comfort research v. ace bayou - complaint
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
1/19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
COMFORT RESEARCH, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
ACE BAYOU CORPORATION,
Defendant.
Case No:
Judge:
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff, COMFORT RESEARCH, LLC ("PLAINTIFF" or "COMFORT
RESEARCH"), by and through its undersigned counsel, for its Complaint against
Defendant, ACE BAYOU CORPORATION ("DEFENDANT" or "ACE") states the
following. Allegations made on information and belief are premised on the belief that the
same are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further
investigation and discovery.
NATURE OF THE CASE
1. This is an action for patent infringement under the Patent Laws of the
United States, 35 U.S.C. 1, et seq. ("Federal Patent Act").
2. This is also an action for copyright infringement under the Federal
Copyright Act of 1976, as amended, 17 U.S.C. 101, et seq. ("Federal Copyright Act").
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#1
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
2/19
2
3. ACE, manufactures, offers to sell, and sells, without authorization, either
express or implied, from COMFORT RESEARCH, a frameless chair in direct violation
of The Federal Patent Act and The Federal Copyright Act among others.
4. COMFORT RESEARCH seeks injunctive and monetary relief to the
fullest extent possible under The Federal Patent Act, The Federal Copyright Act, as well
as any such other relief as the equities of the case may require and as this Court may
deem just and proper.
PARTIES
5. COMFORT RESEARCH, LLC is a Michigan limited liability company
having a principal place of business at 1719 Elizabeth Avenue NW, Grand Rapids,
Michigan 49504.
6. Upon information and belief ACE BAYOU CORPORATION is a
corporation organized under the laws of Louisiana, having a principal place of business at
3700 Desire Parkway, New Orleans, Louisiana 70126.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
7. This Court has original jurisdiction over the subject matter by virtue of at
least one of 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1338(a), and 1338(b).
8. This Court has personal jurisdiction over ACE, and venue is proper in this
judicial district pursuant to at least one of 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2), 1391(c), 1400(a), and
1400(b). Upon information and belief ACE is actively doing business in this judicial
district, and/or has committed certain acts of patent infringement and copyright
infringement in this judicial district. ACE makes, distributes, offers for sale, and/or sells
frameless chairs in the State of Michigan. ACE is subject to the personal jurisdiction of
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 2 of 9 Page ID#2
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
3/19
3
this Court and is amenable to service of process pursuant to the Michigan long-arm
statute, MI ST 600.705 (2003), and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e). Requiring ACE to respond to
this action will not violate due process.
BACKGROUND
9. COMFORT RESEARCH is, among other things, a world leader in the
innovation, design, and manufacture of frameless furniture. COMFORT RESEARCH
manufactures, distributes, and sells its frameless beanbag chairs, loungers, loveseats, and
pet beds to companies and end users around the world.
10. COMFORT RESEARCH is actively philanthropic both locally and
nationally donating thousands of chairs, as well as proceeds from the sales of chairs, to
organizations such as Grand Rapids Urban Oasis, The Wounded Warrior Project,
Sunshine on a Ranney Day, the Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, and East Jefferson
YMCA of New Orleans just to name a few.
11. Prior to May 8, 2014, Daniel C. George II and Matthew Jung conceived of
a new frameless chair that is now known as the Milano Chair.
12. On October 28, 2014, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly
and legally issued U.S. Design Patent No. D716,064 S ("the '064 patent"), entitled
"Milano Chair" to Daniel C. George II and Matthew Jung. (See Exhibit A.)
13. All rights in the '064 patent have been assigned to Comfort Research,
LLC.
14. Comfort Research, LLC is the sole owner of the '064 patent and has the
right to enforce and recover damages for infringement of the '064 patent.
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 3 of 9 Page ID#3
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
4/19
4
15. The United States Copyright Office also duly and legally issued U.S.
Registration No. VA 1-933-980 ("the '980 registration"), entitled "Big Joe Milano" to
Comfort Research, LLC.
16. In an improper attempt to unlawfully profit from the goodwill and
charitable missions of COMFORT RESEARCH, ACE has begun selling a frameless
chair that infringes COMFORT RESEARCH's intellectual property associated with its
now famous Big Joe Milano Chair in direct violation of The Federal Patent Act, and The
Federal Copyright Act among others.
