combustible dust procedures agenda - procedures · combustible dust procedures 1 gary q ......
TRANSCRIPT
1
Combustible Dust ProceduresCombustible Dust Procedures
1
Gary Q. Johnson, P.E.Gary Q. Johnson, P.E.Workplace Exposure SolutionsWorkplace Exposure SolutionsNCNC--IVC IVC –– Raleigh, NCRaleigh, NCApril 30, 2010April 30, 2010
Agenda - Procedures Housekeeping Ignition Source Control Hazard Communication Training
Administrative Procedures
2
Personal Protective Equipment Equipment Maintenance Management of Change Emergency Procedures & Incident
ReportingCopyright Gary Q. Johnson 2010
Back to the Dust Explosion Pentagon:Back to the Dust Explosion Pentagon:Multiple Strategies to Reduce Cleanup RiskMultiple Strategies to Reduce Cleanup Risk
Heat or ignition source: prevent static electricity, prevent static electricity, sparkssparks
Confinement of dust cloud: building & equipment building & equipment designed to safely contain or designed to safely contain or ventvent
Dispersion of dust particles: prevent dust prevent dust layer getting airborne layer getting airborne –– clean up method?clean up method?
3
Oxidizer (oxygen in air): reduce Oreduce O22with inert gas (asphyxiation with inert gas (asphyxiation hazard?)hazard?)
Combustible dust (fuel): prevent accumulation prevent accumulation ––housekeepinghousekeeping
••Chemical Engineer Chemical Engineer –– Ohio State Univ.Ohio State Univ.••Professional Engineer Professional Engineer –– OhioOhio
••Industries: Industries: pharmapharma, laundry, paper, health , laundry, paper, health care, bar soap, paint, plastics compounding, care, bar soap, paint, plastics compounding, plastic film, auto parts, metal fabrication, plastic film, auto parts, metal fabrication, tree resins, printing, wood products, trainingtree resins, printing, wood products, training
How We Got Here Page 4
••7+ yrs Consultant 7+ yrs Consultant –– Dust Collection Systems, Dust Collection Systems, Combustible DustCombustible Dust••27 yrs Procter & Gamble 27 yrs Procter & Gamble –– HSE Exposure HSE Exposure ControlControl5 years US Navy 5 years US Navy –– nuclear submarinesnuclear submarines
••ACGIH Ventilation Committee (past)ACGIH Ventilation Committee (past)••Intl.Soc.Pharm.EngrsIntl.Soc.Pharm.Engrs –– Baseline GuidesBaseline Guides
Imperial Sugar Imperial Sugar –– Dust accumulations Dust accumulations were fuel for building wide deflagrationswere fuel for building wide deflagrations
5
Dust Cloud Density > MECDust Cloud Density > MEC
6
Pneumatic conveying system leak like dust cloud from compressed air blow down –cannot see 3-4 feet thru cloud
2
Dust coating overhead piping and Dust coating overhead piping and conduit is knocked down (forktruck, conduit is knocked down (forktruck, supersack, supersack, earthquakeearthquake) over an ) over an ignition sourceignition source Dust MEC = 30 grams/cubic meterDust MEC = 30 grams/cubic meter Dust cloud 2 meters diameter, 5 meters Dust cloud 2 meters diameter, 5 meters
longlong
How Little Dust for an Explosion?
7
longlong What mass of dust (specific What mass of dust (specific
gravity=1) in perfectly distributed gravity=1) in perfectly distributed dust cloud?dust cloud? V =pi x D2/4 x L=3.14 x 22/4 x 5= V =pi x D2/4 x L=3.14 x 22/4 x 5=
15.7m315.7m3 Mass =15.7 m3 x 30 gr/m3=471 gm x Mass =15.7 m3 x 30 gr/m3=471 gm x
1#/454gm= 1#/454gm= 1.04 pounds1.04 pounds
Housekeeping
The hazards associated with cleaning Safe cleanup methods
Manual
8
Manual Vacuum cleaning Housekeeping procedures
Contractor cleanup Summary
Cleanup Dust Explosion Scenario
Overhead settled dust –create dense dust cloud > MEC during cleaning
Static electrical spark –hose to building structure
9
g– ignite this dense dust cloud (other ignitiion sources possible – hot surface, flame)
Exploding cloud dislodges other settled dust to propagate deflagration
Expanding deflagration gases destroy building
NFPA 654: Annex DAssessing Dust Layer Hazard
Dust layer allowable thickness varies with dust bulk density: 1/32” layer basis for
Proportion of building with layer Floor area > 5% up
f 2
10
/ yhazardous condition Density 75 #/ft3, MEC=350
gm/m3
1/32” cover floor => dust cloud 10 feet high, dense enough for dust deflagration
AT(inches)=((1/32)*75#/ft3)/(actual density#/ft3) BD = 36: AT= 1/8” BD = 18: AT = ¼”
to 20,000 ft2, 1000 ft2 maximum?
