common core state standards next generation assessments the why and what bill daggett, founder and...

230
Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Upload: aaron-lewis

Post on 26-Mar-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments

The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman

November 16, 2012

Page 2: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

School Improvement

Growing Gap

Readiness

Changing World

Page 3: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

School Improvement

Growing Gap

Changing World

Page 4: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

School Improvement

Growing Gap

Changing World

Page 5: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

School Improvement

Growing Gap

Changing World

Page 6: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Common Core State Standards

Page 7: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

23 Successful PracticesWHAT

Page 8: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

College and Career Ready

• Fewer• Clearer• Higher

Page 9: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

600

800

1000

1400

1600

1200

Tex

t L

exil

e M

easu

re (

L)

HighSchool

Literature

CollegeLiterature

HighSchool

Textbooks

CollegeTextbooks

Military PersonalUse

Entry-LevelOccupations

SAT 1,ACT,AP*

* Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics

Reading Study SummaryInterquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)

Page 10: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

College and Career Ready

• Fewer• Clearer• Higher• Different

Page 11: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Application Model1. Knowledge in one discipline2. Application within discipline3. Application across disciplines4. Application to real-world predictable

situations5. Application to real-world unpredictable

situations

Page 12: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Application Model1. Knowledge in one discipline2. Application within discipline3. Application across disciplines4. Application to real-world predictable

situations5. Application to real-world unpredictable

situations

Page 13: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Knowledge Taxonomy1. Awareness2. Comprehension 3. Application4. Analysis5. Synthesis 6. Evaluation

Page 14: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1 2 3 4 5

Bloom’sBloom’s

CC DD

AA BB

456

321

ApplicationApplication

Levels

Page 15: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 2 3 4 5

A B

DC

Rigor/Relevance Framework

• Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals.

• Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides.

• Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes.

• Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid.

• Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides.

• Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter.

• Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function.

• Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes.

• Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year.

• Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically.

• Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event.

• Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale.

• Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper.

• Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles.

• Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram

• Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs.

Page 16: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 2 3 4 5

A B

DC• Analyze the graphs of the

perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides.

• Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter.

• Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function.

• Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes.

• Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year.

• Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically.

• Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event.

• Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale.

• Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper.

• Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles.

• Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram

• Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs.

•Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals.

•Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides.

•Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes.

•Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid.

Rigor/Relevance Framework

Page 17: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 2 3 4 5

A B

DC• Express probabilities as fractions,

percents, or decimals.• Classify triangles according to angle

size and/or length of sides.• Calculate volume of simple three-

dimensional shapes.• Given the coordinates of a

quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid.

• Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides.

• Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter.

• Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function.

• Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes.

• Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year.

• Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically.

• Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event.

• Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale.

• Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper.

• Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles.

• Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram.

• Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs.

Rigor/Relevance Framework

Page 18: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1 2 3 4 5

Bloom’sBloom’s

CC DD

AA BB

456

321

ApplicationApplication

Levels

Page 19: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

The “two-second rule” is used by a driver who wants to maintain a safe following distance at any speed. A driver must count two seconds from when the car in front of him or her passes a fixed point, such as a tree, until the driver passes the same fixed point. Drivers use this rule to determine the minimum distance to follow a car traveling at the same speed. A diagram representing this distance is shown.

As the speed of the cars increases, the minimum following distance also increases. Explain how the “two-second rule” leads to a greater minimum following distance as the speed of the cars increases. As part of your explanation, include the minimum following distances, in feet, for cars traveling at 30 miles per hour and 60 miles per hour.

