collaborating on collaboration

37
Collaborating on Collaboration K. Burrell A. Fazio A. Pepenella Saturday May 14, 2011 – 5P42

Upload: argus

Post on 22-Feb-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Collaborating on Collaboration. K. Burrell A. Fazio A . Pepenella Saturday May 14, 2011 – 5P42. Agenda. Introductions What is collaboration? Collaboration as an effective way of learning Collaborative assessment Making use of technology and space Collaborative activities and models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 4: Collaborating on Collaboration

col·lab·o·ra·tion (n)

• typically working together with one or more people in order to achieve something

• methodologies and environments where learners engage in a common task• each party is dependent on and accountable to the other in varying

degrees• usually as group work to:

– search for understanding, meaning, solutions, or to produce something about their learning

• reorganizes typical student-teacher roles • can include:

– writing, group projects, joint problem solving, debate, study groups, others

• Educause: Learning Initiative www.educause.edu/eli/collaborativelearning

Page 13: Collaborating on Collaboration

• “Assessment for learning”

• learning is defined as ‘meaning-making’ rather than ‘acquiring’ information

• Formative assessment as "practice."

• Collaborative Assessments are Formative Assessments

• Used specifically to enhance learning processes or performances, rather than just measure them.

(Watkins, 2004; Hargreaves,

2007)

Collaborative Assessment

Page 15: Collaborating on Collaboration

Activities• In the moment observations • Questioning strategies• Self and peer assessment• Group assessment• Student record keeping• Grading for attendance• Reflection assignments• Application projects• Interplay of private and public

reflection

Behaviours (Increase)• Applying knowledge• Learning to learn• Problem solving• Awareness of self• Communication fluency • Making sound moral judgements• Active, involved, exploratory• Performance in formal exams• Positive attitude towards course

content

(Garrison, 2011; ARG, 2002; Watkins, 2001; Watkins, 2004)

Collaborative AssessmentMethods

Page 16: Collaborating on Collaboration

Collaborative AssessmentConsiderations

• Goals the educator intends to reach• Consequences of the evaluation• Assessment could be subjective• Generally summative assessment is applied to collaborative learning

environment• Consistency with Learning objectives, learning environment & learning

assessment• According to Douglas Reeves defines it as: intellectually and

emotionally demanding • The enemy is never each other – the enemy is ambiguity

(Webcast, D. Reeves)

Page 17: Collaborating on Collaboration

Collaborative AssessmentValidity

High degree of validity if the following conditions are met:

– the assessment for learning actually leads to further learning of a kind that is consistent with other social values

– the form and content of the assessment for learning reflects and encourages valuable learning

– the assessment is an inquiry rather than a measurement

– classroom conditions are conducive to valuable learning(Hargreaves, 2007)

Page 18: Collaborating on Collaboration

• Powerful to improve instruction practice• Benefits:

1. Consistency & Reliability2. Collaborative planning3. Fairness and Equity4. Alignment of Instruction (plan with the end in mind)

• Moderation Process vs. Independent Assessment• Creating a Culture of Trust and Productive conflict• Importance of Common Assessments

Collaborative AssessmentTeacher Moderation

Page 19: Collaborating on Collaboration

Collaborative AssessmentTeacher Moderation - Roles

Principals(create the culture)

Teachers(impact student achievement)

Students(provide feedback)

• Schedule regular moderation sessions• Participate• Model effective questioning• Contribute to the discussion• Support & encourage distributed leadership

• Collectively discuss results• Use information to plan instruction• Provide students feedback • Actively participate in the session• Share their successful strategies

• Provide feedback on useful strategies• Practise articulating strengths and weaknesses of their learning• Apply feedback

(Literacy & Numeracy Secretariat, 2007).

Page 21: Collaborating on Collaboration

Think about it…

Rate your level of expertise (low, medium, high, no experience) with the following:

1. classroom technologies (computer, projector, whiteboard, document viewer, clickers, etc.)

2. online web tools (blogs, wikis, social networking, Google apps, etc.)

3. learning management systems (Blackboard, Desire2Learn, Sakai, Moodle, etc.)

4. What technologies have you used to support collaborative learning?

Page 22: Collaborating on Collaboration

Technology

• there are many opportunities to utilize technology for collaboration in & out of the classroom

• often requires account setup with username and password

• often limited to the tools available based on learner’s experience to keep it contained to a few sites

Page 24: Collaborating on Collaboration

Space

• configuration, outfitting & accessibility can promote or prevent successful collaboration activities

• know what is appropriate and in what space• you don’t NEED technology to be collaborative– space and facilities requirements for collaborative

work are more specialized– many spaces, especially classrooms, were not

designed with collaborative activities in mind

Page 25: Collaborating on Collaboration

Space3 categories of learning spaces

formal informal non-physical classrooms face-to-face auditorium lecture halls seminar rooms team-based flexible

configuration

where students and faculty gather outside of class time

practically anywhere (due to technology &wireless)

library cafeteria lounge

Second Life online forums social networks Skype

Page 27: Collaborating on Collaboration

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING: Activities and Models

Some examples of Collaborative Learning are: PlacematFour Corners• Think Pair Share• Jigsaw• Round Table (Round Robin)• Double Entry Journal*There are many other CL Activities and Models to consider. (See:

Bennett & Rolheiser, 2001 and our wiki link [referenced on your handout] for more details)

Page 30: Collaborating on Collaboration

JIGSAW• Groups of 5-6 work best.• Divide up a lesson, strategy, etc., into 5-6 parts. Each

person in responsible for becoming an expert on one segment of information in each group (allow sufficient time to do so).

