collaborative authoring, use and maintenance of a multidisciplinary textbook
DESCRIPTION
Collaborative Authoring, Use and Maintenance of a Multidisciplinary Textbook. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY. SCHOOL OF INFORMATION. Robert J. Glushko [email protected] @rjglushko Books in Browsers 25 October 2013. Today’s Talk. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Collaborative Authoring, Use and Maintenance of
a Multidisciplinary Textbook
Robert J. [email protected]
@rjglushko
Books in Browsers
25 October 2013
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•The interwoven challenge(s) of multidisciplinarity and collaboration
•Our crucible: The Discipline of Organizing
•Implications for:
•Book & ebook design
•Authoring
•Maintenance and evolution
Today’s Talk
2
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
3
We can note how these domains and types of collections differ… or we can emphasize that they are all “Organizing Systems”
A collection of resources Intentionally arrangedTo enable some set of interactions
The Concept of the “Organizing System”
4
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
Published by MIT Press in May 2013 as a printed book and as epub3 and Kindle ebooks
In August we published an “Academic Edition eBook” with many enhancements to the epub3 5
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
The Discipline of Organizing
•A textbook for a multidisciplinary field is challenging to write…
•…and changes what a book is•…and changes what an ebook is•…and changes how they are maintained and evolve
The Challenge(s) of Multidisciplinarity
6
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•Identifies / explains the concepts at the intersection of multiple disciplines
•Uses discipline-neutral vocabulary•Incorporates discipline-specific concepts and examples in the context of the transdisciplinary content and vocabulary
What Makes a Text Multidisciplinary?
7
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•A BROAD textbook for a multidisciplinary field represents all the disciplines that contribute to it
•A DEEP textbook treats all the disciplines with rigor and nuance
Can a textbook be deep and broad at the same time?
The Breadth vs. Depth Challenge
8
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•Using the draft book at different schools purged disciplinary bias, but every adopter and reviewer would suggest topics and examples from their own disciplines to “flesh out the book”
•The book grew bigger and bigger and bigger…
Battling the Breadth vs. Depth Challenge
9
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•We had been bloating the book with disciplinary nuance that made the book more credible to experts but made it less accessible for students
•The solution turned out to have ancient roots in book design that we have adapted to ebooks
Solving the Breadth vs. Depth Challenge
10
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
The Content of Textbooks
11
A textbook contains many types of content, especially in an evolving multidisciplinary field
Supplemental and Core Content
12
Some of this content is “core” and essential to the text. Other content is “supplemental”
•“Inline” with the core text• Tables, figures, illustrations, sidebars
•“Pointed to” by the core text• Footnotes, endnotes, glossary entries, citations
•External to the core text• Appendices, commentaries and reviews, case studies
Supplemental Content
13
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•The simplest mechanism for a personalized reading experience
•A reader gets the content and (logically) includes it in the “text stream”
•Example: with footnotes, endnotes, glossary terms, bibliographic references, visual or hypertextual inclusion is an optional act by the reader
Selective Inclusion of Supplemental Content
14
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
15
Endnote Markers in Print
ENDNOTES MARKED WITH NUMBERED SUPERSCRIPTS
Link following “by hand and eye”
•Supplemental content can be tagged or typed by discipline, target audience, or a contextual category
•Reader can use these tags to decide whether or not to read the note
•Useful in both print and ebooks but radically different user experiences
Using “Tagged Content” to Address the “Breadth” vs.
“Depth” Challenge
16
•About 24% of the content in TDO was converted to endnotes tagged by discipline
•This makes depth into a choice rather than a distraction or confusion
•Could think of this as “inevitable” disciplinary-specific annotation that we decided to create in advance
Tagged Endnotes in TDO
17
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
18
Tagged Endnotes in Print Book(at end of each chapter)
19
Pop-up “Web” Note in eBook
Transclusion – a word coined by hypertext pioneer Ted Nelson, is the automatic or “seamless” incorporation of one resource into another
Transclusion of would be less disruptive for readers than link following or pop-ups
No eBook reader currently transcludes, but we can imagine how it might work
Transclusion of Supplemental Content
20
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
Transclusion in eBooks
21
•Transclusion mechanisms should be general enough to handle any type of supplemental content
•Any instructor or institution should be able to create supplemental content
•Except with “offline” reading, supplemental content should be discoverable from anywhere
Making Transclusion Extensible
22
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
23
The “Network” Textbook
•Who can write it?
