combination therapy with cpap - o2vent · 1. pneumotachograph 2. mask pressure 3. epiglottic...

2
OM159_Oct 2018 INTRODUCTION: CPAP and mandibular advancement splints (MAS) are common therapies for OSA. CPAP is efficacious but often poorly tolerated. Adherence to MAS is higher but efficacy varies. Treatment options for those who cannot tolerate CPAP or do not fully respond to MAS therapy alone are limited. Combination therapy (CPAP+MAS) may be a therapeutic solution for incomplete responders to MAS or for those who cannot tolerate CPAP (via reduced CPAP requirements). Thus, this study aimed to determine therapeutic CPAP requirements using combination therapy (a novel MAS device [Oventus O 2 VentT] with a built in oral airway + CPAP) vs. CPAP alone in incomplete responders to MAS. METHODS: Data from 10 out of 15 incomplete responders to MAS therapy (residual AHI>10 events/h) who completed the study have been analysed thus far (7 males, aged 31-64y, BMI 22-38 kg/m 2 , residual AHI 13-63events/h). Participants were instrumented with a nasal mask, pneumotachograph, epiglottic pressure (Pepi) catheter to define therapeutic CPAP using gold standard methodology, and standard polysomnography equipment. CPAP titrations during NREM supine sleep were performed (order randomised) during: 1) CPAP only, 2) CPAP+MAS (oral airway open), and 3) CPAP+MAS (oral airway closed). RESULTS: The mean residual AHI on MAS therapy alone (% advancement= 84±15%) was 24±16events/h. OSA was treated (normalisation of Pepi swings to near wakefulness levels) with 7.6±1.8cmH 2 O during the CPAP only condition. Compared to CPAP alone, CPAP+MAS reduced therapeutic CPAP requirements by 36±21% (4.8±2.1cmH 2 O, p<0.01) with the oral airway open and by 38±20% (4.8±2.1cmH 2 O, p<0.01) with the oral airway closed. Pepi was normalised to wakefulness levels at the therapeutic CPAP level during all 3 conditions (CPAP alone= -2.0[-3.3,-1.2] vs. CPAP+MAS (oral airway open)= -1.8[-4.3,-1.8] vs. CPAP+MAS (oral airway closed)= -1.7[-3.1,-1.4]cmH 2 O, p=0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy (CPAP+MAS) reduces Pepi swings to a similar extent to CPAP alone with ~40% lower CPAP requirements. This may be a therapeutic option for people with OSA who cannot tolerate high pressures and incomplete MAS responders. SUPPORT: This study was funded by a Cooperative Research Centre Project Grant, a joint Government, Academia and Industry collaboration (Industry partner: Oventus Medical). Combination therapy with CPAP plus MAS reduces CPAP therapeutic requirements in incomplete MAS responders Authors: Benjamin Tong 1,2 , Carolin Tran 2 , Andrea Ricciardiello 2 , Michelle Donegan 2 , Nicholas Murray 3 , Alan Chiang 2 , Irene Szollosi 4 , Jason Amatoury 1,2 and Danny Eckert 1,2 1. School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia; 2. Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Randwick, NSW, Australia; 3. Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia; 4. Oventus Medical, ndooroopilly, QLD, Australia www.oventus.com.au Abstract ID Number P180 Poster presentation: Sleep DownUnder, Brisbane. Saturday October 20, 2018 – 11am to 12pm For Oventus queries email [email protected] See poster for final clinical data presented

Upload: others

Post on 10-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Combination therapy with CPAP - O2Vent · 1. Pneumotachograph 2. Mask pressure 3. Epiglottic pressure catheter (Pepi) 4. End tidal CO 2 5. Nasal mask 1 2 4 3 Participant set up P

OM159_Oct 2018

INTRODUCTION:

CPAP and mandibular advancement splints (MAS) are common therapies for OSA. CPAP is efficacious but often poorly tolerated. Adherence to MAS is higher but efficacy varies. Treatment options for those who cannot tolerate CPAP or do not fully respond to MAS therapy alone are limited. Combination therapy (CPAP+MAS) may be a therapeutic solution for incomplete responders to MAS or for those who cannot tolerate CPAP (via reduced CPAP requirements). Thus, this study aimed to determine therapeutic CPAP requirements using combination therapy (a novel MAS device [Oventus O2VentT] with a built in oral airway + CPAP) vs. CPAP alone in incomplete responders to MAS.

METHODS:

Data from 10 out of 15 incomplete responders to MAS therapy (residual AHI>10 events/h) who completed the study have been analysed thus far (7 males, aged 31-64y, BMI 22-38 kg/m2, residual AHI 13-63events/h). Participants were instrumented with a nasal mask, pneumotachograph, epiglottic pressure (Pepi) catheter to define therapeutic CPAP using gold standard methodology, and standard polysomnography equipment. CPAP titrations during NREM supine sleep were performed (order randomised) during: 1) CPAP only, 2) CPAP+MAS (oral airway open), and 3) CPAP+MAS (oral airway closed).