Overhead dusty areas 5-10% floor? Bar joists and beams Walls Piping and conduit
NFPA 654: Allowable Dust Accumulation, table A.6.6.2
Accumulation frequency: Infrequent (2-3 episodes/year) Frequent (>3 episodes/yr or within 24 hours) Continuous (faster than 24 hours)
Housekeeping frequency:/ ” / ” f
11
<1/32” 1/8” – infrequent – SAME SHIFT <1/32” 1/8” – frequent – OFTEN ENOUGH TO KEEP
LAYER AVG 1/16” > 1/8” – SHUT DOWN AND CLEAN UP IMMEDIATELY
Electrical classification: Infrequent - at least dust tight 1/32 -> 1/8” – frequent – Class II, Div. 2 > 1/8” – infrequent - Class II, Div 2 > 1/8” – frequent - Class II, Div 1
FM 7-76 (Prevention and Mitigation of Combustible Dust Explosions and Fire): Assessing Dust Layer Hazard
Hazard exists in 10 ft high building if: > 5% of area has >1/16” dust layer Dust bulk density assumed = 36 #/ft3
Equation for different conditions for
12
Equation for different conditions for suspendible dust above floor or floor dust that could be disturbed Tex = HxAtot/(87.5xBDxADust)
H = height of room, ft Atot = total area, 20,000 ft2 upper limit ADust = area with suspendible dust (bar joists,
beams, piping, conduit, light fixtures can be 5-10% of floor area)
3
Clean Design Concepts to Minimize Clean Design Concepts to Minimize Overhead Dust AccumulationsOverhead Dust Accumulations
60o slopes on horizontal surfaces
Enclose structural steel
Electrical Cable Tray
13
Solid deck plates versus open grating
Enclosed I-Beam
Spills from one level to the next through open grating become fugitive dust
Dust Layer Where, How Much?Dust Layer Where, How Much?Lightly discolored ~ 1/64” layer
14
¼”
1/32”1/16”3/32”
Use settling pans to determine rate of fugitive dust accumulation.
Dust Layers on Process Equipment?
15
Dust Layers on Overhead Structure, Conduits, Piping?
16
Dust above ceiling tiles?Dust above ceiling tiles?
17
Dust Accumulations in Ventilation Ducts?Dust Accumulations in Ventilation Ducts?
18
4
Cleanup Methods
Safe conditions for compressed air blow down
Sweeping
19
Sweeping Water wash down Vacuum cleaning
Portable vacuum cleaners (PVC) Central vacuum cleaning systems (CVC)
Safe compressed air blow down NFPA 654: Section 8.2
Vacuum all accessible dust – vacuum cleaners listed for use in Class II locations
De-energize any electrical equipment not rated for
20
equipment not rated for Class II locations
Cool any hot surfaces capable of igniting dust cloud
Use 15 psi steam or compressed air
Vacuum up remaining dust
Safe sweeping
Sweep gently to minimize airborne dust
21
Natural bristles (no synthetic)
Aluminum or conductive polymer dust pans
Water wash down Water wash down –– what pressure?what pressure?
22
Hard spray Hard spray “pumps air” “pumps air” ––pumped air pumped air column create column create dust cloud?dust cloud?
Fog or mist Fog or mist wets dustwets dust
Water wash down versus dry?
Advantages Increases conductivity
of dust layer – reduce static electricity
Disadvantages Safe way - wet down
first, then spray downT i kl d
23
static electricity If done right, minimizes
combustible dust cloud
Trickle down mess –widespread cleanup
Where does residue end up and can that area be cleaned?
How water tight is YOUR electrical system?
Portable Vacuum Cleaner Portable Vacuum Cleaner –– Air PoweredAir Powered
Static dissipating features
-Drum grounding cable
24
cable
-Conductive vacuum and air hoses
-Conductive wheels
Courtesy Vac-U-Max
5
Portable Vacuum Cleaner Portable Vacuum Cleaner -- ElectricElectric
25
HEPA filter
Electrical Classification II, Div 1
Courtesy Vac-U-Max
Courtesy Gardner Denver
Portable Vacuum Cleaner Portable Vacuum Cleaner –– High KHigh Kstst and Explosive Materialsand Explosive Materials
--Incoming waste Incoming waste submerged in liquid submerged in liquid
--Air powered vacuumAir powered vacuum
--Bonding strap on reelBonding strap on reel
26
-- Sight glass level, Sight glass level, sludge removalsludge removal
--Static conductive Static conductive wheels, hoseswheels, hoses
--Applications: rocket Applications: rocket propellant, toner, propellant, toner, gunpowder, sodium gunpowder, sodium azideazide
Courtesy Vac-U-Max
Bagging Vacuum Cleaner WasteBagging Vacuum Cleaner WasteAddress ergonomic issues for emptying the unit - break vacuum to empty the hopper
- Continuous liner cartridge –non-conductive plastic
- Static conductive plastic
Courtesy Vac-U-Max
27
- Static conductive plastic individual liners
Central Vacuum Cleaning SystemsCentral Vacuum Cleaning Systems
System components
-High vacuum producer (6-12”Hg = 82-164” w.c.)
