comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

23
Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments R.C. Sharma 1 , A.I. Morgounov 2 , H.J. Braun 2 , B. Akin 2 , M. Keser 1 , D. Bedoshvili 1,2 , A. Bagci 3 , M. van Ginkel 1 , A. Yahyaoui 1 , S. Rajaram 1 1 ICARDA; 2 CIMMYT; 3 Celcuk Univ., Turkey

Upload: quynn-norman

Post on 31-Dec-2015

17 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments. R.C. Sharma 1 , A.I. Morgounov 2 , H.J. Braun 2 , B. Akin 2 , M. Keser 1 , D. Bedoshvili 1,2 , A. Bagci 3 , M. van Ginkel 1 , A. Yahyaoui 1 , S. Rajaram 1. 1 ICARDA; 2 CIMMYT; 3 Celcuk Univ., Turkey. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under

dryland and irrigated environments

R.C. Sharma1, A.I. Morgounov2, H.J. Braun2, B. Akin2, M. Keser1, D. Bedoshvili1,2, A. Bagci3, M.

van Ginkel1, A. Yahyaoui1, S. Rajaram1

1ICARDA; 2CIMMYT; 3Celcuk Univ., Turkey

Abbreviations

• IWWIP :

International Winter Wheat Improvement Program• IWWYT :

International Winter Wheat Yield Trial• SA : Semi-arid• IR : Irrigated• CWANA: Central and West Asia and North Africa

International Winter Wheat Program (IWWIP)

Cooperative winter wheat breeding program:

• Ministry of Agric. and Rural Affairs, Turkey

• CIMMYT

• ICARDA

0.6 Mha6.5 Mha

4.0 Mha0.4 Mha

3.9 Mha

0.8 Mha

Objectives

• Compare grain yield of wheat genotypes targeted to irrigated and semi-arid environments in the IWWIP

• Examine high yielding wheat genotypes under low and high productive environments for their specific and broad adaptation

Materials and Methods

• IWWYT – SA • IWWYT – IR

• Comparison of grain yield levels of genotypes in IWWYT-SA and IWWYT-IR evaluated under similar management conditions

• Comparison of grain yield levels of genotypes in IWWYT-SA tested under low and high productive environments

Edirne

AdapazariAnkara

Konya Adana

Eskisehir

Erzurum

Diyarbakir

SWWW

Research Stations in Turkey contributing to the Turkey – CIMMYT – ICARDA

International Winter Wheat Improvement Program

Aleppo

Izmir

Samsun

Ankara

Eskisehir

SWWW

IWWIP framework in Turkey: F4 and Head Rows

Aleppo

IzmirF1

F2F3

F4,HR

EdirneAdapazari

Ankara

Konya Adana

Eskisehir

Erzurum

Diyarbakir

SWWW

IWWIP framework : PYT

Aleppo

Izmir

Samsun

F4,HR

PYT

PYT

PYTPYT

PYT

EdirneAdapazari

Ankara

Konya

Adana

Eskisehir

Erzurum

Diyarbakir

IWWIP framework : Yield Trials

Aleppo

Izmir

Samsun

YT&AYT

PYT

YT&AYT

YT&AYT

YT&AYT

YT&AYT

YT&AYT

Tashkent

YT&AYT2010

Edirne

SWWW

IWWIP framework in Turkey: seed multiplication for international distribution

Aleppo Konya

Central AsiaUSA & S. America

W. Europe Russia & E. Europe

WANA

China

Breeding methodologyIWWIP framework in Turkey and germplasm

movement

Location Yield Potential

Drought tolerance

Cold tolerance

Yellow rust

Leaf rust

Quality

Adana +

Adapazari +

Aleppo + + + +

Ankara + + + +

Diyarbakir +

Edirne + +

Erzurum + +

Eskisehir + +

Izmir +

Konya + +

Samsun

S. Urfa +

Total sites 9 5 1 2 2 2

• Mean grain yield (t/ha) under similar management

IWWYT-SA IWWYT-IR

Portugal-07 5.31 5.54

Armenia-08 3.25 3.33

Russia-08 6.16 5.47

Serbia-08 8.01 8.90

Uzbekistan-08 5.32 4.89

Uzbekistan-09 4.62 5.55

Study 1: IWWYT-SA vs. IWWYT-IR

• Highest grain yield (t/ha) under similar management

IWWYT-SA IWWYT-IR

Portugal-07 7.49 7.52 (0%)

Armenia-08 4.20 4.75 (+12%)

Russia-08 8.13 7.53 (-8%)

Serbia-08 9.96 10.16 (+2%)

Uzbekistan-08 6.55 6.05 (-8%)

Uzbekistan-09 6.43 6.75 (+5%)

Study 1: IWWYT-SA vs. IWWYT-IR

Performance of wheat lines under irrigated management in

Uzbekistan - 2009Type of genotype

Mean Yield(t/ha)

Highest Yield(t/ha)

Days to Maturity

Plant Height(cm)

1000-kernel wt.