2 Second Rule

Page 20: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Rigor/Relevance Framework

Page 21: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Decision Making• Innovation/Creativity • Goal Setting/Results Driven• Multi Tasking• Work with others

Quad D – Skills and Knowledge

Page 22: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

School Improvement

Growing Gap

Changing World

Page 23: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

21st Annual

Model Schools Conference• Effective and efficient practices for improving student achievement in times of decreasing

resources and increasing expectations

• Focusing on instructional excellence as the key to the Common Core State Standards, Next Generation Assessments, and Teacher Evaluations

• Providing effective instructional approaches for special populations

•June 30 – July 3 | Washington, D.C.www.modelschoolsconference.com

Page 24: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

23 Successful PracticesWHY

Page 25: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

The Changing Landscape

• Technology

Page 26: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Analyze Documentso Keywords and Headers

(Google)• Meaning / Concepts

o Wolfram Alpha• Complete Task

Semantic Web

Page 27: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

2 + 2Integrate x^2 sin^3 x dxgdp francewhat is the gdp of france?what is the gdp of france / italyinternet users in europespringfieldWeather Springfield

Page 28: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Homework

Implications

Page 29: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Homework• Term Paper

Implications

Page 30: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 31: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 32: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Integrated Projection• Projection Keyboard

SPOT

Page 33: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Projection Keyboard

Page 34: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Projection Keyboard and Monitor

Page 35: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Technology should work for you—to be there when you need it and get out of your way when you don’t.

Google X started Project Glass to build this kind of technology, one that helps you explore and share your world, putting you back in the moment.

Project Glass

Page 36: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Download any movie, website, or piece of information into your glasses or

contact lenses

Page 37: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Today’s students live in a hyper-connected world,

except in school OR

are they also connected in school but we just don’t know it?

Page 38: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Information is everywhere. In this changing world, sense-making and

the ability to evaluate the credibility of information are paramount.

Page 39: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Technology• Financial

The Changing Landscape

Page 40: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 41: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 42: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 43: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

2011 US Federal Budget2011 US Federal Budget

-borrowing 41% of -borrowing 41% of every dollar it is every dollar it is

spending spending

Page 44: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Federal Obligations•$534,000 per household•More than 5 times

—Mortgages —Car Loans—College Loans—Credit Cards

Page 45: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Technology• Financial• Globalization

The Changing Landscape

Page 46: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

PISA 2009

1 Shanghai-China 556

2 Korea 539

3 Finland 536

4 Hong Kong-China 533

5 Singapore 526

6 Canada 524

7 New Zealand 521

8 Japan 520

9 Australia 515

10 Netherlands 508

17 United States 500

20 Germany 497

21 Ireland 496

22 France 496

25 United Kingdom 494

33 Spain 481

43 Russian Federation 459

48 Mexico 425

53 Brazil 412

57 Indonesia 402

•Overall Reading

Scale

Significantly Above OECD Average

Not Significantly Different

(OECD Average 493)

Significantly below OECD Average

Page 47: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

PISA 2009

•Overall Math Scale

Significantly Above OECD Average

Not Significantly Different

(OECD Average 496)

Significantly below OECD Average

1 Shanghai-China 600

2 Singapore 562

3 Hong Kong-China 555

4 Korea 546

6 Finland 541

9 Japan 529

10 Canada 527

11 Netherlands 526

13 New Zealand 519

15 Australia 514

16 Germany 513

22 France 497

28 United Kingdom 492

31 United States 487

32 Ireland 487

34 Spain 483

38 Russian Federation 468

51 Mexico 419

57 Brazil 386

61 Indonesia 371

Page 48: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

PISA 2009

•Overall Science Scale

Significantly Above OECD Average

Not Significantly Different

(OECD Average 501)

Significantly below OECD Average

1 Shanghai-China 575

2 Finland 554

3 Hong Kong-China 549

4 Singapore 542

5 Japan 539

6 Korea 538

7 New Zealand 532

8 Canada 529

10 Australia 527

11 Netherlands 522

13 Germany 520

16 United Kingdom 514

20 Ireland 508

23 United States 502

27 France 498

36 Spain 488

39 Russian Federation 478

50 Mexico 416

53 Brazil 405

60 Indonesia 383

Page 49: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Technology• Financial• Globalization• Demographics

The Changing Landscape

Page 50: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Population

FemaleMale

1950

2010

2050

Page 51: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

School Improvement

Growing Gap

Changing World

Page 52: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

23 Successful PracticesWHAT

Page 53: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Next Generation Assessments

Page 54: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

The “two-second rule” is used by a driver who wants to maintain a safe following distance at any speed. A driver must count two seconds from when the car in front of him or her passes a fixed point, such as a tree, until the driver passes the same fixed point. Drivers use this rule to determine the minimum distance to follow a car traveling at the same speed. A diagram representing this distance is shown.