-Filter/receiver
-Pre-separator
28
Pre separator (optional)
-Tubing branches to use zones
-Hoses and tools
Courtesy Gardner Denver
CVC Design PrinciplesCVC Design Principles Place multiple hose inlets on a tubing branch,
convenient to areas of need Layout tubing network branches to match
operating team usage Long radius elbows to minimize plugging
T bi j ti f id t
29
Tubing junctions from side or top Tubing diameter
Adequate conveying velocity – 3500 to 4500 ft/min
Enlarge as necessary for vacuum expansion Filter/receiver and optional separator
conservatively sized for solids slug loading Size vacuum producer for reasonable number
of hoses
Use the CVC tools designed for your problem!Use the CVC tools designed for your problem!
Pipes
Floors
30
Crevices
Open end of hose has limited reach – job takes longer –tools designed for high velocity “scrubbing power”
Equip-ment
6
Elements of Effective HousekeepingElements of Effective Housekeeping
Survey – areas with unacceptable accumulation (FM 7-76 useful to assess hazard)
Designated responsibilities Adequate resources Safe cleaning methods Routinely document results
31
Look for opportunities to eliminate dust sources (overhead accumulations greatest concern – ie, structural steel beams might have horizontal surface area 10% of floor)
Building clean design: 60o
sloped surfaces, box in structural steel, etc.
Routine management reviews of housekeeping schedule to ensure focus and continuous improvement
Determining Cleanup FrequencyDetermining Cleanup Frequency
Clean up area with care to avoid ignition risks – note areas where layer is thicker
Purchase 9x9 baking pans, weigh them and mark the tare weight
Suspend these pans in the areas where the dust was thicker
Routinely monitor pan dust layer to get data on how fast your dust settles
Clean up before the layer exceeds the allowable layer
32
Ignition Source ControlIgnition Source Control
Hot work permits go beyond welding and cutting
Static grounding systems verified to work and inspected routinely?
Hot spot checks with InfraRed camera – ie, hot equipment insulation breakdown
Document initial findings and routine integrity checks
33
Hot Work Procedures Cover?Hot Work Procedures Cover?
In addition to Welding, Brazing, Torch Cuts
Grinding?g Mechanical Sparks? Static Electricity? Mechanical Friction? Grounding &
bonding portable equipment?
34
Hot Work Procedures Cover Hot Work Procedures Cover Static Grounding?Static Grounding?
Ducts grounded?
35
Dust drum bonded to dust collector? – Courtesy Stuart R. Browne Manufacturing Co.
Equipment grounded?Courtesy Milrail Co.
Hot Spot Monitoring Hot Spot Monitoring –– Look for Look for High Temperature SurfacesHigh Temperature Surfaces
Hot process equipment: heaters, dryers, extruders, steam pipes, electrical equipment.
Direct ignition of
36
Direct ignition of explosion dust cloud
Ignition of dust layer that then ignites dust cloud (higher temps possible)
©Sierra Pacific Infrared Thermography
Infra-Red Imaging Cameras Reveal “Hot Spots”
7
Explosion Protection Equipment to Explosion Protection Equipment to Include in Maintenance ProceduresInclude in Maintenance Procedures Protection Systems
Process controls and interlocks Static Grounding Hazardous Classification Electrical Classified fork trucks Explosion Venting Explosion Prevention Explosion Isolation
Dust collection systems Vacuum cleaning equipment
37
Sustaining Explosion Protection Results Sustaining Explosion Protection Results ––Maintenance (NFPA 654) Maintenance (NFPA 654) -- RetroactiveRetroactive
Personnel training Hazard recognition Dust collection system Explosion protection Initial & annual refresher training
Testing (verify system performance as per design) New system Annually by owner After system modification
38
Inspection or monitoring Written plan and checklists (very specific
requirements NFPA 68, NFPA 69) Typically monthly checks
Sustaining Explosion Protection Results Sustaining Explosion Protection Results ––Maintenance (NFPA 654) Maintenance (NFPA 654) -- RetroactiveRetroactive
Report unusual changes Retain records for 2 years
Maintenance Written plan Routinely remove dust accumulations Maintain collectors & fans as per manufacturer
39
Sustaining Explosion Protection Results Sustaining Explosion Protection Results ––Management of Change (NFPA 654)Management of Change (NFPA 654)
Management of Change Procedures Technical Basis for proposed change Safety and health implications Permanent or temporary change
40
p y g Modifications to operating and maintenance
procedures Employee training requirements Authorization requirements Retroactive requirement
Checklist for Combustible Dust Issues?