•Where can you start?
•What are appropriate authoring tools, collaboration mechanisms, and document architectures that can address the intellectual, procedural, technological, and social/cultural challenges?
Collaborative Authoring for a Multidisciplinary Text
24
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•Coincidence
- Experts in different disciplines each write a chapter that presents their own perspective on the new discipline
Three Authoring Options for Achieving Multidisciplinarity
25
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
Coincidence -> Blind Men and the Elephant
26
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant
•Consensus
- Assemble experts in relevant disciplines. Let them develop a shared vision and plan for the book
Three Authoring Options for Achieving Multidisciplinarity
27
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
Consensus ->
28
A detailed view of the elephant?
Or one with no nuance?
•Evangelism
- One person proposes a vision and plan for the book and recruits experts with specific complementary expertise to become co-authors
Three Authoring Options for Achieving Multidisciplinarity
29
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
Evangelism – Leading the Elephant
30
A Quixotic Quest, or a Successful Crusade?
31
•In January 2010, starting with the detailed lecture notes from my Berkeley course, I recruited current and former students to write draft chapters according to an outline I proposed
•The lead authors for each chapter did a “slide swap” from the lecture notes to maximize continuity and minimize redundancy
Evangelical Collaboration with TDO (1)
32
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•Conway’s Law – the structure of a system reflects the composition and communication of the group that builds it
•How do Committees Invent? (1968)
Unavoidable “Laws of Collaboration” (1)
33
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•Brooks’s Law – adding people to a late project makes it later
•The Mythical Man-Month (1975)
Unavoidable “Laws of Collaboration” (2)
34
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•We initially used Word as the authoring software because its ubiquity made it easy to solicit co-authors and reviewers
•As the number of contributors increased, we needed better collaboration support than docs-as-attachments
•Initially we used generic technology (email, Dropbox, Skype) rather than tools with book-specific collaboration functionality
Evangelical Collaboration with TDO (2)
35
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•We were 90% complete when we learned about O’Reilly’s Atlas single-source publishing system• ASCIIdoc markup editor front end• DocBook XML “under the hood”• git repository for version control• built-in transforms to pdf, html, epub, mobi
Book-Specific Collaboration Environments
36
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
37
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
38
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•Faced with the need to convert from Word, we decided that native XML would enable more content-based markup and greater automation than ASCIIdoc
•This seemed like the optimal time for the evangelist / benevolent dictator and his XML publishing markup editor to finish all the unfinished chapters and edit the entire book end-to-end
From Word to XML; From Collaboration to Control
39
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•The original authoring approach shapes the evolution of the book
•Bottom up or “emergent consensus” approaches impose relatively weak constraints on possible changes to the book; any part is potentially revisable (a la Wikipedia) (a la DITA)
•With a top-down model, the evangelizing author is less willing to allow unconstrained revision; evolution takes place via annotation “at the leaves” rather than by large-scale pruning and grafting (a la DocBook)
Authoring and Evolution
40
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
•We have just published TDO in a “book browser” format augmented with the hypothesis annotation capability
•We hope to create a version in which the existing endnotes appear as hypothesis notes instead
•Need to develop a process by which user-contributed notes might co-evolve with the endnotes published with the book
Managing “Community Content” in TDO
41
•An ebook is not a self-contained single book
•Any ebook might be a member of a family of books in a logical repository of structured content resources organized by the author(s) to enable the selection and assembly of coherent subsets
•The content of the book depends on the capabilities of its ereader, blurring the boundary between book and the software that “reads” it, especially when annotation is enabled
So what is an ebook?
42
•Multidisciplinarity shapes the design of books and ebooks and the processes for creating and maintaining them
•Selective inclusion of supplemental content is one solution to the breadth vs. depth challenge
•A top-down “evangelism-driven” approach to collaboration encourages an “evolution at the edges” or annotation model of maintenance
Summary
43
SCHOOL OF INFORMATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY