comparative efficacy of human simulated exposures of tedizolid

23
Version: May 15, 2012 Prepared for: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1 Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid and Linezolid against 2 Staphylococcus aureus in the Murine Thigh Infection Model 3 4 R. A. Keel 1 , P. R. Tessier 2 , J. L. Crandon 2 , D. P. Nicolau 2 5 1 California Northstate College of Pharmacy, Rancho Cordova, CA, 2 Center for Anti- 6 Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford 7 Running title: Comparative efficacy of tedizolid and linezolid (character and space 8 count: 47/54) 9 Key words: tedizolid, linezolid, human-simulated, Staphylococcus aureus 10 Corresponding author: 11 David P. Nicolau, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA 12 Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development 13 Hartford Hospital 14 80 Seymour Street 15 Hartford, CT 06102 16 Phone: (860) 545-3941; Fax (860) 545-3941 17 Email: [email protected] 18 Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.00122-12 AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 11 June 2012 on March 25, 2018 by guest http://aac.asm.org/ Downloaded from

Upload: ngoxuyen

Post on 20-Jan-2017

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

Version: May 15, 2012

Prepared for: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

1

Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid and Linezolid against 2

Staphylococcus aureus in the Murine Thigh Infection Model 3

4

R. A. Keel1, P. R. Tessier2, J. L. Crandon2, D. P. Nicolau2 5

1California Northstate College of Pharmacy, Rancho Cordova, CA, 2Center for Anti-6

Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford 7

Running title: Comparative efficacy of tedizolid and linezolid (character and space 8

count: 47/54) 9

Key words: tedizolid, linezolid, human-simulated, Staphylococcus aureus 10

Corresponding author: 11

David P. Nicolau, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA 12

Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development 13

Hartford Hospital 14

80 Seymour Street 15

Hartford, CT 06102 16

Phone: (860) 545-3941; Fax (860) 545-3941 17

Email: [email protected]

Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.00122-12 AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 11 June 2012

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 2: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

2

ABSTRACT (252 words) 19

Objectives: Tedizolid (formally torezolid) is a second generation oxazolidinone with 20

enhanced in vitro potency against Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-21

susceptible (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) Staphylococcus aureus. The 22

efficacy of human simulated exposures of tedizolid and linezolid against S. aureus in an 23

immunocompetent mouse thigh model over 3 days were compared. 24

Methods: Four MRSA and 1 MSSA with tedizolid and linezolid MICs ranging from 25

0.25–0.5 and 2–4 µg/mL, respectively, were utilized. Tedizolid and linezolid were 26

administered as regimens simulating human steady-state 24h area under the free 27

concentration-time curve of 200mg Q24 and 600mg Q12, respectively. Thighs were 28

harvested after 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72h and efficacy was determined by the change 29

in bacteria density. 30

Results: The mean bacterial density in control mice increased over the 3 day period. 31

After 24h of treatment, ≥1 log CFU reduction in bacterial density was observed for both 32

tedizolid and linezolid treatments. Antibacterial activity was enhanced for both agents 33

with a reduction of ≥2.6 log CFU after 72h of treatment. Any statistical differences (p 34

≤0.05) in efficacy between agents were transient and did not persist throughout the 72h 35

treatment period. 36

Conclusions: Both tedizolid and linezolid regimens demonstrated similar in vivo 37

efficacy against the S. aureus isolates tested. Both agents were bacteriostatic at 24h 38

and were bactericidal on 3rd day of treatment. These data support the clinical utility of 39

tedizolid for skin and skin structure infections caused by S. aureus as well as the 40

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 3: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

3

bactericidal activity of the oxazolidinones after 3 days of treatment.41

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 4: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

4

INTRODUCTION 42

Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) are frequently caused 43

by Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 44

(MRSA)35. While vancomycin is still considered the gold standard therapy for MRSA29, 45

treatment failures have been reported while the infecting pathogen is still susceptible to 46

vancomycin8,9,11,23,33. Moreover, studies have suggested the potential for a vancomycin 47

“MIC creep” or incremental increases in MIC over time22,28,34. While these increases 48

have not been noted in national or global surveillance studies to date13,30, the reported 49

clinical vancomycin failures, the advocacy for higher vancomycin exposures, and the 50

need for more aggressive concentration monitoring, highlight the need for alternative 51

therapies targeting MRSA. 52

Tedizolid (TR-700, formerly torezolid), the active moiety of tedizolid phosphate 53

