college - limassol business studies european history lecture 9

55
COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Upload: joseph-banks

Post on 03-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

COLLEGE - LIMASSOLBUSINESS STUDIES

European History

Lecture 9

Page 2: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Topics The Russian Revolution: The March and

November Revolutions. Lenin and Stalin. The relationship between Bolsheviks and the

Civil War.

Page 3: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The Russian Revolutions, 1917 The two Russian Revolutions of 1917 were

merely the most explosive examples of discontent that affected all of Europe.

Page 4: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The Russian Revolutions, 1917 Tsarist Russia was particularly vulnerable to worker

unrest. Newcomer to industrialization. Its workers were peasant stock undergoing their first

generation of factory discipline, the stage of greater turbulence in every experience of industrialization.

The Russian industry stepped directly into the most advance technological level, which concentrated in a few major cities.

Page 5: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The Russian Revolutions, 1917 Russia might have survive worker discontent if the

tsarist regime had enjoyed the support of any other major element of the population.

The middle classes and liberal aristocrats chafed at the revocation of even the minor democratic concessions of 1905.

Many of them waited Russia’s version of the French Revolution, of 1789, the replacement of divine right autocracy by constitutional monarchy.

Page 6: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The Russian Revolutions, 1917

Page 7: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The Russian Revolutions, 1917 Even conservative aristocrats were enraged at the

bumbling and sycophancy that insulated the tsar and tsarina from efficient war government advisers.

Combat opened the eyes of the tsar’s last naively supporters, the peasantry.

Russia went to war superior to its enemies in only one resource: sheer masses of men.

The tsar throw the peasant mass of his people at German steel.

Page 8: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The Russian Revolutions, 1917 Ill equipment and poorly led, the Russian soldiers

underwent the most wasting campaigns of any army in the first years of the war.

By the Spring of 1917, up to 1, 850, 000 Russian soldiers had been killed and far larger numbers wounded or captured.

The tsar mobilized the mass of his subjects into uniform only to see them radicalized.

Under such conditions, what needs explaining is how the regime survived as long as it did.

Page 9: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The ‘February Revolution’ The first outburst came not from a planned

revolution but from a spontaneous eruption of mass anger.

Women began it, with demonstrations over the lack of bread and coal in the Russian capital of Petrograd that began on March 8, 1917 (February 23 by the old Julian calendar still in use in Russia).

The mass support for these demonstrations that welled up from a hungry and disgusted population took every political leader by surprise, even the socialists.

Page 10: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The ‘February Revolution’

Page 11: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The ‘February Revolution’ At first, these demonstrations seemed no more

serious to the regime than similar unrest in other belligerent countries.

The tsar ordered unquestioning repression. The death of 40 demonstrators on March 11, when

troops fired into a crowd, simply solidified the people in their anger.

The regime was fatally stricken when the troops sent to rout the demonstrators fraternized with them instead.

Page 12: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The ‘February Revolution’ Tsarist officials found that their ability to have

orders obeyed simply evaporated. Refusing an imperial order to disband, the Duma

stepped into the vacuum and named a provisional government on March 12 from among its party leaders.

The dominant group in this legislative, elected by increasingly restricted suffrage since the creation of the Duma had been forced on the tsar in 1905, would have preferred a constitutional monarchy.

Page 13: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The ‘February Revolution’ Only a totally new regime had any chance of

restoring public order. They persuaded the tsar to yield to inevitable. He abdicated on March 12, naming Prince George

Lvov, the Duma’s choice, to be prime minister. Prince Lvov was an ineffectual but respected

constitutional monarchist who had headed the Union of Zemstvos and Towns.

Page 14: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Prince Lvov

Page 15: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The ‘February Revolution’

Page 16: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Provisional Government and the Soviets

It was easy to form a Provisional Government, but it was difficult to be accepted its authority.

The Provisional Government sprang from a legislative had become less and less representative since its beginning in the Revolution of 1905.

The Provisional Government’s challenge was whether Russia’s small liberal elite could succeed where the tsarist autocracy had failed: Could it gird a backward and weary country to go with the war effort?

Page 17: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Provisional Government and the Soviets

The challenge was complicated by the existence of Soviet.

Soviet: the Russian word for council of committee. A new Petrograd soviet sprang into being at once in

March 1917, led by workers’ leaders who had already participated in a joint regulatory agency, the War Industries Committee.

Mass delegations, arguing all night about policy. It issued its own orders.

Page 18: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Provisional Government and the Soviets

An all-Russian congress of soviets met in Petrograd on April 11, it brought together workers’ delegates from 138 local soviets and soldiers’ delegates from 7 armies, 13 rear units, and 26 front units.

The Provisional Government was dominated by liberals.

Marxists: believed that a growing proletariat of industrial wage earners would eventually succeed in replacing privately owned factories, farms, and stores with collectivized production and distribution.

Page 19: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Provisional Government and the Soviets

Mensheviks: reformist Social Democrats who wanted to form a mass electoral socialist party on the Western Model.

