comparing many group means one way analysis of variance

28
Comparing Many Comparing Many Group Means Group Means One Way Analysis of One Way Analysis of Variance Variance

Post on 15-Jan-2016

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Comparing Many Comparing Many Group MeansGroup Means

One Way Analysis of VarianceOne Way Analysis of Variance

Page 2: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Data SituationData Situation

The data situation has k populations The data situation has k populations and we wish to determine if there and we wish to determine if there are any differences in the population are any differences in the population means.means.

If there are differences, we need to If there are differences, we need to describe them.describe them.

Each population is sampled so that Each population is sampled so that n_1 to n_k observations are n_1 to n_k observations are obtained.obtained.

Page 3: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

ExamplesExamples

An agricultural researcher wishes to An agricultural researcher wishes to know what color of bug trap catches the know what color of bug trap catches the most bugs. Four colors are considered: most bugs. Four colors are considered: yellow, white, green, blue.yellow, white, green, blue.

An education researcher wishes to know An education researcher wishes to know if where a student sits in a classroom has if where a student sits in a classroom has any relationship to the grade the student any relationship to the grade the student will receive in the class. Three seating will receive in the class. Three seating locations are considered: front, middle, locations are considered: front, middle, and back.and back.

Page 4: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

HypothesesHypotheses

The null hypothesis is that all The null hypothesis is that all population means are equal. That is, population means are equal. That is, no differences.no differences.

The alternative hypothesis is that The alternative hypothesis is that not all of the population means are not all of the population means are equal.equal.

Note in this situation the Ha cannot Note in this situation the Ha cannot be represented by using just be represented by using just symbols.symbols.

Page 5: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

HypothesesHypotheses

sequalnotallHa

Ho k

':

: 21

Page 6: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Test StatisticTest Statistic

The idea is that if the population means The idea is that if the population means differ, the variation between the group differ, the variation between the group sample means will be large relative to the sample means will be large relative to the variation within the groups. variation within the groups.

The test statistic is based on this idea – it The test statistic is based on this idea – it is a ratio of the variation between groups is a ratio of the variation between groups divided by the variation within groups. divided by the variation within groups.

This ratio has an F distribution under Ho.This ratio has an F distribution under Ho.

Page 7: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

F DistributionF Distribution

The F distribution is a skewed right The F distribution is a skewed right distribution with minimum value distribution with minimum value zero, and can extend out to infinity.zero, and can extend out to infinity.

The F distribution is indexed by two The F distribution is indexed by two sets of degrees of freedom: the first sets of degrees of freedom: the first is the numerator degrees of is the numerator degrees of freedom, and the second is the freedom, and the second is the denominator degrees of freedom.denominator degrees of freedom.

Page 8: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Degrees of FreedomDegrees of Freedom

The numerator degrees of freedom The numerator degrees of freedom are the number of groups, k, minus are the number of groups, k, minus one giving k-1.one giving k-1.

The denominator degrees of freedom The denominator degrees of freedom are n-k, the number of observations are n-k, the number of observations minus the number of groups.minus the number of groups.

Page 9: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Hypothesis Test FormulaHypothesis Test Formula

)(

)(

1)(

)(

)(

:

:

,1

1 1

2

1

2

210

FobsFPValueP

knyy

kyynF

WithinMS

BetweenMSF

qualnotallmuseH

H

knk

k

i

n

jiij

k

iii

a

k

i

Page 10: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Test StatisticTest Statistic The test statistic formula looks complex, The test statistic formula looks complex,

but is pretty easy to understand: the but is pretty easy to understand: the denominator is simply finding the denominator is simply finding the variation of each observation yij around variation of each observation yij around its group average y-bar_i. This variation its group average y-bar_i. This variation is summed over all observations within is summed over all observations within each group. This gives the total each group. This gives the total squared variation within groups.squared variation within groups.

The numerator gives the variation of The numerator gives the variation of each group sample mean around an each group sample mean around an overall average y-bar.overall average y-bar.

Page 11: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

P-ValueP-Value

The p-value is found using an F-table with the The p-value is found using an F-table with the appropriate degrees of freedom. appropriate degrees of freedom.

If the null hypothesis is not true, the test If the null hypothesis is not true, the test statistic F will be large and the probability of statistic F will be large and the probability of getting beyond a large positive F will be getting beyond a large positive F will be small. small.