(TR-701), is a novel second generation oxazolidinone with activity against Gram-54

positive pathogens26,16, including MRSA. Much interest has emerged in comparing the 55

in vitro and in vivo efficacy of TR-700 and the only other FDA approved oxazolidinone, 56

linezolid (LZD), against clinically relevant pathogens. Against S. aureus and other 57

Gram-positive pathogens, TR-700 has shown 4- to 16-fold greater in vitro activity than 58

LZD and may have activity against LZD-resistant strains 2,15,12,31,32. Additionally, in a 59

phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of TR-700 for the treatment of ABSSSI, 60

clinical cure rates were 96.6% and 96.8% for patients with S. aureus and MRSA, 61

respectively6. Our study was undertaken to compare the in vivo efficacy of human 62

simulated exposures of TR-700 and LZD against Staphylococcus aureus in the 63

immunocompetent murine thigh infection model. 64

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 5: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

5

MATERIALS AND METHODS 65

Antimicrobial test agents. Analytical-grade tedizolid phosphate (TR-701) and LZD 66

were used for the in vivo analyses. In the in vitro analyses, analytical-grade tedizolid 67

(TR-700) and LZD were utilized. Immediately prior to each in vivo experiment, TR-701 68

and LZD were diluted in 0.025 M sodium phosphate dibasic solution and sterile water, 69

respectively, to achieve the desired concentration. The solutions were stored under 70

refrigeration and discarded 24h after reconstitution. 71

Bacterial isolates. Five clinical isolates of S. aureus, were utilized in this study. Four 72

isolates were MRSA including one community-acquired MRSA and 3 hospital-73

associated MRSA of which one was also vancomycin resistant (VRSA). The remaining 74

isolate was a methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). MICs were determined for both 75

agents by broth microdilution according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 76

guidelines4. Isolates were stored at -80°C in double-strength skim milk (Remel, Lenexa, 77

KS), subcultured twice onto Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood (Becton, 78

Dickinson, and Co., Sparks, MD) and grown for 18 to 24h at 35°C prior to use in the 79

experiments. 80

Immunocompetent thigh infection model. Specific-pathogen-free, female ICR mice 81

weighing approximately 22 g each were obtained from Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Inc. 82

(Indianapolis, IN) and utilized throughout these experiments. This study was reviewed 83

and approved by the Hartford Hospital Animal Care and Use Committee. Animals were 84

maintained and used in accordance with National Research Council recommendations 85

and were provided food and water ad libitum. 86

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 6: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

6

A suspension of each isolate was freshly prepared from the second subculture of 87

each organism and diluted in normal saline to achieve a final inoculum of 108 CFU/ml. 88

Each thigh was inoculated intramuscularly with 0.1 ml of inoculums two hours prior to 89

initiation of antimicrobial therapy. 90

Pharmacokinetic studies and determination of dosing regimen. Single doses of 91

tedizolid phosphate and LZD were administered to infected, immunocompetent mice to 92

determine a regimen that simulated the human steady state exposures of tedizolid 93

200mg PO every 24h and LZD 600mg IV every 12h. The target indices were a 24h 94

area under the free drug concentration-time curve (fAUC) of 3 µg·h/ml2,9 and 137 95

µg·h/ml 4,23,27for TR-700 and LZD, respectively. The murine protein binding values 96

utilized for TR-700 and LZD were 85%25 (data on file Trius Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, 97

CA) and 30%1,14, respectively. The fAUC for the both regimens was calculated using the 98

trapezoidal rule. Blood samples were collected via cardiac puncture from groups of six 99

mice at three to four time points over 12 to 24 h dosing interval. Plasma (TR-700) and 100

serum (LZD) samples as dictated by the analytical procedures were separated and 101

stored at -80°C until analysis. TR-700 concentrations were analyzed by Midwest 102

Bioresearch (Skokie, IL) using a validated liquid-chromatography-tandem mass 103

spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay26. LZD concentrations were analyzed in the Center for 104