Bolsheviks: ‘majority’ in Russian. They agreed on orthodox Marxist goals but disagreed vehemently that electoral politics was the proper means to achieve them for Russia.

Their exiled leader was Vladimir Ulianov (Lenin), a public school official’s son.

Page 20: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Vladimir Ulianov (Lenin)

Page 21: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Provisional Government and the Soviets

Lenin believed that even before the proletariat was ready, its ‘vanguard’ should form a tightly disciplined party of dedicated professional revolutionaries, fit for surviving tsarist police methods and for seizing any revolutionary opportunity that presented itself.

Social Revolutionaries: unlike Lenin, they placed their hopes in peasants rather than urban workers, they were skeptical of disciplined organizations, and they were attracted to tactics of individual violence.

Page 22: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Provisional Government and the Soviets

The first land seizures began in March, and army desertions swelled from a trickle to a flood after the Provisional Government attempted one more military offensive, the Brusilov offensive of July 1917.

Millions of Russian farm laborers took over estates and hundreds of thousands of soldiers were walking away from the front.

The Provisional Government had the support of the Western Allies and of the educated and skilled professional and business people.

Page 23: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Petrograd, 4 July 1917. Street demonstration on Nevsky Prospekt just after troops of the Provisional Government have opened fire

with machine guns.

Page 24: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Provisional Government and the Soviets

Lenin’s ‘April theses’: Russia was ripe to move at once beyond a bourgeois

revolution toward socialism. He presented a clear alternative program to the

Provisional Government’s mixture of democracy, eventual land reform, and continued war: immediate peace, land and bread.

‘All power to soviets’.

Page 25: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Street demonstration, Petrograd, 18 June 1917. The banner in the foreground reads "Down With The 10 Capitalist Ministers/ All Power To The Soviets Of Workers', Soldiers', And Peasants' Deputies/ And To The Socialist Ministers/ [We Demand That Nicholas II Be Transfered To The Peter-Paul Fortress."

Page 26: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Provisional Government and the Soviets

From July 16 to 18, 1917, the Petrograd crowd rose against the Provisional Government.

In order not to led the Bolsheviks be left behind, Lenin had to support them publicly.

The Provisionary Government had still enough military force to crush the demonstrators, killing 200 people, and Lenin had to flee to Finland disguised as a locomotive fireman.

Page 27: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Provisional Government and the Soviets

Alexander Kerensky was the prime minister of the Provisional Government in Russia.

He ordered the offensive under General Brusilov in July.

This action triggered the final dissolution of the army.

The Provisional Government could make either peace or war.

General Lavr Kornilov tried to move troops into Petrograd to crush the rival power of the Soviets in September.

Page 28: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Alexander Kerensky

Page 29: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

General Lavr Kornilov

Page 30: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Provisional Government and the Soviets

Kerensky asked for help, but Kornilov planned to sweep away democracy as well as the soviets.

Kornilov’s troops began to move toward the capital. Kerensky turned for supporters. He released some Bolsheviks from prison and

distributed arms to volunteer units raised by the Petrogrand soviet ‘Red Guards’.

Kerensky made the Provisional Government dependent on the soviets.

Kerensky was left carrying on the hater war without any reliable sources for support.

Page 31: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The ‘October Revolution’ The Bolshevik group had become a majority

in the Petrograd and Moscow soviets. Lenin built up a majority within the Bolshevik

Central Committee in favor of immediate insurrection against the Provisional Government, without waiting for the constitutional convention.

He drew Leon Trotsky to his side a brilliant Menshevik.

Page 32: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Leon Trotsky

Page 33: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The ‘October Revolution’ This group turned the Petrograd soviet into a base

for Lenin’s attempt to seize the central power. The Bolshevik forces acted in the night of November

9 (October 25, old style). They had the support of most soldiers of the

Petrograd who had been angered at Kerensky’s attempts to send them to the front.

The garrison's support meant easy Bolshevik access to weapons.

The Provisional Government collapsed almost without bloodshed.

Page 34: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Painting symbolizing the October Revolution of the Bolsheviks

Page 35: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Lenin’s ‘Peace, Land, and Bread’ Lenin’s first step was to appropriate the Socialist

Revolutionary program. He declared the land nationalized and turned its

further distribution over to local rural soviets, which were supposed to keep the large estates unified as ‘model farms’.

In practice, he gave free rein to the peasants who were already seizing the land.

Lenin’s regime was invulnerable to any force that seemed likely to try to restore the old landlords.

Page 36: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Lenin’s ‘Peace, Land, and Bread’

Page 37: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Treaty of Brest-Litovsk To obtain peace, the Bolshevik leaders

accepted the harsh German terms on March 15, 1918.

The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk recognized German conquests and detached eastern Poland, the Ukraine, Finland, and the Baltic provinces from Russia.