As the speed of the cars increases, the minimum following distance also increases. Explain how the “two-second rule” leads to a greater minimum following distance as the speed of the cars increases. As part of your explanation, include the minimum following distances, in feet, for cars traveling at 30 miles per hour and 60 miles per hour.

2 Second Rule

Page 55: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

School Improvement

Growing Gap

Changing World

Page 56: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

23 Successful PracticesHOW did they do it?

Page 57: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

No Formula

Page 58: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 59: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 60: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 61: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 62: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 63: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

21st Annual

Model Schools Conference• Effective and efficient practices for improving student achievement in times of decreasing

resources and increasing expectations

• Focusing on instructional excellence as the key to the Common Core State Standards, Next Generation Assessments, and Teacher Evaluations

• Providing effective instructional approaches for special populations

•June 30 – July 3 | Washington, D.C.www.modelschoolsconference.com

Page 64: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• 1587 Route 146• Rexford, NY 12148• Phone (518) 399-2776• Fax (518) 399-7607• E-mail: [email protected]• www.LeaderEd.com

•International Center for Leadership in Education

Page 65: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments

The How Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman

November 16, 2012

Page 66: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

School Improvement

Growing Gap

Changing World

Page 67: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

School Improvement

Growing Gap

Changing World

Page 68: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

School Improvement

Growing Gap

Changing World

Page 69: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

No Formula

Page 70: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

SUCCESS BY DESIGN NOT BY CHANCE

Page 71: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 72: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 73: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 74: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 75: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 76: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

21st Annual

Model Schools Conference• Effective and efficient practices for improving student achievement in times of decreasing

resources and increasing expectations

• Focusing on instructional excellence as the key to the Common Core State Standards, Next Generation Assessments, and Teacher Evaluations

• Providing effective instructional approaches for special populations

•June 30 – July 3 | Washington, D.C.www.modelschoolsconference.com

Page 77: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Culture

Organizational Leadership

Page 78: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Technology• Financial• Globalization• Demographics

The Changing Landscape

Page 79: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Culture

Vision

Organizational Leadership

Page 80: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

College and Career Ready

• Fewer• Clearer• Higher

Page 81: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Academics

Page 82: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Layers of non-sequential but increasingly complex

knowledge

Page 83: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

College Ready

1 2 3 4 5

456

321

Page 84: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Academics

Page 85: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Rules

K-12 Culture

Page 86: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Rules• Regulation

K-12 Culture

Page 87: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Rules• Regulation • Certification

K-12 Culture

Page 88: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Rules• Regulation • Certification• Tenure

K-12 Culture

Page 89: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Rules• Regulation • Certification• Tenure• Contracts

K-12 Culture

Page 90: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Rules• Regulation • Certification• Tenure• Contracts• Teachers Trained

K-12 Culture

Page 91: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Rules• Regulation • Certification• Tenure• Contracts• Teachers Trained• Physical Plant

K-12 Culture

Page 92: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Career Ready

Page 93: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1. Knowledge in one discipline2. Application within discipline3. Application across disciplines4. Application to real-world

predictable situations5. Application to real-world

unpredictable situations

Career Ready

Page 94: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

College and Career Ready

• Fewer• Clearer• Higher• Different

Page 95: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Career Ready

Page 96: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

College Ready

Page 97: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

600

800

1000

1400

1600

1200

Tex

t L

exil

e M

easu

re (

L)

HighSchool

Literature

CollegeLiterature

HighSchool

Textbooks

CollegeTextbooks

Military PersonalUse

Entry-LevelOccupations

SAT 1,ACT,AP*

* Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics

Reading Study SummaryInterquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)

Page 98: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Career Ready

Page 99: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Career Ready

Page 100: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Requires Both Vertical and Horizontal Integration

Career Ready

Page 101: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Career ReadyCareer Ready

Page 102: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Levels

1 2 3 4 5

Bloom’sBloom’s

CC DD

AA BB

456

321

ApplicationApplication

Page 103: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

College Ready

AA BB

DDCC

Page 104: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

AA BB

DDCC

Career Ready

Page 105: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Culture

Vision

Structure and

systems

Organizational Leadership

Page 106: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Looping

Organizational Changes

Page 107: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Looping• Interdisciplinary Chairs

Organizational Changes

Page 108: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Looping• Interdisciplinary Chairs• 9th Grade Electives

Organizational Changes

Page 109: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Culture

Vision

Structure and

systems

Organizational Leadership

Bui

ld le

ader

ship

Page 110: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Top-down support for bottom-up success

Page 111: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Empower Leadership Teams

Page 112: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Culture

Vision

Structure and

systems

Sel

ectio

n, s

uppo

rt,

eval

uatio

n

Organizational Leadership

Bui

ld le

ader

ship

Page 113: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Culture

Vision

Structure and

systems

Sel

ectio

n, s

uppo

rt,

eval

uatio

n

Organizational Leadership

Bui

ld le

ader

ship

Page 114: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Culture

Vision

Structure and

systems

Sel

ectio

n, s

uppo

rt,

eval

uatio

n

Data

syste

msB

uild

lead

ersh

ip

Organizational Leadership

Page 115: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 116: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

High expectations

Instructional Leadership

Page 117: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

600

800

1000

1400

1600

1200

Tex

t L

exil

e M

easu

re (

L)

HighSchool

Literature

CollegeLiterature

HighSchool

Textbooks

CollegeTextbooks

Military PersonalUse

Entry-LevelOccupations

SAT 1,ACT,AP*

* Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics

Reading Study SummaryInterquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)

Page 118: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

2005 Proficiency2005 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading

ProficientRequired

NAEP Score

Mississippi 88 %

Georgia 87 %

Wisconsin 83 %

Texas 81 %

Ohio 77 %

Florida 71%

Arkansas 53 %

Massachusetts 48 %

Page 119: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

2005 Proficiency2005 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading

ProficientRequired

NAEP Score

Mississippi 88 % 161

Georgia 87 % 175

Wisconsin 83 % 189

Texas 81 % 190

Ohio 77 % 199

Florida 71% 202

Arkansas 53 % 217

Massachusetts 48 % 234

Page 120: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading

ProficientRequired

NAEP Score

Georgia 87 %

Texas 84 %

Ohio 82 %

Wisconsin 82 %

Florida 74%

Arkansas 70 %

Massachusetts 54 %

Mississippi 52 %

Page 121: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading

ProficientRequired

NAEP Score

Georgia 87 % 178

Texas 84 % 188

Ohio 82 % 192

Wisconsin 82 % 189

Florida 74% 206

Arkansas 70 % 200

Massachusetts 54 % 234

Mississippi 52 % 210

Page 122: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading

ProficientRequired

NAEP Score

Georgia 87 % (0) 178 (+3)

Texas 84 % (+3) 188 (-2)

Ohio 82 % (+5) 192 (-7)

Wisconsin 82 % (-1) 189 (0)

Florida 74% (+3) 206 (+4)

Arkansas 70 % (+17) 200 (-17)

Massachusetts 54 % (+6) 234 (0)

Mississippi 52 % (-36) 210 (+49)

Page 123: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 8 ReadingGrade 8 Reading

ProficientRequired

NAEP Score

Texas 94 % (+11) 201 (-24)

Wisconsin 85 % (-1) 232 (+3)

Georgia 77 % (-6) 209 (-15)

Ohio 72 % (-8) 251 (+10)

Arkansas 71 % (+14) 241 (-13)

Florida 54 % (+10) 262 (-3)

Mississippi 48 % (-10) 254 (+7)

California 48 % (+9) 259 (-3)

Page 124: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 MathematicsGrade 4 Mathematics

ProficientRequired

NAEP Score

Texas 85 % (+3) 214 (-5)