Anti-infective Research and Development laboratory at Hartford Hospital using a 105

modified validated high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay36. The 106

standard curve was extended from 20 µg/ml to 30 µg/ml and the extraction was 107

modified from deproteinization with 200 ml of acetonitrile to deproteinization with 150 ml 108

of 7.5% trichloroacetic acid with no drying step. The upper and lower limits of 109

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 7: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

7

quantification for the TR-700 assay were 1000 and 10 ng/ml, respectively. The upper 110

and lower limits of quantification for the LZD assay were 30 and 0.2 µg/ml, respectively. 111

The intraday percentage coefficients of variation (CV) for the LZD quality control 112

samples of 0.5 µg/ml and 20 µg/ml were 4.89% and 3.15%, respectively, and the 113

respective interday CV were 3.25% and 2.37%. 114

In vivo efficacy as assessed by bacterial density. Five clinical S. aureus isolates 115

were utilized in the immunocompetent thigh infection model to assess the efficacy of 116

humanized exposure regimens of TR-700 and LZD. Two hours after inoculation, groups 117

of three mice were administered the human simulated regimen of tedizolid as 0.2 ml 118

intraperitoneal injection and LZD as a 0.3 ml subcutaneous injection over a 72 h 119

treatment period. Control mice were administered normal saline at the same time, 120

volume, and route as the most frequent regimen. Groups of 3 untreated control mice 121

were euthanized by CO2 exposure, followed by cervical dislocation just prior to the 122

initiation of therapy (0h). A group of tedizolid-treated, LZD-treated, and control mice 123

were sacrificed at the following time points: 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h. Following 124

sacrifice, both rear thighs were removed and homogenized individually in 5 ml of normal 125

saline. Serial dilutions of thigh homogenate were subcultured onto Trypticase soy agar 126

with 5% sheep blood for determination of bacterial density. Efficacy, defined as the 127

change in bacterial density, was calculated as the change in log10 CFU/ml obtained for 128

the treated mice versus that from the control mice at the respective time point. A 129

comparison of the efficacies of TR-700 and LZD against each isolate at each time point 130

was made by using the Student t test. A P value of < 0.05 was defined a priori as 131

statistically significant. 132

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 8: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

8

RESULTS 133

Bacterial isolates. The phenotypic profiles for the 5 S. aureus isolates evaluated in 134

this study are listed in Table 1. TR-700 and LZD MICs for the isolates ranged from 0.25 135

to 0.5 µg/ml and 2 to 4 µg/ml, respectively. 136

Pharmacokinetic determination. In this study we were able to define dosing regimens 137

for both tedizolid and linezolid to attain humanized 24h fAUCs. In this model we 138

achieved exposures that simulated the human regimens of tedizolid with a fAUC0-24 of 139

2.99 µg·h/ml; and linezolid, fAUC0-24 of 144 µg·h/ml. 140

In vivo efficacy. The mean bacterial density for control mice prior to initiating dosing 141

was 6.89 log10 CFU and the mean bacterial density increased to 7.34, 6.94, and 7.08 142

log10 CFU after 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. 143

The TR-700 human simulated regimen produced a 1.04 to 1.80, 2.13 to 2.68, 144

and 2.68 to 3.72 log10 CFU reduction from 0h control at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively, 145

against all isolates in the immunocompetent thigh infection model (Fig 1 a-e). Similarly, 146

a reduction of 1.36 to 2.02, 2.19 to 3.11, and 2.64 to 3.76 log10 CFU was observed with 147

the LZD human simulated regimen at the respective time points (Fig 1 a-e). While both 148

agents would be defined as having bacteriostatic activity at 24 hours, this activity was 149

enhanced over time. By 72 hours, both agents showed considerable enhancement in 150

overall kill that approximated or exceeded the bactericidal target of 3 logs kill. 151

Additionally, no statistical difference (p>0.05) was observed between treatments at 24 152

hours with the exception S. aureus 152 (p=0.045); however, there was no statistical 153

difference between treatments prior to or after 24 hours for this isolate. Also, one isolate 154

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 9: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

9

at both 48 h (S. aureus 433; p=0.002) and 72 h (S. aureus 456; p=0.012) had a 155

statistical difference noted between treatments in favor of LZD; however, this difference 156

was not identified consistently throughout therapy. When considering the reduction in 157

bacterial density for the 5 S. aureus isolates as a whole, both regimens produced similar 158

reduction in CFU over the 72h treatment period regardless of genotype or phenotype. 159