RESULTS:

The mean residual AHI on MAS therapy alone (% advancement= 84±15%) was 24±16events/h. OSA was treated (normalisation of Pepi swings to near wakefulness levels) with 7.6±1.8cmH2O during the CPAP only condition. Compared to CPAP alone, CPAP+MAS reduced therapeutic CPAP requirements by 36±21% (4.8±2.1cmH2O, p<0.01) with the oral airway open and by 38±20% (4.8±2.1cmH2O, p<0.01) with the oral airway closed. Pepi was normalised to wakefulness levels at the therapeutic CPAP level during all 3 conditions (CPAP alone= -2.0[-3.3,-1.2] vs. CPAP+MAS (oral airway open)= -1.8[-4.3,-1.8] vs. CPAP+MAS (oral airway closed)= -1.7[-3.1,-1.4]cmH2O, p=0.67).

CONCLUSIONS:

Combination therapy (CPAP+MAS) reduces Pepi swings to a similar extent to CPAP alone with ~40% lower CPAP requirements. This may be a therapeutic option for people with OSA who cannot tolerate high pressures and incomplete MAS responders.

SUPPORT:

This study was funded by a Cooperative Research Centre Project Grant, a joint Government, Academia and Industry collaboration (Industry partner: Oventus Medical).

Combination therapy with CPAP plus MAS reduces CPAP therapeutic requirements in incomplete MAS responders

Authors: Benjamin Tong1,2, Carolin Tran2, Andrea Ricciardiello2, Michelle Donegan2, Nicholas Murray3, AlanChiang2, Irene Szollosi4, Jason Amatoury1,2 and Danny Eckert1,2

1. School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia; 2. Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Randwick, NSW, Australia; 3. Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia; 4. Oventus Medical, ndooroopilly, QLD, Australia

www.oventus.com.au

Abstract ID Number P180Poster presentation: Sleep DownUnder, Brisbane. Saturday October 20, 2018 – 11am to 12pmFor Oventus queries email [email protected] See poster for final clinical data presented

Page 2: Combination therapy with CPAP - O2Vent · 1. Pneumotachograph 2. Mask pressure 3. Epiglottic pressure catheter (Pepi) 4. End tidal CO 2 5. Nasal mask 1 2 4 3 Participant set up P

Introduction

Combination therapy (CPAP + MAS) can normalise pharyngeal pressure swings with ~35-45% lower CPAP • Combination therapy (CPAP + MAS) can normalise pharyngeal pressure swings with ~35-45% lower CPAP requirements than CPAP alone

• This may be a therapeutic option for patients who are incomplete responders to MAS therapy alone and those who can not tolerate CPAP due to high pressure requirements

AimsTo compare pharyngeal pressure (Pepi) swings and therapeutic CPAPrequirements when CPAP is combined with MAS therapy versus CPAPtherapy alone in incomplete MAS responders

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Acknowledgements

CPAP therapy• First line treatment for OSA• Highly efficacious but is often poorly tolerated

MAS therapy• Common alternative to CPAP therapy• Higher adherence vs. CPAP but efficacy varies and is difficult to

predict

Combination therapy (CPAP + MAS)• A potential therapeutic solution for:

• Incomplete responders to MAS therapy alone• Patients who cannot tolerate high pressure levels with CPAP

including oronasal mask users• Combination therapy in OSA has been minimally studied

• This study was supported by a Cooperative Research Centre Project grant from the Australian Government in collaboration with academia and industry (Industry partner: Oventus Medical)

• DJE is supported by a NHMRC of Australia Senior Research Fellowship (1116942)

Study design

• CPAP titrations were conducted during NREM supine sleep

CPAP only CPAP + MAS (airway open)

CPAP + MAS(airway closed)

Oventus O2 Vent T• Novel MAS device with a built in oral

airway was used

Figure 1: Therapeutic CPAP level was objectively defined as the pressure at which there were no respiratory events or flow limitation and where pharyngeal pressure swings were stabilised to near wakefulness levels as shown in this individual example

Figure 2: As per study design, pharyngeal pressure swings were successfully normalised to CPAP only levels (near wakefulness levels) with combination therapy (CPAP + MAS) with oral airway opened and closed) RM ANOVA p= 0.144

Figure 3: Combined CPAP plus mandibular advancement splint (MAS) therapy reduces the CPAP requirements required to eliminate OSA by ~35-45%

Incomplete responders to MAS therapy (residual AHI> 10 events/h)

Randomise to split night physiology PSG (3 arm cross-over)

CPAP only

CPAP + MAS (Closed)

CPAP + MAS (Open)

CPAP + MAS (Open)

CPAP + MAS (Closed)

CPAP + MAS (Closed)

CPAP only

CPAP only

CPAP + MAS (Open)

CPAP titration set up1. Pneumotachograph2. Mask pressure3. Epiglottic pressure catheter (Pepi)4. End tidal CO25. Nasal mask

1

2

34

Participant set up

P<0.001

P<0.001

ACTRN#: 12617000492358

Benjamin Tong1,2, Carolin Tran2, Andrea Ricciardiello2, Michelle Donegan2, Nicholas Murray3, Alan Chiang2, Irene Szollosi4, Jason Amatoury1,2, Jayne Carberry1,2, Danny Eckert1,2

1. School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia; 2. Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Randwick, NSW, Australia; 3. Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia; 4. Oventus Medical, Indooroopilly, QLD, Australia

Combination therapy with CPAP plus MAS reduces CPAP therapeutic requirements in incomplete MAS responders

5

Conn

ecte

d to

CP

AP

16 incomplete responders to MAS therapy (residual AHI: 13-63 events/h, average % of maximum mandibular advancement: 83 % ) [ 13 males, 3 females, age: 31-65 years, BMI: 22 – 38 kg/m2]