COUNT I PATENT INFRINGEMENT OF
U.S. DESIGN PATENT NO. D716,064 BY ACE
17. Plaintiff restates and incorporates by reference herein paragraphs 1-16.
18. ACE makes or has made, uses, offers to sell and/or sells one or more
frameless chairs (e.g., the chairs sold at Walmart Stores, Inc. having the UPC code
094338979725 from lot number 20140625C) which infringe upon one or more claims of
the '064 patent in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States in violation of
35 U.S.C. 271.
19. Infringement of the '064 patent by ACE has caused, and will continue to
cause, COMFORT RESEARCH to suffer damages, including, but not limited to, lost
sales, lost profits, lost royalties and/or price erosion in an amount to be determined by the
trier of fact.
20. Furthermore, the recent recall of nearly 2.2 million of ACE's chairs due
the death of two children from the lack of a permanent zipper closure, causes further
harm to COMFORT RESEARCH as there have been multiple occasions where confused
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 4 of 9 Page ID#4
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
5/19
5
consumers contact COMFORT RESEARCH asking about the recall because of the
confusingly similar frameless chairs sold by ACE.
21. Unless restrained and enjoined by this Court, ACE will continue to
infringe the '064 patent, resulting in substantial, continuing and irreparable damages to
COMFORT RESEARCH.
22. The actions of ACE are "exceptional" within the meaning of 35 U.S.C.
285.
COUNT II COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OF
U.S. REGISTRATION NO. VA 1-933-980 BY ACE
23. Plaintiff restates and incorporates by reference herein paragraphs 1-22.
24. COMFORT RESEARCH is a business which, among other things, designs
and manufactures innovative and distinct frameless chairs.
25. Each new line of COMFORT RESEARCH's chairs and its associated
photographs are original works subject to copyright protection under United States Law.
26. At least as early as May 8, 2014, COMFORT RESEARCH designed,
photographed, and implemented the Big Joe Milano chair.
27. COMFORT RESEARCH is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and
copyrights to U.S. Registration No. VA 1-933-980 (Big Joe Milano).
28. Big Joe Milano comprises an original work of authorship fixed in a
tangible medium of expression within the meaning of the Copyright Act of 1976 17
U.S.C. 101 et seq., as amended. Therefore, it constitutes copyrightable subject matter
under the laws of the United States.
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 5 of 9 Page ID#5
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
6/19
6
29. COMFORT RESEARCH believes, and therefore alleges, that ACE has
knowingly and willfully copied and continues to copy the Big Joe Milano.
30. COMFORT RESEARCH believes, and therefore alleges, that ACE has
sold and continues to sell substantial quantities of chairs continuing to copy from
COMFORT RESEARCH.
31. As a direct and proximate result of the ACE's acts of infringement,
COMFORT RESEARCH has suffered and will continue to suffer, irreparable injury.
32. The DEFENDANT's conduct is causing and, unless enjoined and
permanently restrained by this Court, will continue to cause COMFORT RESEARCH
great and irreparable injury that cannot be fully compensated or measured in money.
COMFORT RESEARCH has no adequate remedy at law.
33. COMFORT RESEARCH is entitled to recover all damages suffered as a
result of the ACE's wrongful acts, including but not limited to profits obtained by the
DEFENDANT as a result of their wrongful acts and the loss of profits sustained by
COMFORT RESEARCH. In the alternative, COMFORT RESEARCH is entitled to
recover statutory damages in an amount to be determined by the Court. COMFORT
RESEARCH is also entitled to recover all reasonable attorney's fees, court costs and
interest on said damages from the date of DEFENDANT's infringement.