DISCUSSION 160

Tedizolid, the active moiety of the prodrug tedizolid phosphate, is an 161

oxazolidinone, which has activity against Gram-positive pathogens including MRSA. In 162

addition to its spectrum of activity, tedizolid has been postulated to have a lower 163

potential to induce resistance than the only FDA approved oxazolidinone, LZD16,17,18,. In 164

the present analysis, we evaluated the efficacy of human simulated exposures of TR-165

700 and LZD against a number of S. aureus strains including MRSA in an 166

immunocompetent mouse thigh infection model. No sustained statistical difference in 167

efficacy was observed between the human simulated exposures of TR-700 once daily 168

and LZD twice daily against the five tested S. aureus isolates. Additionally, as treatment 169

continued past the initial 24 hours, enhanced antibacterial activity was observed for both 170

agents with an overall reduction of approximately 3 logs over the 72h treatment period. 171

Similar to LZD, the pharmacodynamic target associated with efficacy for TR-700 172

is the AUC to MIC ratio (AUC/MIC)19. A previous study has noted that a lower AUC/MIC 173

ratio is required for efficacy in immunocompetent mice compared with neutropenic 174

mice20. In the current study using immunocompetent animals, the human simulated 175

regimen of TR-700 achieved a mean total drug AUC0-24/MIC of 79.7 and 39.8 for the 176

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 10: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

10

isolates with TR-700 MICs of 0.25 and 0.5 µg/ml, respectively. For LZD, the 177

pharmacodynamic index associated with efficacy is an AUC0-24/MIC of ≥ 831,21,27 and 178

our human simulated LZD regimen attained a mean AUC0-24/MIC ratio of 102.9 and 51.4 179

for those isolates with LZD MICs of 2 and 4 µg/ml, respectively. While having isolates 180

with higher MICs for both agents would have helped identify the in vivo therapeutic 181

breakpoint, the TR-700 MIC90 for S. aureus is 0.5 µg/ml while the LZD MIC90 is 4 µg/ml 182

thus the isolates in the present study represent the upper end of the MIC distribution 183

that would be encountered clinically.31 184

In a phase 2 clinical trial using TR-700 in patients with ABSSSI, S. aureus was 185

the most common pathogen with TR-700 MIC values ranging from 0.12 to 0.5 µg/ml at 186

baseline.26 For those with S. aureus identified at baseline, clinical cure rates were > 187

96% and pathogen eradication occurred between 88.9 and 100% depending on the 188

dose of TR-700 (doses ranged from 200mg to 400mg daily). These data, in conjunction 189

with our murine data, support the continued development of TR-700 for the treatment of 190

complicated skin and skin structure infections. The exposure of TR-700 and its 191

reductions in CFU noted herein provide pharmacodynamic support for the clinical 192

efficacy observed with this compound. Moreover, the accumulative bactericidal activity 193

that TR-700 displayed over the 72h in this model provides additional pharmacodynamic 194

sustenance for its Day 3 efficacy (i.e. cessation of lesion spread and resolution of fever) 195

as observed in the clinical trials of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections 196

(ABSSI)6. 197

Tedizolid is a novel second generation oxazolidinone with in vitro potency against 198

S. aureus, including MRSA and has shown positive clinical outcomes in setting of 199

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 11: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

11

ABSSI. In the immunocompetent murine thigh model, human simulated exposures of 200

tedizolid and linezolid resulted in similar efficacy against both methicillin-susceptible and 201

resistant S. aureus. Furthermore, the antibacterial activity for both agents was 202

enhanced as therapy continued out to 72 hours. Human simulated dosages of tedizolid 203

200 mg once daily resulted in efficacy against these S. aureus isolates with MICs, up to 204

and including 0.5 µg/ml. These data support the clinical utility and further development 205

of tedizolid against S. aureus for the treatment of ABSSI. 206

207

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 12: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

12

Acknowledgements 208

We authors wish to thank Deborah Santini, Lindsay Tuttle, Jennifer Hull, Henry 209