This means that a small p-value implies This means that a small p-value implies evidence to doubt the Ho, just like it always evidence to doubt the Ho, just like it always does.does.

The test will always be one-sided, positive tail.The test will always be one-sided, positive tail.

Page 12: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

F-DistributionF-Distribution

Page 13: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Color BoxplotsColor Boxplots

Page 14: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Trap Color ProblemTrap Color Problem

0001.)552.30(

552.30025.46

153.1406

)(

)(

:

:

20,3

4210

FPValueP

F

WithinMS

BetweenMSF

qualnotallmuseH

H

a

Page 15: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

ConclusionConclusion

The data is unlikely to occur if the Ho The data is unlikely to occur if the Ho was true. The data are inconsistent was true. The data are inconsistent with the Ho.with the Ho.

There is evidence to doubt the Ho.There is evidence to doubt the Ho. There is evidence to support the Ha.There is evidence to support the Ha. There is evidence that not all of the There is evidence that not all of the

trap color means are equal. There trap color means are equal. There are differences between the colors in are differences between the colors in how many bugs they catch.how many bugs they catch.

Page 16: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

ConclusionConclusion

The sample summary shows how the The sample summary shows how the colors differ.colors differ.

Sample means:

Treatment n Mean Std. Error

yellow 6 47.166668 2.7738862

White 6 15.666667 1.3581033

Green 6 31.5 4.047633

Blue 6 14.833333 2.181997

Page 17: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

ConclusionConclusion

The means show that yellow is by far The means show that yellow is by far the best color at catching bugs.the best color at catching bugs.

The next best color is green.The next best color is green.

Page 18: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

ANOVA TableANOVA Table

ANOVA table:

Source df SS MS F-Stat P-value

Treatments 3 4218.4585 1406.1528 30.551935 <0.0001

Error 20 920.5 46.025    

Total 23 5138.9585      

Page 19: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Means PlotMeans Plot

Page 20: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Row Seating AnalysisRow Seating Analysis

The response variable is grade in the The response variable is grade in the course (grade points).course (grade points).

The grouping variable is seating The grouping variable is seating location at three levels: front, location at three levels: front, middle, back. middle, back.

The idea is that academic The idea is that academic performance may be related to performance may be related to seating location in the classroom.seating location in the classroom.

Page 21: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Row Seating AnalysisRow Seating Analysis

Page 22: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Row Seating AnalysisRow Seating Analysis

Page 23: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Row Seating AnalysisRow Seating Analysis

Sample means:

Treatment n Mean Std. Error

Front 35 14.285714 0.9886511

Middle 25 11.12 1.3245376

Back 19 10.105263 1.4446812

ANOVA table:

Source df SS MS F-Stat P-value

Treatments 2 264.3011 132.15054 3.428296 0.0375

Error 76 2929.5723 38.547005    

Total 78 3193.8735      

Page 24: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

ConclusionConclusion

The data are unlikely to occur if the The data are unlikely to occur if the Ho is true. The data is inconsistent Ho is true. The data is inconsistent with the Ho.with the Ho.

There is evidence to doubt the Ho.There is evidence to doubt the Ho. There is evidence to support the Ha.There is evidence to support the Ha. There is evidence the group means There is evidence the group means

differ by seating location. That is, the differ by seating location. That is, the seating location mean gpas differ.seating location mean gpas differ.

Page 25: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

ConclusionConclusion

The table of means and the plots The table of means and the plots show clearly that the front of the show clearly that the front of the classroom has higher grades than classroom has higher grades than the other locations.the other locations.

From the graphs it is clear that the From the graphs it is clear that the middle and the back of the room middle and the back of the room have similar grades.have similar grades.

Where do you sit? Where do you sit?

Page 26: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Math ScoresMath Scores

Page 27: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Math ScoresMath Scores

Group n Mean Std. Error

Computer 20 0.95 0.45581043

None 14 0.78571427 0.85278195

Piano 34 3.6176472 0.52396184

Singing 10 -0.3 0.47258157

ANOVA table:

Source df SS MS F-Stat P-value

Treatments 3 184.10191 61.367302 8.418377 <0.0001

Error 74 539.4366 7.2896833    

Total 77 723.53845      

Page 28: Comparing Many Group Means One Way Analysis of Variance

Math ScoresMath Scores