StatementThesis Statement
“Through the comparison of four renewable sources of energy (wind, solar, nuclear, and water), we propose that a combination of wind and solar energy is the best possible solution to the current energy problem we are facing”.
“Through the comparison of four renewable sources of energy (wind, solar, nuclear, and water), we propose that a combination of wind and solar energy is the best possible solution to the current energy problem we are facing”.
Wind PowerWind Power
LocationLocation• Practical where average wind speed is 10 mph
or greater• Ideal location:
• Near constant flow of non-turbulent wind yearlong• Wouldn’t suffer from sudden bursts of powerful wind• Higher altitudes There are minimum temperature
operating limits• Warmer than -20 degrees celsius
• Practical where average wind speed is 10 mph or greater
• Ideal location: • Near constant flow of non-turbulent wind yearlong• Wouldn’t suffer from sudden bursts of powerful wind• Higher altitudes There are minimum temperature
operating limits• Warmer than -20 degrees celsius
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
http://www.nmm.ac.uk/upload/img_400/Wind-turbine.jpg
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Usage of Wind Power in the United States
Usage of Wind Power in the United States
Investment Required/Cost of Production
Investment Required/Cost of Production
• In the US: cost now lower than the cost of fuel-generated electric power
• 5.6 US cents per kilowatt hour • Requires a lot of land• Effects aesthetics of the area• Noisy
• In the US: cost now lower than the cost of fuel-generated electric power
• 5.6 US cents per kilowatt hour • Requires a lot of land• Effects aesthetics of the area• Noisy
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
http://www.kidzworld.com/img/upload/article/a1181i0_bsc.jpg
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
http://www.barrhill.org.uk/windfarm/noise/4-BWEA%20Are%20wind%20turbines%20noisy_files/noise.gif
Time ConsumedTime Consumed
• The wind is translated directly to the generators to create energy almost instantaneously.
• The wind is translated directly to the generators to create energy almost instantaneously.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
http://www.ourwind.org/windcoop/graphics/TurbineGraphs/Goldendale/Goldendale_powercurve_1105.jpg
EffectivenessEffectiveness
• Average output of one megawatt of wind power is equivalent to the average consumption of about 160 American households.
• Average output of one megawatt of wind power is equivalent to the average consumption of about 160 American households.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
http://www.stratobox.com/wind-turbines/images/bonus.jpg
Pros for Wind EnergyPros for Wind Energy
• Little pollution
• Renewable resource
• Long-term potential
• Low-cost
• Clearing of wooded areas is often unnecessary
• Little pollution
• Renewable resource
• Long-term potential
• Low-cost
• Clearing of wooded areas is often unnecessary
Cons for Wind EnergyCons for Wind Energy
• Highly taxed• Environmental hazard to flying animals• Aesthetics• Loud• Because of their look and their noise they may
cause depreciation of property value
• Highly taxed• Environmental hazard to flying animals• Aesthetics• Loud• Because of their look and their noise they may
cause depreciation of property value
Solar EnergySolar Energy
Usable energy from the light of the Sun Usable energy from the light of the Sun
LocationLocation
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
The colors in the map show the average available solar energy on the surface (data from 1991 to 1993). For comparison, the dark disks mark the land area required to supply the primary energy demand in the year 2010. (http://www.ez2c.de/ml/solar_land_area/)
The colors in the map show the average available solar energy on the surface (data from 1991 to 1993). For comparison, the dark disks mark the land area required to supply the primary energy demand in the year 2010. (http://www.ez2c.de/ml/solar_land_area/)
Applications
Applications
• Heating (hot water, building heat, cooking, lighting)
• Electricity generation (photovoltaic cells, heat engines)
• Heating (hot water, building heat, cooking, lighting)
• Electricity generation (photovoltaic cells, heat engines)
BiofuelsBiofuels
• Any fuels derived from biomass
• Energy of the Sun is “captured” through photosynthesis.
• Biodegradable• You get more fuel
energy in your tank than the amount of fossil energy used to get it there
• Any fuels derived from biomass
• Energy of the Sun is “captured” through photosynthesis.