Christensen, Mary Banevicius, Christina Sutherland, Mao Hagihara and Seth Housman 210

for technical assistance in the performance of this study. This study was sponsored by a 211

grant from Trius Therapeutics, San Diego, CA. 212

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 13: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

13

Table 1. Phenotypic and genotypic profiles of the Staphylococcus aureus test isolates 213

for TR-700 and LZD. 214

MIC (µg/ml) (Range)

S. aureus isolate Genotype TR-700 LZD

152 HA-MRSA 0.5 4 (2 – 4)

156 CA-MRSA 0.5 4 (2 – 4)

426 HA-MRSA 0.25 2

433 MSSA 0.5 4

456 HA-MRSA,VRSA 0.25 2

TR-700, tedizolid; LZD, linezolid; HA-MRSA, hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant S. 215

aureus; CA-MRSA, community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus; MSSA, 216

methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; VRSA, vancomycin-resistant S. aureus. 217

218

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 14: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

14

Figure 1. Change in log10 CFU for human simulated TR-700 (black bars) and LZD (grey 219

bars) at selected time points relative to the 0h controls for (A) Staphylococcus aureus 220

152, (B) S. aureus 156, (C), S. aureus 426, (D) S. aureus 433, (E) S. aureus 456. Data 221

is expressed as means ± SD for 3 mice per group. 222

223

224

225

226

227

228

229

230

231

232

233

234

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 15: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

15

References: 235

1. Andes, D., M. L. van Ogtrop, J. Peng, and W. A. Craig. 2002. In vivo 236 pharmacodynamics of a new oxazolidinone (Linezolid). Antimicrob Agents 237 Chemother. 46(11):3484-3489. 238

2. Bien P., K. A. Munoz, J. Bohn, R. Wright, C. Bethune, and P. Prokocimer. 239 2008. Human Pharmacokinetics of TR-700 after ascending single oral doses 240 of the prodrug TR-701, a novel oxazolidinone antibiotic. Abstr., 48th Intersci. 241 Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Abstr F1-2063. 242

3. Brown, S. D., and M. M. Traczewski. 2010. Comparative in vivo 243 antimicrobial activities of torezolid (TR-700), the active moiety of a new 244 oxazolidinone, torezolid phosphate (TR-701), determination of tentative disk 245 diffusion interpretative criteria, and quality control ranges. Antimicrob. Agents 246 Chemother. 54(5):2063-2069. 247

4. Buerger C., N. Plock, P. Dehghanyar, C. Joukhadar, and C. Kloft. 2006. 248 Pharmacokinetics of unbound linezolid in plasma and tissue interstitium of 249 critically ill patients after multiple dosing using microdialysis. Antimicrob. 250 Agents Chemother. 50:2455-2463. 251

5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). 2009. Methods for 252 dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically 253 approved standard, 8th edition. M07-A8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards 254 Institute, Wayne, PA. 255

6. De Anda, C., Das, A., Fang, E. and P. Prokocimer. 2011. Acute Bacterial 256 Skin and Skin Structure Infection (ABSSI) Dose-Ranging Phase 2 Tedizolid 257 Phosphate (TR-701) Study: Assessment of Efficacy with New FDA Guidance. 258 Abstr 51st Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. abstr L1-1496. 259

7. Drusano, G. L., C. Fregeau, W. Liu, H. Conde, R. Kulawy, and Louie, A. 260 2011. Impact of granulocytes on the antimicrobial effect of Tedizolid in a 261 mouse thigh infection model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55(11):5300-262 5305. 263

8. Hidayat, L. K., H. Dl, R. Quist, K. A. Shriner, and A. Wong-Beringer. 264 2006. Highdose vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus 265 aureus infections: efficacy and toxicity. Arch Intern Med. 166:2138–2144. 266

9. Housman, S. T., J. S. Pope, J. Russomanno, E. Salerno, E. Shore, J. L. 267 Kuti, and D. P. Nicolau. 2011. Pulmonary disposition of torezolid following 268 200mg once-daily oral tedizold phosphate in healthy volunteers. Abstr. 51st 269 Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Abstr.A1-1747. 270