Wisconsin 81 % (+7) 219 (+4)

Mississippi 58 % (-21) 223 (+17)

Georgia 75 % (0) 218 (+3)

Ohio 78 % (+13) 219 (-14)

Florida 75 % (+12) 225 (-5)

Arkansas 78 % (+25) 216 (-20)

Massachusetts 48 % (+9) 255 (0)

Page 125: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 8 MathematicsGrade 8 Mathematics

ProficientRequired

NAEP Score

Texas 83 % (+22) 254 (-19)

Illinois 82 % (+28) 251 (-25)

New York 80 % (+24) 249 (-26)

Ohio 71 % (+8) 265 (-9)

Oklahoma 59 % (-8) 269 (+11)

Mississippi 54 % (+1) 264 (+2)

Massachusetts 49 % (+7) 300 (-1)

Missouri 47 % (+3) 287 (-2)

Page 126: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

High expectations

Curriculum

Instructional Leadership

Page 127: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

High expectations

Curriculum

Literacy and math

Instructional Leadership

Page 128: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

High expectations

Curriculum

Literacy and math

Dat

a-dr

iven

Instructional Leadership

Page 129: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Take off the plate

Page 130: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Next Network

Page 131: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1 2 3 4 5

Page 132: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Road Map

• State Standards to State Test

Page 133: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Ohio English Language ArtsIndicators Tested

High Medium Low Grade 3 20 9 72 Grade 4 36 29 19 Grade 5 24 8 51 Grade 6 23 8 51 Grade 7 43 25 13 Grade 8 21 7 51 Grade 9 58 6 12 Grade 10 58 0 12

Page 134: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

StateTests

StateStandards

AA

AA

Page 135: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

NESS &

Lexile

StateTests

StateStandards

AA

Page 136: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

National Essential Skills Study (NESS)

Page 137: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

NESS StudySubgroup Rankings

ELA Skill: Write clear and concise directions or procedures.

Group Rank

Overall 9

Business/Industry 2

Other Non-educators 10

English Language Arts Teachers 25

Other Educators 8

Page 138: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

NESS StudySubgroup Rankings

ELA Skill: Give clear and concise oral directions.

Group Rank

Overall 7

Business/Industry 3

Other Non-educators 9

English Language Arts Teachers 28

Other Educators 7

Page 139: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

NESS StudySubgroup Rankings

Math Skill: Apply the Pythagorean Theorem to right triangles.

Group Rank

Overall 20

Business/Industry 29

Other Non-educators 31

Mathematics Teachers 4

Other Educators 24

Page 140: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

NESS StudySubgroup Rankings

Math Skill: Understand accuracy and precision of measurement, round off numbers according to the correct number of significant figures, and determine percent error.

Group Rank

Overall 12

Business/Industry 3

Other Non-educators 10

Mathematics Teachers 30

Other Educators 8

Page 141: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Proficiency

Page 142: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Reading Study Summary

600

800

1000

1400

1600

1200

Tex

t L

exil

e M

easu

re (

L)

HighSchool

Literature

CollegeLiterature

HighSchool

Textbooks

CollegeTextbooks

Military PersonalUse

Entry-LevelOccupations

SAT 1,ACT,AP*

* Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics

Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)

Page 143: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

NESS &

Lexile

StateTests

StateStandards

AA

Page 144: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

CommonCore

Standards

NESS&

Lexile

StateTests

StateStandards

AA

Page 145: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Road Map

• State Standards to State Test• State Standards to Research• State Standards to CCSS• CCSS to State Standard

Page 146: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Road Map

• State Standards to State Test• State Standards to Research• State Standards to CCSS• CCSS to State Standard• State Test to CCSS• Samples to NGA

Page 147: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Road Map

• State Standards to State Test• State Standards to Research• State Standards to CCSS• CCSS to State Standard• State Test to CCSS• Samples to NGA

Page 148: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Performance Task drawn from the Ohio Performance Assessment Project.

Available at, www.ModelSchoolsConference.com/handouts12.html

Page 149: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

State Test NGACreate a large spinner for a game that has at least eight sectors. Each sector should be assigned a different ‘prize’. Prizes should range in value from most appealing to least appealing.