• Biodegradable• You get more fuel
energy in your tank than the amount of fossil energy used to get it there
http://www.biofuels4oregon.com/biofuels/ebgraph
Energy ConversionEnergy Conversion
LIGHT
LIGHT
-Skylights
DIRECT-Photovoltaic Cells
-Solar sails of spacecrafts
INDIRECTHydroelectric dams
ELECTRICITY
DIRECTHeats solar thermal collector
INDIRECTOean thermal energy
HEAT
Photosynthesis > Biofuels Fossil Fuels
CHEMICAL
SOLAR ENERGY
LIGHT
LIGHT
-Skylights
DIRECT-Photovoltaic Cells
-Solar sails of spacecrafts
INDIRECTHydroelectric dams
ELECTRICITY
DIRECTHeats solar thermal collector
INDIRECTOean thermal energy
HEAT
Photosynthesis > Biofuels Fossil Fuels
CHEMICAL
SOLAR ENERGY
Residue management
Residue management
• Pollution free during use• Wastes manageable using existing
pollution controls• End-of-use recycling technologies
under development
• Pollution free during use• Wastes manageable using existing
pollution controls• End-of-use recycling technologies
under development
ProsPros
• The amount of solar energy intercepted by the Earth every minute is greater than the amount of fossil fuel the world uses every year
• Pollution free during use
• Grid connected solar electricity reduces transmission/distribution losses
• Low operating costs
• The amount of solar energy intercepted by the Earth every minute is greater than the amount of fossil fuel the world uses every year
• Pollution free during use
• Grid connected solar electricity reduces transmission/distribution losses
• Low operating costs
ConsCons
• Limited power density
• Intermittency
• Locations at high altitudes/substantial cloud cover
• AC > DC
• Limited power density
• Intermittency
• Locations at high altitudes/substantial cloud cover
• AC > DC
Nuclear EnergyNuclear Energy
What is Nuclear Energy?
What is Nuclear Energy?
• Nuclear energy utilizes nuclear fission, breaking apart the element: uranium-235.
• Massive amounts of energy is released, evaporating water into steam.
• We then use steam turbines to generate electricity.• Similar to fossil fuel, the full potential of nuclear energy has not yet
been reached.
• Nuclear energy utilizes nuclear fission, breaking apart the element: uranium-235.
• Massive amounts of energy is released, evaporating water into steam.
• We then use steam turbines to generate electricity.• Similar to fossil fuel, the full potential of nuclear energy has not yet
been reached.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
EffectivenessEffectiveness• One nuclear plant can approximately generate
around a million kilowatts. And run for a 100 years.
• 7% of the worlds energy and 17% of the world’s electricity. 20% of USA’s electricity.
• USA provides the most nuclear energy.• 80% of France’s electricity is produced from
nuclear.• Supports 366GW as of 2005, 25GW worth of
power plants are under construction. • 441 power plants in the world.
• One nuclear plant can approximately generate around a million kilowatts. And run for a 100 years.
• 7% of the worlds energy and 17% of the world’s electricity. 20% of USA’s electricity.
• USA provides the most nuclear energy.• 80% of France’s electricity is produced from
nuclear.• Supports 366GW as of 2005, 25GW worth of
power plants are under construction. • 441 power plants in the world.
Is it convenient and versatile?
Is it convenient and versatile?
• Nuclear energy power plants can be installed anywhere with sufficient space.
• Nuclear energy can power typical equipments in households, to submarines and aircraft carriers.
• However it cannot replace fossil fuels required for airplanes.
• Nuclear energy power plants can be installed anywhere with sufficient space.
• Nuclear energy can power typical equipments in households, to submarines and aircraft carriers.
• However it cannot replace fossil fuels required for airplanes.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Waste?Waste?• Nuclear energy produces a very little
amount of green house gases.• It is cheap like wind energy.• It produces exhausted radioactive
wastes (plutonium) that must be properly buried.
• Nuclear energy produces a very little amount of green house gases.
• It is cheap like wind energy.• It produces exhausted radioactive
wastes (plutonium) that must be properly buried.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
The Future?The Future?• Nuclear energy is the youngest
source of energy.• Nuclear energy is improving, it is
rather safe now. • Nuclear energy is evolving:
hydrogen fuel cell cars.
• Nuclear energy is the youngest source of energy.
• Nuclear energy is improving, it is rather safe now.
• Nuclear energy is evolving: hydrogen fuel cell cars.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Hydro EnergyHydro Energy
• Utilizes the flow of water to power turbines and mills.• There are 5 types of Hydro Energy: Waterwheels, Hydroelectric energy, Tidal Power, Tidal Steam, Wave Power.
• Utilizes the flow of water to power turbines and mills.• There are 5 types of Hydro Energy: Waterwheels, Hydroelectric energy, Tidal Power, Tidal Steam, Wave Power.
EffectivenessEffectiveness
• Hydro Energy is mainly converted to electricity.
• Supplies 715000MWe (19% of the world’s electricity)
• Cheaper than fossil fuels and nuclear energy
• Hydro Energy is mainly converted to electricity.
• Supplies 715000MWe (19% of the world’s electricity)
• Cheaper than fossil fuels and nuclear energy
Is it convenient?Is it convenient?
• Can only be installed in places with a water source.
• Often limited by its environment.• Needs to relocate people when
constructing dams.• No cost of fuel.
• Can only be installed in places with a water source.
• Often limited by its environment.• Needs to relocate people when
constructing dams.• No cost of fuel.
Waste?Waste?
• No harmful gas emissions.• Possibility of producing a very
insignificant amount of methane gases due to dead plants in the reservoir.
• No harmful gas emissions.• Possibility of producing a very
insignificant amount of methane gases due to dead plants in the reservoir.
The Future?The Future?
• Hydro energy is still evolving.• Tidal stream power mills are still
developing.• Blue energy: chemical process of
separating salt water from fresh water.
• Hydro energy is still evolving.• Tidal stream power mills are still
developing.• Blue energy: chemical process of
separating salt water from fresh water.
Wind Solar Hydro Nuclear
Pros Little pollutionPollution free during use
Pumped storage plants most significant means of storing energy
Low emission rate of greenhouse gases
Low capital and operating costs
Low operating costs Low cost production Pretty reliable
Long term potential
Large amounts of energy intercepted by the Earth
Negligible environmental effects of small scale hydro power
Clearing of wooden areas is unnecessary
Little maintenance needed after initial setup
Cons Highly taxed Large capital costsLittle potential of tidal power
Not all countries have required technology
Environmental hazard to flying animals
Locations at high altitudes/cloud cover
Building dams causes environmental problems
Radioactive wastes cause environmental problems
Disruptive to aesthetics
AC to DC conversionRelocation of people building dams
Radiation
Loud IntermittencyTidal stream power needs more research
Meltdowns
Cost of EnergyCost of Energy
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Cents per Kilowatt
Hour
Nuclear Hydro Solar Wind
Different Forms of Energy
Comparison of Energy Prices
Why Wind and Solar?Why Wind and Solar?
• Wind energy complements solar energy when there is no sunlight.
• They are the two cheapest and most viable renewable sources of energy.
• Both have low operating costs.• Very little or no environmental
impact.
• Wind energy complements solar energy when there is no sunlight.
• They are the two cheapest and most viable renewable sources of energy.
• Both have low operating costs.• Very little or no environmental
impact.
BibliographyBibliography
• W. Hoffmann. 2006. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 90: 3285-3311
• W. Krewitt, and J. Nitsch. 2003. The potential for electricity generation from on-shore wind energy under the constraints of nature conservation: a case study for two regions in Germany. Renewable Energy. 28. 10: 1645-1655.
• Bauen A, 2006. Future energy sources and systems- Acting on climate change and energy security, Journal of Power Sources 157 (3): 893-901
• www.wikipedia.com
• W. Hoffmann. 2006. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 90: 3285-3311
• W. Krewitt, and J. Nitsch. 2003. The potential for electricity generation from on-shore wind energy under the constraints of nature conservation: a case study for two regions in Germany. Renewable Energy. 28. 10: 1645-1655.
• Bauen A, 2006. Future energy sources and systems- Acting on climate change and energy security, Journal of Power Sources 157 (3): 893-901
• www.wikipedia.com