10. Howden, B. P., P. B. Ward, P. G. Charles, T. M. Korman, A. Fuller, P. du 271 Cros, E. A. Grabsch, S. A. Roberts, J. Robson, K. Read, N. Bak, J. 272 Hurley, P. D. Johnson, A. J. Morris, B. C. Mayall, and M. L. Grayson. 273 2004. Treatment outcomes for serious infections caused by methicillin-274 resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. Clin 275 Infect Dis 38:521–528. 276

11. Hsu, D.I., L. K. Hidayat, R. Quist, J. Hindler, A. Karlsson, A. Yusof, and A. 277 Wong-Beringer. 2008. Comparison of method-specific vancomycin minimum 278 inhibitory concentration values and their predictability for treatment outcome 279

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 16: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

16

of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) infections. Int J 280 Antimicrob Agents. 32:378–385. 281

12. Jones, R. N., G. J. Moet, H. S. Sader, R. E. Mendes, and M. Castanheira. 282 2009. TR-700 in vitro activity against and resistance mutation frequencies 283 among Gram-positive pathogens. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 63:716-720. 284

13. Jones, R. N. 2006. Microbiological features of vancomycin in the 21st 285 century: minimum inhibitory concentration creep, bactericidal/static activity, 286 and applied breakpoints to predict clinical outcomes or detect resistant 287 strains. Clin. Infect. Dis. 42:S13–S24. 288

14. LaPlante, K. L., S. L. Leonard, D. R. Andes, W. A. Craig, and M. J. Rybak. 289 2008. Activities of clindamycin, daptomycin, doxycycline, linezolid, 290 trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin against community-291 associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with inducible 292 clindamycin resistance in murine thigh infection and in vitro 293 pharmacodynamic models. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 52(6):2156-2162. 294

15. Livermore, D. M., S. Mushtaq, M. Warner, and N. Woodford. 2009. Activity 295 of oxazolidinone TR-700 against linezolid –susceptible and –resistant 296 staphylococci and enterococci. J. Antimicrob Chemother. 63:713-715. 297

16. Locke, J. B., M. Hilgers, and K. J. Shaw. 2009. Novel ribosomal mutations 298 in Staphylococcus aureus strains identified through selection with the 299 oxazolidinones linezolid and torezolid (TR-700). Antimicrob. Agents 300 Chemother. 53(12):5265-5274. 301

17. Locke, J. B., M. Hilgers, and K. J. Shaw. 2009. Mutations in ribosomal 302 protein L3 are associated with oxazolidinone resistance in Staphylococci of 303 clinical origin. Antimcrob. Agents Chemother. 53(12):5275-5278. 304

18. Locke, J. B., J. Finn, M. Hilgers, G. Morales, S. Rahawi, G. C. Kedar, J. J. 305 Picazo, W. Im, K. J. Shaw, and J. L. Stein. 2010. Structure-activity 306 relationships of diverse oxazolidinones for linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus 307 aureus strains possessing the cfr methyltransferase gene or ribosomal 308 mutations. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 54(12):5337-5343. 309

19. Louie, A., W. Lui, R. Kulawy, and G. L. Drusano. 2011. In vivo 310 pharmacodynamics of torezolid phosphate (TR-701), a new oxazolidinone 311 antibiotic, against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant 312 Staphylococcus aureus strains in a mouse thigh infection model. Antimicrob. 313 Agents Chemother. 55(7):3453-3460. 314

20. Louie, A., C. Fregeau, W. Liu, H. Conde, R. Kulawy, and G. L. Drusano. 315 2009. Defining the impact of granulocytes on the kill of methicillin-resistant 316 Staphyloccocus aureus (MRSA) by the new oxazolidinone prodrug TR-701. 317 Abstr. 49th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Abstr. A1-1935. 318

21. MacGowan, A. P. 2003. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of 319 linezolid in healthy volunteers and patients with Gram-positive infections. J. 320 Antimicrob. Chemother. 51(S2):ii17-ii25. 321

22. Mason, E. O., L. B. Lamberth, W. A. Hammerman, K. G. Hulten, J. 322 Versalovic, and S. L. Kaplan. 2009. Vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus 323 aureus vary by detection method and have subtly increased in a pediatric 324 population since 2005. J Clin. Microbiol. 47:1628–1630. 325

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 17: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