• Each expert is to share their own segment’s information with the others in their group.

* I find this activity works best when there is a template which can be filled in by each person.

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING: Activities and Models

Page 31: Collaborating on Collaboration

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING: Activities and Models

ROUND TABLE/ROUND ROBIN• A question is posed to people seated in groups who

have a piece of paper and a marker/pen.• The first person shares their thoughts and jots down

their response passing the sheet to the next person who then shares their thoughts, jots them down, etc., etc., until the facilitator stops the activity.

• Groups are called upon to share their responses and then similarities and differences can be noted.

Page 32: Collaborating on Collaboration

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING: Activities and Models

DOUBLE ENTRY JOURNAL (an example)

• This information can then be shared in pairs and/or large group setting to become aware of the different interpretations and insights people gain from the same reading material.

List reference here. Bennett, B., and Rolheiser, C. (2001). Beyond Monet: The Artful Science of Instructional Integration. Toronto, Canada: Bookation Inc.Excerpts from the Reading Critical Points (in general or specific),

Thoughts, Challenges, etc.1. “our brains benefit from the opportunity to talk. Intelligent behaviour is enhanced through social interaction” (p. 168)

1. What about people who have difficulties with social interactions? Is talking always necessary to benefitting our brains? (is there research to back this up)?

Page 33: Collaborating on Collaboration

The Marshmallow Experiment

• Your task is to build the tallest freestanding structure in 15 minutes.

• The successful team will be the one that has the tallest structure measured from the table to the top of the marshmallow. That means the structure cannot be suspended from a higher structure, like a chair, ceiling, or chandelier.

Page 34: Collaborating on Collaboration

The Rules

• The Marshmallow Must be on Top:– The entire marshmallow needs to be on the top of the structure.

Cutting or eating part of the marshmallow disqualifies the team.• Use as Much or as Little of the Kit:

– The team can use as many or as few of the 20 spaghetti sticks, as much or as little of the string or tape. The team cannot use the paper bag as part of their structure.

• Break up the Spaghetti, String or Tape:– Teams are free to break the spaghetti, cut up the tape and string to

create new structures.• The Activity Lasts 15 minutes:

– Teams must not be holding on to the structure when the time runs out.

Page 35: Collaborating on Collaboration

Final Thoughts…

67% of our students learn best actively, yet many lectures are passive.

69% of our students are visual, yet we often choose primarily verbal material.

28% of our students think globally, so we can help them more with the ‘big picture’.

(Cassidy, 2005, p. 13)

Page 37: Collaborating on Collaboration

ReferencesAssessment Reform Group (ARG) (2002) Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Available online at: http://www.assessment-reform-group.org.uk (accessed 12 May 2011). Bennett, B., and Rolheiser, C. (2001). Beyond Monet: The Artful Science of Instructional Integration. Toronto, Canada: Bookation Inc. Cassidy, A. (2005). Problem-based Learning, Collaborative Learning, Problem-solving and Use of Cases to Enhance Learning: What’s it all about? Retrieved May 8, 2011 from

http://www.kwantlen.ca/academicgrowth/resources/PBLhandout.pdf Collaborative Learning Workshop. Retrieved May 8, 2011 from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Garrison, C. National Middle School Association, Formative and Summative Assessments in the Classroom. Retrieved May 10, 2011 from

http://www.nmsa.org/publications/webexclusive/assessment/tabid/1120/default.aspx Hargreaves, E., (2007). 'The validity of collaborative assessment for learning', Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14: 2, 185 — 199. Literacy & Numeracy Secretariat (2007). Teacher Moderation: Collaboration Assessment of Student Work (Special Edition #2). Lomas, C., Burke, M., and Page, C. L. (2008) Collaboration Tools, EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative advanced learning through IT innovation. Retrieved May 8, 2011 from

http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Teach Science for All. Retrieved May 9, 2011 from http://teachscience4all.wordpress.com/2009/07/27/concept-cartoons/ The Principal’s Office. Retrieved May 9, 2011 from http://hhsprincipalsoffice.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/pic-3.jpg?w=419&h=336 Watkins, C. (2004) Classrooms as learning communities, NSIN Research Matters, 24. Watkins, C. with Carnell, E., Lodge, C., Wagner, P. & Whalley, C. (2001) Learning about learning enhances performance, NSIN Research Matters, 13. Webcast: Collaborative Scoring of Student Work http://www.curriculum.org/secretariat/september10.shtml