Hazard CommunicationsHazard Communications Combustible dust hazards are:
Understood by operators Addressed in plant safe work practices Managed by equipment maintenance
M d b d l li Managed by procedural compliance Managed by appropriate personal protective
equipment Managed by correct Management of Change
OSHA Guidance Document on Combustible Dust Hazard Communications
41
Combustible Dust Combustible Dust Hazard CommunicationHazard Communication
IntroductionOSHA’s Hazard Communication StandardStandardIdentifying and Controlling the Potential for Dust ExplosionsMSDS PreparationProduct LabelsTraining & InformationReferencesOSHA AssistanceRegional Offices
42
8
Possible Safe Work PracticesPossible Safe Work Practices
Clean up procedures Bonding and grounding procedures
Preventing static ignition (if low MIE) Preventing static ignition (if low MIE) Equipment operation to prevent dusting Emergency procedures Change Management procedures Other?
43
Flame Resistant Clothing?Flame Resistant Clothing?
Workplace hazard assessment to determine if flammable materials are present in quantities that will generate a flash fire and endanger a person
If dust hazard cannot be eliminated, NFPA 2113 recommends appropriate Flame Resistant Clothing
No regulatory hazard assessment yet Train operators on care and cleaning
44
Flame Resistant FabricsFlame Resistant Fabrics((Minimize burns from flash fires)Minimize burns from flash fires)
Everyday wearing apparel will ignite and burn
Polyester will burn melt and drip Polyester will burn, melt and drip
Flame resistant protective apparel is designed to self extinguish almost immediately.
Advancing the Science of Safety www.tecgenfr.com
60
80
100
urv
ival 25% Body Burn
50% Body Burn
Chances of Survival from Burn InjuryChances of Survival from Burn Injury(Can’t protect against explosion)(Can’t protect against explosion)
0
20
40
Age Range, Years
% S
u
75% Body Burn
Source American Burn Association(1991 - 1993 Study)
Goal: minimize burn injury level
20‐29 30‐39 40‐49 50‐59
Advancing the Science of Safety www.tecgenfr.com
FRC Example: TECGEN® FRC Example: TECGEN® Note: Undergarments of the wrong Note: Undergarments of the wrong material can melt, causing burnsmaterial can melt, causing burns
TECGEN XTREME® TECGEN® baselayer TECGEN® balaclavas
TECGEN® gloves
TECGEN® welding sleeves
Emergency ResponseEmergency Response
Dust fires and explosions have different problems to address Evacuation routes & assembly areas Evacuation routes & assembly areas Fire fighting techniques
Mist versus hard spray Class D Extinguishers for metal dusts
Document the issues and train personnel
48
9
Incident InvestigationIncident Investigation
Gather data and share information within the organization on
Use the data to track trends and make improvementsmake improvements
No OSHA reporting requirements yet
49
Incidents: History of Fires, Explosions?Incidents: History of Fires, Explosions?
ExplosionsExplosions(overpressure )(overpressure )
DeflagrationsDeflagrations
Is there a dust explosions triangle like the “Safety Triangle”?
Fatalities
Lost Work Day
203B OSHA Comb. Dust Update 50
Deflagrations Deflagrations (large flash fires)(large flash fires)
Dust firesDust fires(small fires)(small fires)
Near MissesNear Misses(minor puffs, pops, flames) (minor puffs, pops, flames)
Lost Work Day
Recordable
Near misses
History of Fires, Explosions?Attitude towards past incidents?
Hide or ignore Fear of legal or regulatory action Employees fear management action Familiarity bug – “just a part of doing y g j p g
business in my industry – no big problem”
Investigate to eliminate root cause Incidents are warning of unsafe conditions Use the data to reduce risk of employee
injury and business interruption Trends in my industry or similar processes
203B OSHA Comb. Dust Update 51
SummarySummary
Procedures need to be integrated with protective equipment Coordinate protective functions
Prevent operator error from ignorance Prevent operator error from ignorance
These procedures mentioned in either OSHA CD NEP or NFPA
OSHA Regulations will emphasis procedures more than equipment – get ready with procedures that make sense now
52