17

23. Meager A. K., A. Forrest, C. R. Rayner, M. C. Birmingham, and J. J. 326 Schentag. 2003. Population pharmacokinetics of linezolid in patients treated 327 in a compassionate-use program. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:548-328 553. 329

24. Neoh, H., S. Hori, M. Komatsu, T. Oguri, F. Takeuchi, L. Cui, and K. 330 Hiramatsu. 2007. Impact of reduced vancomycin susceptibility on the 331 therapeutic outcome of MRSA bloodstream infections. Ann Clin Microbiol 332 Antimicrob. 6:13. 333

25. Pichereau, S., J. Bohrmuller, K. Marchillo, T. Stamstad, W. Craig, and D. 334 Andes. 2009. Comparative pharmacodynamics of novel oxazolidinone, 335 torezolid phosphate (TR-701), against S. aureus in the neutropenic murine 336 pneumonia model. Abstr 49th Instersci. Conf. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 337 abstr A1-1939. 338

26. Prokocimer P., P. Bien, J. Surber, P. Mehra, C. DeAnda, J. B. Bulitta, and 339 G. R. Corey. 2011. Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study 340 evaluating the safety, tolerability, population pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of 341 oral torezolid phosphate in patients with complicated skin and skin structure 342 infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 55(2):583-592. 343

27. Rayner, C. R., A. Forrest, A. K. Meagher, M. C. Birmingham, and J. J. 344 Schentagg. 2003. Clinical pharmacodynamics of linezolid in seriously ill 345 patients treated in a compassionate use programme. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 346 42(15):1411-1423. 347

28. Rhee, K. Y., D. F. Gardiner, and M. Charles. 2005. Decreasing in-vitro 348 susceptibility of clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates to vancomycin at the 349 New York Hospital: quantitative testing redux. Clin. Infect. Dis. 40:1705–1706. 350

29. Rybak, M., B. Lomaestro, J. C. Rotschafer, R. Moellering, W. Craig, M. 351 Billeter, J. R. Dalovisio, and D. P. Levine. 2009. Therapeutic monitoring of 352 vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of 353 Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and 354 the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm 355 66:82–98. 356

30. Sader, H. S.,P. D. Fey, D. N. Fish, A. P. Limaye, G. Pankey, J. Rahal, M. 357 J. Rybak, D. R. Snydman, L. L. Steed, K. Waites, and R. N. Jones. 2009. 358 Evaluation of vancomycin and daptomycin potency trends (MIC creep) 359 against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected in nine 360 U.S. medical centers from 2002 to 2006. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 361 53:4127–4132. 362

31. Schaadt, R., D. Sweeney, D. Shinabarger, and G. Zurenko. 2009. In vitro 363 activity of TR-700, the active ingredient of the antibacterial prodrug TR-701, a 364 novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agent. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 365 53(8):3236-3239. 366

32. Shaw, K. J., S. Poppe, R. Schaadt, V. Brown-Driver, J. Finn, C. M. Pillar, 367 D. Shinabarger, G. Zurenko. 2008. In vitro activity of TR-700, the 368 antibacterial moiety of the prodrug TR-701, against linezolid-resistant strains. 369 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52(12):4442-4447. 370

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 18: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

18

33. Soriano, A., F. Marco, J. A. Martinez, E. Pisos, M. Almela, V. P. Dimova , 371 D. Alamo, M. Ortega, J. Lopez, and J. Mensa. 2008. Influence of 372 vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration on the treatment of methicillin 373 resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 46:193–200. 374

34. Steinkraus, G., R. White, L. Friedrich. 2007.Vancomycin MIC creep in non–375 vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin 376 susceptible clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 377 2001–05. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60:788–794. 378

35. Stevens, D. L., et al. 2005. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and 379 management of skin and soft-tissue infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41:1373–380 1406. 381

36. Tobin, C. M., Sunderland, J., White, L. O. and A. P. MacGowan. 2001. A 382 Simple, Isocratic High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Assay for 383 Linezolid in Human Serum. J Antimicrob. Chemother. 48:605-608. 384

385

386

387

388

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 19: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 20: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 21: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 22: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 23: Comparative Efficacy of Human Simulated Exposures of Tedizolid

on March 25, 2018 by guest

http://aac.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from