Page 38: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

War Communism Centralized state administration under one party during 1918

and 1919 as the Bolsheviks consolidated their power. The soldiers’ councils gave away to traditionally commanded

troops. The factory councils gave way to centralized agencies and

trade unions controlled from above. Loose association with the non-Russian border peoples was

replaced by centralization under Russian domination thinly disguised as a federal state.

This was the system known as War Communism that Lenin established in Russia by 1919.

Page 39: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

War Communism The Bolsheviks never pretended to run their

regime democratically. The Bolshevik regime was a dictatorship of

the proletariat, or working class.

Page 40: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Civil War Leninist authoritarianism was also a response to civil

war. The Bolshevik regime had to fight for its life-against

the armed opposition of anti-Bolshevik ‘white’ armies, against border nationalities that declared their independence from Russia, against the intervention of Allied troops, and against the passive resistance of the peasants who kept up a ‘green revolution’ to counter the ‘red revolution’ that requisitioned their grain to feed the cities.

Page 41: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The ‘White Army’

Page 42: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

The ‘White Army’

Page 43: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Civil War During the struggle the regime had been transformed

into a bureaucratic, one-party, centralized state. It emerged from the civil war deeply marked by

hostility to the Allied powers that had actively supported its opponents.

Allied intervention began as an attempt to keep the eastern front in action against the Germans.

Bolshevik acceptance of the German terms at Brest-Litovsk in March 1918, strengthened the case in Britain and France for intervention.

Page 44: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Civil War The British and French sent about 24, 000 men to the

northern Russian ports of Murmansk and Archangel in June 1918 to secure Allied supplies, to prevent German and Bolshevik troops (still believed to be secret allies) from joining forces there, and ‘to make it safe for [anti-Bolshevik] Russian forces to come together in organized bodies in the north.

In all over 100,000 troops of fourteen countries-mostly Japanese, British, American, and French-were stationed at one time or another around the edges of Bolshevik territory.

Page 45: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Civil War Civil war raged in Russia for more than two years. The first serious threat to Lenin came from Siberia,

where Bolshevik authority had never been established.

In November 1918, Admiral Alexander Kolchak proclaimed himself ‘Supreme Ruler of Russia’ in the western Siberian city of Omsk, and attacked westward, advancing almost to the Volga River by December.

In the spring of 1919, the Red Army pushed Kolchak’s forces back again.

Page 46: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Civil War The main treat in 1920 came from Poland. The new Polish state set out to conquer parts of

Lithuania, western White Russia, and the Ukraine that were not ethnically Polish but had belonged to the medieval Kingdom of Poland at its heir.

After initial Polish successes, a young Bolshevik commander, Mikhail Tukhachecsky, drove the Poles back to the very gates of Warsaw.

The Peace of Riga in March 1921 established these borders, which remained until 1939.

Page 47: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Civil War The Bolsheviks retook Ukraine. No further Bolshevik tolerance for Ukranian self-

determination. After winning the civil war, the Bolshevik regime

also established direct control over separatist areas in the Caucasus: Georgia, Russian Armenia, and Azerbaijan.

In December 1922, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was organized as federal but unitary state.

Page 48: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Civil War Its constituent parts (Russia, White Russia,

the Ukraine, Transcaucasia, Uzbekistan, Turkestan, and Kazakhstan) possessed substantial autonomy on paper, but the real power lay in the victorious central regime in the new capital of Moscow.

Page 49: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Stalin His real name was Iosif Vissarionovich

Dzhugashvili. One of the most powerful and murderous dictators in

history, Stalin was the supreme ruler of the Soviet Union.

His regime of terror caused the death and suffering of tens of millions, but he also oversaw the war machine that played a key role in the defeat of Nazism.

Page 50: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Stalin

Page 51: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Stalin In 1922, he was general secretary of the Communist

Party. After Lenin's death in 1924, Stalin promoted himself

as his political heir and gradually outmanoeuvred his rivals.

His forced collectivisation of agriculture cost millions of lives.

His programme of rapid industrialisation achieved huge increases in Soviet productivity and economic growth but at great cost.

Page 52: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Stalin The population suffered immensely during the Great

Terror of the 1930s, during which Stalin purged the party of 'enemies of the people', resulting in the execution of thousands and the exile of millions to the gulag system of slave labour camps.

Stalin was ill prepared for Hitler's attack on the Soviet Union in June 1941. His political future, and that of the Soviet Union, hung in the balance, but Stalin recovered to lead his country to victory.

The human cost was enormous.

Page 53: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Stalin After World War Two, the Soviet Union

entered the nuclear age and ruled over an empire which included most of eastern Europe. Increasingly paranoid, Stalin died of a stroke on 5 March 1953

Page 54: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

References Gombrich, E., H. A little history of the world.

2nd edition, 2008. Paxton, O.,R., 1997. Europe in the Twentieth

Century. http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/

historic_figures/stalin_joseph.shtml

Page 55: COLLEGE - LIMASSOL BUSINESS STUDIES European History Lecture 9

Pictures http://www.nevsky88.com/SaintPetersburg/

Revolution/ www.google.com