(g)

Irrigated(8 Varieties) 6.33 a† 7.58 ab 193 a 87 ab 41.6 a

Semi-arid(10 Varieties) 6.18 a 7.91 a 193 a 95 a 42.6 a

Commercial(5 Varieties) 5.34 b 7.16 b 193 a 81 b 42.2 a

† Values within a column followed by different letters significantly at P =0.05 based on DMRT

Study 2: Highest yielding genotypes in the 7th IWWYT-SA under low and high productive environments, 2005

EntryNo.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Entry No.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Low productivity (< 3 t/ha) High productivity (>3 t/ha)

7-13Eskina-6 2132 7-12 JI5418/Maras 4968

7-12JI5418/Maras 2130 7-11 TAM200/Kauz 4735

Check Mercan-1 2061 7-13 Eskina-6 4577

7-11 TAM200/Kauz 2038 7-09HAA88-89-18/4105W//TRK13

4482

7-23 Tranca-4 2025 7-23 Tranca-4 4475

EntryNo.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Entry No.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Low productivity (< 3 t/ha) High productivity (> 3 t/ha)

Check Bagci-2000 2.903 8-25

Tast/Sprw/4/Rom-Tast/Bon/3/Dibo//SU92/CI13645/5/F130L1.12

6.533

8-19Ngda146/4/Ymh/Tob//Mcd/3/Lira/5/F130L1.12

2.823 8-15Saulesku #44/ TR810200

6.232

Check Gerek-79 2.630 8-21 Bilinmiyen96.27 6.213

Check Dagdas-94 2.573 8-11Saulesku #44/ TR810200

6.198

8-15Saulesku #44/ TR810200

2.573 8-08Saulesku #44/ TR810200

6.179

Study 2: Highest yielding genotypes in the 8th IWWYT-SA under low and high productive environments, 2006

EntryNo.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Entry No.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Low productivity (< 3 t/ha) High productivity (> 3 t/ha)

9-17 YE2453//PPBB68/Chrc 2.435 9-09 Gun91/Pobeda//F900K 5.856

9-16 YE2453//PPBB68/Chrc 2.193 9-23Alpu-1/3/ Chen/Ae.sq.(Taus)//Bcn

5.685

9-13 Agri/Bjy//Vee/3/Prinia 2.174 9-15CA8055//KS82W409/ Stephens

5.349

9-24 Savalan/Grk//Pyn/Bau 2.087 9-20Tirchmir2/5/Cnn/Kkv/KC66/3/Skp35/4/Vee/6/KS82W409/Stephens

5.212

9-19

MV17/5/C126-15/Cofn/3/N10B/P14//P101/4/21183/Co652643//Lcr/KS6

1.945 9-10 Gun91/Pobeda//F900K 5.174

Study 2: Highest yielding genotypes in the 9th IWWYT-SA under low and high productive environments, 2007

EntryNo.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Entry No.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Low productivity (< 3 t/ha) High productivity (> 3 t/ha)

10-17Bul Everdika/ Stozher/4/Tast/Sprw//CA8055/3/Csm

2.209 10-19338-K1-1//Anb/Buc/3/GS50A

6.608

Check Gerek-79 2.201 10-10 F130-L-1-12/Lagos 6.604

10-13 Pyn/Bau/3/Agri/Bjy//Vee 2.122 10-13Pyn/Bau/3/Agri/Bjy//Vee

6.511

10-24AU/CO652337//2*CA8-155/3/F474S1-1.1

2.113 10-21ERYT1489.87 (Don Polukarlikovaya/Olvia)/3/2*Agri/Bjy//Vee

6.427

Check Bayraktar 2.104 10-20Agri/Bjy//Vee/3/Gun91/4/Cham6//1D13.1/Mlt

6.370

Study 2: Highest yielding genotypes in the 10th IWWYT-SA under low and high productive environments, 2008

Conclusions Grain yield of highest yielding genotypes in IWWYT-

IR and IWWYT-SA are comparable under irrigated management

Certain genotypes developed for dryland also possess yield potential that could efficiently utilize management practices for irrigated management

In general, different sets of genetic materials are needed under strictly semi-arid and irrigated environments

A few lines targeted towards stressed conditions in fact possess yield plasticity resulting in their superior performance both under dryland and irrigated conditions

Acknowledgement

• IWWIP partners

• IWWP collaborators

More information: www.iwwip.org

Thank You