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 6 of 9 Page ID#6
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
7/19
7
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE COMFORT RESEARCH respectfully demands judgment against
ACE as follows:
A. Declaring that ACE has infringed the '064 patent;
B. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283, permanently enjoining and restraining ACE
and its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those persons in active
concert or participation with them, from further acts of infringement of the '064 patent;
C. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, awarding to COMFORT RESEARCH
damages, including lost profits, together with prejudgment interest, post judgment
interest, and costs, adequate to compensate COMFORT RESEARCH for ACE's acts of
infringement of the '064 patent;
D. Declaring that ACE's infringement has been willful and this is an
exceptional case pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285 and awarding COMFORT RESEARCH
treble damages and reasonable attorneys' fees against ACE for infringement of the '064
patent;
E. Declaring that ACE has infringed one or more copyrights of COMFORT
RESEARCH;
F. Preliminarily and permanently restrain and enjoin ACE from further
infringement of COMFORT RESEARCH's copyright;
G. Order the impoundment and destruction of all infringing works;
H. Order ACE to pay damages adequate to compensate COMFORT
RESEARCH for the acts of copyright infringement by ACE and ACE's profits from its
sales of goods in violation of the law as described in this Complaint;
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 7 of 9 Page ID#7
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
8/19
8
I. Order ACE to pay statutory damages, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504 for
willful infringement;
J. Order ACE to pay COMFORT RESEARCH's expenses, interest, and costs
including reasonable attorney's fees, pursuant 17 U.S.C. 505;
K. Declaring that ACE has infringed at least one of the patent, and copyright
of COMFORT RESEARCH;
L. Preliminarily and permanently restrain and enjoin ACE from further
infringement of COMFORT RESEARCH's patent and copyright;
M. Order ACE to pay damages adequate to compensate COMFORT
RESEARCH for the acts of patent and/or copyright infringement by ACE and ACE's
profits from its sales of goods in violation of the law as described in this Complaint;
N. Order ACE to pay all applicable statutory damages including exceptional
and/or treble damages;
O. Order ACE to pay COMFORT RESEARCH's expenses, interest, and costs
including reasonable attorney's fees;
P. Order ACE to pay COMFORT RESEARCH for rehabilitative advertising
and price point restoration; and
Q. Awarding COMFORT RESEARCH such other and further relief as the
Court deems just and proper.
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 8 of 9 Page ID#8
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
9/19
9
JURY TRIAL DEMAND
COMFORT RESEARCH, LLC respectfully demands a trial by jury on all issues
so triable.
Respectfully submitted,
COMFORT RESEARCH, LLC
Dated: December 9, 2014 /William L. King III/
By: One of the Attorneys for Plaintiff
William L. King IIIKING & PARTNERS, PLC
170 College Avenue, Suite 230Holland, Michigan 49423
T: 616.355.0400F: 616.355.9862
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 9 of 9 Page ID#9
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
10/19
Exhibit A
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#10
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
11/19
Exhibit A
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 2 of 8 Page ID#11
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
12/19
Exhibit A
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 3 of 8 Page ID#12
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
13/19
Exhibit A
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 4 of 8 Page ID#13
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
14/19
Exhibit A
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 5 of 8 Page ID#14
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
15/19
Exhibit A
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 6 of 8 Page ID#15
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
16/19
Exhibit A
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 7 of 8 Page ID#16
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
17/19
Exhibit A
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 8 of 8 Page ID#17
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
18/19
S 44 (Rev. 12/12) CIVIL COVER SHEETThe JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except
rovided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for theurpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS
(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff County of Residence of First Listed Defendant
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OFTHE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.
