comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

30
Comparative genomics of fungi: studying adaptation through gene family evolution Jason Stajich University of California, Berkeley

Upload: jason-stajich

Post on 11-May-2015

2.434 views

Category:

Technology


5 download

DESCRIPTION

March 2007 presentation at Fungal Genetics conference

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Comparative genomicsof fungi: studying

adaptation throughgene family evolution

Jason StajichUniversity of California, Berkeley

Page 2: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Gene family evolution• How do fungi adapt to a niche? How do

they acquire new functions and new genes?

• Neofunctionalization

• Horizontal Transfer

• Duplication and innovation

• Are genome-wide patterns of duplicationor loss useful to understand adaptation?

Page 3: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Gene family sizes followpower law distribution

Multicopy genesSugar transporters

P450 Enzymes

single copy genesPRP8 (splicing)

CDC48 (cell cycle ATPase)

Page 4: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Models of gene familyevolution

• Need a Null model for comparison of genefamily size

• Birth-Death model for gene family sizeevolution

• CAFE: Computational Analysis of FamilyEvolution

• Compare observed to expected patternsof family size

Hahn et al, Genome Res 2005Demuth et al, PLoS One 2006

Page 5: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Case study: mammals

Demuth JP, De Bie T, Stajich JE, Cristiani N, Hahn MW. PLoS One 2006

6%difference

Page 6: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Methods: Gene families• Functional Annotation “Free”

• Build gene families from protein sequencesimilarity (FASTP), clustered with MCL

• Identify families that are unusually large or smallwith CAFE

• Build gene trees to validate and study mode andtempo of duplication.

• Protein Domain distribution

• Pfam domain counts

Page 7: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

FASTAall-vs-all

MCL

Gene families

CAFE

Family 1 P < 0.001 Branch A

Family 2 P < 0.001 Branch B

Family 3 P=0.02 BranchC,E

Family 4 P=0.03 Branch D

10 1 2

14 18 2

7 1 1

6 1 12

6 1 8

3 1 1

+

Family count

Spec

ies

Page 8: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Phylogeny of sequenced fungi

Fitzpatrick DA, Logue ME,Stajich JE, Butler G. BMC

Genomics 2006

Basidiomycota

Eurotiomycetes

Page 9: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Long Life

Short Life

SpheruleEndospores

Granuloma

Doctorfungus.comM. McGinnis

Coccidioides: Evolution of apathogen

Page 10: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Gene Family Evolutionin the Onygenales

ML phylogeny from 1148concatenated genes

46890 unambiguous AA sitesafter removing gaps.

Page 11: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Onygenales Familyexpansions

2 1

0 1

3 3

4 2

3 2

3 2

7 13

7 14

4 13

2 2

Peptidase M35

Keritinase

Page 12: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Keratinases in Onygenales

• Onygenales are Keratinophilic

• Domains: Peptidase S8, Subtilisin domains

• Large expansion of putative keratinases inOnygenales

Subtilisin_N

SignalP

Page 13: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Keratinase expansionin Onygenales

13/14 copies inCoccidioides

1 in Histoplasma

Expansion of 7

Page 14: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Metalloproteinase expansion

MEP

4

MEP

5

MEP

6

MEP

3

MEP

7

MEP

2

MEP

8

MEP1 is a previously described Virulencefactor (Hung et al. 2005)

Page 15: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Family contractions inOnygenales

1 3 7 18

1 0 2 0

5 5 13 17

11 5 11 3

6 8 16 15

6 4 15 7

0 1 2 0

0 1 2 0

0 1 2 0

0 2 3 0

Tan

nase

Cut

inas

e

Cel

lula

se

Cel

lula

seBi

ndin

gD

omai

n

Page 16: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Carbohydratemetabolism

• Domains absent or contracted inOnygenales fungi

• Tannase, Cutinase

• Pectin Lyase, Cellulase, Cellulase BindingDomain, Pectinesterase

• Alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase

• Glycosyl hydrolase

• HET domain

Page 17: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Summary

• Onygenales fungi have lost many domainsrelating to saprophytic growth on plantmatter

• Few expansions, but at least one family isrelated to a known virulence factor

• MEP genes are good Cocci specificexpansion

Page 18: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Basidiomycota changes

U.maydisC.cinereusP.chrysosporiumC.neoformans

Page 19: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

P450 CYP64P450 enzymes involved in synthesis and cleavage ofchemical bonds. Drug metabolism in animals.

CYP64: Step in Aspergillus spp aflatoxin pathwayP. chrysosporium implicated in lignin and hydrocarbondegradation.

Page 20: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

CYP64 was fromindependentduplication

C. cinereus expansion P. chrysosporium expansion

Tom VolkMario Cervini

Page 21: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Local duplications createdCYP64 expansion

Page 22: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Interpretation ofCYP64 expansion

Million yearsago

Page 23: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Hydrophobin Family

• Self assembling proteins involved in fungalcell wall

• Part of what makes a mushroom

• 8 Cysteine residues critical to function

• Help spores stay airborne resisting water

P.chr C.cin C.neo U.may

21 33 0 2

Page 24: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution
Page 25: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Local Duplications

C. cinereus

P. chrysosporium

Page 26: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Summary•Local duplications are a major mode of family

expansion in two Homobasidiomycetes

• Independent expansion of families

•Convergent evolution

•High gene turnover in some families?

Page 27: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

James et al. Nature 2006 Bruns TD. Nature 2006

Page 28: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Chytrid family changes• Expansions

•More Polysaccharide deacyetalase (2x) and Chitinbinding domains than most fungi

• 12 Chitin synthases, but R.oryzae has 23+, Mostother fungi have 1-5.

• Bd Contractions or small families in fungal ancestor

•No Glucan synthase (FKS1) homolog.

• Few Sugar transporters and Major FacilitorSuperfamily. No Acetate transporter.

•Of 9 P450 genes, 2 pairs are adjacent.

Page 29: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Discussion• Gene content differences not just

orthologous genes need to be consideredwhen describing species divergence.

• Losses may be more informative in someclades.

• Family size change can be a useful startingpoint for comparing species.

• Models that incorporate phylogeneticcontext are critical.

Page 30: Comparative genomics of fung: studying adaptation through gene family evolution

Acknowledgments

Miller Institutefor Basic Research in Science

Indiana UniversityMatthew Hahn

UC BerkeleyThomas Sharpton

John Taylor

Duke UniversityFred Dietrich

Sequencing CentersFGI, Broad Institute

DOE - JGITIGR

Stanford GTCBaylor College of

Medicine