Vary the sectors so that the probability to win a desired prize is much less that the probability to win a lesser desired prize. Calculate the theoretical probability of landing on each prize.

Conduct multiple trials with the spinner and determine the experimental probability of landing on each prize. Which price has the greatest probability and which prize has the least probability?

Page 150: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

CommonCore

Standards

NESS&

Lexile

StateTests

StateStandards

ConsortiumAssessment

DDAA

Page 151: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Gold Seal Lessons

Page 152: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Career & Technical Education

Ohio English Language ArtsBenchmarks/Indicators

Grade 10

OTG

Agriculture, Food& Natural Resources

Architecture& Construction

Food P

roducts & P

rocessing Systems

Agribusiness System

s

Pow

er, Structural & T

echnical Systems

Environm

ental Service System

s

Plant System

s

Natural R

esource System

s

Anim

al Systems

Design/ P

re-C

onstruction

Construction

Maintenance/

Operations

1. Define unknown words through context clues and the author’s use of comparison, contrast and cause and effect.

H

2. Analyze the relationships of pairs of words in analogical statements (e.g., synonyms and antonyms, connotation and denotation) and infer word meanings from these relationships.

L

3. Infer the literal and figurative meaning of words and phrases and discuss the function of figurative language, including metaphors, similes, idioms and puns.

H

4. Analyze the ways that historical events influenced the English language. H

5. Use knowledge of Greek, Latin and Anglo-Saxon roots, prefixes and suffixes to understand complex words and new subject-area vocabulary (e.g., unknown words in science, mathematics and social studies).

H

6. Determine the meanings and pronunciations of unknown words by using dictionaries, glossaries, technology and textual features, such as definitional footnotes or sidebars.

M

1. Apply reading comprehension strategies, including making predictions, comparing and contrasting, recalling and summarizing and making inferences and drawing conclusions.

H

Page 153: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Ohio Arts EducationOhio English Language Arts

Benchmarks/IndicatorsGrade 6

NESSGrade 6

Achievement Test

Visual Arts

Dance Music Theatre

1. Define the meaning of unknown words by using context clues and the author’s use of definition, restatement and example.

E5 H

1. Establish and adjust purposes for reading, including to find out, to understand, to interpret, to enjoy and to solve problems.

E2E12

H

2. Predict or hypothesize as appropriate from information in the text, substantiating with specific references to textual examples that may be in widely separated sections of text.

E12E13

H

3. Make critical comparisons across texts, noting author’s style as well as literal and implied content of text.

E24 H

4. Summarize the information in texts, recognizing important ideas and supporting details, and noting gaps or contradictions.

E2E9

H

5. Select, create and use graphic organizers to interpret textual information.

E6E22E31

M

6. Answer literal, inferential, evaluative and synthesizing questions to demonstrate comprehension of grade-appropriate print texts and electronic and visual media.

E2 H

Page 154: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Net Network Resources

• Professional Development

Page 155: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Net Network Resources

• Professional Development• Verb Analyzer -continuous improvement

Page 156: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Net Network Resources

• Professional Development• Verb Analyzer -continuous improvement • Video Cast

Page 157: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Net Network Resources

• Professional Development• Verb Analyzer -continuous improvement • Video Cast• Case Studies

Page 158: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Net Network Resources

• Professional Development• Verb Analyzer -continuous improvement • Video Cast• Case Studies• Bulletins/Updates

Page 159: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

High expectations

Curriculum

Literacy and math

Dat

a-dr

iven

Provid

e

prof

essio

nal g

rowth

Instructional Leadership

Page 160: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• A focus on college AND career ready

Successful Practices

Page 161: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• A focus on college AND career ready• A common vision

Successful Practices

Page 162: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• A focus on college AND career ready• A common vision• A culture of high expectations

Successful Practices

Page 163: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• A focus on college AND career ready• A common vision• A culture of high expectations • Literacy across the curriculum

Successful Practices

Page 164: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• A focus on college AND career ready• A common vision• A culture of high expectations • Literacy across the curriculum• Rigor and Relevance for ALL students

Successful Practices

Page 165: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• A focus on college AND career ready• A common vision• A culture of high expectations • Literacy across the curriculum• Rigor and Relevance for ALL students• A culture of continuous improvement

Successful Practices

Page 166: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• A focus on college AND career ready• A common vision• A culture of high expectations • Literacy across the curriculum• Rigor and Relevance for ALL students• A culture of continuous improvement• Leadership across all levels

Successful Practices

Page 167: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• A focus on college AND career ready• A common vision• A culture of high expectations • Literacy across the curriculum• Rigor and Relevance for ALL students• A culture of continuous improvement• Leadership across all levels • Focused and sustained professional

development

Successful Practices

Page 168: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

23 Successful Practices

Page 169: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Successful Practices Network-Barrier Study-

Page 170: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Level of Establishment• Firmly Established• Partially Established• In Planning Stage• Not Evident

Best Practices

Page 171: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Technical• Cultural• Political• Insufficient Support• Insufficient Budget• Insufficient Personnel

Barriers

Page 172: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Technical – • Cultural – is greatest barrier in 18

of the 23 successful practices• Political• Insufficient Support• Insufficient Budget • Insufficient Personnel

Barriers

Page 173: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Technical – is greatest in 4 of the 23 successful practices

• Cultural – is greatest barrier in 18 of the 23 successful practices

• Political• Insufficient Support• Insufficient Budget • Insufficient Personnel

Barriers

Page 174: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Technical – is greatest in 4 of 23 the successful practice

• Cultural – is greatest barrier in 18 of the 23 successful practices

• Political• Insufficient Support• Insufficient Budget – is greatest in

1 of the 23 successful practices • Insufficient Personnel

Barriers

Page 175: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 176: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Career Ready Network

Page 177: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

32

1

K-12 Education – High Impact Factors

Page 178: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

32

1

1 – Computer Labs 2 – One-to-One Computing 3 – Bring Your Own Technology (BYOT)

Technology in Schools

Page 179: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Pencil Budget

Page 180: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

32

1

1 – Training all teachers to grade essays 2 – Computer grading of essays 3 – Computer-based grading and immediate instruction based on performance

Grading of Papers

Page 181: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1

1 – Learning Together

Learning

Page 182: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

32

1

1 – Student-run technology P.D. (survey/3 levels)

2 – Teachers are given technology IEP with students as their mentors

3 – Top 1/3rd students and teachers create alternative instructional delivery system

Professional Development

Page 183: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

32

1

1 – Project-based Learning 2 – Flipped Classroom 3 – Online Game-based System

Instruction

Page 184: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Rigor and Relevance

Teaching

Page 185: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Levels

1 2 3 4 5

Bloom’sBloom’s

CC DD

AA BB

456

321

ApplicationApplication

Page 186: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Rigor/Relevance Framework

Page 187: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Quad DSkills and Knowledge

• Decision Making• Innovation/Creativity • Goal Setting/Results Driven• Multi Tasking• Work with others

Page 188: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Rigor and Relevance

Relationships

Teaching

Page 189: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1

2

3

1 2 3 4 5

A B

DC

• Calculate with numbers, including decimals, ratios, percents, and fractions.

• Understand two-dimensional motion and trajectories by separating the motion of an object into x and y components.

Rigor/Relevance Framework

Page 190: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1

2

3

1 2 3 4 5

A B

DC

• Know the characteristics and phenomena of sound waves and light waves.

• Understand the effect of sounds, words, and imagery on a listening audience.

Rigor/Relevance Framework

Page 191: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Rigor and Relevance

Relationships

Content

Teaching

Page 192: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Rigor and Relevance

Relationships

Content

Teaching

How

stu

dent

s le

arn

Page 193: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

AA BB

DDCC

Page 194: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

How Students Learn

Page 195: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

AA BB

DDCC

Page 196: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Rigor and Relevance

Relationships

Content

Teaching

How

stu

dent

s le

arn

Inst

ruct

iona

l stra

tegi

es

Page 197: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Rigor and relevance

Relationships

Content H

ow s

tude

nts

lear

n

Inst

ruct

iona

l stra

tegi

es

Asses

smen

t to

guid

e

inst

ruct

ion

Teaching

Page 198: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 199: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 200: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Doctor

Pilot

Page 201: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

32

1

1 – Teaching 2 – Learning 3 – Personalization of Learning

Our Mission

Page 202: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Recommendations

Page 203: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1. Self Reflection -Barrier Study

Recommendations

Page 204: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• A focus on college AND career ready• A culture of high expectations • Literacy across the curriculum• A culture of continuous improvement• A common vision• Leadership across all levels • Focused and sustained professional

development

23 Best Practices

Page 205: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Level of Establishment• Firmly Established• Partially Established• In Planning Stage• Not Evident

Best Practices

Page 206: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Technical• Cultural• Political• Insufficient Support• Insufficient Budget• Insufficient Personnel

Barriers

Page 207: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Technical – • Cultural – is greatest barrier in 18

of the 23 successful practices• Political• Insufficient Support• Insufficient Budget • Insufficient Personnel

Barriers

Page 208: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Technical – is greatest in 4 of the 23 successful practices

• Cultural – is greatest barrier in 18 of the 23 successful practices

• Political• Insufficient Support• Insufficient Budget • Insufficient Personnel

Barriers

Page 209: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

• Technical – is greatest in 4 of 23 the successful practice

• Cultural – is greatest barrier in 18 of the 23 successful practices

• Political• Insufficient Support• Insufficient Budget – is greatest in

1 of the 23 successful practices • Insufficient Personnel

Barriers

Page 210: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1. Self Reflection -Barrier Study

Recommendations

Page 211: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1. Self Reflection -Barrier Study -ICLE we analyze and

suggest actions that should be

taken

Recommendations

Page 212: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1. Self Reflection -Barrier Study -We Surveys

Recommendations

Page 213: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Survey Tools for Rigor, Relevance and

RelationshipsWE™ Learn Student Survey

WE™ Teach Instructional Staff Survey

WE™ Lead Whole Staff Survey

Page 214: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

T – Students can apply what I am teaching to their everyday lives.

92%

S – I can apply what I learn to my everyday life.

58%

Teacher vs. Student Comparison

Page 215: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

T – Students in my classroom engage in hands-on activities.

88%

S – We do lots of hands-on activities in my classes.

45%

Teacher vs. Student Comparison

Page 216: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

T – I make learning exciting for my students.

84%

S – My teachers make learning exciting.

40%

Teacher vs. Student Comparison

Page 217: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

T – I recognize students when they demonstrate positive behavior in school.

95%

S – Good citizenship is rewarded in this school.

40%

Teacher vs. Student Comparison

Page 218: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1. Self Reflection2. Needs Assessment

Recommendations

Page 219: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1. Self Reflection2. Needs Assessment3. Strategic Plan

Recommendations

Page 220: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

SUCCESS BY DESIGN NOT BY CHANCE

Page 221: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1. Self Reflection2. Needs Assessment3. Strategic Plan -Comprehensive

Recommendations

Page 222: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012
Page 223: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

CULTURE DRIVES STRATEGY

Page 224: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1. Self Reflection2. Needs Assessment3. Strategic Plan -Comprehensive -Coaching

Recommendations

Page 225: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1. Self Reflection2. Needs Assessment3. Strategic Plan -Comprehensive -Coaching -Professional Development

Recommendations

Page 226: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1. Self Reflection2. Needs Assessment3. Strategic Plan -Comprehensive -Coaching -Professional Development -Tools

Recommendations

Page 227: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Take off the plate

Page 228: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

Next Network

Page 229: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1 2 3 4 5

Next Network

Page 230: Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments The Why and What Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman November 16, 2012

1.Self Reflection

2.Needs Assessment

3.Strategic Plan

-Comprehensive

-Coaching

-Professional Development

-Tools

4. Career Ready Network

• Recommendations