(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)
I. BASIS OF JURISDICTION(Place an X in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES(Place an X in One Box for(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant
1 U.S. Government 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF D
Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State 1 1 Incorporated orPrincipal Place 4
of Business In This State
2 U.S. Government 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State 2 2 Incorporated andPrincipal Place 5
Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State
Citizen or Subject of a 3 3 Foreign Nation 6
Foreign Country
V. NATURE OF SUIT(Place an X in One Box Only)CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES
110 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY 625 Drug Related Seizure 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 375 False Claims Act
120 Marine 310 Airplane 365 Personal Injury - of Property 21 USC 881 423 Withdrawal 400 State Reapportionm
130 Miller Act 315 Airplane Product Product Liability 690 Other 28 USC 157 410 Antitrust
140 Negotiable Instrument Liability 367 Health Care/ 430 Banks and Banking
150 Recovery of Overpayment 320 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceutical PROPERTY RIGHTS 450 Commerce& Enforcement of Judgment Slander Personal Injury 820 Copyrights 460 Deportation
151 Medicare Act 330 Federal Employers Product Liabi lity 830 Patent 470 Racketeer Influence
152 Recovery of Defaulted Liability 368 Asbestos Personal 840 Trademark Corrupt Organizatio
Student Loans 340 Marine Injury Product 480 Consumer Credit
(Excludes Veterans) 345 Marine Product Liability LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY 490 Cable/Sat TV 153 Recovery of Overpayment Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY 710 Fair Labor Standards 861 HIA (1395ff) 850 Securities/Commod
of Veterans Benefits 350 Motor Vehicle 370 Other Fraud Act 862 Black Lung (923) Exchange
160 Stockholders Suits 355 Motor Vehicle 371 Truth in Lending 720 Labor/Management 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) 890 Other Statutory Acti
190 Other Contract Product Liability 380 Other Personal Relations 864 SSID Title XVI 891 Agricultural Acts
195 Contract Product Liability 360 Other Personal Property Damage 740 Railway Labor Act 865 RSI (405(g)) 893 Environmental Matt
196 Franchise Injury 385 Property Damage 751 Family and Medical 895 Freedom of Informa
362 Personal Injury - Product Liability Leave Act ActMedical Malpractice 790 Other Labor Litigation 896 Arbitration
REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS 791 Employee Retirement FEDERAL TAX SUITS 899 Administrative Proc
210 Land Condemnation 440 Other Civil Rights Habeas Corpus: Income Security Act 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff Act/Review or Appe
220 Foreclosure 441 Voting 463 Alien Detainee or Defendant) Agency Decision
230 Rent Lease & Ejectment 442 Employment 510 Motions to Vacate 871 IRSThird Party 950 Constitutionality of
240 Torts to Land 443 Housing/ Sentence 26 USC 7609 State Statutes
245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations 530 General
290 All Other Real Property 445 Amer. w/Disabilities - 535 Death Penalty IMMIGRATION
Employment Other: 462 Naturalization Application 446 Amer. w/Disabilities - 540 Mandamus & Other 465 Other Immigration
Other 550 Civil Rights Actions
448 Education 555 Prison Condition
560 Civil Detainee -
Conditions of
Confinement
V. ORIGIN(Place an X in One Box Only)
1 OriginalProceeding
2 Removed fromState Court
3 Remanded fromAppellate Court
4 Reinstated orReopened
5 Transferred fromAnother District(specify)
6 MultidistrictLitigation
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION
Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):
Brief description of cause:
VII. REQUESTED INCOMPLAINT:
CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTIONUNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P.
DEMAND $ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint
JURY DEMAND: Yes No
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)IF ANY
(See instructions):JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER
DATE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIPT # AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1-2 Filed 12/09/14 Page 1 of 2 Page ID#18
COMFORT RESEARCH, LLC
Kent
King & Partners, PLC70 College Avenue, Suite 230
Holland, Michigan 49423
ACE BAYOU CORPORATION
35 USC 1 et seq.
patent infringement, copyright infringement
2/09/2014 /William L. King III/ (P59098)
Print Save As... Reset
-
8/10/2019 Comfort Research v. Ace Bayou - Complaint
19/19
JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 12/12)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44
Authority For Civil Cover Sheet
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as
required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is
required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk o
Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows:
I.(a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, us
only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency andthen the official, giving both name and title.
(b) County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides attime of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In lan
condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)
(c) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noin this section "(see attachment)".
II. Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.
United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here
United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box.
Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendm
to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code tak
precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.
Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the
citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversitycases.)
III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Marksection for each principal party.
IV. Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI belowsufficient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more th
one nature of suit, select the most definitive.
V. Origin. Place an "X" in one of the six boxes.Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts.
Removed from State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441.
When the petition for removal is granted, check this box.Remanded from Appellate Court. (3) Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the fili
date.
Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date.
Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers o
multidistrict litigation transfers.
Multidistrict Litigation. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 140
When this box is checked, do not check (5) above.
VI. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictionstatutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service
VII. Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.
VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docketnumbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.
Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.
Case 1:14-cv-01264 Doc #1-2 Filed 12/09/14 Page 2 of 2 Page ID#19